Markedness as a discourse management device: The role of alternative adverbial clause orders

REFERENCES

• Abraham, Elyse. 1991. “Why ‘because’? The management of given/new information as a constraint on the selection of causal alternatives”. Text 11: 323–39.
   Google Scholar
• Andersen, Henning. 1989. “Markedness theory—the first 150 years”. Markedness in synchrony and diachrony. ed. Olga M. Tomic. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. pp. 11–46.
   Google Scholar
• Bever, Thomas G. 1970. “The cognitive basis for linguistic structures”. Cognition and the development of language. ed. John R. Hayes. New York: John Wiley and Sons. pp. 279–362.
   Google Scholar
• Chafe, Wallace L. ed. 1980. The pear stories: cognitive, cultural and linguistic aspects of narrative production. Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, Herbert H., and Eve V. Clark. 1968. “Semantic distinctions and memory for complex sentences”. Quarterly journal of experimental psychology 20: 129–38.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, Herbert H., and Eve V. Clark. 1977. Psychology and language: an introduction to psycholinguistics. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
   Google Scholar
• Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth. 1989. “On the markedness of ‘narrative temporal clauses’”. Markedness in synchrony and diachrony. ed. Olga M. Tomic. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. pp. 333–58.
   Google Scholar
• Firbas, Jan. 1965. “A note on transition proper in functional sentence analysis”. Philologica pragensia 8: 170–76.
   Google Scholar
• Fox, Barbara A. 1987. “Morpho-syntactic markedness and discourse structure”. Journal of pragmatics 11: 359–75.
   Google Scholar
• Givón, Talmy. ed. 1983. Topic continuity in discourse: quantified cross-language studies. Typological studies in language, vol. 3. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Fox, Barbara A. 1987. “Beyond foreground and background”. Coherence and grounding in discourse. ed. Russell Tomlin. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. pp. 173–88.
   Google Scholar
• Fox, Barbara A. 1990. Syntax: a functional-typological introduction, volume 2. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Gundel, Jeanette K., Kathleen Houlihan, and Gerald Sanders. 1988. “On the functions of marked and unmarked terms”. Studies in syntactic typology. Ed. Michael Hammond, Edith A. Moravcsik, and Jessica Werth. Typological studies in language, 17. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. pp. 285–301.
   Google Scholar
• Harris, Martin. 1989. “Markedness and clause structure”. Markedness in synchrony and diachrony. Ed. Olga M. Tomic. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. pp. 359–72.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, Jon F., and Robin S. Chapman. 1984. Systematic analysis of language transcripts. Madison, WI: Waisman Center on Mental Retardation and Human Development, University of Wisconsin-Madison.
   Google Scholar
• Prideaux, Gary D. 1989. “Text data as evidence for language processing principles: The grammar of ordered events”. Language sciences 11: 27–42.
   Google Scholar
• Prideaux, Gary D. 1992a. Syntactic correlates of cognitive and social factors in controlled discourse production. Final Report, Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada Research Grant 410-90-0125.
   Google Scholar
• Prideaux, Gary D. 1992b. “Talking to friends: An experimental study of gender differences in oral narratives.” Paper presented at the XV International Congress of Linguists, Québec City, August 14, 1992 (forthcoming in the Proceedings of the XV international congress of linguists).
   Google Scholar
• Slobin, Dan I. 1973. “Cognitive prerequisites for the development of grammar”. Studies of child language development. ed. Charles A. Ferguson and Dan I. Slobin. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston. pp. 175–208.
   Google Scholar
• Trubetskoy, Nikolaj S. 1939. Grundzüge der phonologie. Prague: Travaux du Cercle Linguistique de Prague 7.
   Google Scholar
• Tomic, Olga M. ed. 1989. Markedness in synchrony and diachrony. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar