The Nominal Group in British Sign Language: A Preliminary Description

References

• Asif, Muhammad, Deng Zhiyong, Anila Iram, and Maria Nisar. 2021. “Linguistic Analysis of Neologism Related to Coronavirus (COVID-19).” Social Sciences & Humanities Open 4 (1): 1–6. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2021.100201.
   Google Scholar
• Baker, Anne, and Roland Pfau. 2016. “Constituents and Word Classes.” In The Linguistics of Sign Languages, edited by Anne Baker, Beppie van den Bogaerde, Roland Pfau, and Trude Schermer, 93–116. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Barberà, Gemma. 2014. “Use and Functions of Spatial Planes in Catalan Sign Language (LSC) Discourse.” Sign Language Studies 14 (2): 147–174.
   Google Scholar
• Brentari, Diane, Laura Horton, and Susan Goldin-Meadow. 2020. “Crosslinguistic Similarity and Variation in the Simultaneous Morphology of Sign Languages.” The Linguistic Review 37 (4): 571–608. doi:https://doi.org/10.1515/tlr-2020-2055.
   Google Scholar
• Cecchetto, Carlo. 2017. “The Syntax of Sign Language and Universal Grammar.” In The Oxford Handbook of Universal Grammar, edited by Ian Roberts, 509–526. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cormier, Kearsy, Jordan Fenlon, Sannah Gulamani, and Sandra Smith. 2017. BSL Corpus Annotation Conventions (Version 3.0). London: Deafness Cognition and Language (DCAL) Research Centre, UCL.
   Google Scholar
• Cormier, Kearsy, David Quinto-Pozos, Zed Sevcikova, and Adam Schembri. 2012. “Lexicalisation and De-lexicalisation Processes in Sign Languages: Comparing Depicting Constructions and Viewpoint Gestures.” Language and Communication 32 (4): 329–348. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langcom.2012.09.004.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dachkovsky, Svetlana, Christina Healy, and Wendy Sandler. 2013. “Visual Intonation in Two Sign Languages.” Phonology 30 (2): 211–252. doi:https://doi.org/10.1017/S0952675713000122.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ELAN (Version 6.2) [Computer software]. 2021. Nijmegen: Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics, The Language Archive. https://archive.mpi.nl/tla/elan.
   Google Scholar
• Emmorey, Karen. 2002. Language, Cognition, and the Brain: Insights from Sign Language Research. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlaub Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Gleason, Henry A. 1965. Linguistics and English Grammar. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
   Google Scholar
• Halliday, M. A. K., and Christian M. I. M. Matthiessen. 1999. Construing Experience through Meaning: A Language-Based Approach to Cognition. London: Cassell.
   Google Scholar
• Halliday, M. A. K., and Christian M. I. M. Matthiessen. 2014. Halliday’s Introduction to Functional Grammar. 4th ed. Oxford: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hodge, Gabrielle, and Trevor Johnston. 2014. “Points, Depictions, Gestures and Enactment: Partly Lexical and Non-lexical Signs as Core Elements of Single Clause-like Units in Auslan (Australian Sign Language).” Australian Journal of Linguistics 34 (2): 262–291. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/07268602.2014.887408.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnston, Trevor. 1996. “Function and Medium in the Forms of Linguistic Expression found in a Sign Language.” In International Review of Sign Linguistics (Vol. 1), edited by W. H. Edmondson and R. B. Wilbur, 57–94. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Johnston, Trevor. 2002. “BSL, Auslan and NZSL: Three Signed Languages or One?” In Cross-linguistic Perspectives in Sign Language Research: Selected Papers from TISLR 2000, edited by Anne Baker, Beppie van den Bogaerde, and Onno Crasborn, 47–69. Hamburg: Signum Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Lawson, Lilian, Frankie McLean, Rachel O’Neill, and Rob Wilks. 2019. “Recognizing British Sign Language in Scotland.” In The Legal Recognition of Sign Languages, edited by Maartje De Meulder, Joseph J. Murray, and Rachel L. McKee, 67–82. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, J. R., Y. J. Doran, and Giacomo Figueredo. 2020. Systemic Functional Language Description: Making Meaning Matter. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, J. R., Y. J. Doran, and Dongbing Zhang. 2021. “Nominal Group Grammar: System and Structure.” WORD 67 (3): 248–280. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00437956.2021.1957545.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, J. R., Beatriz Quiroz, Pin Wang, and Yongsheng Zhu. In press. Systemic Functional Grammar: Another Step into the Theory – Grammatical Description. Beijing: Higher Education Press.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, J. R., and Gi-Hyun Shin. 2021. “Korean Nominal Groups: System and Structure.” WORD 67 (3): 387–429. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00437956.2021.1957549.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matthiessen, Christian M. I. M, Kazuhiro Teruya, and Marvin Lam. 2010. Key Terms in Systemic Functional Linguistics. London: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Ngo, Thu, Susan Hood, J. R. Martin, Clare Painter, Bradley Smith, and Michele Zappavigna. 2021. Modelling Paralanguage Using Systemic Functional Semiotics. London: Bloomsbury.
   Google Scholar
• Quiroz, Beatriz. 2018. “Negotiating Interpersonal Meanings: Reasoning about Mood.” Functions of Language 25 (1): 135–163. doi:https://doi.org/10.1075/fol.17013.qui.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quiroz, Beatriz. 2020. “Experiential Cryptotypes: Reasoning About PROCESS TYPE.” In Systemic Functional Language Description: Making Meaning Matter, edited by J. R. Martin, Y. J. Doran, and Giacomo Figueredo, 102–128. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Rudge, Luke A. 2020. “Situating Simultaneity: An Initial Schematization of the Lexicogrammatical Rank Scale of British Sign Language.” WORD 66 (2): 98–118. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00437956.2020.1751974.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rudge, Luke A. 2021. “Interpersonal Grammar of British Sign Language.” In Interpersonal Grammar: Systemic Functional Linguistic Theory and Description, edited by J. R. Martin, Beatriz Quiroz, and Giacomo Figueredo, 227–256. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rudge, Luke A. Forthcoming. Exploring British Sign Language via Systemic Functional Linguistics: A Metafunctional Approach. Bloomsbury Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Sandler, Wendy, and Diane Lillo-Martin. 2006. Sign Language and Linguistics Universals. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schermer, Trude. 2016. “Lexicon.” In The Linguistics of Sign Languages, edited by Anne Baker, Beppie van den Bogaerde, Roland Pfau, and Trude Schermer, 173–196. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Stamp, Rose, Adam Schembri, Jordan Fenlon, and Ramas Rentelis. 2015. “Sociolinguistic Variation and Change in British Sign Language Number Signs: Evidence of Leveling?” Sign Language Studies 15 (2): 151–181. doi:https://doi.org/10.1353/sls.2015.0001.
   Google Scholar
• Stamp, Rose, Adam Schembri, Jordan Fenlon, Ramas Rentelis, Bencie Woll, and Kearsy Cormier. 2014. “Lexical Variation and Change in British Sign Language.” PLoS One 9 (4): e94053. doi:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0094053.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sutton-Spence, Rachel. 1999. “The Influence of English on British Sign Language.” International Journal of Bilingualism 3 (4): 363–394. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/13670069990030040401.
   Google Scholar
• Sutton-Spence, Rachel, and Bencie Woll. 1999. The Linguistics of British Sign Language: An Introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, Dongbing. 2021. “The Nominal Group in Khorchin Mongolian: A Systemic Functional Perspective.” WORD 67 (3): 350–386. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00437956.2021.1957548.
   Google Scholar