Defining the word

References

• Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y., Robert M. W. Dixon, and Nathan M. White. 2020. “The Essence of ‘Word’.” In Phonological Word and Grammatical Word: A Cross-Linguistic Typology, edited by Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald, Robert M. W. Dixon, and Nathan M. White, 1–24. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Alpatov, Vladimir. M. 2018. Slovo i časti reči [The word and the parts of speech]. Moscow: LRC.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, Stephen R. 1992. A-Morphous Morphology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, Stephen R. 2015. “The Morpheme: Its Nature and Use.” In The Oxford Handbook of Inflection, edited by Matthew Baerman, 11–33. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Aničkov, I. E. 1963. “Ob opredelenii slova” [On the definition of the word]. In Morfologičeskaja struktura slova v jazykax različnyx tipov, edited by Viktor M. Žirmunskij and O. P. Sunik, 146–159. Leningrad: Izdatel’stvo Akademii Nauk SSSR. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8180316
   Google Scholar
• Bauer, Laurie, Rochelle Lieber, and Ingo Plag. 2013. The Oxford Reference Guide to English Morphology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bloomfield, Leonard. 1926. “A Set of Postulates for the Science of Language.” Language 2 (3): 153–164. https://doi.org/10.2307/408741.
   Google Scholar
• Bloomfield, Leonard. 1933. Language. New York: H. Holt and Company.
   Google Scholar
• Boas, Franz. 1911. “Introduction.” In Handbook of American Indian Languages, edited by Franz Boas, 1–83. Washington, DC: Bureau of American Ethnology.
   Google Scholar
• Breiter, Maria A. 1994. “Length of Chinese Words in Relation to Their Other Systemic Features.” Journal of Quantitative Linguistics 1 (3): 224–231. https://doi.org/10.1080/09296179408590020.
   Google Scholar
• Bresnan, Joan and Sam A. Mchombo. 1995. “The Lexical Integrity Principle: Evidence from Bantu.” Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 13 (2): 181–254. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00992782.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Croft, William. 2000. “Parts of Speech as Language Universals and as Language-Particular Categories.” In Approaches to the Typology of Word Classes, edited by Petra M. Vogel and Bernard Comrie, 65–102. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Dixon, Robert M. W. and Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald. 2002. “Word: A Typological Framework.” In Word: A Cross-Linguistic Typology, edited by Robert M. W. Dixon and Alexandra Y Aikhenvald, 1–41. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Embick, David. 2015. The Morpheme: A Theoretical Introduction. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
   Google Scholar
• Gebhardt, Lewis. 2023. The Study of Words: An Introduction. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003030188.
   Google Scholar
• Haspelmath, Martin. 2011. “The Indeterminacy of Word Segmentation and the Nature of Morphology and Syntax.” Folia Linguistica 51 (1): 31–80. https://doi.org/10.1515/flin-2017-1005.
   Google Scholar
• Haspelmath, Martin. 2015. “Defining vs. Diagnosing Linguistic Categories: A Case Study of Clitic Phenomena.” In How Categorical are Categories? New Approaches to the Old Questions of Noun, Verb, and Adjective, edited by Joanna Błaszczak, Dorota Klimek-Jankowska, and Krzysztof Migdalski, 273–304. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
   Google Scholar
• Haspelmath, Martin. 2020a. “The Morph as a Minimal Linguistic Form.” Morphology 30 (2): 117–134. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11525-020-09355-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haspelmath, Martin. 2020b. “The Structural Uniqueness of Languages and the Value of Comparison for Language Description” Asian Languages and Linguistics 1 (2): 346–366. https://doi.org/10.1075/alal.20032.has.
   Google Scholar
• Haspelmath, Martin. 2021a. “Bound Forms, Welded Forms, and Affixes: Basic Concepts for Morphological Comparison.” Voprosy Jazykoznanija 2021 (1): 7–28. https://doi.org/10.31857/0373-658X.2021.1.7-28.
   Google Scholar
• Haspelmath, Martin. 2021b. “Towards Standardization of Morphosyntactic Terminology for General Linguistics.” In Linguistic Categories, Language Description and Linguistic Typology, edited by Luca Alfieri, Giorgio Francesco Arcodia, and Paolo Ramat, 35–57. Amsterdam: Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.132.02has.
   Google Scholar
• Haspelmath, Martin. 2023a. “Types of Clitics in the World’s Languages.” Linguistic Typology at the Crossroads (to appear).
   Google Scholar
• Haspelmath, Martin. 2023b. “Word Class Universals and Language-Particular Analysis.” In Oxford Handbook of Word Classes, edited by Eva van Lier, 15–40. Oxford: Oxford University Press. (to appear).
   Google Scholar
• Haspelmath, Martin. 2023c. “Inflection and Derivation as Traditional Comparative Concepts.” Linguistics. (to appear).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haspelmath, Martin. 2024. “Compound and Incorporation Constructions as Combinations of Unexpandable Roots.” (to appear). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8137251.
   Google Scholar
• Hippisley, Andrew and Gregory Stump, eds. 2016. The Cambridge Handbook of Morphology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hockett, Charles F. 1958. A Course in Modern Linguistics. New York: MacMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Kiparsky, Paul. 2020. “Morphological Units: Stems.” In Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Linguistics 2020. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780199384655.013.542.
   Google Scholar
• Lupyan, Gary and Rick Dale. 2010. “Language Structure is Partly Determined by Social Structure.” PLoS ONE 5 (1): e8559. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0008559.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lyons, John. 1968. Introduction to Theoretical Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Masini, Francesca. 2019. “Multi-word Expressions and Morphology.” In Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Linguistics 2019. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780199384655.013.611.
   Google Scholar
• Matthews, Peter H. 1974. Morphology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mel’čuk, Igor. 1993. Cours de morphologie générale (théorique et descriptive): Volume 1. Montréal: Presses de l’Université de Montréal.
   Google Scholar
• Mel’čuk, Igor A. 2006. Aspects of the Theory of Morphology. Berlin: De Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110199864.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, James T. M. 2020. “The Ontology of Words: Realism, Nominalism, and Eliminativism.” Philosophy Compass 15 (7): e12691. https://doi.org/10.1111/phc3.12691.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mithun, Marianne. 1997. “Lexical Affixes and Morphological Typology.” In Essays on Language Function and Language Type: Dedicated to T. Givón, edited by Joan L. Bybee, John Haiman, and Sandra A. Thompson, 357–371. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Mugdan, Joachim. 2015. “Units of Word-Formation.” In Vol. 1 of Word-Formation: An International Handbook of the Languages of Europe, edited by Peter O. Müller, Ingeborg Ohnheiser, Susan Olsen, and Franz Rainer, 235–301. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110246254-017.
   Google Scholar
• Nespor, Marina and Irene Vogel. 2007. Prosodic Phonology. 2nd ed. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Nichols, Johanna. 2016. “Morphology in Typology.” In The Cambridge Handbook of Morphology, edited by Andrew Hippisley and Gregory Stump, 710–742. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Osborne, Timothy and Kim Gerdes. 2019. “The Status of Function Words in Dependency Grammar: A Critique of Universal Dependencies (UD).” Glossa: A Journal of General Linguistics 4 (1): 17. https://doi.org/10.5334/gjgl.537.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sapir, Edward. 1921. Language: An Introduction to the Study of Speech. New York: Harcourt, Brace & Co.
   Google Scholar
• Spencer, Andrew. 2013. Lexical Relatedness. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stewart, Thomas W. 2016. Contemporary Morphological Theories: A User’s Guide. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tallman, Adam J. R. 2020. “Beyond Grammatical and Phonological Words.” Language and Linguistics Compass 14 (2): e12364. https://doi.org/10.1111/lnc3.12364.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tallman, Adam J. R. and Sandra Auderset. 2022. “Measuring and Assessing Indeterminacy and Variation in the Morphology-Syntax Distinction.” In Linguistic Typology. De Gruyter Mouton. https://doi.org/10.1515/lingty-2021-0041.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, John R. 1995. Linguistic Categorization: Prototypes in Linguistic Theory. 2nd ed. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, John R. 2015. “Introduction.” In The Oxford Handbook of the Word, edited by John R. Taylor, 1–20. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vendryes, Joseph. 1921. Le Langage. Paris: Renaissance du livre.
   Google Scholar
• Žirmunskij, Viktor M. 1966. “The Word and its Boundaries.” Linguistics 4 (27): 65–91. https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.1966.4.27.65.
   Google Scholar