Disjuncts

REFERENCES

• Baker, Mona. 1992. In other words. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Burton-Roberts, Noel. 1999. “Language, linear precedence and parentheticals.” The clause in English: In honour of Rodney Huddleston. Eds. Peter Collins and David Lee. Studies in Language Companion Series. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. pp. 33–52.
   Google Scholar
• Canals, Marta Payà, n.d. “Incidental clauses in spoken Catalan: Prosodic characteristics and pragmatic function.” Department de Filologia Catalana, Universitat de Barcelona, Spain. [email protected].
   Google Scholar
• Cruttenden, Alan. 1986. Intonation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dickins, James. 1998. Extended axiomatic linguistics. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Elhadad, Michael and Kathleen R. McKeown. 1990. “Generating connectives.” Proceedings of the 13th international conference on computational linguistics (Coling 90). Helsinki, Finland. 3:97–101.
   Google Scholar
• Emonds, Joseph E. 1979. “Appositive relatives have no properties.” Linguistic inquiry 10:211–243.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fabb, Nigel. 1990. “The difference between English restrictive and non-restrictive relative clauses.” Journal of linguistics 26:57–78.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Firbas, Jan. 1992. Functional sentence perspective in written and spoken English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Geeraerts, Dirk. 1988. “Where does prototypicality come from?” Topics in cognitive grammar. Ed. Brygida Rudzka-Ostyn. Amsterdam: Benjamins. pp. 207–230.
   Google Scholar
• Haegeman, Liliane. 1988. “Parenthetical adverbials: The radical orphanage approach.” Aspects of modern linguistics. Ed. Shoju Chiba. Tokyo: Kaitakushi. pp. 232–254.
   Google Scholar
• Halliday, Michael A. K. and Ruqaya Hasan. 1976. Cohesion in English. London: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Hengeveld, Kees. 1993. “Semantic type, factivity, and the expression of adverbial clauses.” The internal structure of adverbial clauses. Ed. Kees Hengeveld. EUROTYP Working paper V, 5. Strasbourg: European Science Foundation. pp. 1–23.
   Google Scholar
• Hobbs, Jerry R. 1985. On the coherence and structure of discourse. Technical report CSLI-85-37. Center for the Study of Language and Information: Stanford University.
   Google Scholar
• Honderich, Ted, ed. 1995. The Oxford companion to philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Knott, Alistair. 2001. “Semantic and pragmatic relations and their intended effects.” Text representation: Linguistic and psycholinguistic aspects. Eds. Ted Sanders, Joost Schilperoord and Wilbert Spooren. Amsterdam: Benjamins. pp. 127–151.
   Google Scholar
• Knott, Alistair and Chris Mellish. 1996. “A feature-based account of the relations signalled by sentence and clause connectives.” Language and speech 39:143–183.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kortmann, Bernd. 1997. Adverbial subordination: A typology and history based on European languages. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Levinson, Stephen C. 1983. Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, James R. 1992. English text: System and structure. Amsterdam: Benjamin.
   Google Scholar
• McCawley, James D. 1982. “Parentheticals and discontinuous constitutent structure.” Linguistic inquiry 13:91–106.
   Google Scholar
• Mulder, Jan F. G. 1989. Foundations of axiomatic linguistics. Mouton de Gruyter: Berlin and New York.
   Google Scholar
• Noordman, Leo G. M. 2001. “On the production of causal-contrastive although-sentences in context.” Text representation: Linguistic and psycholinguistic aspects. Eds. Ted Sanders, Joost M. Schilperoord and Wilbert Spooren. Amsterdam: Benjamins. pp. 153–180.
   Google Scholar
• Oversteegen, Leonoor E. 1997. “On the pragmatic nature of causal and contrastive connectives.” Discourse processes 24:51–86.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quirk, Randolph, Jan Svartvik, Geoffrey Leech and Sidney Greenbaum. 1985. A comprehensive grammar of the English language. London and New York: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Redeker, Gisela. 1990. “Ideational and pragmatic markers of discourse structure.” Journal of pragmatics 14:367–381.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rutherford, William E. 1970. “Some observations concerning subordinate clauses in English.” Language 46:97–115.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanders, Ted, Joost M. Schilperoord, Wilbert Spooren and Leo G. M. Noordman. 1992. “Towards a taxonomy of coherence relations.” Discourse processes 15:1–35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schriffin, Deborah. 1987. Discourse markers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sekine, Fumio. 1996. “Clause combining in contextual grammar in English.” Ph.D. dissertation, University of Birmingham.
   Google Scholar
• Sweetser, Eve. 1990. From etymology to pragmatics: Metaphorical and cultural aspects of semantic structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, John R. 1989. Linguistic categorization: Prototypes in linguistic theory. Oxford: Clarendon.
   Google Scholar
• Tomlin, Russell S. 1987. Coherence and grounding in discourse. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Van Dijk, Teun A. 1979. “Pragmatic connectives.” Journal of pragmatics 3:447–456.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar