Linguistics and other semiotic arts

REFERENCES

• Austin, John L. 1970. Philosophical Papers. London: Oxford U.P.
   Google Scholar
• Austin, John L. 1973. How to do Things with Words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard U.P.
   Google Scholar
• Barthes, Roland. 1953/1972. Le degré zéro de l'écriture. Paris: Seuil.
   Google Scholar
• Barthes, Roland. 1964. “Éléments de sémiologie”. Communications 4: 91–135.
   Google Scholar
• Barthes, Roland. 1967. “Science vs. Literature”. The Times Literary Supplement. 28 September: 89798.
   Google Scholar
• Barthes, Roland. 1970. S/Z. Paris: Seuil.
   Google Scholar
• Bühler, Karl. 1934. Sprachtheorie. Jena: Gustav Fischer.
   Google Scholar
• Chomsky, Noam. “On the Nature, Use and Acquisition of Language”. In Pütz 1992:3–29.
   Google Scholar
• Corti, Maria. 1798. Il viaggio testuale. Torino: Einaudi.
   Google Scholar
• Corti, Maria. 1973. I metodi attuali della critica in Italia. Torino: ERI.
   Google Scholar
• Coseriu, Eugenio. 1971. Teoria del linguaggio e linguistica generale. Bari: Laterza.
   Google Scholar
• Croce, Benedetto. [1901] 1922. Aesthetic as Science of Expressinn and General Linguistics. Rev. Ed. Trans. Douglas Ainslie. New York: Noonday.
   Google Scholar
• Cros, Edmond. 1988. Theory and Practice of Sociocriticism. Theory and History of Literature 53. Trans. Jerome Schwartz. Minneapolis: Univ. of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Culler, Jonathan. 1975. Structuralist Poetics: Structuralism, Linguistics and the Study of Literature. Ithaca: Cornell U.P.
   Google Scholar
• Culler, Jonathan. 1982. On Deconstruction: Theory and Criticism After Structuralism. Ithaca: Cornell U.P.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, Robert Con. 1818. Contemporary Literary Criticism. New York-London: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• De Castris, Arcangelo Leone. 1991. La critica letteraria in Italia dal dopoguerra a oggi. Roma-Bari: Laterza.
   Google Scholar
• Della Volpe, Galvano. 1964. Critica del gusto. 2nd ed. Milan: Feltrinelli
   Google Scholar
• Della Volpe, Galvano. 1978. Critique of Taste. Trans. Michael Caesar. London: NLB.
   Google Scholar
• de Man, Paul. 1979. Allegories of Reading: Figurai Language in Rousseau, Nietzsche, Rilke, and Proust. New Haven: Yale U.P.
   Google Scholar
• de Man, Paul. 1983. Blindness and Insight: Essays in the Rhetoric of Contemporary Criticism. Introd. by Wlad Godzich. 2nd ed. Theory and History of Literature 7. Minneapolis: Univ. of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Derrida, Jacques. 1972. Positions. Paris: Éditions de Minuit. (Eng. trans. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press 1981.)
   Google Scholar
• Derrida, Jacques. 1963. De la grammatologie. Paris: Éditions de Minuit.
   Google Scholar
• Derrida, Jacques. 1977. Of Grammatology. Trans. Gayatri Chakravorty Spivak. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins U.P.
   Google Scholar
• Derrida, Jacques. 1978. Writing and Difference. Trans. Alan Bass. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dingwall, William Orr, ed. 1971. A Survey of Linguistic Science. Stamford, CT: Greylock.
   Google Scholar
• Eco, Umberto. 1979a. The Role of the Reader: Explorations in the Semiotics of Texts. Advances in Semiotics. Bloomington: Indiana U.P.
   Google Scholar
• Eco, Umberto. 1979b. A Theory of Semiotics. Advances in Semiotics. Bloomington: Indiana U.P.
   Google Scholar
• Eco, Umberto. 1984. Semiotics and the Philosophy of Language. Advances in Semiotics. Bloomington: Indiana U.P.
