On the grammar of scam: transitivity, manipulation and deception in scam emails

REFERENCES

• Bano, Zakia, and Aleem Shakir. 2015. Personal pronouns in “About Us” section of online university prospectus. Journal of Education and Practice 6(1). 133–9.
   Google Scholar
• Bernal, Miriam J., and Simone Belli. 2013. Virtual ethnography and spam: Fraud and fear in deceptive narratives on the internet. Universidad de Valladolid. Facultad de Ciencias Sociales, Jurídicas y de la Comunicación, 205–17.
   Google Scholar
• Blommaert, Jan, and Tope Omoniyi. 2006. Email fraud: Language, technology, and the indexicals of globalisation. Social Semiotics 16(4). 573–605.
   Google Scholar
• Burton, Deirdre. 1982. Through glass darkly: through dark glasses. In Ronald Carter (ed.), Language and literature: An introductory reader in stylistics, 194–214. London and Boston: G. Allen & Unwin.
   Google Scholar
• Chiluwa, Innocent E. 2006. A critical study of language variation and ideological differences in media discourse in Nigeria. Ibadan Journal of English Studies 3. 87–175.
   Google Scholar
• DePaulo, Bella M., James J. Lindsay, Brian E. Malone, Laura Muhlenbruck, Kelly Charlton, and Harris Cooper. 2003. Cues to deception. Psychological Bulletin 129(1). 74.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Downing, Angela, and Philip Locke. 2006. English grammar: A university course, 2nd edn. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Edelson, Eve. 2003. The 419 scam: information warfare on the spam front and a proposal for local filtering. Computers & Security 22(5). 392–401.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edu-Buandoh, Dora F., and Isaac N. Mwinlaaru. 2013. ‘I’ll DEAL with you … ’: Power and domination in discourse in a Ghanaian educational context. Power & Eduction 5(3). 222–35.
   Google Scholar
• Eggins, Suzanne, and Diana Slade. 1997. Analysing casual conversations. Oakville: Equinox.
   Google Scholar
• Fairclough, Norman. 1995. Media discourse. London: Arnold.
   Google Scholar
• Freiermuth, Mark R. 2011. Text, lies and electronic bait: An analysis of email fraud and the decisions of the unsuspecting. Discourse & Communication 5(2). 123–45.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goffman, Erving. 1981. Footing in forms of talk. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.
   Google Scholar
• Halliday, Michael A. 1966. Some notes on ‘deep’grammar. Journal of Linguistics 2(1). 57–67.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halliday, Michael A. K. 1961. Categories of the theory of grammar. Word 17. 241–92.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halliday, Michael A. K. 1971. Linguistic function and literary style: An inquiry into the language of William Golding’s The Inheritors. In S. Chatman (ed.), Literary style: A symposium, 330–68. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Halliday, Michael A. K. 1973. Explorations in the functions of language. London: Edward Arnold.
   Google Scholar
• Halliday, Michael A. K. 1985. An introduction to functional grammar. London: Arnold.
   Google Scholar
• Halliday, Michael A. K. 1998. On the grammar of pain. Functions of Language 5(1). 1–32.
   Google Scholar
• Halliday, Michael A. K. 2005. On matter and meaning: The two realms of human experience. Linguistics and the Human Sciences 1(1). 59–82.
   Google Scholar
• Halliday, Michael A. K. 2008.Working with meaning: Towards an appliable linguistics. In J. J. Webster (ed.), Meaning in context: Implementing intelligent applications of language studies, 7–23. London: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Halliday, Michael A. K, and Ruqaiya Hasan. 1976. Cohesion in English. London: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Halliday, Michael A. K., and Christian M. I. M. Matthiessen. 2004. An introduction to functional grammar. London: Arnold.
   Google Scholar
• Halliday, Michael A. K., and Christian M.I.M. Matthiessen. 2014. An introduction to functional grammar. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hancock, Jeffrey T., Kailyn Gee, Kevin Ciaccio, and Jennifer M. H. Lin. 2008. I'm sad you're sad: emotional contagion in CMC. Proceedings of the 2008 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 295–8. ACM, New York, November.
   Google Scholar
• Hauch, Valerie, Siegfried L. Sporer, Stephen W. Michael, and Christian A. Meissner. 2014. Does training improve the detection of deception? A meta-analysis. Communication Research 43(3). 283–343.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herman, David. 2001. Spatial reference in narrative domains. Text 21(4). 515–41.
   Google Scholar
• Hiß, Florian. 2015. Fraud and fairy tales: Storytelling and linguistic indexicals in scam E mails. International Journal of Literary Linguistics 4(1). 1–210.
   Google Scholar
• Holt, Thomas J., and Danielle C. Graves. 2007. A qualitative analysis of advance fee fraud email schemes. The International Journal of Cyber Criminology 1. 137–54.
   Google Scholar
• Idrus, Mohd M., Nor Fariza M. Nor, and Izaham S. Ismail. 2014. Representing action: Transitivity and verb processes in Malaysian and Singaporean oral proceedings over Batu Puteh Island issue. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences 118. 180–3.
   Google Scholar
• Ji, Yinglin, and Dan Shen. 2004. Transitivity and mental transformation: Sheila Watson’s The Double Hook. Language and Literature 13(4). 335–48.
   Google Scholar
• Ji, Yinglin, and Dan Shen. 2005. Transitivity, indirection, and redemption in Sheila Watson’s The Double Hook. Style 39(3). 348–62.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kennedy, Chris. 1982. Systemic grammar and its use in literary analysis. In R. Carter (ed.), Language and literature: An introductory reader in stylistics, 82–99. London: George Allen and Unwin.
   Google Scholar
• Kondowe, Wellman. 2014. Presidents and ideologies: A transitivity analysis of Bingu wa Mutharika’s inaugural address. International Journal of Language and Linguistics 2(3). 174–80.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, Chang-soo. 2016. A corpus-based approach to transitivity analysis at grammatical and conceptual levels: A case study of South Korean newspaper discourse. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 21(4). 465–98.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, Juan. 2010. Transitivity and lexical cohesion: Press representations of a political disaster and its actors. Journal of Pragmatics 42(12). 3444–58.
   Google Scholar
• Mann, William C., Christian M. I. M. Matthiessen, and Sandra A. Thompson. 1992. Rhetorical structure theory and text analysis. In W. C. Mann and S. A. Thompson (eds.), Discourse description: Diverse linguistic analyses of a fund raising text, 39–78. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Mann, William C., and Sandra A. Thompson. 1988. Rhetorical structure theory: Toward a functional theory of text organisation. Text 8(3). 243–81.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, James R., and Peter R. White. 2005. The language of evaluation. Vol. 2. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, Jim R. 2016. Meaning matters: a short history of systemic functional linguistics. WORD 62(1). 35–58.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matthiessen, Christian M. I. M. 2007a. The ‘architecture’ of language according to systemic functional theory: Developments since the 1970s. In R. Hasan, C. M. I. M. Matthiessen, and J. J. Webster (eds.), Continuing discourse on language: A functional perspective, Vol. 2, 505–61. Oakville: Equinox.
   Google Scholar
• Matthiessen, Christian M. I. M. 2007b. Lexicogrammar in systemic functional linguistics: descriptive and theoretical developments in the ‘IFG’ tradition since the 1970s. In R. Hasan, C. M. I. M. Matthiessen, and J. J. Webster (eds.), Continuing discourse on language: A functional perspective, Vol. 2, 765–858. Oakville: Equinox.
   Google Scholar
• Matthiessen, Christian, M. I. M. 2014. Appliable discourse analysis. In F. Yan and J. J. Webster (eds.), Developing systemic functional linguistics: Theory and application, 135–205. London: Equinox.
   Google Scholar
• Matthiessen, Christian M. I. M. 2015. Subliminal construal of world order clause by clause: Hierarchy of control in Noah’s Ark. Linguistics and the Human Sciences 11(2–3). 250–83.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matthiessen, Christian M. I. M., and Abhishek K. Kashyap. 2014. The construal of space in different registers: An exploratory study. Language Sciences 45. 1–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mwinlaaru, Isaac N. 2012. Transitivity and narrative viewpoint in Ngugi wa Thiong’o’s Weep Not, Child. In D. F. Edu-Buandoh and A. B. Appartaim (eds.), Between language and literature: A festschrift for Professor Kofi Edu Yankson, 345–70. Cape Coast: University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mwinlaaru, Isaac N. 2014. Style, character and the theme of struggle and change: Chinua Achebe’s Anthills of the Savannah. Research in African Literatures 45(2). 104–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mwinlaaru, Isaac N., and Winfred W. Xuan. 2016. A survey of studies in systemic functional language description and typology. Functional Linguistics 3(8). 1–41.
   Google Scholar
• Naksawat, Chitchanok, Songyut Akkakoson, and Chek K. Loi. 2016. Persuasion strategies: Use of negative forces in scam e-mails. GEMA Online® Journal of Language Studies 16(1). 1–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newman, Mathew L., James W. Pennebaker, Diana S. Berry, and Jane M. Richards. 2003. Lying words: Predicting deception from linguistic styles. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 29(5). 665–75.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rich, Timothy. 2018. You can trust me: A multimethod analysis of the Nigerian email scam. Security Journal 31(1). 208–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sapir, Edward. 1921. Language: An introduction to the study of speech. New York: Brace.
   Google Scholar
• Shafqat, Wafa, Seunghun Lee, Sehrish Malik, and Hyun-chul Kim. 2016. The language of deceivers: Linguistic features of crowdfunding scams. Proceedings of the 25th International Conference Companion on World Wide Web, 99–100. International World Wide Web Conferences Steering Committee, Republic and Canton of Geneva, Switzerland, April.
   Google Scholar
• Simpson, Paul. 2004. Stylistics: A resource book for students. London: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Slobin, Dan I. 2004. The many ways to search for a frog: Linguistic typology and the expression of motion events. In S. Strömqvist and L. Verhoeven (eds.), Relating events in narrative, typological and contextual perspective, Vol. 2, 219–57. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Tan, Hooi K., and Yoong David. 2017. Preying on lonely hearts: A systematic deconstruction of an internet romance scammer’s online lover persona. Journal of Modern Languages 23(1). 28–40.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, Geoff. 2014. Introducing functional grammar. 3rd edn. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Toma, Catalina L., and Jeffrey T. Hancock. 2012. What lies beneath: The linguistic traces of deception in online dating profiles. Journal of Communication 62(1). 78–97.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whorf, Benjamin L. 1956. Language, thought and reality. Ed. J. B. Carroll. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Xu, Dan (ed.). 2008. Space in languages of China. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Young, Lynne, and Claire Harrison (eds.). 2004. Systemic functional linguistics and critical discourse analysis: Studies in social change. London: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Zhou, Lina, Judee K. Burgoon, Douglas P. Twitchell, Tiantian Qin, and Jay F. Nunamaker Jr. 2003. An exploratory study into deception detection in text-based computer-mediated communication. Proceedings of the 36th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 1–10. IEEE, Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Zhou, Lina, Judee K. Burgoon, Douglas P. Twitchell, Tiantian Qin, and Jay F. Nunamaker Jr. 2004. A comparison of classification methods for predicting deception in computer-mediated communication. Journal of Management Information Systems 20(4). 139–66.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar