210
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Reviews

Reviews

, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , & show all
Pages 75-167 | Published online: 16 Jun 2015

REFERENCES

  • Blood, D. E. 1988. “The script as a cohesive factor in Cham society.” In M. Gregerson and D. Thomas (eds), Notes from Indochina on ethnic minority cultures. Dallas: SIL Museum of Anthropology.
  • Bradley, Lynette. 1992. “Rhymes, rimes, and learning to read and spell.” In C. A. Ferguson, L. Menn, and C. Stoel-Gammon (eds.). Phonological development: Models, research, implications. Timonium, MD: York Press.
  • Ferguson, Charles A. 1990. “Then they could read and write: Case studies of the introduction of vernacular literacy.” In L. F. Bouton and Y. Kachru (eds), Pragmatics and Language Learning Monograph Series, Vol. 1. Urbana-Champaign, IL: Division of English as an International Language and Intensive English Institute, University of Illinois.
  • Halle, Morris and J. R. Vergnaud. 1980. “Three dimensional phonology.” Journal of linguistic research 1:83–105.
  • Huebner, Thom. 1968. “Vernacular literacy, English as a language of wider communication, and language shift in American Samoa.” Journal of multilingual and multicultural development 7:393–411.
  • Long, Lynellen D. 1991. “Literacy acquisition of Hmong refugees in Thailand.” In F. Dubin and N. Kuhlmann (eds), Cross-cultural literacy: Global perspectives on reading. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
  • Long, Lynellen D. 1993. Ban Vinai: The refugee camp. New York: Columbia University Press.
  • Ransom, Jay Ellis. 1945. “Writing as a means of acculturation among the Aleut.” Southwest journal of anthropology 1:333–44.
  • Smalley, William A. 1976. Phonemes and orthography: Language planning in ten minority languages of Thailand. (= Pacific Linguistic Series 43) Canberra: Australian National University.
  • Smalley William A. 1991. “My pilgrimage in mission.” International bulletin of missionary research 15:70–73.
  • Vang, Chia Koua, Gnia Yee Yang, and William A. Smalley. 1990. The life of Shong Lue Yang. Minneapolis: Southeast Asian Refugee Studies, University of Minnesota.

REFERENCE

  • Large, A. 1985 The artificial language movement. Basil Blackwell, Oxford.
  • Monnerot-Dumaine, M. (1960) Précis d'interlinguistique. Librairie Maloine, Paris.

REFERENCES

  • Antonsen, E.A. 1975. A concise grammar of the older runic inscriptions. Tübingen: Niemeyer.
  • Campbell, A. 1959. Old English grammar. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
  • Lass, R. 1980. On explaining language change. Cambridge: Cambridge Unversity Press.
  • Lass, R. 1986. Words without etyma: Germanic ‘tooth’. In D. Kastovsky, A. Szwedek (eds.), Linguistics across historical and geographical boundaries. In honour of Jacek Fisiak on the occasion of his fiftieth birthday, I, 473–82. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
  • Sweet, H. 1885. The oldest English texts. Early English Text Society, OS 83.

REFERENCES

  • Chomsky, Noam. 1965. Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Chomsky, Noam. 1981. Lectures on Government and Binding. Dordrecht: Foris.
  • Chomsky, Noam. 1982. Some Concepts and Consequences of the Theory of Government and Binding. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

REFERENCES

  • Bybee, Joan L. 1985. Morphology: A study of the relation between meaning and form. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
  • Bybee, Joan L. & Dahl, Östen. 1989. “The creation of tense and aspect systems in the languages of the world.” Studies in Language 13.1:51–103.
  • Chomsky, Noam. 1991. “Some notes on economy of derivation and representation”. In: Freidin, Robert (ed.) 1991. Principles and parameters in comparative grammar. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 417–54.
  • Haspelmath, Martin. 1993. “The diachronic externalization of inflection”. Linguistics 31.2: 279–309.
  • Hawkins, John A. 1983. Word order universals. New York: Academic Press.
  • Himmelmann, Nikolaus P. 1992. Grammaticalization and grammar. (Arbeitspapier, 16. (N.F.)) Cologne: Institut für Sprachwissenschaft der Universität zu Köln.
  • Koptjevskaja-Tamm, Maria. 1993. Nominalizations. London: Routledge. (Pre-published and circulated in 1988 as a University of Stockholm dissertation)
  • Nichols, Johanna. 1986. “Head-marking and dependent-marking grammar”. Language 62:56–119.
  • Pollock, J.-Y. 1989. “Verb movement, Universal Grammar, and the structure of IP”. Linguistic Inquiry 20:365–424.
  • Siewierska, Anna. 1993. “On the ordering of subject agreement and tense affixes”. In: EUROTYP Working Papers, Series II (Constituent order). No. 5:101–26.

REFERENCES

  • Brown, G. & Yule, G. 1983. Discourse analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Dik, S.C. 1989. The theory of functional grammar. Part I: The structure of the clause. Dordrecht: Foris.
  • Downing, A. 1990a. “Sobre el tema tópico en inglés.” Revista Española de lingüística aplicada. Anejo 1. ed. M.T. Turrell. Nuevas corrientes lingüísticas. Aplicación a la descripción del inglés. pp. 119–28.
  • Downing, A. 1990b. “The discourse function of presentative there in existential structures in Middle English and present-day English: a systemic-functional perspective.” Occasional Papers in Systemic Linguistics. Vol. 4. pp. 103–126.
  • Downing, A. 1991. “An alternative approach to theme: a systemic-functional perspective.” WORD, 42:119–43.
  • Givón, T. Ed. 1983. Topic continuity in discourse: a quantitative cross-language study.
  • Halliday, M.A.K. 1971. “Language in a social perspective.” In Halliday (1973) Explorations in the Functions of Language. London: Edward Arnold. (First published in Educational Review, June 1971)
  • Halliday, M.A.K. 1985. An Introduction to Functional Grammar. London: Edward Arnold.
  • Levinson, S. 1983. Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Prince, E. 1985. “On the given/new distinction.” Papers from the 15th Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society. 267–78.
  • Quirk, R., Greenbaum, S., Leech, G. & J. Svartvik. 1985. A comprehensive grammar of the English language. London: Longman.
  • Radford, A. 1988. Transformational grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Rivero, M. L. 1980. “On left-dislocation and topicalization in Spanish.” Linguistic Inquiry, 11:363–72.
  • Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. & G. Jefferson. 1974. “A simplest systematics for the organisation of turn-taking in conversation.” Language 50. 696–735.
  • Schiffrin, D. 1987. Discourse markers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

REFERENCES

  • Lasnik, H. 1989. “On the necessity of binding conditions.” In Lasnik, Essays on anaphora. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
  • Peters, S. 1972. “The projection problem.” In Peters, ed., Goals of linguistic theory. Engle-wood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.

REFERENCES

  • Chomsky, Noam. 1981. Lectures on government and binding. Dordrecht: Foris.
  • Chomsky, Noam. 1986. Barriers. Cambridge: MIT Press.
  • Hale, Ken. 1985. “On nonconfigurational structures,” Susumu Kuno et al. eds. Harvard studies in Korean linguistics.
  • Kuno, Susumu. 1973. The structure of the Japanese language. Cambridge: MIT Press.
  • Kuroda, Shige-Yuki. 1965. Generative grammatical studies in the Japanese language. Ph.D. dissertation. MIT.
  • Martin, Sam. 1975. Reference grammar of Japanese. New Haven: Yale University Press.
  • Miyagawa, Shigeru. 1989. Structure and case marking in Japanese. New York: Academic Press.
  • Saito, Mamoru. 1985. Some asymmetries in Japanese and their theoretical consequences. Ph.D. dissertation. MIT.

REFERENCES

  • Besten, H. den and G. Webelhuth. 1987. “Remnant topicalization and the constituent structure of the VP in the Germanic SOV languages”. Paper presented at GLOW, Venice.
  • Haegeman, L. 1991. An introduction to government and binding theory. Oxford: Blackwells.
  • Haegeman, L. 1986. “Verb projection raising, scope and the typology of rules affecting verbs”. Linguistic inquiry 17, 417–66.
  • Koster, J. 1986. The relation between pro-drop, scrambling and verb movement. Groningen papers in theoretical and applied linguistics, TTT1.
  • Lasnik, H. and J. Uriagereka. 1988. A course in GB syntax. Cambridge, Mass.: The MIT Press.
  • Muysken, P. 1983. “Parametrizing the notion head”. The journal of linguistic research 2, 57–76.
  • Platzack, C. 1983. Germanic word order and the comp/infl parameter. Working papers in Scandinavian syntax 2.
  • Pollock, J-Y. 1989. “Verb movement, UG and the structure of IP”. Linguistic inquiry 20: 365–424.
  • Rizzi, L. 1986. “Null objects in Italian and the Theory of pro”. Linguistic inquiry 17, 501–57.

