“Look with thine ears”: Why Writing Is Syllable-based

References

• Albright, William Foxwell. 1948. “The Early Alphabetic Inscriptions from Sinai and Their Decipherment.” Bulletin of the American Schools of Oriental Research 110: 6–22. doi:10.2307/3218767.
   Google Scholar
• Ascher, Marcia, and Robert Ascher. 1981. Code of the Quipu: A Study of Media, Mathematics, and Culture. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Asfaha, Yonas Mesfun, Jeanne Kurvers, and Siaak Kroon. 2009. “Grain Size in Script and Teaching: Literacy Acquisition in Ge’ez and Latin.” Applied Psycholinguistics 30: 709–724. doi:10.1017/S0142716409990087.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bell, Alan, and Joan B. Hooper, eds. 1978. Syllables and Segments. Linguistic Series 40. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
   Google Scholar
• Branner, David Prager. 2006. The Chinese Rime Tables: Linguistic Philosophy and Historical-Comparative Phonology. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Bricker, Victoria R. 1989. “The Last Gasp of Maya Hieroglyphic Writing in the Books of Chilam Balam of Chumayel and Chan Kan.” In Word and Image in Maya Culture: Explorations in Language, Writing, and Representation, edited by William F. Hanks and Don S. Rice, 39–50. Salt Lake City: University of Utah Press.
   Google Scholar
• Burnaby, Barbara, ed. 1985. Promoting Native Writing Systems in Canada. Ontario Institute for Studies in Education Occasional Papers 24. Toronto: OISE Press.
   Google Scholar
• Byrne, Brian. 2007. “Theories of Learning to Read.” In The Science of Reading: A Handbook, edited by Margaret J. Snowling and Charles Hulme, 104–119. Blackwell Handbooks of Developmental Psychology. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, Kuang Yu, Dietrich Tschanz, and Ching-I Tu, eds. 2019. Dialogue of Four Pristine Writing Systems. New Brunswick, NJ: Confucius Institute of Rutgers University.
   Google Scholar
• Civil, Miguel. 1994. “Sumerian.” In History of Linguistics, Vol. 1: The Eastern Tradition in Linguistics, edited by Giulio Lepschy, 76–87. London: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Clodd, Edward. 1900. The Story of the Alphabet. New York: D. Appleton. https://archive.org/details/storyofalphabet00cloduoft
   Google Scholar
• Coe, Michael D., and Mark L. Van Stone. 2005. Reading the Maya Glyphs. 2nd ed. London: Thames & Hudson.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, Marcel. 1958. La grande invention de l’écriture et son évolution. 2 vols. (text and bibliography) and portfolio of plates. Paris: Imprimerie Nationale.
   Google Scholar
• Cushman, Ellen. 2011. The Cherokee Syllabary: Writing the People’s Perseverance. American Indian Literature and Critical Studies series 56. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.
   Google Scholar
• Daniels, Peter T. 1990. “Fundamentals of Grammatology.” Journal of the American Oriental Society 110: 727–731. doi:10.2307/602899.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daniels, Peter T. 1992. “The Syllabic Origin of Writing and the Segmental Origin of the Alphabet.” In The Linguistics of Literacy, edited by Pamela Downing, Susan D. Lima, and Michael Noonan, 83–110. Typological Studies in Language 21. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Daniels, Peter T. 1996. “The Invention of Writing.” In The World's Writing Systems, edited by Peter T. Daniels and William Bright, 579–586. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Daniels, Peter T. 2000. “Syllables, Consonants, and Vowels in West Semitic Writing.” Lingua Posnaniensis 42: 43–55.
   Google Scholar
• Daniels, Peter T. 2002. “The Study of Writing in the Twentieth Century: Semitic Studies Interacting with Non-Semitic.” Israel Oriental Studies 20: 85–117.
   Google Scholar
• Daniels, Peter T. 2006. “Three Models of Script Transfer.” WORD 57 (published 2014): 371–378. (Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the International Linguistic Association, New York, 2004). doi:10.1080/00437956.2006.11432572.
   Google Scholar
• Daniels, Peter T. 2007. “Littera ex occidente: Toward a Functional History of Writing.” In Studies in Semitic and Afroasiatic Linguistics Presented to Gene B. Gragg, edited by Cynthia L. Miller, 53–68. Studies in Ancient and Oriental Civilization 60. Chicago, IL: Oriental Institute of the University of Chicago. http://oi.uchicago.edu/pdf/saoc60.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Daniels, Peter T. 2010. “Writing in the World and Linguistics.” Berkeley Linguistic Society, Proceedings 36. http://linguistics.berkeley.edu/bls/previous_proceedings/bls36.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Daniels, Peter T. 2017. “Writing Systems.” In The Handbook of Linguistics Second Edition, edited by Mark Aronoff and Janie Rees-Miller, 75–94. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Daniels, Peter T. 2018. An Exploration of Writing. Sheffield: Equinox.
   Google Scholar
• Daniels, Peter T. 2021. “Aramaic Documents from Achaemenid Bactria: Connections to the West—and the East—and the Future.” In From Qom to Barcelona: Aramaic, South Arabian, Coptic, Arabic and Judeo-Arabic Documents, edited by Andreas Kaplony and Daniel Potthast, 3–23. Islamic History and Civilization 178. Leiden: Brill. (Paper presented at the meeting of the International Society for Arabic Papyrology, Munich, 7 October 2014).
   Google Scholar
• Daniels, Peter T., and David L. Share. 2017. “Writing System Variation and Its Consequences for Reading and Dyslexia.” Scientific Studies of Reading 22 (2018): 101–116. doi:10.1080/10888438.2017.1379082.
   Google Scholar
• Diringer, David. 1948. The Alphabet: A Key to the History of Mankind. New York: Philosophical Library.
   Google Scholar
• Diringer, David. 1968. The Alphabet: A Key to the History of Mankind. Edited by Reinhold Regensburger. 3rd ed., 2 vols. (text and plates). New York: Funk & Wagnall’s. (1st ed., 1948).
   Google Scholar
• Diringer, David. 1974. “Alphabets.” In Encyclopædia Britannica, 15th ed., Macropædia, 1, 618–627. Chicago.
   Google Scholar
• Dreyer, Günter, Ulrich Hartung, and Frauke Pumpenmeier. 1998. Umm el-Qaab I: das prädynastische Königsgrab U-j und seine frühen Schriftzeugnisse. Archäologische Veröffentlichungen 86. Mainz: Zabern.
   Google Scholar
• Faulmann, Karl. 1880a. Das Buch der Schrift enthaltend die Schriftzeichen und Alphabete aller Zeiten und aller Völker des Erdkreises. 2nd ed. Vienna: K.-K. Hof- und Staatsdruckerei. (Reprint Augsburg: Augustus, 1995).
   Google Scholar
• Faulmann, Karl. 1880b. Illustrierte Geschichte der Schrift: Popular-wissenschaftliche Darstellung der Entstehung der Schrift der Sprache und der Zahlen sowie der Schriftsysteme aller Völker der Erde. Vienna. (Reprint with Afterword by Eva-Maria Hanebutt-Benz and Dirk H. Veldhuis, Nördlingen: Greno, 1989).
   Google Scholar
• Février, James-Germain. 1948. Histoire de l’écriture. Paris: Payot. (2nd ed., 1959).
   Google Scholar
• Foreman, Grant. 1938. Sequoyah. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.
   Google Scholar
• Friedrich, Johannes. 1966. Geschichte der Schrift. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.
   Google Scholar
• Gardiner, Alan H. 1916. “The Egyptian Origin of the Semitic Alphabet.” The Journal of Egyptian Archaeology 3: 1–16. doi:10.1177/030751331600300101.
   Google Scholar
• Gelb, I. J. 1931. Hittitle Hieroglyphs I. Studies in Ancient Oriental Civilization 2. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gelb, I. J. 1952. A Study of Writing: The Foundations of Grammatology. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. (Reissued with additions and corrections, 1963).
   Google Scholar
• Gelb, I. J. 1963. A Study of Writing. 2nd ed. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. (1st ed., 1952).
   Google Scholar
• Gelb, I. J. 1974. “Writing, Forms of.” In Encyclopædia Britannica, 15th ed., Macropædia, 19, 1033–45. Chicago.
   Google Scholar
• Haarmann, Harald. 1990. Universalgeschichte der Schrift. Frankfurt: Campus.
   Google Scholar
• Hanks, William F., and Don S. Rice, eds. 1989. Word and Image in Maya Culture: Explorations in Language, Writing, and Representation. Salt Lake City: University of Utah Press.
   Google Scholar
• Harris, Zellig S. 1939. Development of the Canaanite Dialects: An Investigation in Linguistic History. American Oriental Series 16. New Haven: American Oriental Society.
   Google Scholar
• Houston, Stephen D. 1989. Maya Glyphs. Reading the Past. London: British Museum.
   Google Scholar
• Houston, Stephen D. 2004. “Overture to First Writing.” In First Writing: Script Invention as History and Process, edited by Stephen D. Houston, 3–15. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jensen, Hans. 1969. Sign, Symbol and Script. Translated by George Unwin. New York: Putnam’s.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, Scott A. J. 2013. Translating Maya Hieroglyphs. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.
   Google Scholar
• Junker, Heinrich F. J. 1925–26. “Das Awestaalphabet und der Ursprung der armenischen und georgischen Schrift.” Caucasica 2: 1–82, 122–139, 3: 82–121.
   Google Scholar
• Justeson, John S. 1989. “The Representational Conventions of Mayan Hieroglyphic Writing.” In Word and Image in Maya Culture: Explorations in Language, Writing, and Representation, edited by William F. Hanks and Don S. Rice, 23–38. Salt Lake City: University of Utah Press.
   Google Scholar
• Katz, Leonard, and Laurie B. Feldman. 1981. “Linguistic Coding in Word Recognition: Comparisons between a Deep and a Shallow Orthography.” In Linguistic Coding in Word Recognition, Interactive Processes in Reading, edited by Alan M. Lesgold and Charles A. Perfetti, 85–106. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Katz, Leonard, and Laurie B. Feldman. 1983. “Relation between Pronunciation and Recognition of Printed Words in Deep and Shallow Orthographies.” Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 9(1): 157–166. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.9.1.157.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katz, Leonard, and Ram Frost. 1992. “The Reading Process Is Different for Different Orthographies: The Orthographic Depth Hypothesis.” In Orthography, Phonology, Morphology, and Meaning, edited by Ram Frost and Leonard Katz, 67–84. Advances in Psychology 94. Amsterdam: North Holland.
   Google Scholar
• Kızılyay, Hatıce. 1959. “Nach Vokalen geordneten Silbenlisten die Serie ‘u-a-i‘.” In Zwei altbabylonische Schulbücher aus Nippur, edited by Muazzez Çiğ, Hatıce Kızılyay, and Benno Landsberger, 59–63. Türk Tarıh Kurumu Yayınlarından 7/35. (In Turkish.)
   Google Scholar
• Kroeber, Alfred L. 1923. Anthropology. New York: Harcourt, Brace.
   Google Scholar
• Kroeber, Alfred L. 1940. “Stimulus Diffusion.” American Anthropologist N.S. 42: 1–20. doi:10.1525/aa.1940.42.1.02a00020.
   Google Scholar
• Kroeber, Alfred L. 1948. Anthropology: Race Language Culture Psychology Prehistory. New York: Harcourt, Brace & World.
   Google Scholar
• Kurbjuhn, Kornelia. 1989. The Complete Catalogue of Glyph Readings. Kassel: Schneider & Weber.
   Google Scholar
• Light, Timothy. 1980. “Bilingualism and Standard Language in the People’s Republic of China.” In Georgetown University Round Table on Languages and Linguistics 1980: Current Issues in Bilingual Education, edited by James E. Alatis, 259–279. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Loprieno, Antonio. 1995. Ancient Egyptian: A Linguistic Introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Macri, Martha J. 1996. “Maya and Other Mesoamerican Scripts.” In The World’s Writing Systems, edited by Peter T. Daniels and William Bright, 172–182. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Macri, Martha J., and Matthew G. Looper. 2003. The New Catalog of Maya Hieroglyphs. Vol. 1: The Classic Period Inscriptions. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mason, William A. 1920. A History of the Art of Writing. New York: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• McCarthy, Suzanne Hayhoe. 2008. “The Shorthand Origin of Cree Syllabics.” Paper presented, Algonquian Linguistics Conference.
   Google Scholar
• Michalowski, Piotr. 2004. “Sumerian.” In Encyclopedia of the World’s Ancient Languages, edited by Roger D. Woodard, 19–59. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Moorhouse, Alfred C. 1953. The Triumph of the Alphabet: A History of Writing. New York: Henry Schuman.
   Google Scholar
• Mora-Marín, David. 2003. “The Origin of Mayan Syllabograms and Orthographic Conventions.” Written Language & Literacy 6: 193–238. doi:10.1075/wll.6.2.04mor
   Google Scholar
• Mora-Marín, David. 2010. “Consonant Deletion, Obligatory Synharmony, Typical Suffixing: An Explanation of Spelling Practices in Mayan Writing.” Written Language & Literacy 13: 118–179. doi:10.1075/wll.13.1.05mor
   Google Scholar
• Nichols, John D. 1996. “The Cree Syllabary.” In The World's Writing Systems, edited by Peter T. Daniels and William Bright, 599–611. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nougayrol, Jean. 1965. “‘Vocalises’ et ‘syllables en liberté’ à Ugarit.” In Studies in Honor of Benno Landsberger on His Seventy-Fifth Birthday April 21, 1965, edited by Hans G. Güterbock and Thorkild Jacobsen, 29–31. Assyriological Studies 16. Chicago, IL: Oriental Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Parpola, Asko. 1994. Deciphering the Indus Script. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Puett, Michael. 1998. “China in Early Eurasian History: A Brief Review of Recent Scholarship on the Issue.” In The Bronze Age and Early Iron Age Peoples of Eastern Central Asia, edited by Victor Mair, 699–715. Journal of Indo-European Studies Monograph 26. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Museum Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Reiner, Erica. 1969. “The Elamite Language.” In Altkleinasiatische Sprachen, edited by B. Spuler, 54–118. Handbuch der Orientalistik I.2.1–2.2. Leiden: Brill.
   Google Scholar
• Reiner, Erica. 1973. “How We Read Cuneiform Texts.” Journal of Cuneiform Studies 25: 1–58. doi:10.2307/1359507.
   Google Scholar
• Rutgers University, Confucius Institute. 2015. International Conference on the Chinese Writing System and Its Dialogue with Sumerian, Egyptian, and Mesoamerican Writing Systems.
   Google Scholar
• Salomon, Frank. 2008. “Late Khipu Use.” In The Disappearance of Writing Systems: Perspectives on Literacy and Communication, edited by John Baines, John Bennet, and Stephen D. Houston, 285–310. London: Equinox.
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt, David L. 1991. “Some Implications of Alphabetolatry for Writing System Analysis.” In Literacies: Writing Systems and Literate Practices, edited by David L. Schmidt and Janet S. Smith, 1–9. Davis Working Papers in Linguistics 4. Davis: University of California, Linguistics Program.
   Google Scholar
• Schmitt, Alfred. 1980. Entstehung und Entwicklung von Schriften. Edited by Claus Haeber. Cologne: Böhlau.
   Google Scholar
• Scribner, Sylvia, and Michael Cole. 1981. The Psychology of Literacy. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Share, David L. 2008. “On the Anglocentricities of Current Reading Research and Practice: The Perils of Overreliance on an ‘Outlier’ Orthography.” Psychological Bulletin 134: 584–615. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.134.4.584.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Share, David L. 2014. “Alphabetism in Reading Science.” Frontiers in Psychology 5. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00752.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Share, David L., and Peter T. Daniels. 2015. “Aksharas, Alphasyllabaries, Abugidas, Alphabets, and Orthographic Depth: Reflections on Rimzhim, Katz, and Fowler (2014).” Writing Systems Research 8 (2016): 17–34. doi:10.1080/17586801.2015.1016395
   Google Scholar
• Steinkeller, Piotr. 1995. “Review of Zeichenliste der archaischen Texte aus Uruk, by M. W. Green and H. J. Nissen.” Bibliotheca Orientalis 52: 689–713.
   Google Scholar
• Stolper, Matthew W. 2004. “Elamite.” In The Cambridge Encyclopedia of the World's Ancient Languages, edited by Roger D. Woodard, 60–94. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, Isaac. 1883. The Alphabet: An Account of the Origin and Development of Letters. London: Kegan Paul, Trench. (2nd ed., London: Edward Arnold, 1899).
   Google Scholar
• Tsien, Tsuen-hsuin. 2004. Written on Bamboo and Silk: The Beginnings of Chinese Books and Inscriptions. 2nd ed. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. (1st ed., 1962).
   Google Scholar
• Tuchscherer, Konrad, and P. E. H. Hair. 2002. “Cherokee and West Africa: Examining the Origins of the Vai Script.” History in Africa 29: 427–486. doi:10.2307/3172173.
   Google Scholar
• University of Chicago. 1902–86. Daily Maroon. Accessed November 28, 2022. https://campub.lib.uchicago.edu/search/?f1-title=Daily%20Maroon.
   Google Scholar
• Wachter, Rudolf. 1986. “Die etruskische und venetische Silbenpunktierung.” Museum Helveticum 1986: 111–126.
   Google Scholar
• Wachter, Rudolf. 1991. “Abbreviated Writing.” Kadmos 30 (1): 49–80.
   Google Scholar
• Walker, Willard, and James Sarbaugh. 1993. “The Early History of the Cherokee Syllabary.” Ethnohistory 40 (1): 70–94. doi:10.2307/482159.
   Google Scholar
• Watson, Janet C. E. 2002. The Phonology and Morphology of Arabic. The Phonology of the World's Languages. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Woods, Christopher. 2010. “The Earliest Mesopotamian Writing.” In Visible Language: Inventions of Writing in the Ancient Middle East and Beyond, edited by Christopher Woods, Emily Teeter, and Geoff Emberling, 33–50. Oriental Institute Museum Publications 32. Chicago, IL: Oriental Institute of the University of Chicago.
   Google Scholar
• Woods, Christopher. 2020. “The Emergence of Cuneiform Writing.” In A Companion to Ancient Near Eastern Languages, edited by Rebecca Hasselbach-Andée, 27–46. Blackwell Companions to the Ancient World. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley Blackwell.
   Google Scholar