Some reflections on Systemic Functional Grammar: With a focus on Theme

REFERENCES

• Allerton, David J. 1978. “The notion of ‘givenness’ and its relations to presupposition and to theme.” Lingua 44:133–68.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bazell, C. E. 1973. Review of J. Lyons, ed., New horizons in linguistics. Journal of linguistics 9:198–202.
   Google Scholar
• Berry, Margaret. 1982. Review of Language as social semiotic, by M. A. K. Halliday. Nottingham linguistic circular 11:120–45.
   Google Scholar
• Berry, Margaret, Christopher S. Butler and Robin Fawcett, eds. 1996. Meaning and form: Systemic functional interpretations. Norwood, N. J.: Ablex.
   Google Scholar
• Bloor, Meriel and Thomas Bloor. 1996. The functional analysis of English. A Hallidayan approach. London: Edward Arnold.
   Google Scholar
• Boomer, D. S. 1965. “Hesitation and grammatical encoding.” Language and speech 8:148–58.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brazil, D., M. Coulthard and C. Johns. 1980. Discourse intonation and language teaching. London: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, Gillian and George Yule. 1983. Discourse analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Butler, Christopher S. 1982. “The directive function of English modals.” Ph. D. dissertation, University of Nottingham.
   Google Scholar
• Butler, Christopher S.. 1985. Systemic linguistics: Theory and applications. London: Batsford Academic and Educational.
   Google Scholar
• Butler, Christopher S. 1988. “Pragmatics and systemic linguistics.” Journal of pragmatics 12:83–102.
   Google Scholar
• Chafe, Wallace L. 1976. “Givenness, contrastiveness, definiteness, subjects, topics and point of view.” Subject and topic. Ed. C. Li. New York: Academic Press. 1976. pp. 26–56.
   Google Scholar
• Creiden, C. 1978. “Anaphora in Kalenjin.” Anaphora in discourse. Ed. J. Hinds. Current inquiry into language and linguistics, 22. pp. 180–222.
   Google Scholar
• Dahl, Östen. 1976. “What is new information?” Reports on text linguistics: Approaches to word order. Eds. N.E. Enkvist and V. Kohonen. Meddelanden från Stifteisens för Åbo Akademi Forskningsinstitut no. 8. Åbo/Turku. pp. 37–50.
   Google Scholar
• Daneš, František. 1964. “A three level approach to syntax.” Travaux Linguistiques de Prague 1:225–40.
   Google Scholar
• Daneš, František. 1974a. Papers on functional sentence perspective. The Hague: Mouton.
   Google Scholar
• Daneš, František. 1974b. “Functional sentence perspective and the organisation of the text.” Papers on functional sentence perspective. Ed. F. Daneš. The Hague: Mouton. pp. 106–28.
   Google Scholar
• Davies, Martin. 1998. “Wording without meaning and meaning without wording. Theme, information, and non-prosodic cohesion.” Paper presented at the 25th International Systemic Functional Congress, at University of Cardiff, 13th-18th July.
   Google Scholar
• Davison, Alice and Richard Lutz 1985. “Measuring syntactic complexity relative to discourse context.” Natural language parsing. Eds. R. O., Dowty, L. Kartunen and A. M. Zwicky. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 26–66.
   Google Scholar
• De Beaugrande, R. and Wolfgang U. Dressier. 1981. Introduction to text linguistics. London: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Dik, Simon C. 1978. Functional grammar. Amsterdam: North Holland.
   Google Scholar
• Dik, Simon C.. 1980. Studies in functional grammar. London and New York: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dik, Simon C. 1997. The theory of functional grammar. Parts 1 and 2. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Downing, Angela. 1990. “Sobre el tema tópico en Inglés.” Revista Española de Lingüística Aplicada. Anejo I.
   Google Scholar
• Downing, Angela.. 1991. “An alternative approach to theme: A systemic-functional perspective.” WORD 42.2:119–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fawcett, Robin P. 1973a. Systemic functional grammar in a cognitive model of language. Mimeographed. London: University College, London.
   Google Scholar
• Fawcett, Robin P. 1973b. Generating a sentence in systemic functional grammar. Mimeographed. London: University College, London.
   Google Scholar
• Fawcett, Robin P. 1980. Cognitive linguistics and social interaction: Towards an integrated model of a systemic functional grammar and the other components of a communicating mind. Heidelberg: Julius Groos Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Fiibas, Jan. 1964. “On defining theme in functional sentence analysis.” Travaux Linguistiques de Prague 1:267–80.
   Google Scholar
• Fiibas. 1974. “Some aspects of the Czechoslovak approach to problems of functional sentence perspective.” Papers on functional sentence perspective. Ed. F. Daneš. The Hague: Mouton. pp. 11–37.
   Google Scholar
• Foley, William A. and Robert D. Van Valin, Jr. 1984. Functional syntax and universal grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fries, Peter H. 1983. “On the status of theme in English: Arguments from discourse.” Micro and macro connexity of texts. Eds. J. S. Petöfi and E. SÖzer. Papiere zu Textlinguistik, 45. Hamburg: Buske Verlag. pp. 116–52.
   Google Scholar
• Fronek, J. 1983. “Some criticisms of Halliday's ‘Information Systems’.” Lingua 60:311–29.
   Google Scholar
• Givón, Talmy. 1993. English grammar. Vol. 2. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Goldman-Eisler, F. 1972. “Pauses, clauses, sentences.” Language and speech 15:103–13.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GÓmez-González, María Ángeles. 1994. “The relevance of theme in the textual organisation of BBC news reports.” WORD 45:3. 293–305.
   Google Scholar
• GÓmez-González, María Ángeles.. 1996a. “A corpus-based approach to theme in Present-Day British English. Towards an alternative moderate functionalist interpretation.” Ph. D. dissertation, University of Santiago de Compostela.
   Google Scholar
• GÓmez-González, María Ángeles. 1996b. “Theme: Topic or discourse framework? Miscelanea 17:123–40.
   Google Scholar
• GÓmez-González, María Ángeles. 1997. “A contrastive critique of topic and theme in Functional Grammar (FG) and Systemic Functional Grammar (SFG).” RESLA 10.
   Google Scholar
• GÓmez-González, María Ángeles. 1998 “A corpus-based analysis of extended multiple themes in PresE.” International journal of corpus linguistics 3.1:81–114.
   Google Scholar
• GÓmez-González, María Ángeles. 2000. The theme-topic interface: Evidence from English. Amsterdam and New York: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Gundel, Janette. K. 1974. ‘The role of topic and comment in linguistic theory.” Ph. D. dissertation, University of Texas.
   Google Scholar
• Gundel, Janette, K. 1988. “Universals of topic-comment structure.” Studies in syntactic typology. Eds. M. E. Hammond, A. Moravcsik and J. R. Wirth. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. pp. 209–33.
   Google Scholar
• Halliday, M. A. K. 1964. “Syntax and the consumer.” In C. I. J. M. Report of the fifteenth annual (first international) round table meeting on linguistic and language study. Monograph series in language and linguistics, 17. Washington D. C.: Georgetown University Press. pp. 11–24.
   Google Scholar
• Halliday, M. A. K. 1967a. “Notes on transitivity and theme in English, part I.” Journal of linguistics 3:199–244.
   Google Scholar
• Halliday, M. A. K. 1967b. Intonation and grammar in British English. The Hague: Mouton.
   Google Scholar
• Halliday, M. A. K. 1968. “Notes on transitivity and theme in English, part 3.” Journal of linguistics 4:179–215.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halliday, M. A. K. 1970. “Language structure and language function.” New horizons in linguistics. Vol. 1.Ed. John Lyons. Harmondsworth: Penguin. pp. 140–65.
   Google Scholar
• Halliday, M. A. K. 1972. Towards a sociological semantics. Working papers and prebublications, 14. Urbino: Centro internazionale di semiotica e di linguistica, University of Urbino.
   Google Scholar
• Halliday, M. A. K. 1974. “The place of ‘functional sentence perspective’ in the system of linguistic description.” Papers on functional sentence perspective. Ed. F. Daneš. The Hague: Mouton. pp. 43–53.
   Google Scholar
• Halliday, M. A. K. 1977. “Text as semantic choice in social contexts.” Research in text theory. Vol 1. Grammars and descriptions. Eds. T.A. Van Dijk and J.S. Petöfi. New York: Walter de Gruyter. pp. 176–225.
   Google Scholar
• Halliday, M. A. K. 1978. Language as social semiotic: The social interpretation of language and meaning. London: Edward Arnold.
   Google Scholar
• Halliday, M. A. K. 1979. “Modes of meanings and modes of expression: Types of grammatical structure and their determination by different semantic functions.” Function and context in linguistics analysis: Essays offered to William Haas. Eds. D.J. Allerton et al. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 57–79.
   Google Scholar
• Halliday, M. A. K. 1980a. “Context of situation.” Sophia linguistica 6:4–15.
   Google Scholar
• Halliday, M. A. K. 1980b. “Functions of language.” Sophia linguistica 6:60–74.
   Google Scholar
• Halliday, M. A. K. 1994. An introduction to functional grammar. 2nd. ed. London: Edward Arnold.
   Google Scholar
• Halliday, M. A. K. and Jim R. Martin. 1993. Writing science. Literacy and discursive power. London: Palmer Press.
   Google Scholar
• Halliday, M. A. K. and Ruqaiya Hasan. 1976. Cohesion in English. London: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Hasan, Ruqaiya, Carmel Cloran and David G. Butt, eds. 1996. Functional descriptions: Theory and practice. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Hasan, Ruqaiya and Peter H. Fries, eds. 1995. On subject and theme. A discourse functional perspective. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Hengeveld, Kees. 1988. “Illocution, mood and modality in a functional grammar of Spanish.” Journal of semantics 6:227–69.
   Google Scholar
• Hengeveld, Kees.. 1989. “Layers and operators in functional grammar.” Journal of linguistics 25:127–57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hengeveld, Kees. 1990a. “The hierarchical structure of utterances.” Layers and levels of representation in language theory: A functional overview. Eds. J. Nayts et al. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. pp. 1–24.
   Google Scholar
• Hengeveld, Kees. 1990b. “A new architecture for functional discourse grammar.” Paper delivered to the 9th International Conference on Functional Grammar. Madrid: UNED. 7th-9th September.
   Google Scholar
• Huddleston, Rodney D. 1978. Review of Cohesion in English, by M.A.K. Halliday and Ruqaiya Hasan. Lingua 45:335–54
   Google Scholar
• Huddleston, Rodney D.. 1988. “Constituency, multi-functionality and grammaticalization in Halliday's functional grammar.” Journal of linguistics 24:137–74.
   Google Scholar
• Huddleston, Rodney D. 1991. “Further remarks on Halliday's functional grammar: A reply to Mathiessen and Martin.” Occasional papers in systemic linguistics 5:75–129.
   Google Scholar
• Huddleston, Rodney D. 1992. “On Halliday's functional grammar: A reply to Martin and Matthiessen.” Occasional papers in systemic linguistics 6:197–211.
   Google Scholar
• Hudson, Richard. A. 1974. “Systemic generative grammar.” Linguistics 139:5–42.
   Google Scholar
• Hudson, Richard. A. 1984. Word grammar. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Hudson, Richard. A. 1986. “Systemic grammar [A review article].” Linguistics 24:791–815.
   Google Scholar
• Jiménez-Juliá, Tomás. 1986. Aproximación al estudio de las funciones informativas. Málaga: Ágora.
   Google Scholar
• Kempson, Ruth. 1975. Presupposition and the delimitation of semantics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kuno, Susumu. 1975. “Three perspectives in the functional approach to syntax.” Papers from the parasession on functionalism. Eds. R. E. Grossman et al. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society. pp. 276–336.
   Google Scholar
• Lambrecht, Knud. 1988. When subjects behave like topics: Amarkedness analysis of sentence focus constructions across languages. Manuscript. Austin: University of Texas.
   Google Scholar
• Lambrecht, Knud.. 1994. Information structure and sentence form. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Leech, Geoffrey N. 1983. Principles of pragmatics. London: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Lehman, Christian. 1992. “Word order change by grammaticalisation.” Internal and external factors in syntactic change. Eds. D. Stein and M. Gerritsen. Berlin: Mouton. Pp. 395–417.
   Google Scholar
• Lemke, Jay L. 1985. “Ideology, intertextuality and the notion of register.” Systemic functional approaches to discourse, 26. Eds. J. Benson and W.S. Greaves. Norwood, N.J.: Ablex. pp. 275–294.
   Google Scholar
• Lock, Graham. 1996. An introduction to functional English grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mackenzie, J. Lachlan. 1998. “Incremental functional grammar: An application to spoken utterances in English.” Paper delivered to the 8th International Conference on Functional Grammar. Amsterdam: Vrije Universiteit. 6th–11th July.
