The role of deictic particles in the IE personal pronoun system

REFERENCES

• Anderson, Stephen & Edward Keenan. 1985. “Deixis.” Language typology and syntactic description. Vol. 3. Ed. T. Shopen. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 259–308.
   Google Scholar
• Benveniste, Emile. 1971. “The nature of pronouns.” Problems in general linguistics. Trans. M. Meek. Coral Gables: University of Miami Press. 217–22.
   Google Scholar
• Brugmann, Karl. 1904a. Die Demonstrativpronomina der indogermanischen Sprachen. Leipzig: Teubner.
   Google Scholar
• Brugmann, Karl. 1904b. Kurze vergleichende Grammatik der indogermanischen Sprachen. Strassburg: Trübner.
   Google Scholar
• Brugmann, Karl. 1911. Grundriss der vergleichenden Grammatik der indogermanischen Sprachen. Vol. 2.2. Strassburg: Trübner.
   Google Scholar
• Buck, Carl D. 1933. Comparative grammar of Greek and Latin. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, Gerald. 1982. “Reflections on some thorny problems in PIE. personal pronouns.” Indogermanische Forschungen 87:1–7.
   Google Scholar
• Denny, J. Peter. 1978. “Locating the universals in lexical systems for spatial deixis.” Papers from the parasession on the lexicon, Chicago Linguistic Society. Ed. D. Farkas, W. Jacobsen & K. Todrys. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society. 71–84.
   Google Scholar
• Erhart, Adolf. 1970. Studien zur indoeuropäischen Morphologie. Brno: Opera Universitatis Purkynianae Brunensis Facultas Philosophica.
   Google Scholar
• Forschheimer, Paul. 1953. The category of person in language. Berlin: De Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Hamp, Eric. 1980. “Unrecognized deixis in the Indo-European pronouns.” Papers from the parasession on pronouns and anaphora, Chicago Linguistic Society. Ed. J. Kreiman & A. Ojeda. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society. 147–50.
   Google Scholar
• Head, Brian. 1978. “Respect degrees in pronominal reference.” Universals of human language. Vol. 3. Ed. J. Greenberg, C. Ferguson & E. Moravcsik. Stanford: Stanford University Press. 151–211.
   Google Scholar
• Hazelkorn, Leena Tuulikki. 1983. “The role of deixis in the development of Finno-Ugric grammatical morphemes.” Working Papers in Linguistics 27:89–139.
   Google Scholar
• Hirt, Hermann. 1927. Indogermanische Grammatik. Vol. 3. Heidelberg: Winter.
   Google Scholar
• Hudson-Williams, T. 1972. A short introduction to the study of comparative grammar (Indo- European). Cardiff: University of Wales Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kronasser, Heinz. 1956. Vergleichende Laut-und Formenlehre des Hethitischen. Heidelberg: Winter.
   Google Scholar
• Lane, George. 1961. “On the formation of the Indo-European demonstrative.” Language 37: 469–75.
   Google Scholar
• Lehmann, Winfred. 1974. Proto-Indo-European syntax. Austin: University of Texas Press.
   Google Scholar
• Levinson, Stephen. 1992. “Deixis.” International encyclopedia of linguistics. Vol. 1. Ed. W. Bright. New York: Oxford University Press. 342–44.
   Google Scholar
• Lyons, John. 1971. Introduction to theoretical linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Meillet, A. 1964. Introduction à l'étude comparative des langues indo-européennes. University, Alabama: University of Alabama Press. (Reprt. of 8th ed., 1937).
   Google Scholar
• Mühlhäusler, Peter & Rom Harré. 1990. Pronouns and people: The linguistic construction of social and personal identity. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Petersen, Walter. 1930. “The inflection of Indo-European personal pronouns.” Language 6:164–93.
   Google Scholar
• Schachter, Paul. 1985. “Parts-of-speech systems.” Language typology and syntactic description. Vol. 1. Ed. T. Shopen. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 3–61.
   Google Scholar
• Schmalstieg, William. 1980. Indo-European linguistics: A new synthesis. University Park: Penn State Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schmid, Wolfgang. 1972. Die pragmatische Komponente in der Grammatik. (= Abhandlung der Geistes- und Sozialwissenschaftlichen Klasse, no. 9). Mainz: Akademie der Wissenschaften und der Literatur.
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt, Gernot. 1978. Stammbildung und Flexion der indogermanischen Personalpronomina. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.
   Google Scholar
• Schwartz, Linda. 1986. “The function of free pronouns.” Pronoun systems. Ed. U. Wiesemann. Tübingen: Gunter Narr. 405–37.
   Google Scholar
• Seebold, E. 1983. “Hat es im Indogermanischen ein Höflichkeitspronomen gegeben?” Die Sprache 29:27–36.
   Google Scholar
• Shields, Kenneth. 1982. Indo-European noun inflection: A developmental history. University Park: Penn State Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shields, Kenneth. 1986. “Some remarks about the personal pronouns of Indo-European.” Zeitschrift für vergleichende Sprachforschung 99:10–22.
   Google Scholar
• Shields, Kenneth. 1992. A history of Indo-European verb morphology. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Shields, Kenneth. Forthcoming a. “Hittite nom. sg. uk.” Historische Sprachforschung.
   Google Scholar
• Shields, Kenneth. Forthcoming b. “On the origin of the Slavic pronominal genitive singular ending -go.” International Journal of Slavic Linguistics and Poetics.
   Google Scholar
• Showalter, Catherine. 1986. “Pronouns in Leyélé.” Pronoun systems. Ed. U. Wiesemann. Tübingen: Gunter Narr. 205–16.
   Google Scholar
• Simons, Linda. 1986. “The pronouns of To'abaita.” Pronoun systems. Ed. U. Wiesemann. Tübingen: Gunter Narr. 21–35.
   Google Scholar
• Szemerényi, Oswald. 1980. Einführung in die vergleichende Sprachwissenschaft. 2nd Ed. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.
   Google Scholar
• Wiesemann, Ursula. 1986. “The pronoun system of some Jê and Macro-Jê languages.” Pronoun systems. Ed. U. Wiesemann. Tübingen: Gunter Narr. 359–80.
   Google Scholar