REFERENCES
- Cooreman, Ann. 1982. “Topicality, ergativity, and transitivity in narrative discourse: evidence from Chamorro.” Studies in language 6.3.343–74.
- Cooreman, Ann. 1983. “Topic continuity and the voicing system of an ergative language: Chamorro.” In Givon 1983. pp. 425–89.
- In Givon 1984. “The discourse definition of ergativity.” Studies in language 8.1: 1–34.
- Davidse, Kristin. 1992. “Transitivity/ergativity: the Janus-headed grammar of actions and events.” In Davies and Ravelli. pp. 103–35.
- Davies, Martin and Louise Ravelli, eds. 1992. Advances in systemic linguistics: Recent theory and practice. London: Pinter.
- Dixon, Richard M. W. 1979. “Ergativity.” Language 55.1: 59–138.
- Fillmore, Charles. 1968. “Case for case.” In Universals in linguistic theory, eds. E. Bach and R. T. Harms. New York: Holt Rinehart & Winston, Inc. pp. 1–90.
- Firbas, Jan. 1992. “On some basic problems of functional sentence perspective.” In Davies and Ravelli. pp. 167–88.
- Givon, Talmy. 1983. Topic continuity in discourse: a quantitative cross-language study. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
- Givon, Talmy. 1990. Syntax: A functional-typological introduction, Vol. II. Philadelphie: John Benjamins.
- Greenberg, Joseph. 1963. “Some universals of grammar with particular reference to the order of meaningful elements.” In Universals of language, 2nd Ed., ed. J. H. Greenberg. Cambridge: MIT Press. pp. 73–113.
- Halliday, M. A. K. 1985. An introduction to functional grammar. London: Edward Arnold.
- Mel'čuk, Igor A. 1988. Dependency syntax: theory and practice. Albany: SUNY Press.
- Moyne, John. 1974. “The so-called passive in Persian.” Foundations of language 12: 249–67.