   Google Scholar
• Mackenzie, J. Lachlan.. 2000. “Forms and functions in the grammar of spoken English.” Paper delivered to the 9th International Conference on Functional Grammar. Madrid: UNED. 7th-9th September.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, James R. 1981. “Conjunction and continuity in Tagalog.” In Halliday, M. A. K. and J. R. Martin, eds. Pp.310–36.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, James R.. 1983. “Participant identification in English, Tagalog and Kàte.” Australian journal of linguistics 3.1. 45–74.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, James R. 1984. “Functional components in a grammar: A review of deployable recognition criteria.” Nottingham linguistic circular 13:35–70.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, James R. 1988. “Grammatical conspiracies in Tagalog: Family, face and fate—with regard to Benjamin Lee Whorf.” Linguistics in a systemic perspective. Eds. J. D. Benson et al. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. pp. 243–300.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, James R. 1990. “Interpersonal grammaticalization: Mood and modality in Tagalog.” Philippine journal of linguistics 21.1.2–51.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, James R. 1992a. English text: System and structure. Philadelphia and Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, James R. 1992b. “Theme, method of development and existentiality: The price of a reply.” Occasional papers in systemic linguistics 6:147–83.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, James R. 1993. “Clitics.” Linguistics. Philippine encyclopedia of the social sciences. Ed. A. González. Quezon City: Philippine Social Science Council. Pp. 237–40.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, James R. 1994. “Macro-genres: The ecology of the page.” Network 21:29–52.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, James R. 1995a. “More than what the message is about: English theme.” Thematic development of English texts. Ed. M. Ghadessy. London: Cassell. pp. 223–58.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, James R. 1995b. “Logical meaning, interdependency and the linking particle (-ng/ -na) in Tagalog.” Functions of language 2.2:189–228.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, James R. 1995c. ‘Text and clause: Fractal resonance.” Text 15.1.5–12.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, James R. 1996a. “Types of structure: Deconstructing notions of constituency…” Computational and conversational discourse. Eds. E. H. Hovy and D. R. Scott. Heidelberg: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, James R. 1996b. “Metalinguistic diversity: The case from case.” Functional descriptions: Theory and Practice. Eds. R. Hasan et al. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. pp. 323–72.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, James R. 1996c. “Transitivity in Tagalog: A functional interpretation of case.” Meaning and form. Eds. M. Berry et al. Norwood, N. J.: Ablex. pp. 229–96.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, James R. 1997. “Analysing genre: Functional parameters.” Genre institutions: Social processes in the workplace and school. Eds. F. Christie and J. R. Martin. London: Cassell. pp. 3–39.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, James R. and Christian M. I. M. Matthiessen. 1991. “Systemic typology and topology.” Literacy in social processes: Papers from the inaugural Australian systemic linguistics conference, held at Deaking University, January 1990. Ed. F. Christie. Darwin: Centre for Studies in Language and Education, Northern Territory University. pp. 345–83.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, James R. and Christian M. I. M. Matthiessen. 1992. “A brief note on Huddleston's reply to Matthiessen and Martin's response to Huddleston's review of Halliday's Introduction to functional grammar.” Occasional papers in systemic linguistics 6:185–96.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, James R. and P. Peters. 1985. “On the analysis of exposition.” Discourse on discourse: Workshop reports from the Macquarie Workshop on discourse analysis. Ed. R. Hasan. Applied Linguistic Association of Australia. Occasional papers 7:61–92.
   Google Scholar
• Mathesius, Vilém. 1939. ‘Tak Zvaném Aktuálním leneni Vetném [On the so-called functional sentence perspective].” Slovo a Slovesnost 5:171–4.
   Google Scholar
• Matthiessen, Christian M. I. M. 1988. “Representational issues in systemic functional grammar.” Linguistics in a systemic perspective. Eds. J. D. Benson et al. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. pp. 87–179.
   Google Scholar
• Matthiessen, Christian M. I. M. 1991. “Language on language: The grammar of semiosis.” Social semiotics 5.1/1:1–32.
   Google Scholar
• Matthiessen, Christian M. I. M. and James R. Martin. 1991. “A response to Huddleston's review of Halliday's Introduction to functional grammar.” Occasional papers in systemic linguistics 5:55–84.
   Google Scholar
• McGregor, William. 1990. “The metafunctional hypothesis and syntagmatic relations.” Occasional papers in systemic linguistics 5:4–50.
   Google Scholar
• Nesbitt, C. and G. Plum. 1988. “Probabilities in a systemic-functional grammar: The clause complex in English.” New developments in systemic linguistics. Vol. 2: Theory and practice. Eds. R. P. Fawcett and D. Young. London: Pinter. pp. 6–38.
   Google Scholar
• Rojo, Guillermo. 1979. “La función sintáctica como forma del significante.” Verba 6:107–51.
   Google Scholar
• Romero-Trillo, Jesús. 1994. “Ahm, Ehm, You Call It Theme?… A thematic approach to spoken English.” Journal of pragmatics 22:495–509.
   Google Scholar
• Siewierska, Anna. 1991. Functional grammar. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Taglicht, Joseph. 1984. Message and emphasis. London and New York: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, L. J. 1996. Linguistic categorisation. 2nd ed. London: Clarendon Press.
   Google Scholar
• van Dijk, Teun A. 1987. “Episodic models in discourse processing.” Comprehending oral and written language. Eds. R. Horowitz and S. J. Samuels. London: Academic Press. pp. 161–96.
   Google Scholar
• Van Valin Jr., Robert D. 1993. “A synopsis of role and reference grammar.” Advances in role and reference grammar. Ed. R. D. Van Valin, Jr. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. pp. 1–164.
   Google Scholar
• Vasconcellos, Muriel. 1992. “The theme as message onset: Its structure and characteristics.” Linguistics 30.1:147–63.
   Google Scholar