REFERENCES

  • Gregory, Michael and Karen Malcolm. 1981. Generic situation and discourse phase: An approach to the analysis of children's talk. Mimeo. Toronto: A.L.R.W.G., Glendon College of York University.
  • Halliday, M.A.K. 1976. System and function in language. London: Oxford University Press.
  • Labov, W. 1977. Language in the Inner City. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

REFERENCES

  • Cook, Eung-Do. 1989. “Is phonology going haywire in dying languages?” Language in Society 18. 235–55.
  • Cook, Eung-Do. 1992. The acquisition and deacquisition of Chipewyan obstruents. The 31st Conference on American Indian Languages, San Francisco, December.
  • Dorian, Nancy C. (ed.) 1989. Investigating Obsolescence: Studies in Language Contraction and Death. Studies in the Social and Cultural Foundations of Language 7. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Dimmendaal, Gerrit J. 1989. “On language death in eastern Africa.” In Dorian 1989.
  • Ochs, Elinor. 1982. “Ergativity and word order in Samoan child language.” Language 58. 646–71
  • Schmidt, Annette. 1985. “The fate of ergativity in dying Dyirbal.” Language 61. 378–96.

REFERENCES

  • Allan, Keith. 1986. Linguistic meaning. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
  • Chomsky, Noam. 1966. Cartesian linguistics: A chapter in the history of rationalist thought. New York: Harper & Row.
  • Peeters, Bert. 1985. “‘Tout ne se tient-il pas dans le système?’ Bedenkingen bij de paradigmatische samenhang van taalelementen.” Handelingen van de Koninklijke Zuidnederlandse Maatschappij voor taal- en letterkunde en geschiedenis 39:141–56.
  • Peeters, Bert. 1989. “Review (in French) of Linguistic meaning, by Keith Allan.” Canadian journal of linguistics 34:119–22.
  • Peeters, Bert. 1991. “Encore une fois ‘où tout se tient’.” Historiographia Linguistica 17:427–36.
  • Saussure de, Ferdinand. 1966 (1916). Cours de linguistique générale. Paris: Payot.

REFERENCES

  • Albrecht, August. 1857. Practische Englische Sprachschule. Leipzig: Breitkopf & Härtel.
  • Arnold, Theodor, B Rogler, and J.A. Fahrenkrüger. 1809. Grammatica Anglicana Concentrata. Jena: Frommann. (1st ed. 1718).
  • Berg van den, G.. 1844. Practische Englische Sprachlehre für Schulen und zum Selbstunterricht. Hamberg, Leipzig: Schubert & Co.
  • Brown, Goold. 1851. The grammar of English grammars. New York: Wood.
  • Brown, Goold. 1853. The institutes of English grammar. Rev. Ed. New York: Wood. rpt. Delmar: Scholars Facsimiles & reprints, 1982.
  • Curme, George Oliver. 1925. College English grammar. Richmond, Va.: Johnson.
  • Curme, George Oliver. 1931. A grammar of the English language. Vol. 3: Syntax. Boston: Heath.
  • Curme, George Oliver. 1935. A grammar of the English language, Vol. 2: Parts of speech and accidence. Boston: Heath.
  • Dekeyser, Xavier, Betty Devriendt, Guy A.J. Tops, and Steven Geukens. 1979. Foundations of English Grammar: For university students and advanced learners. Antwerpen-Amsterdam: Nederlandsche Boekhandel. (Other editions appeared in 1984 and 1987.)
  • Deutschbein, Karl D. 1917. Kurzgefa?ste englische Grammatik und übungsstücke für reifere Schüler. (Ausgabe B). Cöthen: Schulze.
  • Deutschbein, Max D. 1917. System der neuenglischen Syntax. Heidelberg: Quelle & Meyer.
  • Deutschbein, Max D. 1957. Grammatik der englischen Sprache auf wissenschaftlicher Grundlage. Bearbeitet von Hermann Klitscher. Heidelberg: Quelle & Meyer.
  • Dušková, Libuše a kol. 1988. Mluvnice současné angli˘tiny na pozadí ceštiny A grammar of contemporary English with reference of Czech. Prague: Academia.
  • Dušková. Libuše, Libuše Bubeníková, and Jan Caha. 1979. Strucná Mluvnice Angličtiny <A concise grammar of English>. 5th ed. Prague: Academia.
  • Fowler, Henry Watson. 1926. A dictionary of modern English usage. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
  • Fowler, Henry W. and Francis G. Fowler. 1906. The King's English. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
  • Fries, Charles Carpenter. 1940. American English grammar: the grammatical structure of present-day American English with especial reference to social differences or class dialects. New York: Appleton.
  • Fries, Charles Carpenter. 1952. The structure of English: An introduction to the construction of English sentences. New York: Harcourt.
  • Hais, Karel. 1975. Anglická mluvnice <English grammar>. 2nd ed. Prague: Státni pedagogické nakladatelství.
  • Huddieston, Rodney. 1984. Introduction to the Grammar of English. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.
  • Jesperson, Otto. 1909–1949. A modern English grammar, on historical principles. (7 vols.). Copenhagen: Munksgaard.
  • Kruisinga, Etsko. 1909. A handbook of present-day English (2 parts, 4 vols.). Groningen: Noordhoff.
  • Kruisinga, Etsko. 1912. An English grammar (for Dutch students) (2 parts, 3 vols.). Groningen: Noordhoff.
  • Kruisinga, Etsko. 1926. “English grammar as she is taught at Oxford”. English Studies 7. 181–85.
  • Lamprecht, Adolf. 1956. Grammatik der englischen Sprache. Berlin: Volk & Wissen.
  • Lamprecht, Adolf. 1970. Grammatik der englischen Sprache. Berlin: Volk & Wissen, und Bielefeld: Cornelsen.
  • Lamprecht, Adolf. 1986. Grammatik der englischen Sprache. Neufassung. Berlin: Volk & Wissen, und Berlin: Cornelsen-Velhagen & Klasing.
  • Maetzner, Eduard. 1860–1865. Englische Grammatik. Berlin: Weidmannsche Buchhandlung.
  • Maetzner, Eduard Adolf Ferdinand. 1874. An English grammar; methodical, analytical and historical. Vol. II. Translated from the German by Clair James Grece. Boston: Roberts and Brothers.
  • Mencken, Henry Louis. 1919. The American language: A preliminary inquiry into the development of English in the United States. 1st ed. New York: Knopf.
  • Murray, Lindley. 1824. English grammar. 9th ed. Bridgeport, Conn.: Baldwin <1st American ed. 1800>; rpt Delmar: Scholars’ Facsimiles & Reprints, 1981.
  • Pott, O. 1807. Brittischer Sprachlehrer oder vollständige englische Sprachlehre für Deutsche. Leipzig: Joachim.
  • Quirk, Randolph, Sidney Greenbaum, Geoffrey Leech, and Jan Svartvik. 1985. A comprehensive grammar of the English language. London: Longman.
  • Radford, Andrew. 1988. Transformational grammar: A first course. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.
  • Reichel, Chr. H. 1790. D. Lowth's Englische Sprachlehre, mit kritischen Noten, übersetzt mit Anmerkungen begleitet. Leipzig: Weidmann.
  • Roey Van, Jacques. 1982. English grammar: advanced level. Paris: Didier-Hatier.
  • Scheurweghs, Gustave. 1959. Present-day English syntax: a survey of sentence patterns. London: Longmans, Green & Co. Ltd.
  • Smith, Roswell C. 1864. Smith's English grammar on the productive system. 2nd ed. Richmond Va.: Bidgood; rpt. Delmar: Scholars’ Facsimiles & Reprints, 1983.
  • Sonnenschein, Eduard Adolph. 1913. “Grammatical Reform”. Die Neueren Sprachen 21. 289–95.
  • Sonnenschein, Eduard Adolph. 1916. A new English grammmar. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
  • Sonnenschein, Eduard Adolph. 1927. The soul of grammar. Cambridge Univ. Press.
  • Sweet, Henry. 1892–1898. A new English grammar, logical and historical (2 vols). Oxford: Clarendon Press.
  • Whitney, William Dwight. 1877. Essentials of English grammar. Boston: Ginn & Co. rpt. Delmar: Scholars’ Facsimiles & Reprints, 1988.
  • Zandvoort, Reinard Willem. 1945. A handbook of English grammar. Groningen: Wolters-Noordhoff.

REFERENCES

  • Blevins, J. 1990. Alternatives to exhaustivity and conflation in metrical theory. Austin: University of Texas, ms.
  • Bolinger, D. 1961. “Contrastive accent and contrastive stress.” Language, 37:83–96.
  • Curtiss, S., V.A. Fromkin, S. Krashen, D. Rigler, and M. Rigler 1974. “The linguistic development of Genie.” Language, 50, 528–54
  • Halle, M. and J.R. Vergnaud 1987. An essay on stress. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
  • Harris, J.W. 1983. Syllable structure and stress in Spanish. A nonlinear analysis. Cambridge, MA.: MIT Press.
  • Hymes, D. 1971. “Competence and performance in linguistic theory.” In R. Huxley and E. Ingram (eds.), Language Acquisition: Models and Methods. London: Academic Press.
  • Ladefoged, P. 1982. A course in phonetics, 2nd. ed. San Diego: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
  • Lehiste, I. 1970. Suprasegmentals. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Liberman, M. and A. Prince. 1977. “On stress and linguistic rhythm.” Linguistic inquiry, 8, 249–336.
  • McCarthy, J.J. and A. Prince. 1990. “Foot and word in prosodie morphology: The Arabic broken plural.” Natural language and linguistic theory 8, 209–84.
  • Roca, I. 1986. “Secondary stress and metrical rhythm.” Phonology yearbook 3:341–70.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.