145
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Reviews

Reviews

, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , & show all
Pages 249-341 | Published online: 23 Apr 2019

REFERENCES

  • Bernstein, Basil. 1975. Towards a theory of educational transmissions. London: Routledge.
  • Bernstein, Basil. 1990. The structuring of pedagogic discourse. London: Routledge.
  • Bernstein, Basil. 1996. Pedagogy, symbolic control and identity: Theory, research, critique. London: Taylor and Francis.
  • Halliday, M. A. K. 1973. Explorations in the function of language. London: Arnold.
  • Leavis, F. R. and Denys Thompson. 1933. Culture and environment: The training of critical awareness. London: Chatto & Windus.

REFERENCES

  • Aronoff, Mark. 1994. Morphology by itself: Stems and inflectional classes. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
  • Chomsky, Noam and Morris Halle. 1968. The sound pattern of English. New York: Harper and Row.
  • McCarthy, John J. 1981. “A prosodic theory of nonconcatenative morphology.” Linguistic inquiry 12: 373–418.
  • Yang, Charles D. 2002. Knowledge and learning in natural language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

REFERENCES

  • Danylenko, Andrii. 2002. “The East Slavic habere: Revising a developmental scenario.” Proceedings of the 13th Annual UCLA Indo-European Conference: Los Angeles. November 9–10, 2001. Eds. Karlene Jones Bley et al. Washington, DC: Institute for the Study of Man. Pp. 105–27.
  • Flier, Michael S. 2002. Review of Ukrainian: A comprehensive grammar, by Stefan M. Pugh and Ian Press. Slavonica 6.2: 142–45.
  • Heine, Bernd and Tania Kuteva. 2002. World lexicon of grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Hopper, Paul J. and Sandra A. Thomson. 1980. “Transitivity in grammar and discourse.” Language 56.2: 250–99.
  • Moser, Michael. 1999. Review of Teoretychna hramatyka ukrajins'koji movy: Morfolohija. [The theoretical grammar of the Ukrainian language: Morphology], by Anatolij Zahnitko. Zeitschrift für slavische Philologie 44.4: 483–86.
  • Nedjalkov, Vladimir P. and Sergej Je. Jaxontov. 1988. “The typology of resultative constructions.” Typology of the resultative constructions. Eds. Vladimir P. Nedjalkov. (Translation, ed. by Bernard Comrie, of Tipologija rezul'tativnykh konstruktsij.) Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Pp. 3–62.
  • Newmeyer, Frederick. 2003. “Grammar is grammar and usage is usage.” Language 79.4: 682–707.
  • Synjavs'kyj, Oleksa. 1967 [1931]. Normy ukrajins'koji literaturnoji movy. [Norms of Literary Ukrainian] State College: Zhyttja i Shkola.
  • Šerech, Jury [Shevelov, George Y.]. 1951. Narys suchasnoji ukrajins'koji literaturnoji movy. [An Outline of Modern Literary Ukrainian] Munich: Naukove Tovarystvo im Ševčenka.
  • Shevelov, George Y. 1993. “Ukrainian.” The Slavonic languages. Eds. Bernard Comrie and Greville G. Corbett. London and New York: Routledge. Pp. 947–98.
  • Vykhovanets', Ivan. 1996. “Problemy katehorijnoji hramatyky ukrajins'koji movy.” [“Problems in the categorical grammar of Ukrainian] Tretij Mizhnarodnyj konhres ukrajinistiv. 26–29 serpnja 1996. Movoznavstvo. Eds. Serhii Vakulenko and Andrii Danylenko. Kharkiv. Pp. 177–81.

REFERENCES

  • Görlach, Manfred. 1992. “Text-Types and language history: The Cookery Recipe”. History of Englishes: New methods and interpretations in historical linguistics. Topics in English Linguistics, 10. Eds. Matti Rissanen, Ossi Ihalainen, Terttu Nevalainen, and Irma Taavitsainen. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter. Pp. 736–761.

