208
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Reviews

Reviews

, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , & show all
Pages 95-175 | Published online: 15 May 2015

REFERENCES

  • Einhauser, Eveline. 1989. Die Junggrammatiker: Ein Problem für die Sprachwissenschafts-geschichtsschreibung. Trier: Wissenschaftlicher Verlag Trier.
  • Paul, Hermann. 1880. Principien der Sprachgeschichte. 2nd Ed. Halle: Niemeyer. 1886.
  • Paul, Hermann. 1890. Principles of the History of Language. Tr. Herbert Augustus Strong. New and revised edition. London: Longmans, Green & Co. Reprint 1970: College Park, MD: McGrath.
  • Wundt, Wilhelm. 1908. Logik. Vol. 3: Logik der Geisteswissenschaften. 3rd ed. Stuttgart: Enke.

REFERENCE

  • Willis, R.C. 1971. An essential course in Portuguese. London: Harrap.

REFERENCES

  • Bolinger, Dwight. 1971. The phrasal verb in English. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Duffley, Patrick J. 1992. The English infinitive. London: Longman.
  • Lakoff, George and Mark Johnson. 1980. The metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Lakoff, George. 1987. Women, fire and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the life of the mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Linqvist, Karl-Gunnar. 1978. AT vs ON, IN BY: On the early history of special AT and certain primary ideas distinguishing AT from ON, IN, BY. Stockholm: Almqvist and Wiksell International.

REFERENCES

  • Cheepen, Christine, and James Monaghan. 1990. Spoken English: A practical guide. London, New York: Pinter.
  • Dascal, Marcelo. 1985. “The relevance of misunderstanding.” Eds. Thomas T. Ballmer and Roland Posner. Nach-Chomskysche Linguistik. Berlin and New York: de Gruyter. pp. 194–210.
  • Searle, John R. 1976. “A classification of indirect speech acts.” Language in society 5:1–23.

REFERENCES

  • Cohen, David. 1974. “La forme verbale à marques personnelles préfixées en subarabique moderne.” IV Congresso internazionale di studi etiopici (Roma 1972), II, pp. 63–70.
  • Hetzron, Robert. 1972. Ethiopian Semitic: Studies in classification. (Journal of Semitic studies monograph No. 2.) Manchester: Manchester University Press.
  • Leslau, Wolf. 1951. “Archaic features in South Ethiopic.” Journal of the American Oriental society 71:212–30.
  • Leslau, Wolf. 1979. Etymological dictionary of Gurage. 3 vols. Wiesbaden: Otto Harrassowitz Verlag.

REFERENCES

  • Brewster, E. Thomas and Elizabeth S. Brewster. 1976. Language acquisition made practical: Field methods for language learners. Colorado Springs: Lingua House.
  • Burling, Robbins. 1984. Learning a field language. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press. Gudschinsky, Sarah C. 1967. How to learn an unwritten language. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
  • Healey, Alan. 1975. Language learner's field guide. Ukarumpa, Papua New Guinea: Institute of Linguistics.
  • Samarin, William J. 1967. Field linguistics: A guide to linguistic field work. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

REFERENCES

  • Blau, Joshua. 1976. A grammar of Biblical Hebrew. Wiesbaden: Otto Harrassowitz.
  • Bright, William, ed. 1992. International encyclopedia of linguistics. 4 volumes. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Bybee, Joan, R. Perkins, and W. Pagliuca. 1994. The evolution of grammar: Tense, aspect and modality in the languages of the world. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Comrie, Bernard, ed. 1987. The world's major languages. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • De Caen, V. 1996. “Ewald and Driver on Biblical Hebrew ‘aspect’: Anteriority and the Orientalist framework.” Zeitschrift für Althebraistik 9:129–51.
  • Fischer, Wolfdietrich. 1992. “Arabic.” In Bright (1992:1:91–8).
  • Fischer, Wolfdietrich. 1997. “Classical Arabic.” In Hetzron (1997:187–219).
  • Hetzron, Robert. 1987. “Hebrew.” In Comrie (1987:686–704.)
  • Hetzron, Robert, ed. 1997. The Semitic languages. London: Routledge.
  • Holes, Clive. 1995. Modern Arabic: Structures, functions, and varieties. London: Longman.
  • Joüon, P. and T. Muraoka. 1991. A grammar of Biblical Hebrew. Roma: Pontificio Istituto Biblica.
  • Rubinstein, E. 1980. Contemporary Hebrew and ancient Hebrew (in Hebrew.) Israel: Ministry of Defense.
  • Steiner, Richard C. 1992. “Ancient Hebrew.” In Bright (1992:IV: 110–8).
  • Steiner, Richard C. 1997. “Ancient Hebrew.” In Hetzron (1997:145–73).
  • Von Ewald, G. H. A. 1836. A grammar of the Hebrew language of the Old Testament. Tr. John Nicholson. London: Whittaker.
  • Wright, William. 1859. A grammar of the Arabic language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

REFERENCES

  • Comrie, Bernard. 1985. Tense. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Comrie, Bernard.. 1986. “Tense in indirect speech.” Folia Linguistica 20:265–96.
  • Declerck, Renaat. 1990. “Sequences of tenses in English.” Folia Linguistica 24:513–44.
  • Declerck, Renaat.. 1991. Tense in English: Its structure and use in discourse. London: Routledge.
  • Dik, Simon C. 1989. The theory of functional grammar. Dordrecht: Foris.
  • Sells, Peter. 1986. “Aspects of logophoricity.” Linguistic inquiry. 18. 455–79.
  • Siewierska, Anna. 1991. Functional grammar. New York and London: Routledge.

REFERENCES

  • Dik, Simon C. 1981. Functional grammar. Third Revised Ed. Dordrecht, Holland: Foris Publications.
  • Dik, Simon C. 1989. The theory of Functional Grammar, Part 1: The structure of the clause. Dordrecht, Holland and Providence, RI: Foris Publications.
  • Siewierska, Anna. 1991. Functional grammar. New York and London: Routledge.

REFERENCES

  • Bhat, D. N. S. and M. S. Ningomba. 1997. Manipuri grammar. Munich: Lincom Europa.
  • Chelliah, Shobhana L. 1992. A study of Manipuri grammar. (Unpublished PhD dissertation, University of Texas, Austin).
  • DeLancey, Scott. 1987. “Sino-Tibetan languages.” The world's major languages. Ed. Bernard Comrie. pp. 797–810.
  • Matisoff, James A. 1991. “Sino-Tibetan linguistics: Present state and future prospects.” Annual review of anthropology, 20. pp. 469–504.

REFERENCES

  • Comrie, Bernard. 1981. The languages of the Soviet Union. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Gruzdeva, E. Ju. 1997. “Nivkhskii iazyk [The Nivkh language].” Iazyki mira. Paleoaziatskie iazyki. Ed. A. P. Volodin. Moscow: Indrik. pp. 139–54.
  • Jakobson, Roman. 1971. “Notes on Gilyak.” Roman Jakobson: Selected writings. II: Word and language. The Hague: Mouton. pp. 73–102.
  • Jakobson, Roman, G. Hüttl-Worth, and J. F. Beebe. 1957. Paleosiberian peoples and languages: A bibliographical guide. New Haven, CT: HRAF Press.
  • Kreinovich, E. A. 1934. “Nivkhskii (giliatskii) iazyk [The Nivkh (Gilyak) language].” Iazyki i pis'- mennosti narodov Severa, vol. III. Moscow and Leningrad: Uchpedgiz. pp. 181–222.
  • Kreinovich, E. A.. 1979. “Nivkhskii iazyk [The Nivkh language].” Iazyki Azii i Afriki, vol. III. Moscow: Nauka. pp. 295–329.
  • Panfilov, V. Z. 1962–5. Grammatika nivkhskogo iazyka [Nivkh grammar, 2 vols.]. Moscow and Leningrad: Akademija nauk.
  • Peiros, I.I., and S. A. Starostin. 1986. “O tonakh nivkhskogo iazyka [On Nivkh tones].” Paleoaziatskie iazyki. Ed. P. la. Skorik. Leningrad: Nauka. pp. 213–8.
  • Roon, Tat'iana. 1998. “Lichnyi arkhiv E. A. Kreinovicha [The personal archive of E. A. Kreinovich].” Vestnik Sakhalinskogo muzeia. Ezhegodnik Sakhalinskogo oblastnogo kraevedcheskogo muzeia: 4. Pp. 44–51.

REFERENCES

  • Capell, Arthur and Howard H. H. Coate. 1984. Comparative studies in northern Kimberley languages. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.
  • McGregor, William. 1988. Handbook of Kimberley languages. Vol. 1: general information. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.
  • McGregor, William. 1990. A functional grammar of Gooniyandi. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
  • Ruhlen, Merritt. 1987. A guide to the world's languages. Vol. 1: classification. Stanford, Cal.: Stanford University Press.

REFERENCES

  • Bazzanella, Carla, ed. 1996. Repetition in dialogue. Tübingen: Niemeyer.
  • Ducrot, Oswald et al. 1980. Les mots du discours. Paris: Minuit.
  • Rossari, Corinne. 1994. Les opérations de reformulation. Berne: Peter Lang.
  • Roulet, Eddy et al. 1987. L'articulation du discours en français contemporain. Berne: Peter Lang.
  • Sperber, Dan and Deirdre Wilson. 1986. Relevance: Communication and cognition. Oxford: Blackwell.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.