   Google Scholar
• Eco, Umberto. 1986. Travels in Hyperreality: Essays. Trans. William Weaver. San Diego: Helen and Kurt Wolff-Harcourt Brace and Jovanovich.
   Google Scholar
• Erlich, Victor. C 1955, 1980. Russian Formalism: History—Doctrine. The Hague: Mouton.
   Google Scholar
• Firbas, Jan. 1992a. Functional Sentence Perspective in Written and Spoken Communication. Cambridge: Cambridge U P.
   Google Scholar
• Firbas, Jan. 1992b. “The Why's and How's in My Research into Functional Sentence Perspective”. In Pütz 1992:335–57.
   Google Scholar
• Fokkema, Douwe W., and Elrud Kunne-Ibsch. c1978, 2d ed. 1979. Theories of Literature in the Twentieth Century: Structuralism, Marxism, Aesthetics of Reception, Semiotics. London: C. Hurst; New York: St. Martin's Press.
   Google Scholar
• Greimas, A. J., et al. 1972. Essais de sémiotique poétique. Paris: Larousse.
   Google Scholar
• Hartman, Geoffrey H., ed. 1979. Psychoanalysis and the Question of the Text. Baltimore, MD: J. Hopkins U.P.
   Google Scholar
• Greimas, A. J., et al. 1980. Criticism in the Wilderness: The Study of Literature Today. New Haven: Yale U.P.
   Google Scholar
• Hawkes, Terence. 1977. Structuralism and Semiotics. London: Methuen.
   Google Scholar
• Jakobson, Roman. 1970. Main Trends in the Science of Language. New York: Harper & Row.
   Google Scholar
• Jakobson, Roman. 1973. Questions de Poétique. Paris: Seuil.
   Google Scholar
• Jakobson, Roman. 1985. Verbal Art, Verbal Sign, Verbal Time. Eds. Krystyna Pomorska and Stephen Rudy. Minneapolis: U of Minnesota P.
   Google Scholar
• Jakobson, Roman. 1987. Language in Literature. Eds. Krystyna Pomorska and Stephen Rudy. Cambridge London: The Belknap Press of Harvard University.
   Google Scholar
• Krystyna Pomorska and Stephen Rudy and Morris Halle, eds. 1956. Fundamentals of Language. The Hague: Mouton.
   Google Scholar
• Jauss, Hans Robert. 1982. Aesthetic Experience and Literary Hermeneutics. Trans. Michael Shaw. Introd. by Wlad Godzich. Theory and History of Literature 3. Minneapolis: U of Minnesota P.
   Google Scholar
• Jauss, Hans Robert. 1982. Toward an Aesthetic of Reception. Trans. Timothy Bahti. Introd. by Paul de Man. Theory and History of Literature 2. Minneapolis: U of Minnesota P.
   Google Scholar
• Jefferson, Ann, and David Robey, eds. 1991. Modern Literary Theory: A Comparative Introduction. 2d ed. London: J. T. Batsford, 1986, 1991. 1st ed. 1982. Totowa, NJ: Barnes & Noble.
   Google Scholar
• Koerner, E. F. K. 1972. Contribution au débat post-saussurien sur le signe linguistique. The Hague-Paris: Mouton.
   Google Scholar
• Lacan, Jacques. 1968. The Language of the Self: The Function of Language in Psychoanalysis. Trans. Anthony Wilden. New York: Delta-Dell.
   Google Scholar
• Lévi-Strauss, Claude. 1945. “L'analyse structurale en linguistique et en anthropologie”. Word 1: 33–53. Then in Anthropologie structurale. Paris: Pion, 1958.
   Google Scholar
• Lodge, David. 1988. The Modes of Modem Writing: Metaphor, Metonymy, and the Typology of Modern Literature. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lotman, Iouri. 1964. “Sur la délimitation linguistique et littéraire de la notion de structure.” Linguistics 6: 59–72.
   Google Scholar
• Luperini, Romano. 1991. Teoria e critica letteraria oggi. Milano: Franco Angeli.
   Google Scholar
• Malmberg, Bertil. 1977. Signes et symboles. Paris: A. & J. Picard.
   Google Scholar
• Malmberg, Bertil. 1983. Analyse du langage au XXe siècle. Théorie et méthodes. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France. Ch. 8, “Les idées de Roman Jakobson et leurs échos en linguistique et en poétique“, pp. 99–114.
   Google Scholar
• Mauro de, Tullio. 1967. Ludwig Wittgenstein: His Place in the Development of Semantics. Dordrecht: D. Reidel.
   Google Scholar
• Nordahl Lund, Steffen. 1981. L'aventure du signifiant. Paris: PUF.
   Google Scholar
• Pütz, Martin, ed. 1992. Thirty Years of Linguistic Evolution. Studies in honor of René Dirven. Philadelphia/Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Rice, Philip, and Patricia Waugh, eds. 1989. Modern Literary Theory: A Reader. New York: Edward Arnold.
   Google Scholar
• Sampson, Geoffrey. 1980. Schools of Linguistics. Stanford: Stanford U.P.
   Google Scholar
• Saussure de, Ferdinand. 1967. Cours de linguistique générale. 3d ed. Paris: Payot.
   Google Scholar
• Scaglione, Aldo. 1970. Ars grammatica: A Bibliographie Survey, Two Essays on the Grammar of the Latin and Italian Subjunctive, and A Note on the Ablative Absolute. The Hague-Paris: Mouton, (Janua Linguarum, Series Minor 77.)
   Google Scholar
• Scaglione, Aldo. 1972. The Classical Theory of Composition. Chapel Hill: Univ. of North Carolina Press.
   Google Scholar
• Scaglione, Aldo. 1979. “Beauzée, Behaghel, and J. R. Ross on heavy-NP shift“, Historiographia Linguistica 6.2: 231–45.
   Google Scholar
• Scaglione, Aldo. 1980a. “The Eighteenth-Century debate concerning linearity or simultaneity in the deep structure of language: From Buffier to Gottsched”. Progress in Linguistic Historiography: Papers from the International Conference on the History of the Language Sciences— Ottawa, 28–31 August 1978 (Amsterdam: John Benjamins): 141–54.
   Google Scholar
• Scaglione, Aldo. 1980b. “Direct vs. Inverted Order: Wolff and Condillac on the Necessity of the Sign and the Interrelationship of Language and Thinking”. Romance Philology 33.4: 496–501.
   Google Scholar
• Scaglione, Aldo. 1981a. The Theory of German Word Order, from the Renaissance to the Present. Minneapolis: U of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Scaglione, Aldo. 1981b. Komponierte Prosa von der Antike bis zur Gegenwart, Stuttgart: Klett-Cotta Verlag, 2 vols.
   Google Scholar
• Scaglione, Aldo. 1983. “The Trivium Arts and Contemporary Linguistics: The Contiguity/Similarity Distinction and the Question of Word Order”. 10.3: 195–207.
   Google Scholar
• Todorov, Tzvetan. 1965. “Les poètes devant le bon usage”. Esthétique de la langue française. Revue d'Esthétique, n.s. 3–4: 300–05.
   Google Scholar
• Rice, Philip, and Patricia Waugh, eds. 1966. Théorie de la littérature: Textes des formalistes russes. Paris: Éditions du Seuil.
   Google Scholar
• Todorov, Tzvetan. 1987. Literature and Its Theorists: A Personal View of Twentieth-Century Criticism. Trans. Catherine Porter. Ithaca: Cornell U.P.
   Google Scholar
• Wellek, René. 1981–87. A History of Modem Criticism: 1750–1950. 7 vols. New Haven-London: Yale U.P.
   Google Scholar
• Wellek, René. 1957. Theory of Literature. 3rd ed. New York: Harvest-Harcourt, Brace and World.
   Google Scholar