REFERENCES
- Bickerton, Derek. 1975. “Some assertions about presuppositions about pronominalization.” Papers from the parasession on funciionalism. Ed. Robin E. Grossman et al. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society. pp. 24–35.
- Bolinger, Dwight. 1961. “Contrastive accent and contrastive stress.” Language 37: 83–96.
- Bolinger, Dwight. 1971. The phrasal verb in English. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
- Carden, Guy. 1982. “Backwards anaphora in discourse context.” Journal of linguistics 18: 361–87.
- Chafe, Wallace. 1976. “Givenness, contrastiveness, definiteness, subjects, topics, and point of view.” Subject and topic. Ed. Charles N. Li. New York: Academic Press. pp. 25–55.
- Erades, P. A. 1961. “Points of modern English syntax, XL.” English studies 42: 56–60.
- Firbas, Jan. 1966. “Non-thematic subjects in contemporary English.” Travaux linguistiques de Prague. Vol. 2. University, AL: University of Alabama Press. pp. 239–56.
- Fox, Barbara. 1987. Discourse structure and anaphora. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Härmä, Jni. 1987. “La cataphore pronominale en français.” Neophilologica Fennica (Mémoires de la Société Néophilogique de Helsinki) XLV. Helsinki: Société Néophilologique. pp. 53–69.
- Kesik, Marek. 1989. La cataphore. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
- Keenan, Edward. 1971. “Two kinds of presupposition in natural language.” Studies in linguistic semantics. Ed. Charles J. Fillmore and D. Terence Langendoen. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston. pp. 45–52.
- Kuno, Susumu. 1972. “Functional sentence perspective: a case study from Japanese and English.” Linguistic inquiry 3: 269–320.
- Kuno, Susumu. 1975. “Three perspectives in the functional approach to syntax.” Papers from the parasession on functionalism. Ed. Robin E. Grossman et al. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society. pp. 276–336.
- Petrovitz, Walter. 1990. “Argument opacity.” Ph.D. diss.. Graduate Center of the City University of New York.
- Prince, Ellen F. 1981. “Toward a taxonomy of given-new information.” Radical pragmatics. Ed. Peter Cole. New York: Academic Press. pp. 223–55.