A new perspective on word association: how keystroke logging informs strength of word association

References

• Aitchison, J. 2012. Words in the mind: An introduction to the mental lexicon. 4th edn. Chichester: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Aldridge, M., and L. Fontaine. 2016. The impact of mode on writing processes: A cognitive functional perspective on student writing. Special Issue on SFL and Development in Writing and Reading Competence in Language Education, Revista de Lenguas y Culturas Extranjeras 7. 7–32.
   Google Scholar
• Aldridge, M., and L. Fontaine. in press. The role of working memory in typing fluency: A new perspective on writing activity. In E. Lindgreen, Y. Knospe and K. Sullivan (eds.), Researching writing with observational logging tools from 2006 to the present and beyond.
   Google Scholar
• Alves, R. A., M. Branco, S. L. Castro, and T. Olive. 2012. Effects of handwriting skill, output modes, and gender on fourth graders’ pauses, language bursts, fluency and quality. In V. W. Berninger (ed.), Past, present, and future contributions of cognitive writing research to cognitive psychology, 389–402. New York, NY: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Alves, R. A., S. L. Castro, L. de Sousa, and S. Strömqvist. 2007. Influence of typing skills on pause-execution cycles in written composition. In M. Torrance, L. van Waes and D. Galbraith (eds.), Writing and cognition: Research and applications, 55–65. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Bagger Nissen, H., and B. Henriksen. 2006. Word class influence on word association test results. International Journal of Applied Linguistics 16(3). 389–408. doi: 10.1111/j.1473-4192.2006.00124.x
   Google Scholar
• Balota, D. A., M. J. Cortese, S. D. Sergent-Marshall, D. H. Spieler, and M. J. Yap. 2004. Visual word recognition of single-syllable words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 133. 283–316. doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.133.2.283
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beattie, G., and B. Butterworth. 1979. Contextual probability and word frequency as determinants of pauses and errors in spontaneous speech. Language and Speech 22(3). 201–211. doi: 10.1177/002383097902200301
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brysbaert, M., and M. Ghyselinck. 2006. The effect of age on acquisition: Partly frequency related, partly frequency independent. Visual Cognition 13(7/8). 992–1011. doi: 10.1080/13506280544000165
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chenu F., F. Pellegrino, H. Jisa, and M. Fayol. 2014. Interword and intraword pause threshold in writing. Frontiers in Psychology 5. 182. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00182.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collins, A. M., and M. R. Quillian. 1969. Retrieval time from semantic memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 8. 240–7. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5371(69)80069-1
   Google Scholar
• Cronin, W. 2002. The syntagmatic-paradigmatic shift and reading development. Journal of Child Language 29(1). 189–204. doi: 10.1017/S0305000901004998
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Deyne, S., D. Navarro, and G. Storms. 2013. Better explanations of lexical and semantic cognition using networks derived from continued rather than single-word associations. Behavior Research Methods 45(2). 480–98. doi: 10.3758/s13428-012-0260-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Entwisle, D. R. 1966. Word associations of young children. Baltimore: John Hopkins Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fitzpatrick, T. 2007. Word association patterns: Unpacking the assumptions. International Journal of Applied Linguistics 17(3). 319–31. doi: 10.1111/j.1473-4192.2007.00172.x
   Google Scholar
• Fitzpatrick, T., and J. Clenton. 2010. The challenge of validation: Assessing the performance of a test of productive vocabulary. Language Testing 27(4). 537–54. doi: 10.1177/0265532209354771
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fitzpatrick, T., and C. Izura. 2011. Word association in L1 and L2: An exploratory study of response types, response times and inter-language mediation. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 33. 373–98. doi: 10.1017/S0272263111000027
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fitzpatrick, T., D. Playfoot, A. Wray, and M. Wright. 2013. Establishing the reliability of word association data for investigating individual and group differences. Applied Linguistics 203. 1–29.
   Google Scholar
• Flower, L., and J. Hayes. 1981. A cognitive process theory of writing. College Composition and Communication 32. 365–87. doi: 10.2307/356600
   Google Scholar
• Grabowski, J. 2008. The internal structure of university students’ keyboard skills. Journal of Writing Research 1(1). 27–52. doi: 10.17239/jowr-2008.01.01.2
   Google Scholar
• Izura, C., and A. Ellis. 2002. Age of acquisition effects in word recognition and production in first and second languages. Psicológica 23. 245–81.
