The language of parole: sex offenders’ discourse strategy use in Indeterminate Sentence Review Board hearings

References

• Bletzer, K. V., & M. P. Koss. 2012. From parallel to intersecting narratives in cases of sexual assault. Qualitative Health Research 22(3). 291–303. doi: 10.1177/1049732311430948
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buchholz, M. B., F. Lamott, & K. Mörtl. 2009. Gender constructions from a project on sex offenders. International Forum of Psychoanalysis 18(1). 50–59. doi: 10.1080/08037060802658504
   Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. 2007. Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. 2nd edn. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Dale, A., A. Davies, & L. Wei. 1997. Developing a typology of rapists’ speech. Journal of Pragmatics 27(5). 653–69. doi: 10.1016/s0378-2166(96)00060-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Darn, S. 2005. Aspects of nonverbal communication. The Internet TESL Journal 11(2). 4.
   Google Scholar
• Davies, A. 1992. Rapists’ behaviour: A three aspect model as a basis for analysis and the identification of serial crime. Forensic Science International 55(2). 173–94. doi: 10.1016/0379-0738(92)90122-d
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fox Tree, J. E., & J. C. Schrock. 2002. Basic meanings of you know and I mean. Journal of Pragmatics 34. 727–47. doi: 10.1016/s0378-2166(02)00027-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodwin, C. 2000. Action and embodiment within situated human interaction. Journal of Pragmatics 32(10). 1489–522. doi: 10.1016/s0378-2166(99)00096-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris, M. 1976. History and significance of the emic/etic distinction. Annual Review of Anthropology 5. 329–50. doi: 10.1146/annurev.an.05.100176.001553
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holmstrom, L. L., & A. W. Burgess. 1979. Rapists’ talk: Linguistic strategies to control the victim. Deviant Behavior 1(1). 101–25. doi: 10.1080/01639625.1979.9967515
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holloway, I., & S. Wheeler. 2013. Qualitative research in nursing and healthcare. West Sussex, UK: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Jucker, A. H. 1993. The discourse marker well: A relevance-theoretical account. Journal of Pragmatics 19. 435–52. doi: 10.1016/0378-2166(93)90004-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kellet, P. M. 1995. Acts of power, control, and resistance: Narrative accounts of convicted rapists.” In Rita Kirk Whillock and David Slayden (eds.), Hate Speech, 142–62. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, K. H. 1988. A discourse analysis of cleft and pseudocleft constructions in American English. Unpublished M.A. thesis in TESL, UCLA.
   Google Scholar
• King, S. 2013. Early desistance narratives: A qualitative analysis of probationers’ transitions towards desistance. Punishment & Society 15(2). 147–65. doi: 10.1177/1462474513477790
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirkwood, S. 2016. Desistance in action: An interactional approach to criminal justice practice and desistance from offending. Theoretical Criminology. doi: 10.1177/1362480615607624
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mann, R. E., & C. R. Hollin. 2007. Sexual offender’s explanations for their offending. Journal of Sexual Aggression 13(1). 3–9. doi: 10.1080/13552600701365621
   Google Scholar
• Maruna, S. 2001. Making good: How ex-convicts reform and rebuild their lives. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
   Google Scholar
• Maruna, S., & S. Farrall. 2004. Desistance from crime: A theoretical reformulation. Kolner Zeitschrift fur Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie 43. 171–94. doi: 10.1007/978-3-322-80474-7_7
   Google Scholar
• Maxwell, J. A. 2013. Qualitative research design: An interactive approach. 3rd edn. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Mercer, D., & L. Perkins. 2014. Theorising sexual media and sexual violence in a forensic setting: Men’s talk about pornography and offending. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry 37(2). 174–82. doi: 10.1016/j.ijlp.2013.11.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muchoki, S. 2011. Vocabulary used by sexual offenders: Meaning and implications. Culture, Health & Sexuality 13(1). 101–13. doi: 10.1080/13691058.2010.503971
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Opsal, T. 2012. ‘Livin’on the straights’: Identity, desistance, and work among women post-incarceration. Sociological Inquiry 82(3). 378–403. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-682x.2012.00421.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pomerantz, A. 1984. Agreeing and disagreeing with assessments: Some features of preferred and dispreferred turn shapes. In J. M. Atkinson, & J. Heritage (eds.), Structures of social action, 57–101. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/cbo9780511665868.008
   Google Scholar
• Ruback, R. Barry, & C. H. Hopper. 1986. Decision making by parole interviewers: The effect of case and interview factors. Law and Human Behavior 10(3). 203–14. doi: 10.1007/BF01046210
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scully, D., and J. Marolla. 1984. Convicted rapist’s vocabulary of motive: Excuses and justifications. Social Problems 31(5). 530–44. doi: 10.2307/800239
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shuy, R. W. 2006. Linguistics in the courtroom: A practical guide. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shuy, R. W. 2008. Fighting over words: Language and civil law cases. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sornig, K. 1989. Some remarks on linguistic strategies of persuasion. Language, Power and Ideology: Studies in Political Discourse 7, 95. doi: 10.1075/ct.7.09sor
   Google Scholar
• Stake, R. 1995. The art of case research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Stevens, A. 2012. ‘I am the person now I was always meant to be’: Identity reconstruction and narrative reframing in therapeutic community prisons. Criminology and Criminal Justice 12(5). 527–47. doi: 10.1177/1748895811432958
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Svartvik, J. 1980. Well is conversation. In S. Greenbaum, G. Leech, & J. Svartvik (eds.), In studies in English linguistics for Randolph Quirk, 167–77. New York: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• ten Brinke, L., S. MacDonald, S. Porter, & B. O’Connor. 2012. Crocodile tears: Facial, verbal and body language behaviors associated with genuine and fabricated remorse. Law and Human Behavior 36(1). 51. doi: 10.1007/s10979-011-9265-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vaughan, B. 2007. The internal narrative of desistance. British Journal of Criminology 47(3). 390–404. doi: 10.1093/bjc/azl083
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiggins, S., & J. Potter. 2007. Discursive psychology. In C. Willig, & W. Stainton-Rogers (eds.), The SAGE handbook of qualitative research in psychology, 73–90. Sage. doi: 10.4135/9781848607927.n5
   Google Scholar