The relevance of Theme in the textual organization of BBC news reports

REFERENCES

• Backlund, Ingegard. 1989. “To sum up: Initial Infinitives as Cues to the Reader,” Paper presented at the Sixteenth International Systemic Congress. June 12–16, 1989 Helsinki, Finland.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, H. H. and S. Haviland. 1982. “Comprehension and the Given-New Contract. Discourse Production and Comprehension,” in R. O. Freedle (ed.), Discourse Production and Comprehension, vol 1: Advances in Discourse Process. Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum. pp. 1–40.
   Google Scholar
• Clements, Paul. 1976. The Effects of Staging on Recall from Prose. Research Report #6. Reading and Learning Series. Department of Education, Cornell University.
   Google Scholar
• Collins, Peter C. 1991. Clefts and Pseudoclefts sentences in English. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Comrie, Bernard. 1981. Language Universals and Linguistic Typology. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Danes, Frantisek. 1974 “Functional Sentence Perspective and the organisation of the text,” in Frantisek Danes (ed.), Papers on Functional Sentence Perpective. The Hague: Mouton. pp. 106–28
   Google Scholar
• Downing, Angela. 1991. “An alternative approach to theme: a systemic-functional perspective,” Word 40:119–43.
   Google Scholar
• Ford, Cecilia and Sandra A. Thompson. 1986. “Conditionals in Discourse: A Text-based Study from English,” in E. Traugott et al. (eds.), On Conditionals. Cambridge: University Press. pp. 353–72.
   Google Scholar
• Francis, Gill. 1989. “Thematic Selection and Distribution in Written Discourse,” Word 40:201–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fries, Peter H. 1983. “On the status of Theme in English: Arguments from Discourse,” in Janós S. Petöfi and Emel Sözer (eds.), Micro and macro connexity of texts. Hamburg: Buske Verlag. pp. 116–52.
   Google Scholar
• Fries, Peter H. Forthcoming. “Patterns of information in initial position in English,” in Peter H. Fries and M. Gregory (eds.), Discourse in Society: Functional Perspectives. Norwood, N.J.: Ablex Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Fries, Peter H. and Gill Francis. 1992. “Exploring Theme: problems for research,” Occasional Papers in Systemic Linguistics 6:45–59.
   Google Scholar
• Geluykens, Ronald. 1992. On left dislocation in English: Studies in Discourse and Grammar 1. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Green, Georgia M. 1980. “Some wherefores of English Inversions,” Language 56/3:582–603.
   Google Scholar
• Gregory, M. 1967. “Aspects of varieties differentiation,” Journal of Linguistics 3(2): 177–98.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Habertland, K. and G. Bingham. 1982. “The role of Scripts in the Comprehension and Retention of Texts,” Text 2(1/3):29–46.
   Google Scholar
• Halliday, M.A.K. 1967. “Notes on transitivity and theme in English, II,” Journal of Linguistics 3:199–244.
   Google Scholar
• Halliday, M.A.K. 1977. “Text as Semantic Choice in Social Contexts,” in Teun A. van Dijk & János S. Petöfi (eds.), Grammars and Descriptions: Research in Text Theory. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. pp. 176–225.
   Google Scholar
• Halliday, M.A.K. 1985. Introduction to Functional Grammar. London: Edward Arnold.
   Google Scholar
• Halliday, M.A.K, and Ruqaiya Hasan. 1976. Cohesion in English. London: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Hasan, Ruqaiya. 1984. “Coherence and cohesive harmony,” in James E. Flood (ed.), Understanding reading comprehension. Newark: International Reading Association. Pp: 181–219.
   Google Scholar
• Jordan, M.P. 1985. “Non-thematic re-entry: an introduction to and extension of the system of nominal-group reference/substitution in everyday English use,” in J. D. Benson & W. S. Greaves (eds.), Systemic perspectives in discourse, Vol. I: Selected theoretical papers from the 9th International Systemic Workshop. New Jersey: Ablex. pp. 322–32.
   Google Scholar
• Lowe, Ivan. 1987. “Sentence initial elements in English and their discourse functions,” Occasional Papers in Systemic Linguistics 2, Nottingham: University of Nottingham. pp. 5–33.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, James R. 1985 Factual writing: Exploring and challenging social reality. Geelong, Vict.: Deakin University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Olsen, Leslie and Rod Johnson. 1988a. “A Discourse-based Approach to the Assessment of Readability,” Linguistics and Education 1:207–231.
   Google Scholar
• Olsen, Leslie and Rod Johnson. 1989b. “Towards a Better Measure of Readability: Explanation of Empirical Performance Results,” Word 40:223–234.
   Google Scholar
• Penelope, J. 1982. “Topicalization: the rhetorical strategies and interpretative strategies it imposes,” Linguistics 20/(11–12):683–696.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, Sandra A. 1985. “Initial vs final purpose clauses in written English Discourse,” Text5/(1–2):55–84.
   Google Scholar
• Tyler, A. and J. Bno. 1992. “Discourse Structure in non native English Discourse: the Effect of Ordering and Interpretation Cues on Perceptions and Comprehensibility,” Studies in Second Language Acquisition 14/1:71–86.
   Google Scholar