126
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Reviews

Reviews

, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , & show all
Pages 237-313 | Published online: 16 Jun 2015

REFERENCES

  • Chomsky, N. 1992. A Minimalist Program for Linguistic Theory, MIT Occasional Papers in Linguistics 1.
  • Fromkin, Victoria, & Robert Rodman. 1988. An Introduction to Language. Fourth edition. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

REFERENCES

  • Bickner, Robert. 1989. “Directional modification in Thai fiction: the use of ‘come’ and ‘go’ in text building”. South-East Asian Syntax. Edited by David Bradley. Pacific Linguistics. Series A—No. 77. Papers in South-East Asian Linguistics No. 11. The Australian National University.
  • van Dijk, Teun A. 1977. “Semantic macro-structures and knowledge frames”. In Just & Carpenter (Eds.), Cognitive Processes, pp. 3–32. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Givón, Talmy. 1963. Topic continuity in discourse: a quantitative cross-language study. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
  • Jones, Robert V., Jr., & Anthony V. Diller. 1976. Discourse analysis of Thai and Japanese. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
  • Labov, William, & Joshua Waletzky. 1967. “Narrative analysis: oral versions of personal experience”. Essays on the verbal and visual arts. Edited by June Helm. pp. 12–44. Seattle: University of Washington Press.
  • Longacre, Robert. 1983. The grammar of discourse. New York: Plenum. Miyamoto, Tadao. 1993. Review of Somsonge Burusphat's The Structure of Thai Narrative. Language 69. 3: 617–618.
  • Panupong, Vichin. 1970. Intersentential relations in modern conversational Thai. Bangkok: Siam Society.

REFERENCES

  • Gedney, William J. 1989. Selected papers on comparative Tai studies. Edited by Robert J. Bickner, John Hartmann, Thomas John Hudak, and Patcharin Peyasantiwong. Center for South and Southeast Asian Studies. The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
  • Gedney, William J. 1991. The Yay language; Glossary, Texts, and Translations. Edited by Thomas John Hudak. Michigan Papers on South and Southeast Asian. Center for South and Southeast Asian Studies. The University of Michigan. Number 38.
  • Gedney, William J. 1993. The Saek language; Glossary, Texts, and Translations. Edited by Thomas John Hudak. Michigan Papers on South and Southeast Asian. Center for South and Southeast Asian Studies. The University of Michigan. Number 41.
  • Sarawit, Mary Elizabeth Sautter. 1973. The proto-Tai vowel system. Ph.D. dissertation. The University of Michigan.

REFERENCES

  • Grice, H. Paul. 1975. “Logic and conversation.” Syntax and semantics, Vol. 3: Speech Acts. Eds. Peter Cole & Jerry Morgan. New York: Academic Press. 41–58.
  • Grice, H. Paul. 1989. Studies in the ways of words. Cambridge, MA. Harvard University Press.
  • Kess, Joseph F. 1993. Psycholinguistics: Psychology, linguistics, and the study of natural language. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
  • Leech, Geoffrey. 1983. Principles of pragmatics. London & New York: Longman.
  • Sperber, Dan, & Deirdre Wilson. 1986. Relevance: Communication and cognition. Cambridge, MA.: Harvard University Press.

REFERENCES

  • Allen, M. R. 1978. Morphological Investigations. PhD dissertation. University of Connecticut.
  • Aoun, Youssef. 1981. “Parts of speech.” Unpublished paper. MIT, Cambridge (Mass.).
  • Bradley, Henry. 1904. The making of English. New York: Macmillan.
  • Dressler, Wolfgang. U. 1989. “Prototypical Differences between Inflection and Derivation”. Zeitschrift für Phonetik, Sprachwissenschaft und Kommunikationsforschung, 42/1: 3–10.
  • Dressler, Wolfgang U., Mayerthaler, Willi, Panagl, Oswald, Wurzel, Wolfgang U. 1987. Leitmotifs in Natural Morphology. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
  • Freidin, Robert. 1975. “The Analysis of Passives,” Language 51: 384–405.
  • Kiparsky, Paul. 1982. Lexical morphology and phonology. Ms.
  • Lakoff, George. 1987. Women, fire and dangerous things. What categories reveal about mind. Chicago & London: University of Chicago Press.
  • Lieber, Rochelle. 1980. On the Organization of the Lexicon. PhD dissertation. MIT.
  • Matthews, Peter. 1991. Morphology. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (1st ed. 1974).
  • Rosch, Eleanor et al. 1975. Basic objects in natural categories. Berkeley Language Behaviour Research Lab.: Working Paper 43.
  • Rosch, Elanor & Lloyd, Barbara, (eds.) 1978. Cognition and categorization. Hillsdale (NJ.): Erlbaum.
  • Scalise, Sergio. 1984. Generative morphology. Dordrecht: Foris.
  • Siegel, Dorothy 1974. Topics in English morphology. PhD dissertation. MIT.
  • Taylor, John. R. 1989. Linguistic categorization. Prototypes in linguistic theory. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
  • Szymanek, Bogdan. 1989. Introduction to morphological analysis. Warsawa: Panstwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe.
  • Wasow, Thomas. 1977. Transformations and the lexicon. In: Peter Culicover, Thomas Wasow & Adrian Akmajian (Eds.). Formal syntax. New York: Academic Press, pp. 327–60.
  • Williams, Edwin. 1981. “Argument structure and morphology,” The linguistic review 1: 81–114.

REFERENCE

  • Short, Philip. 1974. Banda. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

REFERENCES

  • de Bray, Reginald G. A. 1980. Guide to the Slavonic languages. 3rd edition. Columbus, Ohio: Slavica.
  • Svane, Gunnar. 1958. Grammatik der slowenischen Schriftsprache. Copenhagen: Rosenkilde & Bagger.

REFERENCES

  • Baker, Peter. 1987. A Basque nautical pidgin: A missing link in the history of fu. Journal of Pidgin and Creole languages 2: 1–31.
  • Bickerton, Derek. 1981. Roots of language. Ann Arbor, MI: Karoma.
  • Byrne, Francis. 1987. Grammatical relations in a radical Creole. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
  • Chomsky, Noam. 1981. Lectures on Government and Binding. Dordrecht: Foris.
  • Chomsky, Noam. 1982. Some concepts and consequences of the theory of Government and Binding. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Chomsky, Noam. 1986a. . Barriers. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Chomsky, Noam. 1986b. . Knowledge of language: Its nature, origin, and use. New York: Praeger.
  • Faingold, Eduardo. MS. “The development of verbal mood in Spanish, French, and English: A study of first language acquisition, second language learning, language change in progress, history, and creolization.” SUNY at Stony Brook.
  • Holm, John. 1989. Pidgins and Creoles. Volume 2. Cambridge: University Press.
  • Muysken, Pieter and Smith, Norval. 1986. Substrata versus universals in Creole Genesis. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
  • Naro, Anthony. 1978. A study on the origins of pidginization. Language 54: 314–47.
  • Naro, Anthony. 1993. Arguing about Arguin. Journal of Pidgin and Creole languages 8: 109–18.
  • Sebba, Mark. 1987. The syntax of serial verbs: An investigation into serialization in Sranan and other languages. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
  • Thomason, Sarah Grey & Kaufman, Terrence. 1988. Language contact, creolization, and genetic linguistics. Berkeley, Los Angeles, & Oxford: University of California Press.

REFERENCES

  • Uhlenbeck, E. M. 1992. “Some critical remarks on a recent interpretation of a sentence from the Old Javanese Tantri Kamandaka.” Bijdragen tot de Taal-, Land- en Volkenkunde 148: 262–69.

REFERENCES

  • Brown, Gillian & George Yule. 1983. Discourse analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Dik, Simon C. 1989. The theory of functional grammar. Part I: The structure of the clause. Dordrecht: Foris.
  • Downing, Angela. 1990a. . “Sobre el tema tópico en inglés.” Revista Española de Lingüística Aplicada. Anejo 1. ed. M. T. Turrell. Nuevas corrientes lingüísticas. Aplicación a la descripción del inglés. 119–28.
  • Downing, Angela. 1990b. . “The discourse function of presentative there in existential structures in Middle English and present-day English: a systemic-functional perspective.” Occasional papers in systemic linguistics. Vol. 4. 103–26.
  • Downing, Angela. 1991. “An alternative approach to theme: a systemic-functional perspective.” WORD 42: 119–43.
  • Downing, Angela & Martínez-Caro, Elena. 1993. “The discourse-pragmatic functions of left- dislocation in Spanish.” Paper presented at the International Conference of Applied Linguistics. Robert Di Pietro. In Memoriam. Universidad de Granada.
  • Givón, Talmy ed. 1983. Topic continuity in discourse: a quantitative cross-language study.
  • Halliday, M. A. K. 1971. “Language in a social perspective.” In Halliday (1973) Explorations in the Functions of Language. London: Edward Arnold. (First published in Educational Review, June 1971)
  • Halliday, M. A. K. 1985. An introduction to functional grammar. London: Edward Arnold.
  • Levinson, Stephen. 1983. Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Prince, Ellen. 1985. “On the given/new distinction.” Papers from the 15th Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society. pp. 267–78.
  • Quirk, Randolph, Sidney, Greenbaum, Geoffrey, Leech, & Jan Svartvik. 1985. A comprehensive grammar of the English language. London: Longman.
  • Radford, Andrew. 1988. Transformational grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Rivero, Maria Luisa. 1980. On left-dislocation and topicalization in Spanish. In Linguistic Inquiry, 11: 362–63.
  • Sacks, H., Schegloff, Emmanuel & G. Jefferson. 1974. A simplest systematics for the organisation of turn-taking in conversation. Language 50. 696–735.
  • Schiffrin, Deborah. 1987. Discourse markers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

REFERENCE

  • Cassidy, F. G. and Le Page, R. B. 1967 (1980). Dictionary of Jamaican English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

REFERENCES

  • Ashton, Ethel O. 1944. Swahili grammar. London: Longmans.
  • Contini-Morava, Ellen. 1989. Discourse pragmatics and semantic categorization. The case of negation and tense-aspect with special reference to Swahili. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
  • Drolc, Ursula. 1992. “On the perfect in Swahili,” In AAP (Afrikanistische Arbeitspapiere, 29.) Köln. pp. 63–87.
  • Polomé, Edgar C. 1967. Swahili language handbook. Washington, D.C.: Center for Applied Linguistics.
  • Sacleux, Charles. 1909. Grammaire Swahilie. Paris.
  • Wald, Benji. 1973. Variation in the system of tense marker of Mombasa Swahili. Ann Arbor: University Microfilms International.
  • Zawawi, Sharifa. 1967. An appraisal of the present tense in Swahili and a new formulation. Columbia University M.A. thesis.

REFERENCES

  • Beekman, John, John Callow, and Michael Kopesec. 1981. The semantic structure of written communication. Dallas: Summer Institute of Linguistics.
  • Callow, Kathleen. Forthcoming. Man and message.
  • van Dijk, Teun A. and J&acutenos S. Petöfi (eds.) 1977. Grammars and descriptions: Studies in text theory and text analysis. Research in Text Theory, 1. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
  • Grimes, Joseph E. 1975. The thread of discourse. The Hague: Mouton.
  • Hwang, Shin Ja J. 1989. “Recursion in the paragraph as a unit of discourse development”. Discourse processes. 12: 461–77.
  • Hwang, Shin Ja J. 1992. “Analyzing a hortatory text with special attention to particle, wave, and field”. The Eighteenth LACUS Forum 1991. Ed. Ruth M. Brend. Lake Bluff, IL: Linguistic Association of Canada and the United States. pp. 133–46.
  • Pike, Kenneth L. 1982. Linguistic concepts: An introduction to tagmemics. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.

REFERENCES

  • Lehmann, W. P. 1974. Proto-Indo-European syntax. Austin: University of Texas Press.
  • Meillet, A. 1953. Introduction à l'étude comparative des langues indo-européennes. Paris: Hachette, (reprint of 8th edition, 1937)
  • Schmalstieg, W. R. 1980. Indo-European linguistics. A new synthesis. University Park and London: Pennsylvania State University Press.
  • Shields, K. C. 1980. ‘Some speculations about the early Indo-European verb’. Word 31. 259–74.
  • Shields, K. C. 1982. Indo-European noun inflection: A developmental history. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.