   Google Scholar
• Kess, J. F. 1992. Psycholinguistics: Psychology, linguistics and the study of natural language. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Leijten, M., S. Engelborghs, S. Van der Mussele, E. Van Horenbeeck, P. Mariën, and L. Van Waes. 2014. Cognitive writing process characteristics in Alzheimer’s disease. Paper presented at the Conference on Writing Research, Amsterdam.
   Google Scholar
• Leijten, M., and L. Van Waes. 2013. Keystroke logging in writing research: Using Inputlog to analyze and visualize writing processes. Written Communication 30(3). 358–92. Online: www.inputlog.net/description.html. doi: 10.1177/0741088313491692
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levelt, W. 1983. Monitoring and self-repair in speech. Cognition 14(1). 41–104. doi: 10.1016/0010-0277(83)90026-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meara P. 1983. Word associations in a foreign language: A report on the Birkbeck vocabulary project, Nottingham Linguistic Circular 11(2). 29–38.
   Google Scholar
• Morrison, C. M., K. W. Hirsh, T. Chappell, and A. W. Ellis. 2002. Age and age of acquisition: An evaluation of the cumulative frequency hypothesis. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology 14(4). 435–59. doi: 10.1080/09541440143000159
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nation, I. S. P. 1990. Teaching and learning vocabulary. New York: Newbury House.
   Google Scholar
• Navarrete, E., B. Basagni, F. X. Alario, and A. Costa. 2006. Does word frequency affect lexical selection in speech production? Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 59(10). 1681–90. doi: 10.1080/17470210600750558
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson, D. L., C. L. McEvoy, and S. Dennis. 2000. What is free association and what does it measure? Memory & Cognition 28(6). 887–99. doi: 10.3758/BF03209337
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson, D., C. McEvoy, and T. Schreiber. 2004. The University of South Florida free association, rhyme, and word fragment norms. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers 36. 402–7. doi: 10.3758/BF03195588
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Olive, T., and R. Kellogg. 2002. Concurrent activation of high- and low-level production processes in written composition. Memory & Cognition 30(4). 594–600. doi: 10.3758/BF03194960
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pinker, S. 1994. The language instinct. New York: W. Morrow and Co.
   Google Scholar
• Plaut, D. C., J. L. McClelland, M. S. Seidenberg, and K. Patterson. 1996. Understanding normal and impaired word reading: Computational principles in quasi-regular domains. Psychological Review 103. 56–115. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.103.1.56
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Precosky, K. 2011. Exploring the mental lexicon using word association tests: How do native and non-native speakers of English arrange words in the mind? University of Birmingham, unpublished PhD.
   Google Scholar
• Schilperoord, J. 2002. On the cognitive status of pauses in discourse production, In T. Olive and M. C. Levy (eds.), Contemporary tools and techniques for studying writing, 61–87. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. doi:10.1007/978-94-010-0468-8_4.
   Google Scholar
• Schmitt, N. 2010. Researching vocabulary: A vocabulary research manual. Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, D. 2007. Second language word associations: How Japanese make mental links between English words they have learned. University of Birmingham, Unpublished assignment.
   Google Scholar
• Van Waes, L., M. Leijten, P. Marien, and S. Engelborghs. 2017. Typing competencies in Alzheimer's disease: An exploration of copy tasks. Computers in Human Behavior 73. 311–9. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2017.03.050
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilks, C., and P. Meara. 2002. Untangling word webs: Graph theory and the notion of density in second language word association networks. Second Language Research 18(4). 303–24. doi: 10.1191/0267658302sr203oa
   Google Scholar
• Zareva, A. 2007. Structure of the second language mental lexicon: How does it compare to native speakers' lexical organization?. Second Language Research 23(2). 123–53. doi: 10.1177/0267658307076543
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zareva, A., and B. Wolter. 2012. The ‘promise’ of three methods of word association analysis to L2 lexical research. Second Language Research 28(1). 41–67. doi: 10.1177/0267658311423452
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar