Deverbal -er suffixation as the equivalent of the clausal Subject-Finite unit

REFERENCES

• Bauer, Laurie. 1983. English word-formation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Booij, Geert. 1986. “Form and meaning in morphology: the case of Dutch ‘agent nouns’.” Linguistics 24: 503–517.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Booij, Geert. 1992. “Morphology, semantics and argument structure.” Thematic structure. Its role in grammar. Ed. I. M. Roca. Berlin and New York: Foris Publications. Pp. 47–64.
   Google Scholar
• Davidse, Kristin. 1997. “The Subject-Object versus the Agent-Patient asymmetry.” Leuven contributions in linguistics and philology. 86.4: 413–431.
   Google Scholar
• Davidse, Kristin. 1998. “The dative as participant role versus the indirect object. On the need to distinguish two layers of organization.” The dative. Volume 2: Theoretical and contrastive studies. Eds. Willy Van Langendonck and William Van Belle. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Pp. 143–184.
   Google Scholar
• Davidse, Kristin and Liesbet Heyvaert. In press. “On the so-called ‘middle’ construction in English and Dutch.” Empirical approaches to contrastive linguistics and translation studies. Eds. Sylviane Granger, Jacques Lerot and Stephanie Petch-Tyson. Amsterdam: Rodopi.
   Google Scholar
• Declerck, Renaat. 1991. A comprehensive descriptive grammar of English. Tokyo: Kaitakusha.
   Google Scholar
• Fagan, Sarah. 1992. The syntax and semantics of middle constructions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fawcett, Robin P. 1980. Cognitive linguistics and social interaction. Towards an integrated model of a systemic functional grammar and the other components of a communicating mind. Exeter and Heidelberg: Julius Groos Verlag and Exeter University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fellbaum, Christiane. 1985. “Adverbs in agentless actives and passives.” Papers from the parasession on causatives and agentivity at the twenty-first regional meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society. Pp. 21–31.
   Google Scholar
• Fellbaum, Christiane. 1986. On the middle construction in English. Indiana: Indiana University Linguistics Club.
   Google Scholar
• Halliday, Michael A. K. 1967. “Notes on transitivity and theme in English.” Journal of linguistics 3.1: 37–81.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halliday, Michael A. K. 1985. An introduction to functional grammar. London: Arnold.
   Google Scholar
• Halliday, Michael A. K. 1994. An introduction to functional grammar. 2nd ed. London, Melbourne and Auckland: Edward Arnold.
   Google Scholar
• Heyvaert, Liesbet. 1997. “Patientive -er nominals.” Leuven contributions in linguistics and philology 86.4: 433–456.
   Google Scholar
• Heyvaert, Liesbet. 1998. “Nonagentive deverbal -er nominalization in English and Dutch: a contrastive analysis.” Languages in contrast 1.2: 211–243.
   Google Scholar
• Heyvaert, Liesbet. 2000. “Gerundive nominalization: From type specification to grounded instance.” Constructions in cognitive linguistics. Selected papers from the fifth international cognitive linguistics conference. Amsterdam. 1997. Eds. Ad Foolen and Frederike van der Leek. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Pp. 103–121.
   Google Scholar
• Huddleston, Richard. 1984. Introduction to the grammar of English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jespersen, Otto. 1914–1929. A modem English grammar on historical principles. 7 volumes. London: George Allen & Unwin.
   Google Scholar
• Kastovsky, Dieter. 1971. “The old English suffix -er(e)”. Anglia. Zeitschrift für englische Philologie. 89: 285–325.
   Google Scholar
• Kastovsky, Dieter. 1986a. “The problem of productivity in word formation.” Linguistics 24: 585–600.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kastovsky, Dieter. 1986b. “Diachronic word-formation in a functional perspective.” Linguistics across historical and geographical boundaries. In honour of Jacek Fisiak on the occasion of his fiftieth birthday. Volume I: Linguistic theory and historical linguistics. Eds. Dieter Kastovsky and A. Szwedek. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Pp. 409–421.
   Google Scholar
• Keyser, Samuel J. and Thomas Roeper 1984. “On the middle and ergative constructions in English.” Linguistic inquiry 15: 381–416.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langacker, Ronald 1991. Foundations of cognitive grammar. Descriptive application. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lees, Robert B. 1968. The grammar of English nominalizations. Indiana University Research Center in Anthropology. Folklore and Linguistics, 12. Bloomington: Indiana University Research Center in Anthropology, Folklore and Linguistics.
   Google Scholar
• Lemmens, Maarten. 1998. Lexical perspectives on transitivity and ergativity. Causative constructions in English. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Levin, Beth and Malka Rappaport. 1988. “Nonevent-er nominals: A probe into argument structure.” Linguistics 26: 1067–1083.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mackenzie, L. 1990. “First argument nominalization in a functional grammar of English.” Linguistica Antverpiensia 24: 119–147.
   Google Scholar
• Marchand, Hans. 1969. The categories and types of present-day English word-formation. A synchronic-diachronic approach. 2nd ed. München: C. H. Beck'sche Verlagsbuchhandlung.
   Google Scholar
• Quirk, Randolph, Sidney Greenbaum, Geoffrey Leech and Jan Svartvik. 1972. A grammar of contemporary English. London: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Quirk, Randolph, Sidney Greenbaum, Geoffrey Leech and Jan Svartvik. 1985. A comprehensive grammar of the English language. London and New York: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Rappaport Hovav, Malka and Beth Levin. 1992. “-ER nominals: Implications for the theory of argument structure.” Syntax and semantics. Volume 26: Syntax and the lexicon. Eds. Tim Stowell and E. Wehrli. New York: Academic Press. Pp. 127–153.
   Google Scholar
• Ryder, Mary E. 1991. “Mixers, mufflers and mousers: The extending of the -er suffix as a case of prototype reanalysis.” Proceedings of the Berkeley Linguistics Society 17: 299–311.
   Google Scholar
• Ryder, Mary E. 1999a. “Complex -er nominals. Where grammaticalization and lexicalization meet?” Between grammar and lexicon. Eds. Ellen Contini-Morava and Yishai Tobin. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Pp. 291–331.
   Google Scholar
• Ryder, Mary E. 1999b. “Bankers and blue-chippers: An account of -er formations in present-day English.” English language and linguistics 3.2: 269–297.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, Carlota. 1978. Jespersen's ‘move and change’ class and causative verbs in English. Linguistic and literary studies in honor of Archibald A. Hill. Eds. Mohammad-Ali Jazayery, Edgar Polomé and Werner Winter. The Hague: Mouton. Pp. 101–109.
   Google Scholar
• Strang, Barbara M. H. 1968. “Swift's agent-noun formations in -er.” Wortbildung, Syntax und Morphologie: Festschrift zum 60. Geburtstag von Hans Marchand. Eds. Brekle and Leonard Lipka. The Hague: Mouton. Pp. 217–229.
   Google Scholar
• Strang, Barbara M. H. 1969. “Aspects of the history of the -er formative in English.” Transactions of the philological society 19690: 1–30.
   Google Scholar
• Sweet, Henry. 1891. A new English grammar. Logical and historical. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
   Google Scholar