REFERENCES
- Andersen, H. 1972. “Diphthongization.” Language 48:11–50.
- Ariel, M. 1994. “Interpreting anaphoric expressions: A cognitive versus a pragmatic approach.” Journal of linguistics 30:3–12.
- de Weck, G. and B. Schneuwly. 1994. “Anaphoric procedures in four text types written by children.” Discourse processes 17:465–77.
- du Bois, J. W. 1985. “Competing motivations.” In Haiman 1985:343–66.
- Fox, B. A. 1986. “Local patterns and general principles in cognitive processes: Anaphora in written and conversational English.” TEXT 6:25–51.
- Givon, Talmy. 1985. “Iconicity, isomorphism and non-arbitrary coding in syntax.” In Haiman 1985: 187–219.
- Givon, Talmy.. 1989. Mind, code and context. Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
- Greenberg, Joseph H. 1985. “Some iconic relationships among place, time, and discourse deixis.” In Haiman 1985:271–88.
- Gundel, J. K. et al. 1993. “Cognitive status and the form of referring expressions in discourse.” Language 69:274–307.
- Haiman, J., ed. 1985. Iconicity in syntax. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
- Huang, Y. 1994. The syntax and pragmatics of anaphora: A study with special reference to Chinese. New York: Cambridge University Press.
- Johnson-Laird, P. N. 1983. Mental models. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
- Kress, G. R. 1979. Language as ideology. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
- Langacker, Ronald W. 1985. “Observations and speculations on subjectivity.” In Haiman 1985: 109–50.
- Langacker, Ronald W.. 1987. Foundations of cognitive grammar. Theoretical prerequisites. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
- Langacker, Ronald W. 1991. Foundations of cognitive grammar. Descriptive applications. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
- Levinson, S. 1991. “Pragmatic reduction of the binding conditions revisited.” Journal of linguistics 27:107–61.
- Li, C. and S. Thompson. 1979. “Third-person pronouns and zero anaphora in Chinese discourse.” Syntax and semantics. Vol. 12. Ed. Talmy Givon. New York: Academic Press. pp. 311–35.
- Light, L. L. et al. 1994. Comprehension and use of anaphoric devices in young and older adults.” Discourse processes 18:77–104.
- Pu, Mingming. 1997. “Zero anaphora and grammatical relations in Mandarin.” Grammatical relations: Typological studies in language. Ed. Talmy Givon. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. pp. 281–321.
- Saussure, Ferdinand. 1974 (1916). Course in general linguistics. Tr. Wade Baskin. London: Peter Owen.
- Tomlin, R. 1987. “Linguistic reflections of cognitive events.” Coherence and grounding in discourse. Ed. R. Tomiin. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
- Tomlin, R. and Mingming Pu. 1991. “The management of reference in Mandarin discourse.” Cognitive linguistics 2(1):65–93.
- Tyler, K. L. and W. Marslen-Wilson. 1982. “The resolution of discourse anaphors: Some on-line studies.” TEXT 2:263–91.
- van Hoek, K. 1995. “Conceptual reference points: A cognitive grammar account of pronominal anaphora constraints.” Language 71:310–40.
- Ward, G. et al. 1991. “A pragmatic analysis of so-called anaphoric islands.” Language 67:439–73.
- Xiong, Xueliang. 1991. “A macro-stylistic analysis of English world-service radio news.” Ph. D. Dissertation. University of Amsterdam.
- Xiong, Xueliang.. 1993. “Cognitive science and linguistics.” Foreign language teaching and research 3:22–9.
- Xiong, Xueliang. 1996a. “Towards a unilateral model of inference.” Journal of contemporary foreign languages 2:1–8; 3:12–19.
- Xiong, Xueliang. 1996b. “Pragmatics and cognitive contexts.” Journal of foreign languages 3:1–8.
- Zipf, G. K. 1965 (1949). Human behavior and the principle of least effort: An introduction to human ecology. New York: Hafner Publishing Co.
- Zribi-Hetz, A. 1989. “Anaphor binding and narrative point of view: English reflexive pronouns in sentence and discourse.” Language 65:695–727.