‘Noticeably Better / Visibly Shaken’: The Use of Four Adverbs of High Perceivability with Meanings of Attitude

References

• Bednarek, Monika. 2009. “Language Patterns and ATTITUDE.” Functions of Language 16 (2): 165–192. doi:10.1075/fol.16.2.01bed.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boye, Kasper. 2012. Epistemic Meaning: A Crosslinguistic and Functional-Cognitive Study (Empirical Approaches to Language Typology 43). Berlin: De Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Carretero, Marta. 2019. “Evidentiality in Adverbs of Perceivability: The Case of Manifestly, Noticeably, Patently and Visibly.” Functions of Language 26 (3): 275–307. doi:10.1075/fol.00024.car.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carretero, Marta. 2022. “Your Conclusion Is Patently False’: Discussing Experiments on Inter-Annotator Agreement in the Analysis of Attitude in Clauses with Adverbs of High Perceivability.” In Working with Corpora and Digital Tools in Language and Translation Studies: Practical Issues and Methodological Challenges, edited by Julia Lavid, 141–172. Madrid: Escolar y Mayo.
   Google Scholar
• Carretero, Marta and Juan Rafael Zamorano-Mansilla. 2013. “Annotating English Adverbials for the Categories of Epistemic Modality and Evidentiality.” In English Modality: Core, Periphery and Evidentiality, edited by Juana I. Marín-Arrese, Marta Carretero, Jorge Arús Hita, and Johan van der Auwera, 317–355. Berlin: De Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Coates, Jennifer. 1983. The Semantics of the Modal Auxiliaries. London: Croom Helm.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, Jacob. 1960. “A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales.” Educational and Psychological Measurement 20 (1): 37–46. doi:10.1177/001316446002000104.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dendale, Patrick, Anne Vanderheyden, and Dámaso Izquierdo Alegría. 2020. “Visiblement en français, visiblemente en espagnol: des marqueurs évidentiels de perception directe ou d’inférence?” In Marcadores del discurso y lingüística contrastive en las lenguas románicas, edited by Óscar Loureda Lamas, Martha Rudka, and Giovanni Parodi, 63–96. Madrid: Iberoamericana Vervuert.
   Google Scholar
• Fuoli, Matteo. 2018. “A Stepwise Method for Annotating Appraisal.” Functions of Language 25 (2): 229–258. doi:10.1075/fol.15016.fuo.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenbaum, Sidney. 1969. Studies in English Adverbial Usage. London: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Grund, Peter J. 2016. “Seeing is Believing: Evidentiality and Direct Visual Perception Verbs in Early Modern English Witness Depositions.” In Studies in the History of the English Language VII: Generalizing vs. Particularizing Methodologies in Historical Linguistic Analysis, edited by Don Chapman, Colette Moore, and Miranda Wilcox, 152–172. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Guimier, Claude. 1986. Syntaxe de l’adverbe anglais. Lille: Presses Universitaires de Lille.
   Google Scholar
• Halliday, M. A. K. and Christian M. I. M. Matthiessen. 2014. Halliday’s Introduction to Functional Grammar. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Haβler, Gerda. 2008. “Recursos evidenciales en las lenguas romances: un estudio funcional y comparativo.” In In Lingüística española contemporánea. Enfoques y soluciones, edited by Francisco M. Carriscondo Esquivel and Carsten Sinner, 225–243. München: Anja Gärtig.
   Google Scholar
• Izquierdo Alegría, Dámaso. 2016. “Alcances y límites de la evidencialidad: Aspectos teóricos y propuesta de análisis aplicada a un conjunto de adverbios evidencialoides del español.” Ph.D. Thesis. Pamplona: Universidad de Navarra.
   Google Scholar
• Lampert, Günther. 2014. “(Dis-)Embodiment, Palpability, and Cognitive State.” International Journal of Cognitive Linguistics 4 (2): 1–25.
   Google Scholar
• Landis, J. Richard and Gary G. Koch. 1977. “The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data.” Biometrics 33 (1): 159–174. doi:10.2307/2529310.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, James R. and Peter R. R. White. 2005. The Language of Evaluation. New York: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Mauranen, Anna and Marina Bondi. 2003. “Evaluative Language Use in Academic Discourse.” Journal of English for Academic Purposes 2 (4): 269–271. doi:10.1016/S1475-1585(03)00045-6.
   Google Scholar
• Nuyts, Jan. 2001. Epistemic Modality, Language and Conceptualization: A Cognitive-Pragmatic Perspective. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Nuyts, Jan. 2009. “The ‘One-Commitment-per-Clause’ Principle and the Cognitive Status of Qualificational Categories.” Linguistics 47 (1): 141–171. doi:10.1515/LING.2009.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruskan, Anna. 2015. “Evidential Adverbials in Lithuanian: A Corpus-Based Study.” Kalbotyra 67: 104–130. doi:10.15388/Klbt.2015.8945.
   Google Scholar
• Ruskan, Anna. 2020. Attitudinal and Epistemic Dimensions of Evaluation: Form, Meaning and Discursive Contexts. Vilnius: Vilnius University.
   Google Scholar
• Simon-Vandenbergen, Anne-Marie and Karin Aijmer. 2007. The Semantic Field of Modal Certainty: A Corpus-Based Study of English Adverbs. Berlin: De Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Swan, Toril. 1988. Sentence Adverbials in English: A Synchronic and Diachronic Investigation. Oslo: Novus.
   Google Scholar
• Taboada, Maite and Marta Carretero. 2012. “Contrastive Analysis of Evaluation in Text: Key Issues in the Design of an Annotation System for Attitude Applicable to Consumer Reviews in English and Spanish.” Linguistics and the Human Sciences 6: 275–295. doi:10.1558/lhs.v6i1-3.275.
   Google Scholar
• Vanderheyden, Anne and Patrick Dendale. 2018. “L’évolution diachronique d’un marqueur évidentiel. Le cas de visiblement en français.” Zeischrift für romanische Philologie 134 (4): 1–28. doi:10.1515/zrp-2018-0068.
   Google Scholar