Native or borrowed, or both—is it possible to have many mothers?

REFERENCES

• Abondolo, Daniel. 1998. “Introduction.” The Uralic languages. Ed. Daniel Abondolo. London and New York: Routledge. pp. 1–42.
   Google Scholar
• Abondolo, Daniel.. 1999. “Architektonik and Uralic Lxica.” In Hasselblatt and Jääsalmi-Krüger, eds. 1999:1–7.
   Google Scholar
• Anttila, Raimo. Forthcoming. “The Indo-European and the Baltic Finnic interface: Time against the ice.” To appear in Time depth in historical linguistics. Eds. Colin Renfrew et al. Cambridge: McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research.
   Google Scholar
• Chafe, Wallace. 1998. “How a historical linguist and a native speaker understand a complex morphology.” Historical linguistics 1997. Selected papers from the 13th International Conference on Historical Linguistics, Düsseldorf, 10–17 August 1997. Ed. by Monika S. Schmid, Jennifer R. Austin, and Dieter Stein. Current Issues in Linguistic Theory, 164. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. pp. 101–16.
   Google Scholar
• Dorian, Nancy C. 1993. “Internally and externally motivated change in language contact settings: Doubts about dichotomy.” Historical linguistics: Problems and perspectives. Ed. Charles Jones. London and New York: Longman. pp. 131–55.
   Google Scholar
• FUF = Finnisch-Ugrische Forschungen. Zeitschrift für finnisch-ugrische Sprach- und Volkskunde. Helsinki: Finno-Ugrian Society, 1901-.
   Google Scholar
• Gallasy, Magdolna. 1999: “Jelzös szerkezetek és a határozottság.” [Attributive constructions and definiteness.] A nyelvtörténeti kutatások újabb eredményei I: Magyar és finnugor mondat- történet. [Recent results of investigations in historical linguistics, Vol. I: Hungarian and Finno-Ugrian historical syntax.] Eds. László B¨ky & Tamás Forgács. Szeged: University of Szeged, Department of Hungarian. pp. 45–52.
   Google Scholar
• Grünthal, Riho. 1997. Livvistä liiviin. Itämerensuomalaiset etnonyymit. (Abstract: The Finnic ethnonyms.) Castrenianumin toimitteita, 51. Helsinki: Finno-Ugrian Society.
   Google Scholar
• Harris, Alice C. and Lyle Campbell. 1995. Historical syntax in cross-linguistic perspective. Cambridge Studies in Linguistics, 74. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hasselblatt, Cornelius and Paula Jääsalmi-Krüger, eds. 1999. Europa et Sibiria. Beiträge zur Sprache und Kultur der kleineren finnougrischen, samojedischen und paläosibirischen Völker. Gedenkband für Wolfgang Veenker. Veröffentlichungen der Societas Uralo-Altaica, 51. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.
   Google Scholar
• Heath, Jeffrey. 1998. “Hermit crabs: Formal renewal of morphology by phonologically mediated affix substitution.” Language 74:728–59.
   Google Scholar
• Helimski, Eugene. 1990. “The external connections and early contacts of the Uralic languages.” Problems of Uralistics. Contributions to the 7th International Congress of Finno-Ugrists. Analytical reviews in two volumes. Vol. I. Eds. Ruth A. Agheyeva et al. Moscow. pp. 19–43.
   Google Scholar
• Helimski, Eugene.. 1995. “Proto-Uralic gradation: Continuation and traces.” Congressus Octavus Internationalis Fenno-Ugristarum. Vol I. Ed. Heikki Leskinen. Jyväskylä. pp. 17–51.
   Google Scholar
• Honti, László. 1997. “Fremdes oder Eigenständiges? Zum historischen Hintergrund der Attributivkongruenz in den uralischen Sprachen.” Finnisch-ugrische Sprachen in Kontakt. Vorträge des Symposiums aus Anlass des 30jährigen Bestehens der Finnougristik an der Rijksuniversiteit Groningen. 21–23 November 1996. Ed. Sirkka-Liisa Hahmo, Tette Hofstra, László Honti, Paul van Linde and Osmo Nikkilä. Maastricht: Shaker. pp. 135–44.
   Google Scholar
• Janhunen, Juha. 1981. “On the structure of Proto-Uralic.” FUF 44:23–14.
   Google Scholar
• Janhunen, Juha.. 1999. “Critical remarks on current Indo-Uralic comparisons.” In Hasselblatt and Jääsalmi-Krüger, eds. 1999:211–5.
   Google Scholar
• Jarva, Vesa. Forthcoming. “Some expressive and borrowed elements in the lexicon of Finnish dialects.” To appear in Ideophones. Papers given at International Symposium of Ideophones, January 25–27, 1999. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Kallio, Petri. 1998. Suomi (ttavia etymologioita). [Suomi and etymologies to be lashed.] Vir. 102:613–20.
   Google Scholar
• Kallio, Petri.. Forthcoming. “Posti's superstrate theory at the threshold of a new millennium.” To appear in: Facing Finnic: Some challenges to historical and contact linguistics. Ed. Johanna Laakso. Castrenianumin toimitteita, 59. Helsinki: Finno-Ugrian Society and Department of Finno-Ugrian Studies, University of Helsinki.
   Google Scholar
• Kangasmaa-Minn, Eeva. 1992. “Pienimuotoinen kieliperimämme.” (Abstract: Our unobtrusive linguistic inheritance.) Sananjalka 34:21–31. (Turku.)
   Google Scholar
• Koivulehto, Jorma. 1993. “Suomi.” Vir. 97:400–8.
   Google Scholar
• Koivulehto, Jorma. 1997. “Were the Baltic Finns ‘clubmen’? On the etymology of some ancient ethnonyms.” You name it. Perspectives on onomastic research. Eds. Ritva Liisa Pitkänen and Kaija Mallat. Studia Fennica Linguistica, 7. Helsinki: Finnish Literature Society. pp. 151–69.
   Google Scholar
• Koivulehto, Jorma. 1998. “Kiire ‘päälaki'ja muuta etymologista rajankäyntiä.” [Kiire ‘crown of the head’ and other problems of etymological demarcation.] Oekeeta asijoo. Commentationes Fenno-Ugricae in honorem Seppo Suhonen sexagenarii. Eds. Riho Grünthal and Johanna Laakso. Mémoires de la Société Finno-Ougrienne, 228. Helsinki: Finno-Ugrian Society. pp. 235–46.
   Google Scholar
• Koivulehto, Jorma.… 1999. Verba mutuata. Quae vestigia antiquissimi cum Germanis aliisque Indo-Europaeis contactus in linguis Fennicis reliquerint. Mémoires de la Société Finno-Ougrienne, 237. Helsinki: Finno-Ugrian Society. [A Festschrift consisting of previously published papers.]
   Google Scholar
• Koponen, Eino. 1997. “Puhdasta puhetta?” [Clean speech?] Vir. 101:440–2.
   Google Scholar
• Koponen, Eino.. 1998. “Millaista oli suomalais-ugrilainen sananmuodostusoppi?” [What was Finno-Ugrian word formation like?] Vir. 102:435–7.
   Google Scholar
• Laakso, Johanna. 1997. “On verbalizing nouns in Uralic.” FUF 54:267–304.
   Google Scholar
• Laakso, Johanna.. Forthcoming. “Development tendencies in Finnic derivation systems.” [Paper presented at an international colloquium Grammaticalisation aréale et sémantique cognitive: les langues fenniques et sames in Paris (CNRS and Sorbonne Nouvelle), April 1999; to be published in a joint volume.]
   Google Scholar
• Lass, Roger. 1997. Historical linguistics and language change. Cambridge Studies in Linguistics, 81. Cambridge: University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Liukkonen, Kari. 1999. Baltisches im Finnischen. Mémoires de la Société Finno-Ougrienne, 235. Helsinki: Finno-Ugrian Society.
   Google Scholar
• Oinas, Felix J. 1960. “Concord in Balto-Finnic and preposition repetition in Russian.” American studies in Uralic linguistics. Uralic and Altaic Series 1. Bloomington. pp. 121–38.
   Google Scholar
• Posti, Lauri. 1954. “From Pre-Finnic to Late Proto-Finnic.” FUF 31:1–91.
   Google Scholar
• Ravila, Paavo. 1960. “Adjektiiviattribuutin kongruenssin synty suomen kielessä.” [The genesis of attribute concord in Finnish.] Sananjalka 2:28–34. (Turku.)
   Google Scholar
• Sammallahti, Pekka. 1998. “Saamic.” The Uralic languages. Ed. Daniel Abondolo. London and New York: Routledge. pp. 43–95.
   Google Scholar
• Sivula, Jaakko. 1989. Lintu soidessa sokea. Suomen murteiden kiimatermistö. [A bird at mating-time is blind. The terms for animal mating-times in Finnish dialects.] Helsinki: Finnish Literature Society.
   Google Scholar
• SKES =Suomen kielen etymologinen sanakirja [Etymological dictionary of the Finnish language.] 1–7. Lexica Societatis Fenno-Ugricae, 12. Helsinki: Finno-Ugrian Society, 1955–1981.
   Google Scholar
• Vir. = Virittäjä. Kotikielen Seuran aikakauslehti. [Journal of the Mother Tongue Society.] Helsinki.
   Google Scholar