Dependency, framing, scope? The syntagmatic structure of sentences of speech or thought representation.

REFERENCES

• Banfield, Ann. 1982. Unspeakable sentences. Narration and representation in the language of fiction. Boston: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
   Google Scholar
• Browne, Michael Dennis and Anne Jenkins. 1999. “Five poems.” American poetry review 28:3. Accessed via EBSCOhost on February 10, 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, Herbert H. and Richard J. Gerrig. 1990. “Quotations as demonstrations.” Language 66: 764–805.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Croft, William. 2001. Radical construction grammar: Syntactic theory in typological perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Davidse, Kristin. 1994. “Fact projection.” Perspectives on English. Studies in honour of Professor Emma Vorlat. Eds. Keith Carlon, Kristin Davidse, and Brygida Rudzka-Ostyn. Orbis Supplementa, 2. Leuven: Peeters. Pp. 257–84.
   Google Scholar
• Davidse, Kristin 2003. “A corpus check of the factive presupposition.” Configurations of culture. Essays in honour of Michael Windross. Eds. Aline Remael and Katja Pelsmaekers. Antwerpen/Apeldoorn: Garant. Pp. 115–26.
   Google Scholar
• Davies, Eirian. 1979. On the semantics of syntax: Mood and condition in English. London: Croom Helm.
   Google Scholar
• Delacruz, Enrique. 1976. “Factives and proposition level constructions in Montague Grammar.” Montague Grammar. Ed. Barbara Partee. New York: Academic Press. Pp. 177–99.
   Google Scholar
• De Roeck, Marijke. 1994. “A functional typology of speech reports.” Function and expression in Functional Grammar. Eds. Elisabeth Engberg-Pedersen, Lisbeth Falster Jakobsen and Lone schack Rasmusssen. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Pp. 331–51.
   Google Scholar
• Givón, Talmy. 1980. “The binding hierarchy and the typology of complements.” Studies in Language 4: 333–377.
   Google Scholar
• Haiman, John. 1985. Natural syntax. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Halliday, Michael. 1961. “Categories of the theory of grammar.” Word 17:241–92.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halliday, Michael 1994 [1985], An introduction to functional grammar. 2nd ed. London: Arnold.
   Google Scholar
• Halliday, Michael and Ruqaiya Hasan. 1976. Cohesion in English. English Language Series, 9. London: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Hand, Michael. 1993. “Parataxis and parentheticals.” Linguistics and philosophy 16: 495–507.
   Google Scholar
• Hengeveld, Kees. 1989. “Layers and operators in Functional Grammar.” Journal of linguistics 25:127–57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huddleston, Rodney. 2002. “Content clauses and reported speech.” The Cambridge grammar of the English language. Eds. Rodney Huddleston and Geoffrey K. Pullum. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Pp. 947–1030.
   Google Scholar
• Kiparsky, Paul and Carol Kiparsky. 1971. “Fact.” Semantics: An interdisciplinary reader in philosopy, linguistics, and psychology. Eds. Danny D. Steinberg and Leon Jakobovits. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Pp. 345–69.
   Google Scholar
• Langacker, Ronald W. 1987. Foundations of Cognitive Grammar. Volume I: Theoretical prerequisites. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Langacker, Ronald W.. 1991. Foundations of Cognitive Grammar. Volume II: Descriptive application. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lehmann, Christian. 1985. “Grammaticalization: Synchronic variation and diachronic change.” Lingua e stile XX: 303–18.
   Google Scholar
• Li, Charles N. 1986. “Direct and indirect speech: A functional study.” Direct and indirect speech. Ed. Florian Coulmas. Berlin: Mouton. Pp. 29–45.
   Google Scholar
• Longacre, Robert E. 2007. “Sentences as combinations of clauses.” Language typology and syntactic description. Vol. 2: Complex constructions. 2nd edition. Ed. Timothy Shopen. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Pp. 372–420.
   Google Scholar
• McGregor, William. 1990. “The metafunctional hypothesis and syntagmatic relations.” Occasional papers in systemic linguistics 4:5–50.
   Google Scholar
• McGregor, William 1994. “The grammar of reported speech and thought in Gooniyandi.” Australian journal of linguistics 14:63–92.
   Google Scholar
• McGregor, William 1997. Semiotic grammar. Oxford: Clarendon.
   Google Scholar
• Mosegaard Hansen, Maj-Britt. 2000. “The syntactic and semiotic status of direct quotes, with reference to French.” Transactions of the Philological Society 98:281–322.
   Google Scholar
• Munro, Pamela. 1982. “On the transitivity of ‘say’ verbs.” Studies in transitivity. Eds. Paul Hopper and Sandra Thompson. Syntax and Semantics, 15. New York: Academic Press. Pp. 301–18.
   Google Scholar
• Noonan, Michael. 2007. “Complementation.” Language typology and syntactic description. Vol. 2: Complex constructions. 2nd edition. Ed. Timothy Shopen. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Pp. 52–150.
   Google Scholar
• Quirk, Randolph, Sidney Greenbaum, Geoffrey Leech, and Jan Svartvik. 1985 [1972]. A comprehensive grammar of the English language. London: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Shore, Susanna. 2002. “Projection or framing.” Paper presented at the 29th International Systemic Functional Conference, Liverpool, July 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, Geoff and Ye Yiyun. 1991. “Evaluation in the reporting verbs used in academic papers.” Applied linguistics 12:365–82.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson, Sandra A. 2002. “Object complements' and conversation: Towards a realistic account.” Studies in language 26:125–63.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson, Sandra A. and Anthony Mulac. 1991a. “A quantitative perspective on the grammaticization of epistemic parentheticals in English.” Approaches to grammaticalization. Volume II: Focus on types of grammatical markers. Eds. Elizabeth Traugott and Bernd Heine. Amsterdam: Benjamins. Pp. 313–29.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, Sandra A. and Anthony Mulac 1991b. “The discourse conditions for the use of the complementizer that in conversational English.” Journal of pragmatics 15:237–51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Traugott, Elizabeth Closs. 1982. “From prepositional to textual and expressive meanings: Some semantic-pragmatic aspects of grammaticalization.” Perspectives on historical linguistics. Eds. Winfred P. Lehmann and Yakov Malkiel. Current issues in linguistic theory, 24. Amsterdam: Benjamins. Pp. 245–67.
   Google Scholar
• Vandelanotte, Lieven. 2000. She wanted her words to be her own. A functional approach to free indirect speech or thought. Unpublished MA thesis, University of Leuven.
   Google Scholar
• Vandelanotte, Lieven 2002. “But forced to qualify. Distancing speech and thought representation as a symptom of uninformedness in Larkin.” Leuvense bijdragen (Leuven contributions in linguistics and philology) 91:383–426.
   Google Scholar
• Vandelanotte, Lieven 2004a. “Deixis and grounding in speech and thought representation.” Journal of pragmatics 36:489–520.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vandelanotte, Lieven 2004b. “From representational to scopal ‘distancing indirect speech or thought’: A cline of subjectification.” Text 24:547–85.
   Google Scholar
• Vandelanotte, Lieven…. 2005. Types of speech and thought representation in English: Syntagmatic structure, deixis and expressivity, semantics. PhD dissertation, Department of Linguistics, University of Leuven.
   Google Scholar
• Vandelanotte, Lieven… 2006. “Speech or thought representation and subjectification, or on the need to think twice.” Belgian Journal of Linguistics 20: 137–168.
   Google Scholar
• Verstraete, Jean-Christophe. 2001. “Subjective and objective modality: Interpersonal and ideational functions in the English modal auxiliary system.” Journal of pragmatics 33:1505–1528.
   Google Scholar
• Verstraete, Jean-Christophe 2009. Speech and thought representation in English: A cognitive-functional approach. Topics in English Linguistics, 65. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
   Google Scholar
• Whorf, Benjamin Lee. 1956. Language, thought and reality. Selected writings of Benjamin Lee Whorf. Ed. John B. Carroll. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Woolf, Virginia. 1994. To the Lighthouse. Wordsworth Classics. Ware: Wordsworth.
   Google Scholar