102
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
ARTICLES

Letters to the editor: A tale of two cities

&

References

  • Antony, L. 2010. AntConc (Version 3.2.1) [Computer Software]. Tokyo: Waseda University.
  • Aitchison, J. 2006. Headlines and deadlines: Changing newspaper language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Biber, D., Conrad, S. & V. Cortes. 2004. Lexical bundles in university teaching and textbooks. Applied Linguistics 25(3). 371–405. doi: 10.1093/applin/25.3.371
  • British Broadcasting Corporation (BBC). 2003. The language of the media. London: BBC.
  • Catherine McAuley Library. 2014. Letters to the editor. Adelaide: St. Aloysius College.
  • Duke University. 2004. Letters to the editor. Durham, NC: Duke University Thompson Writing Program.
  • Halliday, M.A.K. 1985. Spoken and written language. Geelong: Deakin University Press.
  • Halliday, M.A.K. 1994. An introduction to functional grammar. 2nd edn. London: Edward Arnold.
  • Halliday, M.A.K. & R. Hasan. 1985. Language, context and text: Aspects of language in a social-semiotic perspective. Geelong: Deakin University Press.
  • Hunston, S. 1993. Evaluation and ideology in scientific writing. In M. Ghadessy (ed.), Register analysis: Theory and practice, 57–73. London: Pinter.
  • Kansas University. 2016. What is a letter to the editor? Lawrence: University of Kansas Community Tool Box Programme.
  • Martin, J.R. 2000. Beyond exchange: APPRAISAL systems in English. In S. Hunston & G. Thompson (eds.), Evaluation in text: Authorial stance and the construction of discourse, 142–75. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • New York Times. 2004. Letters to the editor. New York, USA.
  • O’Donnell, M. 2009. The UAM corpus tool: Software for corpus annotation and exploration. In Carmen M. Bretones Callejas, et al. (eds.), Applied linguistics now: Understanding language and mind/La linguistica aplicada hoy: Comprendiendo et lenguaje y la mente, 1433–47. Almeria: Universidad de Almeria.
  • Rafiee, M. & M. Kayhanian. 2012. A comparative analysis of lexical bundles in journalistic writing in English and Persian. International Journal of Foregin Language Teaching and Research 1(2). 37–44.
  • Silva, M.T. 2013. Professional views on Letters to the Editor as a means of Audience Participation. Participations: Journal of Audience and Reception Studies 10(1). 428–31.
  • Sinclair, J. Mch. 1988. Compressed English. In M. Ghadessy (ed.), Registers of written English, 130–6. London: Pinter Publishers.
  • Thompson, G. 1996. Voices in the text: Discourse perspectives on language reports. Applied Linguistics 17. 501–30. doi: 10.1093/applin/17.4.501
  • Thompson, Peter. 2005. The battle for Singapore. London: Portraitbooks.
  • To, V. 2013. Lexical density and readability: A case study of English textbooks. Hobart: University of Tasmania.
  • Ure, J.N. 1971. Lexical density and register differentiation. In G.E. Perren & J.L.M. Trim (eds.), Applications of linguistics: Selected papers of the second international conference of applied linguistics, 443–52. Cambridge: CUP.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.