A society of things: animal figurines and material scales at Neolithic Çatalhöyük

References

• Avis, J. 2011. “Figurines Clay Composition Report.” In Çatalhöyük Archive Report 2011, 94–103. http://www.catalhoyuk.com.
   Google Scholar
• Bailey, D. 2000. Balkan Prehistory Exclusion, Incorporation and Identity. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bailey, D. W. 2005. Prehistoric Figurines: Representation and Corporeality in the Neolithic. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bailey, D. W. 2013. “Figurines, Corporeality and the Origin of the Gendered Body.” In A Companion to Gender Prehistory, edited by D. Bolger, 244–64. Oxford: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Bailey, D. W. 2014. “Touch and the Cheirotic Apprehension of Prehistoric Figurines.” In Sculpture and Touch, edited by P. Dent, 27–43. London: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Berger, J. 1980. About Looking. New York: Vintage International.
   Google Scholar
• Clarke, D. 1978. Analytical Archaeology. London: Methuen.
   Google Scholar
• Czeszewska, A. 2014. “Wall Paintings at Çatalhöyük.” In Integrating Çatalhöyük: Themes from the 2000-2008 Seasons, edited by I. Hodder. Los Angeles, CA: Cotsen Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Gell, A. 1998. Art and Agency: An Anthropological Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gosden, C. 2005. “What Do Objects Want?” Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory 12 (3): 193–211. doi:10.1007/s10816-005-6928-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henton, E. 2013. “Oxygen Stable Isotope and Dental Microwear Evidence of Herding Practices at Çatalhöyük.” In Humans and Landscapes of Çatalhöyük: Reports from the 2000-2008 Seasons, edited by I. Hodder. Los Angeles, CA: Cotsen Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Hodder, I. 2006. The Leopard’s Tale: Revealing the Mysteries of Çatalhöyük. London: Thames and Hudson.
   Google Scholar
• Hodder, I. 2012. Entangled: An Archaeology of Relationships between Humans and Things. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Hodder, I., and C. Cessford. 2004. “Daily Practice and Social Memory at Çatalhöyük.” American Antiquity 69 (1): 17–40. doi:10.2307/4128346.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hodder, I., and L. M. Meskell. 2011. “A ‘Curious and Sometimes a Trifle Macabre Artistry’: Some Aspects of Symbolism in Neolithic Turkey.” Current Anthropology 52 (2): 235–63. doi:10.1086/659250.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horwitz, L. K., and N. Goring-Morris. 2004. “Animals and Ritual during the Levantine PPNB: A Case Study from the Site of Kfar Hahorsh, Israel.” Anthropozoologica 3 (1): 165–78.
   Google Scholar
• Ingold, T. 1996. “Hunting and Gathering as Ways of Perceiving the Environment.” In Redefining Nature, edited by R. Ellen and K. Fukui, Oxford: Berg.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, A. 1998. “Where Eagles Dare: Landscape, Animals and the Neolithic of Orkney.” Journal of Material Culture 3: 301–24. doi:10.1177/135918359800300303.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, L., and L. Meskell. 2012. “Animal Figurines from Neolithic Çatalhöyük: Figural and Faunal Perspectives.” Cambridge Archaeological Journal 22 (3): 401–19. doi:10.1017/S0959774312000479.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mauss, M. 2001. A General Theory of Magic. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Mellaart, J. 1962. “Excavations at Çatal Hüyük. First Preliminary Report, 1961.” Anatolian Studies 12: 41–65.
   Google Scholar
• Mellaart, J. 1963. “Excavations at Çatal Hüyük. Second Preliminary Report, 1962.” Anatolian Studies 13: 43–103.
   Google Scholar
• Mellaart, J. 1964. “Excavations at Çatal Hüyük. Third Preliminary Report, 1963.” Anatolian Studies 14: 39–119.
   Google Scholar
• Mellaart, J. 1966. “Excavations at Çatal Hüyük, 1965. Fourth Preliminary Report.” Anatolian Studies 16: 165–91.
   Google Scholar
• Mellaart, J. 1967. Çatal Hüyük: A Neolithic Town in Anatolia. London: Thames and Hudson.
