Participle clauses between adverbial and complement

REFERENCES

• Bolinger, Dwight. 1968. Entailment and the meaning of structures. Glossa 2. 119–27.
   Google Scholar
• Croft, William. 2001. Radical construction grammar: Syntactic theory in typological perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• De Mulder, Walter. 2007. Force dynamics. In Dirk Geeraerts & Hubert Cuyckens (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of cognitive linguistics, 294–317. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Denison, David. 2004. Do grammars change when they leak? In Christian J. Kay, Simon Horobin & Jeremy Smith (eds.), New perspectives on English historical linguistics, 15–29. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• De Smet, Hendrik. 2009. Analysing reanalysis. Lingua 119. 1728–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Smet, Hendrik. 2007. For…to-infinitives as verbal complements in Late Modern and Present-Day English: Between motivation and change. English Studies 88. 67–94.
   Google Scholar
• Fanego, Teresa. 2004. On reanalysis and actualization in syntactic change. The rise and development of English verbal gerunds. Diachronica 21. 5–55.
   Google Scholar
• Fischer, Olga. 2000. Grammaticalization: unidirectional, non-reversable? The case of to before the infinitive in English. In Olga Fischer, Anette Rosenbach & Dieter Stein (eds.), Pathways of change: Grammaticalization in English, 149–69. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Fischer, Olga. 2007. Approaches to morphosyntactic change from a functional and formal perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Givón, Talmy. 1980. The binding hierarchy and the typology of complements. Studies in Language 4. 333–77.
   Google Scholar
• Goldberg, Adele E. 1995. Constructions: A construction grammar approach to argument structure. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goldberg, Adele E. 2006. Constructions at work: The nature of generalization in language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Greenbaum, Sidney. 1969. Studies in English adverbial usage. London: Longmans, Green and Co.
   Google Scholar
• Harris, Alice C. & Lyle Campbell. 1995. Historical syntax in cross-linguistic perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Haspelmath, Martin. 1989. From purposive to infinitive – A universal path of grammaticization. Folia Linguistica Historica 10. 287–310.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heyvaert, Liesbet. 2004. Towards a symbolic typology of -ing nominalizations. In Michel Achard & Suzanne Kemmer (eds.), Language, culture, and mind, 493–506. Stanford: CSLI Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Hollmann, Willem B. 2003. Synchrony and diachrony of English periphrastic causatives: A cognitive perspective. Manchester, UK: University of Manchester Doctoral thesis.
   Google Scholar
• Hopper, Paul J. & Sandra A. Thompson. 1980. Transitivity in grammar and discourse. Language 56. 251–99.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huddleston, Rodney & Geoffrey Pullum. 2002. The Cambridge grammar of the English language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Keizer, Evelien. 2004. Postnominal PP complements and modifiers: A cognitive distinction. English Language and Linguistics 8. 323–50.
   Google Scholar
• Killie, Kristin & Toril Swan. 2006. Pragmatics and the development of adverbial -ing-clauses (converbs) in English. Paper presented at ICAME 27, Helsinki, 26 May.
   Google Scholar
• Kortmann, Bernd. 1991. Free adjuncts and absolutes in English: Problems of control and interpretation. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Langacker, Ronald W. 1987. Foundations of cognitive grammar: Vol.1: Theoretical prerequisites. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Langacker, Ronald W. 1991. Foundations of cognitive grammar: Vol.2: Descriptive application. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lopez-Couso, María José. 2007. Adverbial connectives within and beyond adverbial subordination. The history of lest. In Ursula Lenker & Anneli Meurman-Solin (eds.), Clausal connection in the history of English (Current issues in linguistic theory), 11–30. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Los, Bettelou. 2005. The rise of the to-infinitive. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Noonan, Michael. 1985. Complementation. In Timothy Shopen (ed.), Language typology and syntactic description: Vol.2. Complex constructions, 42–140. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pawley, Andrew & Frances H. Syder. 1983. Two puzzles for linguistic theory. Nativelike selection and nativelike fluency. In Jack Richards & Richard Schmidt (eds.), Language and communication, 191–226. London: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Quirk, Randolph. 2004 [1965]. Descriptive statement and serial relationship. In Bas Aarts, David Denison, Evelien Keizer & Gergana Popova (eds.), Fuzzy grammar: A reader, 327–49. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Quirk, Randolph, Sidney Greenbaum, Geoffrey Leech & Jan Svartvik. 1985. A comprehensive grammar of the English language. London: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Ross, John Robert. 1973. Nouniness. In Osamu Fujimara (ed.), Three dimensions of linguistic research, 137–257. Tokyo: TEC Company.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, John R. 1998. Syntactic constructions as prototype categories. In Michael Tomasello (ed.), The new psychology of language: Cognitive and functional approaches to language structure Vol. 1, 177–202. London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Traugott, Elizabeth C. & Ekkehard König. 1991. The semantics-pragmatics of grammaticalization revisited. In Elizabeth C. Traugott & Bernd Heine (eds.), Approaches to grammaticalization Vol. 1, 189–218. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Traugott, Elizabeth C. & Graeme Trousdale. 2010. Gradience, gradualness and grammaticalization. In Elizabeth C. Traugott & Graeme Trousdale (eds.), Gradience, gradualness and grammaticalization, 19–44. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Van de Velde, Freek, Hendrik De Smet & Lobke Ghesquière. 2013. On multiple source constructions in language change. Studies in Language 37. 473–89.
   Google Scholar
• Visser, Fredericus Theodorus. 1963–73. An historical syntax of the English language. Leiden: Brill.
   Google Scholar