The CP and split CP cross-linguistically: The layer parameter

REFERENCES

• Abraham, Werner. 1997. “The base structure of the German clause.” German: Syntactic problems. Eds. Werner Abraham and Elly van Gelderen. Tubingen: Niemeyer. Pp. 11-42.
   Google Scholar
• ANS = Algernene Nederlandse Spraakkunst. 1984. G. Geerts et al., eds. Groningen: Wollers Noord-hof.
   Google Scholar
• Aulhier, J. Marc. 1992. “Iterated CPs and embedded topicalization.” Linguistic inquiry 23.2:329-336.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barbiers, Sjef. 2002. “Remnant stranding and the theory of movement.” Dimensions of movement. Eds. Atrtemis Alexiadou et al. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Pp. 47-67.
   Google Scholar
• Besten, Hans den. 1983. “On the interaction of root transformations and lexical deletive rules.” On the formal syntax of Westgermania. Ed. Werner Abraham. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Calloway, Morgan. 1913. The infinitive in Anglo-Saxon. Washington, DC: Carnegie Institution.
   Google Scholar
• Chomsky, Noam. 1955/1979. The logical structure of linguistic theory. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chomsky, Noam. 1986. Barriers. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cinque, Guglielmo. 1999. Adverbs and functional heads. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cinque, Guglielmo, ed. 2002. Functional structure in DP and IP. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Condoravdi, Cleo and Paul Kiparsky. 2002. “Clitics and clause structure.” Manuscript. Stanford University.
   Google Scholar
• Diessel, Holger. 1999. Demonstratives. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Dikken, Marcel den. 2002. “On the syntax of wh-movemcnt.” Manuscript. CUNY.
   Google Scholar
• Farkas, Donka. 1992. “On the semantics of subjunctive complements.” Romance languages and modern linguistic theory. Eds. Paul Hirschbühler and Konrad Koerner. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Fischer, Olga. 1998. “On negative raising in the history of English.” Negation in the history of English. The Hague: Mouton. Pp. 55-100.
   Google Scholar
• Gelderen, Elly van. 1993. The rise of functional categories. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Gelderen, Elly van. 1997. Verbal agreement and the grammar behind its “breakdown”. Töbingen: Niemeyer.
   Google Scholar
• Gelderen, Elly van. 2003. “Specifiers, heads, grammaticalization, and economy.” Journal of comparative Germanic linguistics. Pp. 1-40.
   Google Scholar
• Haider, Hubert. 1986. “V-second in German.” Verb second phenomena in Germanic languages. Eds. Hubert Haiderand Martin Prinzholm. Dordrecht: Foris. Pp. 49-75.
   Google Scholar
• Haller, Beat and John Watters. 1984. “Topic in Zulgo.” Studies in African linguistics 15.1:27—16.
   Google Scholar
• Hoekstra, Eric. 1993. “Dialectal variation inside CP as parametric variation.” Linguistische Berichte 5.
   Google Scholar
• Hoekstra, Eric and Jan Wouter Zwart. 1994. “De Struktuur van de CP.” Spektator 23.3:191-212.
   Google Scholar
• Hooper, Joan and Sandra Thompson. 1973. “On the applicability of root transformations.” Linguistic inquiry 4.4:465-497.
   Google Scholar
• Kemenade, Ans van. 1997. “V2 and embedded topicalization in Old and Middle English.” Parameters of morphosyntactic change. Eds. Ans van Kemanade and Nigel Vincent. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Pp. 326-352.
   Google Scholar
• Kiparsky, Paul and Carol Kiparsky. 1970. “Fact.” Progress in linguistics. Eds. Manfred Bierwisch and Karl Heidolph. The Hague: Mouton. Pp. 143-173.
   Google Scholar
• Kiss, Katalin. 1995. Discourse configurational languages. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Koopman, Willem. 1997. “Topicalization in Old English and its effects.” Language history and linguistic remodelling. Ed. Raymnd Hickey. The Hague: Mouton. Pp. 307-321.
   Google Scholar
• Kroch, Anthony and Anne Taylor. 1997. “Verb movement in Old and Middle English.” Parameters of morphosyntactic change. Eds. Ans van Kemenadc and Nigel Vincent. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lasnik, Howard and Mamoru Saito. 1992. Move [alpha]. Cambridge. The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lehmann, Christian. 1988. “Towards a typology of clause linkage.” Typological Studies of the clause. Eds. John Haiman and Sandra Thompson. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Pp. 181-225.
   Google Scholar
• Lightfool, David. 1979. Principles of diachronic syntax. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Massam. Diane. 1985. “Case theory and the projection principle.” Ph. D. dissertation, MIT.
   Google Scholar
• McCloskey, Jim. 1991. “Verb fronting, verb second and the left edge of IP in Irish.” Paper presented El the Stuttgart workshop on comparative Germanic syntax. University of Stuttgart.
   Google Scholar
• Meinunger, André. 2002. “Verb position, verbal mood, and the anchoring (potential) of sentences.” Manuscript.
   Google Scholar
• Miller. Gary. 2002. Nonfinite structures in theory and change. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Noonan. Michael. 1996. “Complementation.” Language typology and syntactic description II. Ed. Timothy Shopcn. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Pp. 42-140.
   Google Scholar
• Pintzuk, Susan. 1991. “Phrase structures in competition.” Ph. D. dissertation. University of Pennsylvania.
   Google Scholar
• Poletto, Cecelia. 2000. The higher functional field. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Reis, Marga. 1977. Präsuppositionen und Syntax. Töbingen: Niemeyer.
   Google Scholar
• Rizzi. Luigi. 1997. “The line structure of the left periphery.” Elements of grammar. Ed. Liliane Haegeman. Dordrecht: Kluwer. Pp. 281-337.
   Google Scholar
• Rizzi, Luigi. 2001. “On the position int(errogative)’ in the left periphery of the clause.” Current studies in Italian syntax. Eds. G. Cinque et al. Amsterdam: Elsevier. Pp. 287-296.
   Google Scholar
• Roberts, Ian. 1996. “Remarks on the Old English C-system and the diachrony of V-2.” Linguistische Berichte. Sonderheft. Pp. 154-168.
   Google Scholar
• Rochette, Anne. 1988. “Semantic and syntactic aspects of Romance sentential complementation.” Ph. D. dissertation. MIT.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenbaum, Peter. 1967. The grammar of English predicate complement constructions. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Roussou, Anna. 2000. “On the left periphery.” Journal of Greek linguistics 1:65-94.
   Google Scholar
• Russom, Geoffrey. 1976. “A syntactic key to a number of Pearl-group cruxes.” Journal of English linguistics 10:21-29.
   Google Scholar
• Santelmann, Lynn. 1995. “Topicalization, CP and licensing in the acquisition of Swedish.” Proceedings of BUCLD 19:499-510.
   Google Scholar
• Seuren, Pieter. 1999. “Factivity.” Concise encyclopedia of grammatical categories. Eds. Keith Brown and Jim Miller. New York: Pergamon. Pp. 145f.
   Google Scholar
• Slowed. Tim. 1981. “Origins of phrase structure.” Ph. D. dissertation. MIT.
   Google Scholar
• Stroik, Tom. 1991. “Expletives revisited.” Linguistic analysis 21:23-33.
   Google Scholar
• Vikner, Sten. 1995. Verb movement and expletive subjects in the Germanic languages. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Visser, F. Th. 1963-1973. An historical syntax of the English language. Leiden: Brill.
   Google Scholar
• Warner. Anthony. 1982. Complementation in Middle English and the methodology of historical syntax. University Park: The Pennsylvania State University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zeitlin, Jacob. 1908. “The ACI and some kindred constructions in English.” Ph. D. dissertation, Columbia University.
   Google Scholar