What kind of structure?—interpersonal meaning and prosodic realization across strata

REFERENCES

• Bateman, John A. 1989. “Dynamic systemic-functional grammar: a new frontier.” Word 40(1–2): 263–286.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bautista, Maria L. 1979. Patterns of Speaking in Filipino Radio Dramas: a sociolinguistic analysis. Tokyo: Institute for the Study of Languages and Cultures of Asia and Africa, Tokyo University of Foreign Studies (Monograph Series 13).
   Google Scholar
• Buggy, T. 1988. The long revolution: a history of Modern China. Sydney: Shakespeare Head Press.
   Google Scholar
• Butler, Chris. 1996. “On the concept of an interpersonal metafunction in English.” Meaning and Form: systemic functional interpretations. Eds. Margaret Berry et al. Norwood: N.J.: Ablex. Pp. 151–181.
   Google Scholar
• Caffarel, Alice. 1995. “Approaching the French clause as a move in dialogue: interpersonal organization.” On Subject and Theme: a discourse functional perspective. Eds. Ruqaiya Hasan & Peter Fries. Amsterdam: Benjamins. Pp. 1–49.
   Google Scholar
• Caffarel, Alice, J. R. Martin & Christian M. I. M. Matthiessen. Eds. 2005. Language typology: a functional perspective. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Channel, Joanna. 2000. “Corpus-based analysis of evaluative lexis.” Evaluation in Text: authorial stance and the construction of discourse. Eds. Susan Hunston & Geoff Thompson. Oxford: OUP. Pp. 38–55.
   Google Scholar
• Cleirigh, Chris. 1998. A Selectionist Model of The Genesis Of Phonic Texture: systemic phonology and universal Darwinism. Sydney: University of Sydney PhD Thesis.
   Google Scholar
• Doyle, Arthur Conan. 2003. “The Valley of Fear, Part 1.” The Complete Sherlock Holmes, Vol. II. New York: Barnes & Noble Classics.
   Google Scholar
• Gibbons, John. 1980. “A tentative framework for speech act description of the utterance particle in conversational Cantonese.” Linguistics 18: 763–775.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halliday, Michael. 1967. Intonation and Grammar in British English. The Hague: Mouton.
   Google Scholar
• Halliday, Michael 1970a. “Language structure and language function.” New Horizons in Linguistics. Ed. John Lyons. Harmondsworth: Penguin. Pp. 140–165.
   Google Scholar
• Halliday, Michael 1970b. A Course in Spoken English: intonation. London: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Halliday, Michael 1979. “Modes of meaning and modes of expression: types of grammatical structure, and their determination by different semantic functions.” Function and Context in Linguistic Analysis: essays offered to William Haas. Eds. David J. Allerton, Edward Carney & David Holdcroft. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Pp; 57–79. [republished in Halliday 2002: 196–218]
   Google Scholar
• Halliday, Michael…. 1981a. “Text semantics and clause grammar: some patterns of realization.” The Seventh LACUS Forum. Eds. James E. Copeland & Philip W. Davis. Columbia, S.C.: Hornbeam Press. Pp.31–59.
   Google Scholar
• Halliday, Michael… 1981b. “Types of Structure.” Readings in Systemic Linguistics. Eds. Michael Halliday & J. R. Martin. London: Batsford. Pp. 29–11.
   Google Scholar
• Halliday, Michael 1981c. “Structure.” Readings in Systemic Linguistics. Eds. Michael Halliday & J. R. Martin. London: Batsford. Pp. 122–131.
   Google Scholar
• Halliday, Michael… 1982. “How is a text like a clause?” Text Processing: text analysis and generation, text typology and attribution. Ed. Store Allen. Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell International. Pp. 209–247.
   Google Scholar
• Halliday, Michael…. 1985. An Introduction to Functional Grammar. London: Edward Arnold. [2nd Edition 1994]
   Google Scholar
• Halliday, Michael….…. 1992. “A systemic interpretation of Peking syllable finals.” Studies in Systemic Phonology. Ed. Paul Tench. London: Pinter. Pp. 98–121.
   Google Scholar
• Halliday, Michael & Christian M. I. M. Matthiessen. 1999. Construing Experience through Meaning: a language-based approach to cognition. London: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Halliday, M. A. K. 2002. On Grammar [Volume 1 in the Collected Works of M A K Halliday, edited by J. J. Webster). London: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Hood, Sue. 2005. “Managing attitude in undergraduate academic writing: a focus on the introductions to research reports.” Analysing academic writing: contextualized frameworks. Eds. Robert Ellis & Louise Ravelli. London: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• “Jeff Fenech, the Marrickville Mauler.” Sydney Morning Herald. May 6, 1990. http://www.boxinggyms.com.au/boxing-gymsarticles/1990/5/6/why-fenech-handles-himself-like-a-champion-in-and-out-of-the-ring/
   Google Scholar
• Johnston, Trevor. 1992. “The realization of the linguistic metafunctions in a sign language.” Language Sciences 14(4): 317–353.
   Google Scholar
• Keating, P. 1992. Redfern Park Speech, http://www.antar.org.au/issues_and_campaigns/self-determination/paul_keating_redfern_speech
   Google Scholar
• Lemke, Jay 1998a. “Resources for attitudinal meaning: evaluative orientations in text semantics.” Functions of Language 5(1): 33–56.
   Google Scholar
• Lemke, Jay. 1998b. “Multiplying meaning: visual and verbal semiotics in scientific text.” Reading Science: critical and functional perspectives on discourses of science. Eds. Jamers R. Martin & Robert Veel. London: Routledge. Pp.87–113.
   Google Scholar
• Louw, Bill. 1993. “Irony in the text of insincerity in the writer? The diagnostic potential of semantic prosodies.” Text and Technology: in honour of John Sinclair. Amsterdam: Benjamins. Eds. Mona Baker, Gill Francis & Elena Tognini-Bognelli. Pp. 157–176.
   Google Scholar
• Macken-Horarik, Mary & J.R. Martin. Eds. 2003. Special Issue: Negotiating heteroglossia: social perspectives on evaluation. Text 23(2).
   Google Scholar
• Mandela, Nelson. 1995. Long walk to freedom: the autobiography of Nelson Mandela. London: Abacus.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, J. R. 1988. “Hypotactic recursive systems in English: toward a functional interpretation.” Systemic Functional Approaches to Discourse. Eds. James D. Benson & William S. Greaves. Norwood, N J: Ablex. Pp. 240–270.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, J. R.. 1990. “Interpersonal grammatization: mood and modality in Tagalog.” Philippine Journal of Linguistics 21(1): 2–51.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, J. R. 1991. “Intrinsic functionality: implications for contextual theory.” Social Semiotics 1(1): 99–162.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, J. R. 1992a. English Text: system and structure. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, J. R. 1992b. “Macroproposals: meaning by degree.” Discourse Description: diverse analyses of a fund raising text. Eds. William A. Mann & Sandra A. Thompson. Amsterdam: Benjamins. Pp. 359–395.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, J. R.…. 1995a. “Text and clause: fractal resonance.” Text 15(1): 5–42.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, J. R.… 1995b. “Logical meaning, interdependency and the linking particle (-ng/na) in Tagalog.” Functions of Language. 2(2): 189–228.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, J. R. 1995c. “Interpersonal meaning, persuasion and public discourse: packing semiotic punch.” Australian Journal of Linguistics 15(1): 33–67.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, J. R.… 1996. “Types of structure: deconstructing notions of constituency in clause and text.” Computational and Conversational Discourse. Eds. Eduard H. Hovy & Donia R. Scott. Heidelberg: Springer. Pp. 39–66.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, J. R.…. 2000a. “Factoring out exchange: types of structure.” Working with Dialogue. Ed. Malcolm Coulthard. Tubingen: Niemeyer. Pp. 19–40.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, J. R.….…. 2000b. “Beyond exchange: appraisal systems in English.” Evaluation in Text: authorial stance and the construction of discourse. Eds. Susan Hunston & Geoff Thompson. Oxford: OUP. Pp. 142–175.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, J. R.….… 2001. “Fair trade: negotiating meaning in multimodal texts.” The Semiotics of Writing: transdisciplinary perspectives on the technology of writing. Ed. Patrick Coppock. Turnhout (Belgium): Brepols. Pp. 311–338.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, J. R.…. 2004. “Sense and sensibility: texturing evaluation.” Language, Education and Discourse: Functional Perspectives. Ed. Joseph Foley. London: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, J. R. & Günther Plum. 1997. “Construing experience: some story genres.” Journal of Narrative and Life History 7(1–4); 299–308.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, J. R. & David Rose. 2003. Working with Discourse: beyond the clause. London: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, J. R. & Peter White. 2005. The language of evaluation: appraisal in English. London: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Matthiessen, Christian M. I. M. 1988. “Representational issues in systemic functional grammar.” Systemic Functional Approaches to Discourse. Eds. James D. Benson & William S. Greaves. Norwood, N J: Ablex. Pp. 136–175.
   Google Scholar
• Matthiessen, Christian M. I. M.. 1992. “Interpreting the textual metafunction.” Advances in systemic linguistics. Eds. Martin Davies & Louise Ravelli. London: Pinter. Pp. 37–81.
   Google Scholar
• McGregor, William. 1990. “The metafunctional hypothesis and syntagmatic relations.” Occasional Papers in Systemic Linguistics 4: 5–50.
   Google Scholar
• McGregor, William 1997. Semiotic Grammar. Oxford: Clarendon.
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell, Terence. 1957. “The language of buying and selling in Cyrenaica: a situational statement. “Hesperis 26–31–71 [reprinted in Terence Mitchell. 1975. Principles of Neo-Firthian Linguistics. London: Longman. Pp. 167–200]
   Google Scholar
• O'Brian, P. 1997a. The reverse of the medal. London: Harper Collins.
   Google Scholar
• O'Brian, P.. 1997b. The letter of the Marque. London: Harper Collins.
   Google Scholar
• Palmer, Frank. Ed. 1970. Prosodic Analysis. London: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pike, Kenneth. L. 1982. Linguistic concepts. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
   Google Scholar
• Plum, Günther. 1988. Textual and Contextual Conditioning in Spoken English: a genre-based approach. Ph.D. Thesis. Department of Linguistics, University of Sydney, [published as Plum, G. A. 1998. Text and Contextual Conditioning in Spoken English: a genre-based approach. Nottingham: Department of English Studies, University of Nottingham]
   Google Scholar
• Poynton, Cate. 1984. “Names as vocatives: forms and functions.” Nottingham Linguistic Circular 13: 1–34.
   Google Scholar
• Poynton, Cate 1996. “Amplification as a grammatical prosody: attitudinal modification in the nominal group.” Meaning and Form: systemic functional interpretations. Eds. Margaret Berry et al. Pp. 211–227.
   Google Scholar
• Rose, David. 2001. The Western Desert Code: an Australian cryptogrammar. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.
   Google Scholar
• Stubbs, Michael. 2001. “On inference theories and code theories: corpus evidence for schematic schemas.” Text 21(3): 437–465.
   Google Scholar
• Teruya, Kazuhiro. 2005. “Metafunctional profile: Japanese.” Language typology: a functional perspective. Eds. Alice Caffarel et al. Pp. 77–137.
   Google Scholar
• Teruya, K. E. Akerejola, T. Anderson, A. Caffarel, J. Lavid, C. M. I. M. Matthiessen, U. Petersen, P. Patpong & E Smedegaard. 2007. “Typology of MOOD: a text-based and system-based functional view.” R. Hasan, C. M. I. M. Matthiessen & J. Webster (eds) Continuing Discourse on Language: a functional perspective Vol. 2. London: Equinox. Pp 859–920.
   Google Scholar
• Thibault, Paul. 1987. “An interview with Michael Halliday.” Language Topics: essays in honour of Michael Halliday. Vol. 2. Eds. Ross Steele & Terry Threadgold. Amsterdam: Benjamins. Pp. 599–627.
   Google Scholar
• Waterson, Natalie. 1956. “Some aspects of the phonology of the nominal forms of the Turkish word.” Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies 18: 578–591 [reprinted in Palmer 1970: 174–187.]
   Google Scholar
• Waterson, Natalie 1987. Prosodic Phonology: the theory and its application to language acquisition and speech processing. Newcastle: Grevatt & Grevatt.
   Google Scholar