288
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Reviews

Reviews

, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , & show all
Pages 249-325 | Published online: 15 May 2015

REFERENCES

  • Abraham, Elyse K. 1995. “Rhetorical devices, markedness, and the prominence strategy: A study in the information management strategies used in discourse processing.” Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation. University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.
  • Garvin, P. 1964. Prague School reader in esthetics, literary structure and style. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press.
  • Vachek, J. 1966. The linguistic school of Prague: An introduction to its theory and practice. Bloomington, Ind.: Indiana University Press.

REFERENCES

  • Abraham, Elyse K. 1995. “Rhetorical devices, markedness, and the prominence strategy: A study in the information management strategies used in discourse processing. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation.” University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.
  • van Eemeren, Frans H. and Rob Grootendorst. 1984. Speech acts in argumentative discussions—A theoretical model for the analysis of discussions directed towards solving conflicts of opinion. Dordrecht-Holland/Cinnaminson: Foris Publications.
  • Labov, William and David Fanshel. 1977. Therapeutic discourse. Psychotherapy as conversation. New York: Academic Press.
  • Sinclair, John M. and Malcolm Coulthard. 1975. Towards an analysis of discourse. London: Oxford University Press.

REFERENCES

  • Koerner, E. F. Konrad, ed. 1995. Mikolaj Kruszewski. Writings in general linguistics. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
  • Kruszewski, Mikolaj [Habdank]. 1879a. “Nabjudenija nad nekotorymi fonetičeskimi javlenijami svjazannymi s akcentuaciej [Observations on certain phonetic phenomena connected with accentuation].” UČenyja zapiski imperatorskago Kazanskago Universiteta 1879. pp. 93–114.
  • Kruszewski, Mikolaj [Habdank].. 1879b. “Ob ‘analogii’ i ‘narodnoj etimologii’ (‘Volksetymologie’) [On ‘analogy’ and ‘folk etymology’ (‘Volksetymologie’)]”. Russkij filologičeskij vestnik 2.3. 109–22.
  • Kruszewski, Mikolaj [Habdank].. 1881. K voprosu o gune: lssledovanie v oblasti staroslavjanskogo vokalizma [On the question of the guna: A study in the domain of Old Slavic vocalism], Russkij filologičeskij vestnik 5:1.1–109. (English transl, by Robert Austerlitz in Koerner 1995).
  • Kruszewski, Mikolaj [Habdank].. 1883. Očerk nauki o jazyke [An outline of the science of language], Učenye zapiski imperatorskago Kazanskago Universiteta 50:1 (German transl., 1884–90; English transl. by Gregory M. Eramian in Koerner 1995).

REFERENCES

  • Gyarmathi, Sámuel. 1799. Affinitas linguae Hungaricae cum linguis Fennicae originis grammatice demonstrata. Göttingen: Joann. Christan Dieterich. (Photolithic reproduction of Second edition 1968, ed. by Thomas A. Sebeok, (Ural and Altaic Series, 95.) Bloomington: Indiana University; The Hague: Mouton.) (English translation. 1983. Grammatical proof of the affinity of the Hungarian language with languages of Fennic origin, translated, annotated, and introduced by Victor E. Hanzeli. [Amsterdam Classics in Linguistics, 15.] Amsterdam: John Benjamins.)
  • Hoenigswald, Henry M. 1990. “Descent, perfection and the comparative method since Leibniz.” Leibniz, Humboldt, and the origins of comparativism. Eds. Tullio de Mauro and Lia Formigari. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. pp. 119–32.
  • Schlözer, August Ludwig von. 1768. Probe russischer Annalen. Bremen and Göttingen.
  • Stipa, Günter Johannes. 1990. Finnisch-ugrische Sprachforschung. Helsinki: Suomalais-Ugrilainen Seura.

REFERENCES

  • Bailey, Charles James N. 1973. Variation and linguistic theory. Washington, D. C.: Center for Applied Linguistics.
  • Bailey, Charles James N.. 1985. “Toward principles governing the progress of phonetological development.” Developmental mechanisms. Eds. C. J. N. Bailey and R. Harris. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
  • Bailey, Charles James N. In press. Essays on time-based linguistic analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Battistella, Edwin, 1992. Markedness. The evaluative superstructure of language. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
  • Faingold, Eduardo D. 1990. “The acquisition of syllabic and word structure: Individual differences and universal constraints.” Language sciences 12:101–3.
  • Faingold, Eduardo D.. 1995. “The emergence of the article system in language acquisition, creolization, and history: A universal hierarchy of natural morphological markedness.” The development of morphological systematicity: A cross-linguistic perspective. Eds. H. Pishwa and K. Maroldt. Tübingen: Gunter Narr.
  • Faingold, Eduardo D. 1996a. “Variation in the application of natural processes: Language-dependent constraints in the phonological acquisition of bilingual children.” Journal of psycholinguistic research 25:515–26.
  • Faingold, Eduardo D. 1996b. Child language, creolization, and historical change. Spanish in contact with Portuguese. Tübingen: Gunter Narr.
  • Givón, Talmy. 1984. Syntax: A functional-typological introduction. Vol 1. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
  • Givón, Talmy.. 1991. Syntax: A functional-typological introduction. Vol 2. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
  • Givón, Talmy. 1995. Functionalism and grammar. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
  • Greenberg, Joseph H. 1966a. Language universals. The Hague: Mouton.
  • Greenberg, Joseph H.. 1966b. Synchronic and diachronic universals in phonology. Language 42:508–17.
  • Greenberg, Joseph H. 1978. “Some generalizations concerning initial and final consonants.” Universals of human language. Vol. 2. Ed. Joseph H. Greenberg Stanford: Stanford University Press.
  • Hoenigswald, Henry M. 1960. Language change and linguistic reconstruction. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Jakobson, Roman. 1968. Child language, aphasia, and phonological universals. The Hague: Mouton.
  • Jespersen, Otto. 1949. A Modern English grammar on historical principles. Part 1: Sounds and spelling. London: George Allen and Unwin.
  • Kiparsky, Paul. 1982.Explanation in phonology. Dordrecht: Foris.
  • Labov, William. 1966. The social stratification of English in New York City. Washington, D.C.: Center for Applied Linguistics.
  • Labov, William.. 1980. “The social origins of sound change.” Locating language in time and space. Ed. William Labov. New York: Academic Press.
  • Labov, William. 1990. The intersection of sex and social class in the course of linguistic change. Language variation and change 2:205–54.
  • Labov, William, Malcah Yaeger and Richard Steiner. 1972. A quantitative study of sound change in progress. Philadelphia: U.S. Regional Survey.
  • Mayerthaler, Wili. 1988. Natural morphology. Ann Arbor, MI: Karoma.
  • Mühlh äusler, Peter. 1986. Pidgin and creole linguistics. Oxford: Blackwell.
  • Trubetzkoy, Nikolai. 1969. Principles of phonology. Berkeley: University of California Press.
  • Weinreich, Uriel, William Labov, and Marvin Herzog. 1968. “Empirical foundations for a theory of language change.” Directions for historical linguistics. Eds. W. Lehmann and Y. Malkiel. Austin: University of Texas Press.

REFERENCES

  • Martin Hinds and El-Said Mohammed Badawi. 1986. A dictionary of Egyptian Arabic. Beirut: Librairie du Liban.
  • Retsö, Jan. 1983. The finite passive voice in Modern Arabic dialects. (Orientalia Gothoburgensia, 7.) Göteborg: Acta Universitatis Gothoburgensis.

REFERENCES

  • Davis, Hayley. 1996. “Theorizing women's and men's language.” Language & communication 16:71–9.
  • Dinneen, Francis P. 1967. An introduction to general linguistics. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.
  • Hymes, Dell H. 1972. “On communicative competence.” In Pride and Holmes (eds.) 1972:269–93.
  • Kaye, Alan S. 1991. “Is English diglossie?” English today 7:8–14.
  • Kaye, Alan S. 1994. “Formal vs. informal in Arabic: diglossia, triglossia, tetraglossia, etc., poly- glossia-multiglossia viewed as a continuum.” Zeitschrift für arabische Linguistik 27:47–66.
  • Leslau, Wolf. 1962. “‘Yes’ and ‘no’ in the Ethiopian languages.” Language 38:147–8.
  • Pride, J. B. and Janet Holmes, eds. 1972. Sociolinguistics. Harmondsworth, Middlesex: Penguin.
  • Tannen, Deborah. 1994. Gender and discourse. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

REFERENCES

  • Hogg, R. M. 1992a. “Phonology and morphology.” The Cambridge history of the English language. I, The beginnings to 1066. Ed. R. M. Hogg. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 67–167.
  • Hogg, R. M. 1992b. A grammar of Old English. Volume 1. Phonology. Oxford: Blackwell.
  • Lass, R. 1976. English phonology and phonological theory. Synchronic and diachronic studies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Lass, R. 1992. “Phonology and morphology.” The Cambridge History of the English Language. II, 1066–1476. Ed. N. F. Blake. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Lass, R. 1994. Old English: a historical linguistic companion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

REFERENCES

  • Fillmore, Charles J. 1968. “The case for case.” Universals of linguistic theory. Eds. Emmon Bach and Robert T. Harms. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
  • Fowkes, Robert A. 1994. “The International Linguistic Association: a subjective history.” WORD 45:1–17.
  • Greenberg, Joseph H. 1994. “The influence of WORD and the Linguistic Circle of New York on my intellectual development”. WORD 45:19–26.
  • Hawkins, John A. 1986. A comparative typology of English and German: Unifying the contrasts. London: Croom Helm.
  • Vachek, Josef, ed. 1983. Praguiana. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.

REFERENCES

  • Denison, David. 1993. English historical syntax: Verbal constructions. Longman: London.
  • Fisiak, Jacek, ed. 1984. Historical syntax. Trends in Linguistics / Studies and Monographs, 23. Berlin: Mouton.
  • Harris, Alice C. and Lyle Campbell. 1995. Historical syntax in cross-linguistic perspective. Cambridge Studies in Linguistics, 74. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Rydén, Mats and Sverker Brorströ m. 1987. The be/have variation with intransitives in English. With special reference to the late modern period. Stockholm Studies in English, 70. Stockholm: Almqvist and Wiksell.

REFERENCES

  • Lehmann, Winfred P. 1986. Gothic etymological dictionary. Leiden: E. J. Brill.
  • Specht, Franz. 1949. “Zum sakralen u.” Die Sprache 1:43–9.

REFERENCES

  • Archangeli, Diana and Douglas Pulleyblank. 1994. Grounded phonology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Delattre, P., A. M. Liberman, F. S. Cooper, and L. J. Gerstman. 1952. “An experimental study of the acoustic determinants of vowel color; observations on one- and two-formant vowels synthesized from spectrographic patterns.” WORD 24:195–210.
  • Petersen, J. E., P. T. Fox, M. I. Posner, M. Mintun and M. E. Raichle. 1988. “Positron emission tomographic studies of the cortical anatomy of single-word processing.” Nature 331:585–9.
  • Trask, R. L. 1995. “Basque and Déné-Caucasian: A critique from the Basque side.” Mother tongue 1:3–82.

REFERENCES

  • Abbi, Anvita. 1992. Reduplication in South Asian languages: an areal, typological and historical study. New Delhi: Allied Publishers.
  • D'Souza, Jean. 1991. “Echos in a sociolinguistic area.” Language sciences 13:289–99.

REFERENCES

  • Anttila, Raimo. 1992. “Historical explanation and historical linguistics.” Explanation in historical linguistics. Eds. G. Davis and G. Iverson. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
  • Harris, Randy Allen. 1993. The linguistics wars. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Postal, Paul. 1988. “Advances in linguistic rhetoric.” Natural language and linguistic theory 6:129–37.
  • Sidwell, Paul. 1995. Review of The linguistics wars, by Randy Allen Harris. Dhumbadji! Journal for the history of language 2.3.

REFERENCES

  • Hayes, Bruce, 1989. “Compensatory lengthening in moraic phonology.” Linguistic inquiry 20:253–306.
  • Kisseberth, Charles. 1970. “On the functional unity of phonological rules.” Linguistic inquiry 1:291–306.
  • Noske, Roland. 1985. “Syllabification and syllable changing processes in Yawelmani.” Advances in non-linear phonology. Eds. H. van der Hülst and N. Smith. Dordrecht: Foris. 335–361.
  • Noske, Roland. 1988. “La syllabification et les règles de changement de syllabe en français.” La phonologie du schwa français. Ed. S. P. Verluyten. Amsterdam: Benjamins. pp. 43–88.
  • Noske, Roland. 1996a. “Is French optimal? A question concerning phonological process order.” Current trends in phonology. Eds. J. Durand and B. Laks. Salford: University of Salford Publications, and Paris: CNRS.
  • Noske, Roland. 1996b. “Differentiation of underlying forms versus morphological specification in phonological grammar.” Manuscript. University of Leiden and HIL.
  • Phelps, Elaine. 1975. “Iteration and disjunctive domains in phonology.” Linguistic analysis 1:137–72.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.