Appraising glances: evaluating Martin's model of APPRAISAL

REFERENCES

• Bolivar, Adriana. 2001. “The negotiation of evaluation in written text.” Patterns of text: in honour of Michael Hoey. Eds. Mike Scott and Geoff Thompson. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Pp. 129–58.
   Google Scholar
• Christie, Fran and James R. Martin. Eds. 1997. Genre and institutions: social processes in the workplace and school. London: Cassell.
   Google Scholar
• Cruse, D. Alan. 1986. Lexical semantics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Francis, Gill and Elisabeth Manning. 1997. Collins COBUILD grammar patterns 2: nouns and adjectives. London: HarperCollins.
   Google Scholar
• Halliday, Michael and Christian M.I.M. Matthiessen. 2004. Introduction to Functional Grammar. Third edition. London: Edward Arnold.
   Google Scholar
• Hoey, Michael. 1983. On the surface of discourse. London: George Allen and Unwin.
   Google Scholar
• Hoey, Michael 2001. Textual interaction. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hunston, Susan 1993. “Evaluation and ideology in scientific discourse.” Register analysis: theory and practice. Ed. Mohsen Ghadessy. London: Pinter. Pp. 57–73.
   Google Scholar
• Hunston, Susan. 2000. “Evaluation and the planes of discourse: Status and Value in persuasive texts.” Evaluation in text: authorial stance and the construction of discourse. Eds. Susan Hunston and Geoff Thompson. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Pp. 176–206.
   Google Scholar
• Hunston, Susan and Gill Francis. 2000. Pattern Grammar: a corpus-driven approach to the lexical grammar of English. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Hunston, Susan and John Sinclair. 2000. “A local grammar of evaluation.” Evaluation in text: authorial stance and the construction of discourse. Eds. Susan Hunston and Geoff Thompson. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Pp. 74–101.
   Google Scholar
• Jordan, Michael. 2001. “Some discourse patterns and the signalling of the Assessment-Basis relation.” Patterns of text: in honour of Michael Hoey. Eds. Mike Scott and Geoff Thompson. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Pp. 159–92.
   Google Scholar
• Labov, William. 1972. Language in the inner city. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press. Pp. 354–96.
   Google Scholar
• Lemke, Jay. 1998. “Resources for attitudinal meaning: evaluative orientations in text semantics.” Functions of Language 5: 1: 33–56.
   Google Scholar
• Macken-Horarik, Mary. 2003. “Envoi: intractable issues in appraisal analysis?” Negotiating heteroglossia: social perspectives on evaluation. Eds. Mary Macken-Horarik and James R. Martin. Special issue of Text 23: 2. Pp. 313–319.
   Google Scholar
• Macken-Horarik, Mary and James R. Martin. Eds. 2003. Negotiating heteroglossia: social perspectives on evaluation. Special issue of Text 23:2.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, James R. 2000. “Beyond exchange: APPRAISAL systems in English.” Evaluation in text: authorial stance and the construction of discourse. Eds. S. Hunston and G. Thompson. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Pp 142–75.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, James R. and David Rose. 2003. Working with discourse: meaning beyond the clause. London: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, James R. and Peter White. 2005. The language of evaluation: Appraisal in English. London: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Sinclair, John. 1988. “Mirror for a text Journal of English and Foreign Languages 1: 15–44.
   Google Scholar
• Sinclair, John and Ronald Carter. Eds. 2004. Trust the text: language, corpus and discourse. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Thetela, Peter. 1997. “Entities and parameters in academic research articles.” English for Specific Purposes 16: 2: 101–118.
   Google Scholar
• White, Peter. 2000. “Dialogue and inter-subjectivity: reinterpreting the semantics of modality and hedging.” Working with dialog. Eds. Malcolm Coulthard, Janet Cotterill and Frances Rock. Tubingen: Max Niemeyer Verlag. Pp. 67–80.
   Google Scholar
• Winter, Eugene. 1982. Towards a contextual grammar of English. London: George Allen and Unwin.
   Google Scholar