The development of Indo-European studies since the Neogrammarians

BIBLIOGRAPHY

• Anthony, David W. 1986. “The ‘Kurgan culture,’ Indo-European origins, and the domestication of the horse: A reconsideration.” Current anthropology. Vol. 27:291–313.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anthony, David W. 1991. “The archaeology of Indo-European origins.” The journal of Indo-European studies. Vol. 19:193–222.
   Google Scholar
• Austin, William M. 1941. “The prothetic vowel in Greek.” Language. Vol. 17:83–92.
   Google Scholar
• Austin, William M. 1958. “Germanic reflexes of IE -Hy-and -Hw-.” Language. Vol. 34:203–11.
   Google Scholar
• Back. Michael. 1979. “Die Rekonstruktion des idg. Verschluβlautsystems im Lichte der einzelsprachlichen Veränderungen.” Zeitschrift für vergleichende Sprachforschung. Vol. 93: 179–95.
   Google Scholar
• Bammesberger, Alfred, ed. 1988. Die Laryngaltheorie. Heidelberg: Carl Winter.
   Google Scholar
• Bartoli, Matteo. 1925. Introduzione alla neolinguistica. Florence/Geneva.
   Google Scholar
• Bartoli, Matteo. 1945. Saggi di linguistica spaziale. Turin: Fondo di Studi Parini-Chirio, Università di Torino.
   Google Scholar
• Bechtel, Franz. 1892. Die Hauptprobleme der indogermanischen Lautlehre seit Schleicher. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck und Ruprecht.
   Google Scholar
• Beeler, Madison S. 1966. “The interrelationships within italic.” Henrik Birnbaum and Jaan Puhvel eds.. Ancient Indo-European dialects. Berkeley/Los Angeles: University of California Press. pp. 51–58.
   Google Scholar
• Benveniste, Emile. 1935. Origines de la formation des noms en indo-européen. Paris: Adrien-Maisonneuve.
   Google Scholar
• Benveniste, Emile. 1948. Noms d'agent et noms d'action en indo-européen. Paris: Adrien-Maisonneuve.
   Google Scholar
• Benveniste, Emile. 1969. Le vocabulaire des institutions indo-européennes. 1. économie, parenté, société—2. pouvoir, droit, religion. Paris: Editions de Minuit. English translation by Elizabeth Palmer: Indo-European language and society. Coral Gables: University of Miami Press, 1973.
   Google Scholar
• Birwé, Robert. 1955. Griechisch-arische Sprachbeziehungen im Verbalsystem. Waldorf-Hessen: Verlag für Orientkunde Dr. H. Vordran.
   Google Scholar
• Bonfante, Giuliano. 1931. I dialetti indoeurope. [Reprint: Brescia: Paideia, 1976. Studi Grammatici e Linguistici, vol. 12].
   Google Scholar
• Bonfante, Giuliano. 1945–1946. “On reconstruction and linguistic method.” Word. Vol. 1:83–94; 132–161; Vol. 2:155–156 (“Additional notes”).
   Google Scholar
• Bonfante, Giuliano. 1947. “The neolinguistic position (A reply to Hall's criticism of neolinguistica).” Language, vol. 23:344–375.
   Google Scholar
• Bonfante, Giuliano. 1957. “La teoria laringale.” Paideia. vol. 12:22–28.
   Google Scholar
• Brugmann, Karl. 1897. Vergleichende Laut-, Stammbildungs- und Flexionslehre der indogermanischen Sprachen. Band 1: Einleitung und Lautlehre. 2nd ed. Strasbourg: Karl J. Trübner.
   Google Scholar
• Brugmann, Karl. 1913. Griechische Grammatik. Lautlehre, Stammbildungs- und Flexionslehre, Syntax. 4th ed. (by Albert Thumb). Handbuch der klassischen Altertumswissenschaft II. 1. Munich: C.H. Beck. [3rd ed., 1899]
   Google Scholar
• Brugmann, Karl. 1922. Kurze vergleichende Grammatik der indogermanischen Sprachen. Auf Grund des fünfbändigen ‘Grundrisses der vergleichenden Grammatik der indogermanischen Sprachen von K. Brugmann und B. Delbrück’ verfaβt. Anastatischer Neudruck. Berlin/Leipzig: Walter de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Buck, Carl Darling. 1949. A dictionary of selected synonyms in the principal Indo-European langauges. A contribution to the history of ideas. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cuny, Albert. 1912. “Notes de phonétique historique: Indo-européen et sémitique.” Revue de Phonétique. Vol. 2:101–132.
   Google Scholar
• de Saussure, Ferdinand. 1879. Mémoire sur le système primitif des voyelles dans les langues indo-européennes (Recueil. pp. 1–268).
   Google Scholar
• de Saussure, Ferdinand. 1891. “Contribution à l'histoire des aspirees sourdes.” (Communication à la séance du 6 juin 1891 de la Société de Linguistique de Paris—Recueil. P. 603)
   Google Scholar
• de Saussure, Ferdinand. 1922. Recueil des publications scientifiques (compiled by Charles Bally and Léopold Gautier). Genève: Editions Sonor.
   Google Scholar
• Devoto, Giacomo. 1931. Gli antichi Italici. Florence: Vallechi. (3rd ed. 1967.)
   Google Scholar
• Devoto, Giacomo. 1962. Origini indeuropee. Florence: Sansoni.
   Google Scholar
• D'jakonov, Igor M. (also spelled Diakonoff). 1985. “On the original home of the speakers of Indo-European.” The journal of Indo-European studies. Vol. 13:92–174.
   Google Scholar
• Drinka, Bridget. 1995. The sigmatic aorist in Indo-European. Evidence for the space-time hypothesis. [The journal of Indo-European studies—Monograph No. 15). McLean, VA: The Institute for the Study of Man.
   Google Scholar
• Dunkel, George. 1981. “Typology vs. reconstruction.” Y. Arbeitman and A. Bomhard, eds. Bono homini donum: essays in historical linguistics in memory of J. Alexander Kerns. pp. 559–569.
   Google Scholar
• Emonds, Joseph. 1972. “A reformulation of Grimm's law.” M. Brame, ed. Contributions to generative phonology. Austin: University of Texas Press. pp. 108–22.
   Google Scholar
• Feist, Sigmund. 1913. Kultur, Ausbreitung und Herkunft der Indogermanen. Berlin: Weid- mannsche Buchhandlung.
   Google Scholar
• Friedrich, Paul. 1975. Proto-Indo-European syntax. The order of meaningful elements [The journal of Indo-European studies—Monograph No. 1]. Butte: Montana College of Mineral Science and Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Gamkrelidze, T.M. 1968. “Hittite and the laryngeal theory.” Pratidänam—Indian, Iranian and Indo-European studies presented to F.B.J. Kuiper on his sixtieth birthday. The Hague/Paris:Mouton, pp. 89–97.
   Google Scholar
• Gamkrelidze, T.N. and V.V. Ivanov. 1972. “Lingvisticeskaja tipologija i rekonstrukcija sistemy indoevropejskix smycnix.” Konferencija po sravniteino-istoriceskoj grammatika indo-evropejskix jazykov. Moscow: “Nauka.” pp. 15–8.
   Google Scholar
• Gamkrelidze, T.N. and V.V. Ivanov. 1973. “Sprachtypologie und die Rekonstruktion der gemein-indogermanischen Verschlüsse.” Phonetica. Vol. 27:150–156.
   Google Scholar
• Gamkrelidze, T.N. and V.V. Ivanov. 1984. Indoevropejskij iazyk i Indoevropejcy. Rekonstrukcija i istoriko-tipologiceskij analiz prajazyka i protokul’ tury. [Indo-European and Indo-Europeans. A Reconstruction and Historical Typological Analysis of a Protolanguage and a Proto-Culture]. Two volumes. Tbilisi: Publishing House of the Tbilisi State University.
   Google Scholar
• Gamkrelidze, T.N. and V.V. Ivanov. 1985a. “The ancient Near East and the Indo-European question: Temporal and territorial characteristics of Proto-Indo-European based on linguistic and historico-cultural Data.” The journal of Indo-European studies. Vol. 13:3–48.
   Google Scholar
• Gamkrelidze, T.N. and V.V. Ivanov. 1985b. “The migrations of tribes speaking Indo-European dialects from their original homeland in the Near East to their historical habitations in Éurasia.” The journal of Indo-European studies. Vol. 13:49–91.
   Google Scholar
• Gamkrelidze, T.N. and V.V. Ivanov. 1985c. “The problem of the original homeland of the speakers of Indo-European languages In response to J.M. Diakonoff's article.” The journal of Indo-European studies. Vol. 13:175–94.
   Google Scholar
• Gimbutas, Marija. 1970. “Proto-Indo-European culture: The Kurgan culture during the 5th, 4th and 3rd millennia.” George Cardona, Henry M. Hoenigswald and Alfred Senn, eds. Indo- European and Indo-Europeans. (Papers presented at the Third Into-European Conference at the University of Pennsylvania). Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press. pp. 155–97.
   Google Scholar
• Gimbutas, Marija. 1977. “The first wave of Eurasian steppe pastoralists into copper age Europe.” The journal of Indo-European studies. Vol. 5:277–338.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gimbutas, Marija. 1980. “The Kurgan wave #2 (c. 3400–3200 B.C.) into Europe and the following transformation of culture.” The journal of Indo-European studies. Vol. 8:273–316.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gimbutas, Marija. 1985. “Primary and secondary homeland of the Indo-Europeans: Comments on the Gamkrelidze-Ivanov articles.” The journal of Indo-European studies. Vol. 13:185–202.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Georgiev, Vladimir I. 1941–1945 Vorgriechische Sprachwissenschaft. Two volumes. Sofia: Pridvorna Pecatnica.
   Google Scholar
• Georgiev, Vladimir I. 1958. “Das Pelasgische.” Eva Sivertsen, ed., Proceedings of the eighth international congress of linguists. Oslo: Oslo University Press. pp. 406–13.
   Google Scholar
• Georgiev, Vladimir I. 1981. Introduction to the history of the Indo-European languages. Sofia: Bulgarian Academy of Sciences.
   Google Scholar
• Goudenough, Ward H. 1970. “The evolution of pastoralism and Indo-European origins.” George Cardona, Henry M. Hoenigswald and Alfred Senn, eds. Indo-European and Indo-Europeans. (Papers presented at the Third Indo-European Conference at the University of Pennsylvania). Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press. pp. 253–65.
   Google Scholar
• Güntert, Hermann. 1916. Indogermanische Ablautprobleme. Untersuchungen zur indogermanischen Sprach- und Kulturwissenschaft, Bd. VI. Strasbourg: Karl J. Trübner.
   Google Scholar
• Haider, Hubert. 1985. “The fallacy of typology: Remarks on the PIE stop system.” Lingua. Vol. 65:1–27.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, Robert A., Jr. 1946. “Bartoli's ‘Neolinguistica’.” Language. Vol. 22:273–284.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haudry, Jean. 1979. L'indo-européeen. Collection “Que sais-je?”. Vol. 1798. 2nd ed. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
   Google Scholar
• Haudry, Jean. 1985. Les Indo-Européens. Collection “Que sais-je?”, vol. 1965. 2nd ed. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
   Google Scholar
• Hester, D.A. 1965. “‘Pelasgian’—A new Indo-European language?” Lingua. Vol. 13:335–84.
   Google Scholar
• Hirt, Hermann. 1900. Der indogermanische Ablaut, vornehmlich in seinem Verhältnis zur Betonung. Strasbourg: Karl J. Trübner.
   Google Scholar
• Hirt, Hermann. 1905-1907. Die Indogermanen. Ihre Verbreitung, ihre Urheimat und ihre Kultur. 2 volumes. Strasbourg: Karl J. Trübner.
   Google Scholar
• Hirt, Hermann. 1921–1937. Indogermanische Grammatik. I. Einleitung. I. Etymologie. II. Konsonantismus (1927[a]). II. Der indogermanische Vokalismus (1921). III. Das Nomen (1927[b]). IV. Doppelung. Zusammensetzung. Verbum (1928). V. Der Akzent (1929). VI. Syntax I: Syntaktische Verwendung der Kasus und der Verbalformen (1934). VII. Syntax II: Die Lehre vom einfachen und zusammengesetzten Satz (1937). Heidelberg: Carl Winter.
   Google Scholar
• Hirt, Hermann. 1931–1934. Handbuch des Urgermanischen. I. Laut- und Akzentlehre (1931). II. Stammbildungs- und Flexionslehre (1932). III. Abriss der Syntax (1934). Heidelberg: Carl Winter.
   Google Scholar
• Hirt, Hermann. 1940. Indogermanica. Forschungen über Sprache und Geschichte Alteuropas, ausgewählt und herausgegeben von Helmut Arntz. Halle/Saale: Max Niemeyer.
   Google Scholar
• Hock, Hans Henrich. 1986. Principles of historical linguistics. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Hopper, Paul. 1973. “Glottalized and murmured occlusives in Indo-European.” Glossa. Vol. 7:141–66.
   Google Scholar
• Hopper, Paul. 1982. “Areal typology and the early Indo-European consonant system.” Edgar C. Polomé, ed. The Indo-Europeans in the fourth and third Millennia. Ann Arbor: Karoma. pp. 121–39.
   Google Scholar
• Hübschmann, H. 1885. Das indogermanische Vocalsystem. Strasbourg: Karl J. Trübner. [Amsterdam: Oriental Press, 1975—reprint).
   Google Scholar
• Jones, Alex I. 1992. “Language and archaeology: Evaluating competing explanations of the origins of the Indo-European languages.” The journal of Indo-European studies. Vol. 20:31–44.
   Google Scholar
• Katicic, Radoslav. 1976. Ancient languages of the Balkans. Two volumes. Trends in linguistics. State-of-the-art reports 4. The Hague: Mouton.
   Google Scholar
• Kilian, Lothar. 1983. Zum Ursprung der Indogermanen. Forschungen aus Linguistik, Prähistorie, und Anthropologie. Bonn:Rudolf Habelt.
   Google Scholar
• Kiparsky, Valentin. 1963. “Comparative and historical slavistics.” Thomas A. Sebeok, ed., Current trends in linguistics 1. Soviet and East European linguistics. The Hague: Mouton. pp. 94–110.
   Google Scholar
• Krahe, Hans. 1940. “Der Anteil der Illyrier an der Indogermanisierung Europas.” Die Welt als Geschichte. Vol. 6:54–73.
   Google Scholar
• Krahe, Hans. 1949. Die Indogermanisierung Griechenlands und Italiens. Heidelberg: Carl Winter.
   Google Scholar
• Krahe, Hans. 1955. Die Sprache der Illyrier. I. Die Quellen. Wiesbaden: Otto Harrassowitz.
   Google Scholar
• Krahe, Hans. 1964. “Vom Illyrischen zum Alteuropäischen: Methodologische Betrachtungen zur Wandlung des Begriffs ‘Illyrisch’.” Indogermanische Forschungen. Vol. 59:201–13.
   Google Scholar
• Kronasser, Heinz. 1952. “‘Structural Linguistics’ und Laryngal-Theorie.” W. Brandenstein, ed. Studien zur indogermanischen Grundsprache. Arbeiten aus dem Institut für allgemeine und vergleichende Sprachwissenschaft, Graz. Vol. 4. Vienna: Gerold. pp. 56–74.
   Google Scholar
• Kronasser, Heinz. 1956. Vergleichende Laut- und Formenlehre des Hethitischen. Heidelberg: Carl Winter.
   Google Scholar
• Kurylowicz, Jerzy. 1935. Etudes indo-européennes. Vol. 1. Polska Akademja Umiejetnosci. Prace Komisji Jezykowej. Vol. 21. Cracow: Gebethner & Wolff.
   Google Scholar
• Kurylowicz, Jerzy. 1956. L'apophonie en indo-européeen. Prace Jezykoznawcze. Vol. 9. Polska Akademia Nauk. Wroclaw: Zaklad imiena Ossolinskich.
   Google Scholar
• Kurylowicz, Jerzy. 1964. The inflectional categories of Indo-European. Heidelberg: Carl Winter.
   Google Scholar
• Kurylowicz, Jerzy. 1977. Problèmes de linguistique indo-européenne. Prace Jezykoznawcze. Vol. 90. Polska Akademia Nauk. Wroclaw: Zaklad narodowy imiena Ossolinskich.
   Google Scholar
• Lehmann, Winfred P. 1952. Proto-Indo-European phonology. Austin: University of Texas Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lehmann, Winfred P. 1974. Proto-Indo-European syntax. Austin: University of Texas Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lindeman, Fredrik Otto. 1970. Einführung in die Laryngaltheorie. Sammlung Göschen, vol. 1247. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Lindeman, Fredrik Otto. 1982. The triple representation of schwa in Greek. Oslo: The Institute for Comparative Research on Human Culture.
   Google Scholar
• Lindeman, Fredrik Otto. 1987. Introduction to the ‘Laryngeal theory’. Oslo: Norwegian University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Makkay, J. 1992. “A neolithic model of Indo-European prehistory.” The journal of Indo-European studies. Vol. 20:193–238.
   Google Scholar
• Mallory, J.P. 1989. In search of the Indo-Europeans. Language, archaeology and myth. London/New York: Thames & Hudson.
   Google Scholar
• Mayrhofer, Manfred. 1986. Indogermanische Grammatik. Bd. 1, 2. Halbband: Lautlehre [Segmentale Phonologie des Indogermanischen], Heidelberg: Carl Winter. pp. 77–216.
   Google Scholar
• Meid, Wolfgang. 1975. “Probleme der räumlichen und zeitlichen Gliederung des Indogermanischen.” Helmut Rix, ed. Flexion und Wortbildung. Akten der fünften Fachtagung der Indogermanischen Gesellschaft. Wiesbaden: Ludwig Reichert. pp. 204–19.
   Google Scholar
• Meid, Wolfgang. 1979. “Der Archaismus des Hethitischen.” Erich Neu and Wolfgang Meid, eds. Hethitisch und Indogermanisch. Innsbrucker Beiträge zur Sprachwissensschaft. Vol. 25. Innsbruck. pp. 159–76.
   Google Scholar
• Meillet, Antoine. 1922. Les dialectes indo-européens. 2nd printing of the 1908 edition, with a new introduction. (Collection Linguistique de la Société de Linguistique de Paris, Vol. 1). Paris: Edouard Champion.
   Google Scholar
• Meillet, Antoine. 1937. Introduction à l'étude comparative des langues indo-européennes. 8th edition (University of Alabama Press reprint in 1964). Paris: Hachette.
   Google Scholar
• Møller, Hermann. 1917. Die semitisch-vorindogermanischen laryngalen Konsonanten. Mémoires de l'Académie Royale des Sciences et Lettres du Danemark. 7e série, Vol. 4.1. Copenhagen: A.F. Høst & Son.
   Google Scholar
• Moulton, William G. 1986. “Die Vennemannsche Lautverschiebungstheorie.” Beiträge zur Geschichte der deutschen Sprache und Literatur. Vol. 108:1–15.
   Google Scholar
• Neu, Erich. 1976. “Zur Rekonstruktion des indogermanischen Verbalsystems.” Anna Morpurgo Davies Wolgang Meid, eds. Studies in Greek, Italic, and Indo-European linguistics offered to Leonard R. Palmer. Innsbrucker Beiträge zur Sprachwissen-schaft. Vol. 16. Innsbruck. pp. 239–54.
   Google Scholar
• Neu, Erich. 1985. “Das frühindogermanische Diathesensystem.” B. Schlerath & V. Rittner, eds. Funktion und Geschichte. Akten der siebenten Fachtagung der Indogermanischen Gesellschaft. Wiesbaden: Ludwig Reichert. pp. 273–95.
   Google Scholar
• Palmer, R.L. 1954. The Latin language. London: Faber & Faber.
   Google Scholar
• Pedersen, Holger. 1931. The discovery of language: Linguistic science in the 19th century. Translated by J.W. Spargo. Bloomington: Indiana Unviersity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Penzl, Herbert. 1986. “Zu den Methoden einer neuen germanischen Stammbaumtheorie.” Beiträge zur Geschichte der deutschen Sprache und Literatur. Vol. 108:16–29.
   Google Scholar
• Penzl, Herbert. 1989. “Positivism and ‘hocus pocus’ in Germanic and English linguistics.” American journal of Germanic linguistics and literatures. Vol. 1:1–16.
   Google Scholar
• Pisani, Vittore. 1933. Studi sulla preistoria delle lingue indeuropee. Atti della R. Accademia dei Lincei. Memorie. Classe di Scienze Morali, Storiche e Filologiche. Ser. IV, vol. iv. fase, vi. Rome. Pp. 545 ff.
   Google Scholar
• Pisani, Vittore. 1940. Geoliguistica e indeuropeo. Memorie della R. Accademia Nazionale dei Lincei. Ser. VI, vol. ix, fase. ii. Rome.
   Google Scholar
• Pisani, Vittore. 1953. “Allgemeine Sprachwissenschaft—Indogermanistik.” Wissenschaftliche Forschungsberichte. Geisteswissenschaftliche Reihe. Vol. 2:3–93.
   Google Scholar
• Pittioni, Richard: see Pokorny 1938.
   Google Scholar
• Pokorny, Julius. 1938. Zur Urgeschichte der Kelten undIllyrier. (With a contribution by Richard Pittioni: “Die Urnenfelderkultur und ihre Bedeutung für die europäische Kulkturentwick- lung.“) Halle/ Saale: M. Niemeyer.
   Google Scholar
• Pokorny, Julius. 1953. “Keltologie.” Wissenschaftliche Forschungsberichte. Geisteswissenschaftliche Reihe. Vol. 2:95–184.
   Google Scholar
• Polomé, Edgar C. 1965. “The laryngeal theory so far. A critical bibliographic survey.” Werner Winter, ed. Evidence for laryngeals. The Hauge: Mouton. pp. 9–78.
   Google Scholar
• Polomé, Edgar C. 1966. “The position of Illyrian and Venetic.” H. Birnbaum and J. Puhvel, eds. Ancient Indo-European dialects. Berkely/Los Angeles: University of California Press. pp. 59–76.
   Google Scholar
• Polomé, Edgar C. 1981. “Lexical date and cultural contacts: A critique of the study of prehistoric isoglosses and borrowings.” Wolf Dietrich and Horst Geckeier, eds. Logos Semantikos. Vol. III. Semantics. Berlin/New York: W. de Gruyter/Madrid: Gredos. pp. 505–13.
   Google Scholar
• Polomé, Edgar C. 1991. “Linguistics and archaeology. Differences in perspective in the study of prehistoric cultures. Critical comments on Renfrew's views on the dispersal of the Indo-European languages.”.” W.P. Lehmann and H. Jakusz-Hewlitt, eds. Language typology 1988. Typologogical models in reconstruction, Current issues in linguistic theory. Vol. 81. Amsterdam/ Philadelphia: John Benjamins. pp. 11–134.
   Google Scholar
• Porzig, Walter. 1954. Die Gliederung des indogermanischen Sprachgebiets. Heidelberg: Carl Winter
   Google Scholar
• Pulgram, Ernst. 1959. “Proto-Indo-European reality and reconstruction.” Language. Vol. 35: 421–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Renfrew, Colin. 1988. Archaeology and language. The puzzle of Indo-European origins. New York: Cambridge University Press [British edition: London: Jonathan Cape, 1987].
   Google Scholar
• Ries. John. 1927. Was ist Syntax? (Beiträge zur Grundlegung der Syntax) Prague: Taussig & Taussig [1st edition: Marburg: N.L. Elwert, 1894].
   Google Scholar
• Ries. John. 1931. Was ist ein Satz? (Beiträge zur Grundlegung der Syntax) Prague: Taussig & Taussig.
   Google Scholar
• Salmons, Joseph C. 1993. The glottalic theory. Survey and synthesis. [The journal of Indo-European studies—Monograph No. 10] McLean, VA: The Institute for Study of Man.
   Google Scholar
• Schlerath, Bernfried. 1981. “Ist ein Raum/Zeit-Modell für eine rekonstruierte Sprache möglich?” Zeitschrift für vergleichende Sprachforschung. Vol. 95:175–202.
   Google Scholar
• Schräder, Otto. 1901. Reallexikon der indogermanischen Altertumskunde. Grundzüge einer Kultur- und Völkergeschichte Alleuropas. 2 volumes. Strasbourg: Karl J. Trübner. (2nd thoroughly revised edition by A. Nehring, Berlin/Leipzig: Walter de Gruyter, 1917–1928).
   Google Scholar
• Schrijnen, Joseph. 1921. Einführung in das Studium der indogermanischen Sprachwissenschaft mit besonderer Berücksichtigung der klassischen und germanischen Sprachen. Bibliographie—Geschichtlicher Überblick—Allgemeine Prinzipien—Lautlehre. Übersetzt von W. Fischer. Heidelberg: Carl Winter.
   Google Scholar
• Schuchardt, Hugo. 1885. Über die Lautgesetze. Gegen die Jung-Grammatiker. Strasbourg: Karl J. Trübner.
   Google Scholar
• Schuchardt, Hugo. 1928. Brevier. Ein Vademekum der allgemeinen Sprachwissenschaft. 2nd ed. Halle/Saale: Max Niemeyer.
   Google Scholar
• Sergent, Bernard. 1987. “Les Indo-Européens: genèse et expansion d'une culture.” In: Pierre Lévêque (ed.), Les premières civilisations des despotismes orientaux à la cité grecque. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France. pp. 471–604.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, Henry Lee, Jr. 1941. “The Verschärfung in Germanie.” Language. Vol. 17:93–98.
   Google Scholar
• Stevens, Christopher M. 1993. “The use and abuse of typology on comparative linguistics: An update on the controversy.” The journal of Indo-European studies. Vol. 20:45–58.
   Google Scholar
• Sturtevant, Edgar H. 1930. “Can Hittite h be derived from Indo-Hittite ∂?” Language. Vol. 6:149–158.
   Google Scholar
• Sturtevant, Edgar H. 1933. A comparative grammar of the Hittite language. Philadelphia: The Linguistic Society of America.
   Google Scholar
• Sturtevant, Edgar H. 1942. The Indo-Hittite laryngeals. Baltimore: The Linguistic Society of America.
   Google Scholar
• Sturtevant, Edgar H., and E. Adelaide Hahn. 1951. A comparative grammar of the Hittite language. Vol. 1. Revised edition. New Haven: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Szemerényi, Oswald. 1967. “The new look of Indo-European phonology: reconstruction and typology.” Phonetica. Vol. 17:65–98.
   Google Scholar
• Szemerényi, Oswald. 1985. “Recent developments in Indo-European linguistics.” In: Transactions of the philological society 1985, pp. 1–71.
   Google Scholar
• Szemerényi, Oswald. 1989. Einführung in die vergleichende Sprachwissenschaft (3rd edition). Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft. [1st ed., 1970; 2nd ed., 1980].
   Google Scholar
• Thieme, Paul. 1973. Die Heimat der indogermanischen Gemeinsprache. Abhandlungen der Akademie der Wissenschaften und Literatur zu Mainz. Geistes- und Sozialwissenschaftliche Klasse. Vol. 11. Wiesbaden: Franz Steiner. pp. 535–613.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, Homer. 1982. “Archaeological evidence for the migration of the Indo-Europeans.” E.C. Polomé, ed. The Indo-Europeans in the fourth and third millennia. Ann Arbor: Karoma. pp. 61–86.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, Homer. 1991. “Indo-European: From the Paleolithic to the Neolithic.” Perspectives on Indo-European language, culture and religion. Vol. 1: pp. 12–37. McLean, VA.: The Institute for the Study of Man.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, Homer. 1992. “Archaeology and Indo-European comparative linguistics.” E.C. Polomé and W. Winter, eds. Reconstructing languages and cultures. Trends in linguistics: Studies & Monographs 58. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. pp. 285–315.
   Google Scholar
• Trubetskoy, N.S. 1939. “Gedanken über das Indogermanenproblem.” Acta linguistica Hafniensia. Vol. 1:81–89.
   Google Scholar
• van Windekens, A.J. 1952. Le pélasgique. Essai sur une langue indo-européenne préhellénique. Bibliothèque du ‘Muséon’. Vol. 29. Louvain: Publications Universitaires.
   Google Scholar
• van Windekens, A.J. 1954. Contributions à l'étude de l'onomastique pélasgique. Bibliothèque du ‘Muséon’. Vol. 35. Louvain: Publications Universitaires.
   Google Scholar
• van Windekens, A.J. 1960. Etudes pélasgiques. Bibliothèque du ‘Muséon’. Vol. 49. Louvain: Publications Universitaires.
   Google Scholar
• Vendryes, Joseph. 1917. “Les correspondances de vocabulaire entre l'indoiranien et l'italoceltique.” Mémoires de la Société de Linguistique de Paris. Vol. 20:265–285.
   Google Scholar
• Vennemann, Theo. 1984. “Hochgermanisch und Niedergermanisch: Die Verzweigungstheorie der germanisch-deutschen Lautverschiebungen.” Beiträge zur Geschichte der deutschen Sprache und Literatur. Vol. 106:1–45.
   Google Scholar
• Vennemann, Theo. 1985. “The bifurcation theory of the Germanic and German consonant shifts.” J. Fisiak, ed. Papers from the Sixth International Conference on Historical Linguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins/Poznan: A. Mickiewicz University Press. pp. 527–47.
   Google Scholar
• Ventris, Michael, and John Chadwick. 1953. “Evidence for Greek dialect in the Mycenaean archives.” The journal of Hellenic studies. Vol. 73:84–103.
   Google Scholar
• Vidossi, G. 1948. “Pro e contro le teorie di M. Bartoli.” Annali della Scuola Normale Superiore di Pisa. vol. 27:204–19.
   Google Scholar
• Wahle, Ernst. 1941. Zur ethnischen Deutung frühgeschichtlicher Kulturprovinzen. Sitzungsberichte der Heidelberger Akademie der Wissenschaften, phil.-hist. Kl., 3/2 [1936-1940]. Heidelberg: Carl Winter.
   Google Scholar
• Walde, Alois. 1917. Über die ältesten Sprachbeziehungen zwischen Kelten und Italikern. Rektoratsschrift. Innsbruck: Wagner'sche K.K. Universität Buchdruckerei R. Kiesel.
   Google Scholar
• Watkins, Calvert. 1962. Indo-European origins of the Celtic verb. I. The sigmatic aorist. Dublin: The Dublin Institute of Advanced Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Watkins, Calvert. 1966. “Italo-Celtic revisited.” Henrik Birnbaum and Jaan Puhvel, eds. Ancient Indo-European dialects. Berkeley/Los Angeles: University of California Press. pp. 29–50.
   Google Scholar
• Watkins, Calvert. 1969. Indogermanische Grammatik. Bd. III. Formenlehre. 1. Geschichte der indogermanischen Verbalflexion. Heidelberg: Carl Winter.
   Google Scholar
• Winter, Werner, ed. 1965. Evidence of laryngeals. The Hague: Mouton.
   Google Scholar
• Wyatt, William F., Jr. 1970. Indo-European /a/. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zimmer, Stefan. 1990a. Ursprache, Urvolk und Indogermanisierung. Zur Methode der indogermanischen Altertumskunde. Innsbrucker Beiträge zur Sprachwissenschaft. Vorträge und kleinere Schriften, No. 46. Innsbruck: Institut für Sprachwissenschaft der Universität.
   Google Scholar
• Zimmer, Stefan. 1990b. “On Indo-Europeanization.” The journal of Indo-European studies. Vol. 18: 141–155.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar