On the possessive perfect in North Russian

REFERENCES

• Anderson, John M. 1997. “Remarks on the structure and development of the have perfect.” Folia Linguistica Historica 18.1, 2:3–23.
   Google Scholar
• Benveniste, Emile. 1952. “La construction passive du parfait transitif.” Bulletin de la Société Linguistique de Paris 48:52–62.
   Google Scholar
• Breu, Walter. 1996. “Überlegungen zu einer Klassifizierung des grammatischen Wandels im Sprachkontakt (am Beispiel slavischer Kontaktfälle).” Sprachtypologie und Universalienforschung 49.1:21–38.
   Google Scholar
• Bybee, Joan L., Revere D. Perkins and William Pagliuca. 1994. The evolution of grammar: Tense, aspect, and modality in the languages of the world. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dahl, Östen, ed. 2000. Tense and aspect in the languages of Europe. Empirical approaches to language typology. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Danylenko, Andrii. 2000. “The verb ‘have’ in East Slavic.” Proceedings of the 13th UCLA Indo- European Conference. Los Angeles: University of California at Los Angeles.
   Google Scholar
• Danylenko, Andrii and Serhii Vakulenko. 1995. Ukrainian. Munich and Newcastle: Lincom Europa.
   Google Scholar
• Drinka, Bridget. 2003. “Areal factors in the development of the European periphrastic perfect.” WORD 54:1–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DuBois, John W. 1987. “The discourse basis of ergativity.” Language 63:805–855.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Filin, F. P. 1972. Proisxoždenie russkogo, ukrainskogo i belorusskogo jazykov. Leningrad: Nauka.
   Google Scholar
• Fleischman, Suzanne. 1982. “The past and the future: Are they coming or going?” Berkeley linguistics society 8:322–334.
   Google Scholar
• Friedman, Victor A. 1976. “Dialectal synchrony and diachronic syntax. The Macedondian perfect.” Papers from the parasession on diachronic syntax. Chicago: Chicago Linguistics Society. pp. 96–104.
   Google Scholar
• Hammond, Michael and Michael Noonan, eds. 1988. Theoretical morphology: Approaches in modern linguistics. New York: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Harris, Alice C. and Lyle Campbell. 1995. Historical syntax in cross-linguistic perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Harris, Martin and Paolo Ramat, eds. 1987. Historical development of auxiliaries. Trends in linguistics, 35. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Haspelmath, Martin. 1999. “Why is grammaticalization irreversible?” Linguistics 37.6:1043–1048.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heine, Bernd. 1997. Possession: Sources, forces, and grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Heine, Bernd. 2003. “Grammaticalization.” The handbook of historical linguistics. Eds. Brian D. Joseph and Richard D. Janda. Oxford: Blackwell. pp. 575–601.
   Google Scholar
• Heine, Bernd and Tania Kuteva. 2002. World lexicon of grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Heine, Bernd and Tania Kuteva. 2003. “On contact-induced grammaticalization.” Studies in language 27.3:529–572.
   Google Scholar
• Heine, Bernd and Tania Kuteva. Forthcoming. The grammaticalization of the possessive perfect from a dynamic typological point of view.
   Google Scholar
• Heine, Bernd, Ulrike Claudi and Friederika Hünnemeyer. 1991. Grammaticalization: A conceptual framework. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hopper, Paul J. and Elizabeth C. Traugott. 1993. Grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jacob, Daniel. 1994. Die Auxiliarisierung von habere und die Entstehung des romanischen periphrastischen Perfekts, dargestellt an der Entwicklung vom Latein zum Spanischen. Habilitationsschrift, Universität Freiburg.
   Google Scholar
• Jacob, Daniel. 1998. “Transitivität, Diathese und Perfekt: Zur Entstehung der romanischen habenPeriphrasen.” Transitivität und Diathese in den romanischen Sprachen. Eds. Hans Geisler und Daniel Jacob. Tübingen: Niemeyer. pp. 105–126.
   Google Scholar
• Joseph, Brian and Richard Janda, eds. 2003. The handbook of historical linguistics. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Joseph, Brian and Richard Janda. 1988. “The how and why of diachronic morphologization and demorphologization.” Theoretical morphology. Approaches in modern linguistics. Eds. Michael Hammond and Michael Noonan. New York: Academic Press. pp. 193–210.
   Google Scholar
• Karskij, E. F. 1956. Belorusy: Jazyk belorusskogo naroda. Moscow: Academy of Sciences Press.
   Google Scholar
• Koptjevskaja-Tamm, Maria, and Bernhard Wälchli. 2001. “The Circum-Baltic languages: An area-typological approach.” Circum-Baltic languages. Vol. 2. Grammar and typology. Eds. Östen Dahl and Maria Koptjevskaja-Tamm. pp. 615–750.
   Google Scholar
• Kuteva, Tania. 2001. Auxiliation: An enquiry into the nature of grammaticalization. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kuz'mina, I. 1979. “K istorii dvukomponentnyx konstrukcij s pričastymi formami na -no,-to v russkom jazyke.” (V svjazi s voprosom 3127 “Voprosnika obščeslavjanskogo lingvističeskogo atlasa.”) OLA: Materialy i issledovanija.
   Google Scholar
• Kuz'mina, I. 1993. Sintaksis russkix govorov v lingvogeografičeskom aspekte. Moscow.
   Google Scholar
• Kuz'mina, I. and E. Nemčenko. 1971. Sintaksis pričastnyx form v russkix govorax. Moscow.
   Google Scholar
• Kuznecov, P. S. 1949. “K voprosu o skazuemostnom upotreblenii pričastij i deepričastij v russkix govorax.” Materialy i issledovanija po russkoj dialektologii. Vol. 3, M-L. pp. 71–72.
   Google Scholar
• Lägreid, Annelies. 1984. “The Scandinavians in Russia: On the extra-linguistic factors in the language contact between North Germanic and East Slavic peoples in the early middle ages.” Scandinavian language contacts. Eds. P. Sture Ureland and Ian Clarkson. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 97–110.
   Google Scholar
• Lutin, S. A. 1990. “Sistemno-tipologičeskij analiz rezul'tativnyx konstrukcij russkix govorov severa i severo-zapada.” Ph. D. dissertation. Moscow.
   Google Scholar
• Martinet, André. 1979. “Shunting on to ergative or accusative.” Ergativity: Towards a theory of grammatical relations. Ed. Frans Plank. London: Academic press. pp. 39–43.
   Google Scholar
• Maslov, J. S. 1949. “K voprosu o prischoždenii possessivnogo perfekta.” Učenye Zapiski LGU, 97. Serija filologičeskich nauk, 14. pp. 76–104.
   Google Scholar
• Moser, Michael. 1998. Die polnische, ukrainische und weißrussische Interferenzschichte im russischen Satzbau des 16. und 17. Jahrhunderts. Frankfurt a. M.: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Newmeyer, Frederick J. 1998. Language form and language function. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Orr, Robert. 1989. “A Russo-Goidelic syntactic parallel: u nego svoja izba postavlena/Tá sé déanta agam.” General linguistics 29:1–21.
   Google Scholar
• Panzer, Baldur. 1984. “Parallel internal development or interference? Post-positive article and possessive perfect in North Germanic and northern Russian.” Scandinavian language contacts. Eds. P. Sture Ureland and Ian Clarkson. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 111–132.
   Google Scholar
• Šafranov, S. 1852. O vidax russkix glagolov v sintaksičceskom otnošenii. Moscow.
   Google Scholar
• Shevelov, George. 1991. In and around Kiev. Heidelberg: Carl Winter Universitätsverlag.
   Google Scholar
• Tchekhov, Claude. 1978. Aux fondements de la syntaxe: l'ergatif. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
   Google Scholar
• Timberlake, Alan. 1976. “Subject properties in the North Russian passive.” Subject and topic. Ed. Charles Li. New York: Academic press. pp. 547–571.
   Google Scholar
• Tommola, Hannu. 2000. “On the perfect in North Slavic.” Tense and aspect in the languages of Europe. Empirical approaches to language typology. Ed. Östen Dahl. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter. pp. 441–478.
   Google Scholar
• Trubinskij, V. I. 1979. “O russkom razgovornom possessivnom perfekte.” Severnorusskie govory. Ed. V. I. Trubinskij. Leningrad.
   Google Scholar
• Trudgill, Peter. 1997. “Typology and sociolinguistics: Linguistic structure, social structure and explanatory comparative dialectology.” Folia Linguistica 31.3, 4:349–360.
   Google Scholar
• Vasilev, Christo. 1968. “Der romanische Perfekttyp in Slavischen.” Slavistische Studien zum VI. internationalen Slavistenkongress in Prag, 1968. Eds. Erwin Koschmieder and Maximilian Braun. München: Dr. Dr. R. Trofenik. pp. 215–230.
   Google Scholar
• Veenker, Wolfgang. 1967. Die Frage des finnougrischen Substrats in der russischen Sprache. Uralic and Altaic Series, 82. Bloomington and The Hague: Mouton.
   Google Scholar
• Veselinović, Elvira. 2003. Suppletion im irischen Verbum. Philologie- Sprachwissenschaftliche Forschungsergebnisse, Bd. 55. Verlag Dr. Kovac.
   Google Scholar
• Vincent, Nigel. 1982. “The development of the auxiliaries HABERE and ESSE in Romance.” Studies in the Romance verb. Eds. Nigel Vincent and Martin B. Harris. London: Croom Helm. pp. 71–96.
   Google Scholar
• Zaliznjak, Andrej. A. 1995. Drevnenovgorodskij dialekt. [Rossijskaja Akademija Nauk, Institut slavjanovedenija i balkanistiki.] Moscow: Škola “Jazyki russkoj kul'tury”.
   Google Scholar