   Google Scholar
• Meskell, L. M. 2007. “Refiguring the Corpus at Çatalhöyük.” In Material Beginnings: A Global Prehistory of Figurative Representation, edited by A. C. Renfrew and I. Morley, 137–49. Cambridge: McDonald Institute Monographs.
   Google Scholar
• Meskell, L. M. 2008. “The Nature of the Beast: Curating Animals and Ancestors at Çatalhöyük.” World Archaeology 40 (3): 373–89. doi:10.1080/00438240802261416.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meskell, L. M., C. Nakamura, R. King, and S. Farid. 2008. “Figured Lifeworlds and Depositional Practices at Çatalhöyük.” Cambridge Archaeological Journal 18 (2): 139–61. doi:10.1017/S095977430800022X.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitchell, W. J. T. 1996. “What Do Pictures “Really” Want?” October 77: 71–82. doi:10.2307/778960.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitchell, W. J. T. 2005. What Do Pictures Want? The Lives and Loves of Images. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell, W. J. T. 2006. What do pictures want? Interview with W. J. T. Mitchell by Asbjørn Grønstad and Øyvind Vågnes. Image and Narrative November: Consulted 6 August 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Nakamura, C., and L. M. Meskell, 2006. “Çatalhöyük Figurines.” Archive Report on the Catalhöyük Season 2006. Accessed July 7, 2014. http://www.catalhoyuk.com.
   Google Scholar
• Nakamura, C., and L. M. Meskell. 2009. “Articulate Bodies: Forms and Figures at Çatalhöyük.” Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory 16: 205–30. doi:10.1007/s10816-009-9070-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nakamura, C., and L. M. Meskell. 2013. “Figurine Worlds at Çatalhöyük.” In Substantive Technologies at Çatalhöyük: Reports from the 2000–2008 Seasons, edited by I. Hodder, 201–34. Los Angeles, CA: Cotsen Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Nanoglou, S. 2008. “Representation of Humans and Animals in Greece and the Balkans during the Earlier Neolithic.” Cambridge Archaeological Journal 18 (1): 1–13. doi:10.1017/S0959774308000012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nanoglou, S. 2009. “Animal Bodies and Ontological Discourse in the Greek Neolithic.” Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory 16: 184–204. doi:10.1007/s10816-009-9069-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rollefson, G. O. 2008. “Charming Lives: Human and Animal Figurines in the Late Epipaleolithic and Early Neolithic Periods in the Greater Levant and Eastern Anatolia.” In The Neolithic Demographic Transition and its Consequences, edited by J.-P. Bocquet-Appel and O. Bar-Yosef, 387–416. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Russell, N., and L. Martin. 2005. “The Çatalhöyük Mammal Remains.” In Inhabiting Çatalhöyük: Reports from the 1995-1999 Seasons, edited by I. Hodder, 33–98. Cambridge: McDonald Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Russell, N., K. Twiss, D. Orton, and A. Demirergi. 2013. “More on the Çatalhöyük Mammal Remains.” In Humans and Landscapes of Çatalhöyük: Reports from the 2000-2008 Seasons, edited by I. Hodder. Los Angeles, CA: Cotsen Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Schmandt-Besserat, D. 1997. “Animal Symbols at ‘Ain Ghazal.” Expedition 39 (1): 48–58.
   Google Scholar
• Taussig, M. 1993. Mimesis and Alterity: A Particular History of the Senses. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Tung, B. 2013. “Excavations in the North Area, 2013.” Çatalhöyük 2013 Archive Report. Accessed May 30. http://www.catalhoyuk.com/downloads/Archive_Report_2013.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Twiss, K., and N. Russell. 2009. “Taking the Bull by the Horns: Cattle Horns at Neolithic Çatalhöyük, Turkey.” Paleorient 35 (2): 19–32.
   Google Scholar
• Whitehouse, H., and I. Hodder. 2010. “Modes of Religiosity at Çatalhöyük.” In Religion in the Emergence of Civilization: Çatalhöyük as a Case Study, edited by I. Hodder. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar