‘(Text as) wording’ as wording in text size: stretching lexicogrammatical rank hierarchy from clause to text

References

• Biber, Douglas; Stig Johansson; Geoffrey Leech; Susan Conrad; and Edward Finegan. 1999. Longman grammar of spoken and written English. London: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Bowcher, Wendy L. 2016. Structure and multimodal texts. In Janina Wildfeuer (ed.), Building bridges for multimodal research: International perspectives on theories and practices of multimodal analysis, 167–92. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Brazil, David. 1995. A grammar of speech. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, Gillian, and George Yule. 1983. Discourse analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Butt, David; Alison Moore; Caroline Henderson-Brook; Joan Haliburn; and Russell Meares. 2007. Dissociation, relatedness, and ‘cohesive harmony’: A linguistics measure of degree of ‘fragmentation’. Linguistics and the Human Sciences 3(3).263–93.
   Google Scholar
• Cloran, Carmel. 1994. Rhetorical units and decontextualization: An enquiry into some relations of context, meaning and grammar. (Monographs in systemic linguistics, 6). School of English Studies, Nottingham University.
   Google Scholar
• Cloran, Carmel. 1995. Defining and relating text segments. In Ruqaiya Hasan, and Peter Fries (eds.), On subject and theme: A discourse functional perspective, 361–403. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Cloran, Camel. 2010. Rhetorical unit analysis and Bakhtin’s chronotype. Functions of Language 17(1).29–70. doi:10.1075/fol.17.1.02clo.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cloran, Carmel; Virginia Stuart-Smith; and Lynne Young. 2007. Models of discourse. In Ruqaiya Hasan; Christian M. I. M. Matthiessen; and Jonathan J. Webster (eds.), Continuing discourse on language: A functional perspective, 647–70. Vol. 2. London: Equinox.
   Google Scholar
• Coote, Maria-Elisabeth; János S. Petöfi; and Emel Sözer. 1989. Text and discourse connectedness. Proceedings of the Conference on Connexity and Coherence, Urbino, July 16–21, 1984. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Cross, Marilyn. 1992. Choice in lexis: Computer generation of lexis as most delicate grammar. Language Science 14(4).579–605. doi:10.1016/0388-0001(92)90031-9.
   Google Scholar
• Cross, Marilyn. 1993. Collocation in computer modeling of lexis as most delicate grammar. In Mohsen Ghadessy (ed.), Register analysis: Theory and practice, 196–220. London: Pinter.
   Google Scholar
• Cruse, David. 2001. The lexicon. In Mark Aronoff, and Janie Rees-Miller (eds.), The handbook of linguistics, 238–64. London: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Crystal, David. 1997. The Cambridge encyclopedia of language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• De Beaugrande, Robert, and Wolfgang U. Dressler. 1981. Introduction to text linguistics. London: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• De Saussure, Ferdinand. 1998. Course in general linguistics. Tr. Roy Harris. Chicago, IL: Open Court.
   Google Scholar
• Firth, John R. 1957. A synopsis of linguistic theory, 1930–55. Studies in linguistic analysis (Special Volume of the Philological Society), 1–32. London: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Forey, Gail, and Geoff Thompson (eds.). 2008. Text type and texture. London: Equinox.
   Google Scholar
• Fries, Peter. 1981. On the status of theme in English: Argument from discourse. Forum Linguisticum 6.1–38.
   Google Scholar
• Fries, Peter. 1995. Patterns of information in initial position in English. In Peter Fries, and Michael Gregory (eds.), Discourse in society: Systemic functional perspectives, meaning and choice in language: Studies for Michael Halliday, 47–66. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
   Google Scholar
• Fries, Peter. 2002. The flow of information in a written English text. In Peter Fries; Michael Cummings; David Lockwood; and William Spruiell (eds.), Relations and functions within and around language, 117–55. London: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Ghadessy, Mohsen (ed.). 1995. Thematic development in English text. London: Pinter.
   Google Scholar
• Giora, Rachel. 1983. Segmentation and segment cohesion: On the thematic organization of the text. Text 3(2).155–81. doi: 10.1515/text.1.1983.3.2.155
   Google Scholar
• Halliday, Michael A. K. 1961. Categories of the theory of grammar. Word (17).241–92. doi:10.1080/00437956.1961.11659756.
   Google Scholar
• Halliday, Michael A. K. 1966a. The concept of rank: A reply. Journal of Linguistics 2(1).110–18. doi:10.1017/S0022226700001377.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halliday, Michael A. K. 1966b. Lexis as a linguistic level. In Charles E. Bazell; John C. Catford; Michael A. K. Halliday; and Robert H. Robins (eds.), In memory of J. R. Firth, 148–62. London: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Halliday, Michael A. K. 1966c. Some notes on ‘deep’ grammar. Journal of Linguistics 2(1).57–67. doi:10.1017/S0022226700001328.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halliday, Michael A. K. 1967–1968. Notes on transitivity and theme in English, part 1–3. Journal of Linguistics 3(1).37–81, 199–244; 4(2).179–215. doi: 10.1017/S0022226700012949
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halliday, Michael A. K. 1970. Language structure and language function. In John Lyons (ed.), New horizon in linguistics, 140–65. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Halliday, Michael A. K. 1971. Linguistic function and literary style: An inquiry into the language of William Golding’s The inheritors. In Seymour Chatman (ed.), Literary style: A symposium, 330–68. London: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Halliday, Michael A. K. 1978. Language as social semiotic: The social interpretation of language and meaning. London: Edward Arnold.
   Google Scholar
• Halliday, Michael A. K. 1981. Text semantics and clause grammar: Some patterns of realization. In James E. Copeland, and Philip W. Davis (eds.), The seventh LACUS forum, 31–59. Columbia, SC: Hornbeam Press.
   Google Scholar
• Halliday, Michael A. K. 1982. How is a text like a clause? In Stu Allen (ed.), Text processing: Text analysis and generation, text typology and attribution. Proceedings of Nobel Symposium 51, 209–47. Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell International.
   Google Scholar
• Halliday, Michael A. K. 1992. Language as system and language as instance: The corpus as a theoretical construct. In Jan Svartvik (ed.), Directions in corpus linguistics: Proceedings of Nobel symposium 82, 61–78. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Halliday, Michael A. K. 1993. Quantitative studies and probabilities in grammar. In Michael Hoey (ed.), Data, description and discourse: Papers on the English language in honour of John M. Sinclair on his sixtieth birthday, 1–25. London: Harper Collins.
   Google Scholar
• Halliday, Michael A. K. 1994. An introduction to functional grammar. 2nd edn. London: Edward Arnold.
   Google Scholar
• Halliday, Michael A. K. 2000. Computing meanings: Some reflections on past experience and present prospects. Paper presented as plenary address at PACLING 1995. Journal of Japan Society for Fuzzy Theory & Systems 12(5).23–42.
   Google Scholar
• Halliday, Michael A. K. 2004. The language of science. Vol. 5 in the Collected works of M. A. K. Holliday, ed. by Jonathan J. Webster. London: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Halliday, Michael A. K. 2005. Computational and quantitative studies. Vol. 6 in the Collected works of M. A. K. Halliday, ed. by Jonathan J. Webster. London: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Halliday, Michael A. K. 2008. Complementarities in language. Beijing: The Commercial Press.
   Google Scholar
• Halliday, Michael A. K., and Ruqaiya Hasan. 1976. Cohesion in English. London: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Halliday, Michael A. K., and Christian M. I. M. Matthiessen. 1999. Construing experience through meaning: A language-based approach to cognition. London: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Halliday, Michael A. K., and Christian M. I. M. Matthiessen. 2014. Halliday’s introduction to functional grammar. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Halliday, Michael A. K., and Jonathan J. Webster, 2014. Text linguistics: The how and why of meaning. London: Equinox.
   Google Scholar
• Hancock, Braig. 2005. Meaning-centered grammar. London: Equinox.
   Google Scholar
• Hasan, Ruqaiya. 1967. Linguistics and the study of literary texts. Edudes de Linguistique Appliquee 5. 106–15.
   Google Scholar
• Hasan, Ruqaiya. 1978. Text in the systemic-functional model. In Wolfgang U. Dressler (ed.), Current trends in textlinguistics, 228–46. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Hasan, Ruqaiya. 1979. On the notion of text. In János S. Petöfi (ed.), Text vs. sentence: Basic questions of textlinguistics, 369–90. Hamburg: Helmet Buske.
   Google Scholar
• Hasan, Ruqaiya. 1984. Coherence and cohesive harmony. In James Food (ed.), Understanding reading comprehension, 181–219. Delaware: International Reading Association.
   Google Scholar
• Hasan, Ruqaiya. 1985a. The structure of a text. In Michael A. K. Halliday, and Ruqaiya Hasan (eds.), Language, context, and text: Aspects of language in a social-semiotic perspective, 52–69. Geelong: Deakin University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hasan, Ruqaiya. 1985b. The texture of a text. In Michael A. K. Halliday, and Ruqaiya Hasan (eds.), Language, context, and text: Aspects of language in a social-semiotic perspective, 70–96. Geelong: Deakin University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hasan, Ruqaiya. 1985c. Linguistics, language and verbal art. Melbourne: Deakin University.
   Google Scholar
• Hasan, Ruqaiya. 1987. The grammarian’s dream: Lexis as most delicate grammar. In Michael A. K. Halliday, and Robin Fawcett (eds.), New developments in systemic linguistics: Theory and application, 183–211. London: Pinter.
   Google Scholar
• Hasan, Ruqaiya. 1993. Contexts for meaning. In James E. Alatis (ed.), Language, communication and social meaning ( Georgetown University Round Table on Languages and Linguistics 1992), 79–103. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press. Online: https://repository.library.georgetown.edu/bookview/10822/000/555/555485/ 1/ index.html.
   Google Scholar
• Hasan, Ruqaiya. 1994. Situation and the definition of genre. In Allen D. Grimshaw (ed.), What’s going on here? Complementary studies of professional talk, 127–67. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
   Google Scholar
• Hasan, Ruqaiya. 2000. The uses of talk. In Srikant Sarangi, and Malcolm Coulthard (eds.), Discourse and social life, 28–47. London: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Hasan, Ruqaiya. 2001. Understanding talk: Directions from Bernstein’s sociology. International Journal of Social Research Methodology: Theory and Practice 4(1).5–9. doi:10.1080/13645570010028549.
   Google Scholar
• Hengeveld, Kees, and J. Lachlan Mackenzie. 2008. Functional discourse grammar: A typologically-based theory of language structure. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hjelmslev, Louis. 1961. Prolegomena to a theory of language. Tr. Francis J. Whitfield. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hoey, Michael. 1983. On the surface of discourse. London: Allen & Unwin.
   Google Scholar
• Hoey, Michael. 1991. Patterns of lexis in text. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hoey, Michael. 2001. Textual interaction: An introduction to written discourse analysis. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hoey, Michael. 2005. Lexical priming: A new theory of words and language. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hoey, Michael. 2007. Text, discourse and corpora: Theory and analysis. London: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Hunston, Susan. 2013. Corpus approach to evaluation. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hunston, Susan, and Gill Francis. 2000. Pattern grammar: A corpus-driven approach to the lexical grammar of English. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Hunston, Susan, and Geoff Thompson. 2000. Evaluation in text. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jespersen, Otto. 1940–1949. A modern English grammar. Vols. 1–7. Copenhagen: Ejnar Munksgaard.
   Google Scholar
• Labov, William, and Joshua Waletsky. 1967. Narrative analysis: Oral versions of personal experience. Journal of Narrative and Life History 7.3–38. doi: 10.1075/jnlh.7.02nar
   Google Scholar
• Longacre, Robert E. 1979. The paragraph as a grammatical unit. In Talmy Givón (ed.), Syntax and semantics. Vol. 12: Discourse and syntax, 115–33. New York: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Longacre, Robet E. 2007. The grammar of discourse. 2nd edn. New York: Springer Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Lukin, Annabelle. 2013. What do texts do? The context-construing work of news. In Geoff Thompson (ed.), Special issue of Text and Talk 4–5.523–52.
   Google Scholar
• Lukin, Annabelle. 2016. Language and society, context and text: The contributions of Ruqaiya Hasan. In Wendy L. Bowcher, and Jennifer Yameng Liang (eds.), Society in language, language in society: Essays in honour of Ruqaiya Hasan, 143–65. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, James R. 1981. How many speech acts? University of East Anglia Papers in Linguistics 14–15.52–77.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, James R. 1992. English text: System and structure. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, James R. 1995. Text and clause: Fractal resonance. Text 15(1).5–42. doi: 10.1515/text.1.1995.15.1.5
   Google Scholar
• Martin, James R. 1996. Types of structure: Deconstructing notions of constituency in clause and text. In Eduard H. Hovy, and Donia H. Scott (eds.), Computational and conversational discourse: Burning issues – an interdisciplinary account, 39–66. Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, James R. 2012. Genre studies. Vol. 3 in the Collected works of J. R. Martin, ed. by Zhenhua Wang. Shanghai: Shanghai Jiaotong University.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, James. (ed.). 2013. Interviews with M. A. K. Halliday: Language turned back on himself. London: Bloomsbury.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, James R., and Peter White. 2005. The language of evaluation: Appraisal in English. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Matthiessen, Christian M. I. M. 1991. Lexico(grammatical) choice in text generation. In Cecile Paris, Wiliam Swartout, and William C. Mann (eds.), Natural language generation in artificial intelligence and computational linguistics, 249–92. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
   Google Scholar
• Matthiessen, Christian M. I. M. 1999. The system of TRANSITIVITY: An exploratory study of text-based profiles. Functions of Language 6(1).1–51. doi:10.1075/fol.6.1.02mat.
   Google Scholar
• Matthiessen, Christian M. I. M. 2007. Lexicogrammar in systemic functional linguistics: Descriptive and theoretical developments in the ‘IFG’ tradition since 1970s. In Ruqaiya Hasan; Christian M. I. M. Matthiessen; and Jonathan J. Webster (eds.), Continuing discourse on language: A functional perspective, 765–858. Vol. 2. London: Equinox.
   Google Scholar
• Matthiessen, Christian M. I. M.; Kazuhiro Teruya; and Marvin Lam. 2010. Key terms in systemic functional linguistics. London: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• McGregor, William. 1991. The concept of rank in systemic linguistics. In Eija Ventola (ed.), Functional and systemic linguistics: Approaches and uses, 121–38. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell, T. F. 1957. The language of buying and selling in Cyrenaica: A situational statement. Hesperis 26.31–71.
   Google Scholar
• Nesbitt, Christopher, and Plum, Guenter A. 1988. Probabilities in a systemic grammar: The clause complex in English. In Robin Fawcett, and David Young (eds.), New developments in systemic linguistics, 6–38. London: Pinter.
   Google Scholar
• Pace-Sigge, Michael. 2013. Lexical priming in English usage. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Peng, Xuanwei. 2000. A comprehensive comparison between English and Chinese. Shanghai: Shanghai Foreign Language Education Press.
   Google Scholar
• Peng, Xuanwei. 2005. The pro-form system in Chinese: A systemic functional account of rank status, scope of typicality and semantic classification. Language Teaching and Research (1). 56–65.
   Google Scholar
• Peng, Xuanwei. 2011. An introduction to language and linguistics: Chinese systemic functional grammar. Beijing: Peking University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Peng, Xuanwei. 2015. Appraisal stylistics. Beijing: Peking University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Peng, Xuanwei. 2016. English morphemic constituents working for discourse wording: Extending rank scale from ‘clause (complex)' up to ‘text (type)'. International Journal of English Linguistics 3. 38–60. doi: 10.5539/ijel.v6n3p38
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pike, Kenneth L., and Evelyn G. Pike, 1983. Text and tagmeme. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
   Google Scholar
• Prince, Ellen F. 1981. Toward a taxonomy of given/new information. In Peter Cole (ed.), Radical pragmatics, 223–55. New York: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Quirk, Randolph; Sidney Greenbaum; Geoffrey Leech; and Jan. Svartvik. 1985. A comprehensive grammar of the English language. London: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Rothkegel, Annely. 1993. Text knowledge and object knowledge. London: Pinter.
   Google Scholar
• Schegloff, Imanuel. 2007. Sequence organization in interaction: A primer in conversation analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stoddard, Sally. 1991. Text and texture: Patterns of cohesion. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
   Google Scholar
• Tsui, Amy B. M. 1994. English conversation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tucker, Gordon. 1997. The lexicogrammar of adjectives: A systemic functional approach to lexis. London: Cassell.
   Google Scholar
• Tucker, Gordon. 2007. Between lexis and grammar: Towards a systemic functional approach to phraseology. In Ruqaiya Hasan; Christian M. I. M. Matthiessen; and Jonathan J. Webster (eds.), Continuing discourse on language: A functional perspective, 953–77. Vol. 2. London: Equinox.
   Google Scholar
• Van Dijk, Teun. 1979. Macro-structures. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Webster, Jonathan J. 2002. Text linguistics. Tr. Jiujiu Xu. Beijing: China Press of Social Sciences.
   Google Scholar
• Wegener, Rebekah. 2011. Parameters of context: From theory to model and application. , Department of Linguistics, Macquarie University dissertation.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, Geoff, and Len Unsworth. 1990. Big books or big basals?: The significance of text form in constructing contexts for early literacy development through shared reading. Australian Journal of Reading 13.100–11.
   Google Scholar