REFERENCES

  • Haiman, John and Sandra A. Thompson, eds. 1988. Clause combining in grammar and discourse. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
  • Longacre, Robert E. 1985. “Sentences as combinations of clauses.” Language typology and syntactic description. Vol. 2. Ed. T. Shopen. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Pp. 235–86.
  • Mann, William C. and Sandra A. Thompson. 1988. “Rhetorical Structure Theory: Towards a functional theory of text organization.” Text 8: 243–81.
  • Matthiessen, Christian M. I. M. and Sandra A. Thomspon. 1988. “The structure of discourse and ‘subordination’.” Clause combining in grammar and discourse. Eds. John Haiman and Sandra A. Thompson. Amsterdam: Benjamins. Pp. 275–329.
  • Thompson, Sandra A. 2002. “‘Object complements’ and conversation: towards a realistic account.” Studies in language 26: 125–63.
  • Wierzbicka, Anna. 1993. “Why do we say IN April, ON Thursday, AT 10 o'clock? In search of an explanation.” Studies in language 17: 437–54.

REFERENCES

  • Emblen, D. L. 1970. Peter Mark Roget: The world and the man. London: Longman.
  • Hüllen, Werner. 2002. Collected papers on the history of linguistic ideas. Ed. Michael M. Isermann. Münster: Nodus.
  • Joseph, John E. 2003. Publication Notice on Hüllen (2002). Historiographia Linguistica 30.251.
  • Roget, Peter Mark. 1852. Thesaurus of English words and phrases, classified and arranged so as to facilitate the expression of ideas and assist in literary composition. London: Longman, Brown, Green and Longmans.

REFERENCES

  • Grimshaw, Jane. 1990. Argument structure. Cambridge. MA: MIT Press.
  • Lewis, G. L. 1988. Turkish grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

REFERENCES

  • Halliday, M. A. K. 1966. “Lexis as a linguistic level.” In memory of J. R. Firth. Eds. C. Bazill, J. Catford, M. A. K. Halliday and R. Robins. London: Longman. Pp. 148–162.

REFERENCES

  • Austin, John L. 1962. How to do things with words. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
  • Bell, Allan. 1991. The language of news media. Cambridge, Mass.: Blackwell.
  • Searle, John R. 1977. “A classification of illocutionary acts.” Proceedings of the Texas conference on performatives, presuppositions, and implicatures. Eds. A. Rogers, B. Wall, and J. P. Murphy. Washington, D.C.: Center for Applied Linguistics. Pp. 27–45.
  • Rajagopalan, Kanavillil (in press). “John Langshaw Austin (1911–1960).” To appear in the Routledge encyclopedia of linguistics. New York: Routledge.

REFERENCES

  • Austin, J. L. 1962. How to do things with words. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
  • Fish, Stanley. 1976. “How to do things with Austin and Searle: speech act theory and literary criticism.” Modern language notes 91: 983–1025.
  • Grice, H. P. 1975. “Logic and conversation.” Syntax and semantics. Vol. 3. Speech acts. Eds. P. Cole and J. L. Morgan. New York: Academic Press. Pp. 41–58.
  • Searle, J. R. 1979. ‘The logical status of fictional discourse.’ Expression and meaning: Studies in the theory of speech acts. Ed. J. R. Searle. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. Pp. 58–75.
  • Sinclair, J. 1991. Corpus, concordance, collocation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Walton, D. 1998. The new dialectic: Conversational contexts of argument. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

REFERENCES

  • Harris, Roy. 2003. Saussure and his interpreters. 2nd ed. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. Silva-Corvalán, Carmen. 1989. Sociolingüística: Teoría y análisis. Madrid: Alhambra.

REFERENCES

  • Olender, Maurice. 1989. Les langues du paradis: Aryens et Sémites: un couple providentiel. Paris: Editions du Seuil.
  • Olender, Maurice. 1992. The languages of Paradise: Race, religion, and philology in the nineteenth century. Translated by Arthur Goldhammer. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.

REFERENCES

  • Chesterman, Andrew. 1997. Memes of translation. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
  • Eco, Umberto. 1979. Lector in fabula. Milano: Bompiani.
  • Toury, Gideon. 1995. Descriptive translation studies—and beyond. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
  • Venuti, Lawrence. 1998. The scandals of translation: Towards an ethics of difference. London and New York: Routledge.

REFERENCES

  • Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. et al., eds. 2001. Non-canonical marking of subjects and objects. Amsterdam, and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
  • Plank, Frans, ed. 1984. Objects. Towards a theory of grammatical relations. London: Academic Press.

REFERENCES

  • Paul, Hermann. 1880. Prinzipien der Sprachgeschichte. Halle: Niemeyer. Fifth edition, 1920.
  • Weinreich, Uriel, William Labov, and Marvin I. Herzog. 1967. “Empirical foundations for a theory of language change.” Directions for historical linguistics: A symposium. Eds. Winfred P. Lehmann and Yakov Malkiel. Austin and Houston: University of Texas Press. Pp. 95–195.

REFERENCES

  • Austin, J. L. 1975 [1962]. How to do things with words: The William James Lectures delivered at Harvard University in 1955. 2nd ed. Eds. J. O. Urmson and Marina Sbisa. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Backström, Lars, Ritva Laiho, Torsti Linnanmäki and Minna Harjuniemi. 2001. ATK-alan arviointi-ja kehittämistyöryhmän loppuraportti. (“Final report of the working group on assessing and developing automatic data processing services at the University of Helsinki.”) <http://www.helsinki.fi/henkos/palvelussuhdeasiat/atk-tes-raporttil.pdf> accessed 15 December 2004.
  • Donald, Merlin. 1993. “Précis of Origins of the modern mind: Three stages in the evolution of culture and cognition.” Behavioral and brain sciences 16: 737–791.
  • Fritz, Gerd and Franz Hundschnurscher, eds. 1994. Handbuch der Dialoganalyse. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer Verlag.
  • Killer, Rudi. 1994. On language change: The invisible hand in language.(Translated by Brigitte Nerlich.) London and New York: Routledge.
  • Lakoff, George. 1987. Women, fire and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
  • Rolf, Eckard. 1994. Sagen und Meinen: Paul Grices Theorie der Konversations-Implikaturen. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.
  • Kyle, Gilbert. 1960 [1954], Dilemmas: The Tarner lectures 1953. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Sanding, Barbara. 1978. Stilistik: Sprachpragmatische Grundlegung der Stilbeschreibung. Berlin and New York: Walter de Gruyter.
  • Searle, John R. 1990 (1969). Speech acts: An essay in the philosophy of language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Weinrich, Harald. 1967. “Semantik der Metapher.” Folia Linguistica: Tomus I. The Hague: Mouton. Pp. 3–17.
  • Wittgenstein, Ludwig. 1997 (1953). Philosophical investigations. 2nd edition. (Translated by G. E. M. Anscombe.) Oxford: Blackwell.

REFERENCES

  • Dixon, R. M. W. and Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald, eds. 1999. The Amazonian languages. (Cambridge language surveys). Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Greenberg, Joseph. 1987. The languages of the Americas. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

REFERENCES

  • Elbert, Samuel H., and Mary Kawena Pukui. 1979. Hawaiian grammar. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.

REFERENCES

  • Aikhenvald, Alexandra A. 2000. Classifiers: A typology of noun categorization devices. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Dixon, R. M. W. 1982. Where have all the adjectives gone? And other essays in semantics and syntax. Berlin and New York: Mouton.
  • Harvey, Mark, and Nicholas Reid. eds. 1997. Nominal classification in Aboriginal Australia. (Studies in language companion series, 37.) Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
  • McGregor, William B. 1990. A functional grammar of Gooniyandi. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
  • McGregor, William B. 1996. Nyulnyul. (Languages of the world/materials, 88.) Munich: Lincom.

REFERENCES

  • Chafe, Wallace. 1976. The Caddoan, Iroquoian, and Siouan languages. The Hague: Mouton.
  • McDonough, Joyce. 2000. “Athabaskan redux: against the position class as a morphological category.” Morphological analysis in comparison. Eds. Wolfgang Dressler, Oscar Pfeiffer, Markus Pöchtrager, and John Rennison. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Pp. 155–178.
  • Simpson, Jane and Meg Withgott. 1986. “Pronominal clitic clusters and templates.” Syntax and semantics, 19: The syntax of pronominal clitics. Ed. H. Borere. Orlando, FL: Academic Press. Pp. 149–174.
  • Stump, Gregory T. 1997. “Template morphology and inflectional morphology.” Yearbook of morphology 1996. Eds. Geert Booij and Jaap van Marle. Amsterdam: Kluwer. Pp. 217–241.

REFERENCES

  • Weinreich, Uriel. 1968 [1953]. Languages in contact. (Publications of the Linguistic Circle of New York, 1.) The Hague: Mouton.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.