Mothers, lies, and bachelors: A brief reply to Wierzbicka (1990)

REFERENCES

• Barsalou, Lawrence W. 1993. “Flexibility, structure, and linguistic vagary in concepts: Manifestations of a compositional system of perceptual symbols.” Theories of memory. Eds., Alan Collins, Susan E. Gathercole, Martin A. Conway, and Peter E. Morris. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. pp. 29–101.
   Google Scholar
• Coleman, Linda and Paul Kay. 1981. “Prototype semantics: The English word lie.” Language 57:26–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coseriu, Eugenio. 1990. “Semántica estructural y semántica ‘cognitiva’.” Profesor Francisco Marsàl Jornadas de filología. Barcelona: Publicacions Universitat de Barcelona. pp. 239–282.
   Google Scholar
• Fillmore, Charles J. 1975. “An alternative to checklist theories of meaning.” Berkeley linguistics society 1:123–31.
   Google Scholar
• Fillmore, Charles J.. 1982. “Towards a descriptive framework for spatial deixis.” Speech, place, and action: Studies in deixis and related topics. eds. Robert J. Jarvella and Wolfgang Klein. Chichester, England: John Wiley and Sons. pp. 31–59.
   Google Scholar
• Fillmore, Charles J. 1985. “Frames and the semantics of understanding.” Quaderni di semantica 6:222–54.
   Google Scholar
• Grice, H. Paul. 1975. “Logic and conversation.” Syntax and semantics, Vol. 3: Speech acts. Ed. Peter and Cole and Jerry L. Morgan. New York: Academic Press. pp. 41–58.
   Google Scholar
• Grice, H.. 1989. Studies in the way of words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Haiman, John. 1980. “Dictionaries and encyclopedias.” Lingua 50:329–57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hudson, Richard. 1995. “Identifying the linguistic foundations for lexical research and dictionary design.” Automating the lexicon: research and practice in a multilingual environment. eds. Donald E. Walker, Antonio Zampolli and Nicoletta Calzolari. Oxford: Oxford University Press. pp. 21–51.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, Mark. 1993. Moral imagination: Implications of cognitive science for ethics. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kleiber, Georges. 1990. La sémantique du prototype (Catégories et sens lexical). Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
   Google Scholar
• Lakoff, George. 1986a. “Classifiers as a reflection of the mind.” Noun classes and categorization. Ed. Colette Craig. Amsterdam: John Benjamins pp. 13–51.
   Google Scholar
• Colette Craig 1986b. “The meanings of literal.” Metaphor and symbolic activity 1:291–96.
   Google Scholar
• Colette Craig 1987a. “Cognitive models and prototype theory.” Concepts and conceptual development: Ecological and intellectual factors in categorization. Ed. Ulric Neisser. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 63–100.
   Google Scholar
• Colette Craig 1987b. Women, fire, and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Langacker, Ronald W. 1987. Foundations of cognitive grammar, Vol. I: Theoretical prerequisites. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Langacker, Ronald W.. 1990. Concept, image, and symbol: The cognitive basis of grammar. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Langacker, Ronald W.. 1991. Foundations of cognitive grammar, Vol. II: Descriptive application. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mondry, Henrietta and John R. Taylor. 1992. “On lying in Russian.” Language and communication 12:133–43.
   Google Scholar
• Rosch, Eleanor. 1977. “Human categorization.” Studies in cross-cultural psychology, Vol. 1. Ed. Neil Warren. New York: Academic Press. pp. 1–49.
   Google Scholar
• Rosch, Eleanor.. 1978. “Principles of categorization.” Cognition and categorization. Ed. Eleanor Rosch and Barbara B. Lloyd. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. pp. 27–48.
   Google Scholar
• Sweetser, Eve E. 1987. “The definition of lie: An examination of the folk models underlying a semantic prototype.” Cultural models in language and thought. eds. Dorothy Holland and Naomi Quinn., Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 43–66.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, John R. 1995. Linguistic categorization: Prototypes in linguistic theory. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ungerer, Friedrich and Hans-Joerg Schmid. 1996. An Introduction to cognitive linguistics. Harlow: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Wierzbicka, Anna. 1990. ‘“Prototypes save’: On the uses and abuses of the notion of ‘prototype’ in linguistics and related fields.” Meanings and prototypes: Studies in linguistic categorization. Ed. Savas L. Tsohatzidis. London: Routledge. pp. 347–67.
   Google Scholar