‘The Minister will tell the nation’: the role of the media for archaeology in Mauritius

References

• Allen, R. 1999. Slaves, Freedmen, and Indentured Laborers in Colonial Mauritius. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Allen, R. 2003. “The Mascarene Slave-Trade and Labour Migration in the Indian Ocean during the Eighteenth and Nineteenth Centuries.” Slavery and Abolition 24: 33–50. doi:10.1080/01440390308559154.
   Google Scholar
• Appleby, J., K. Seetah, D. Calaon, S. Čaval, A. Pluskowski, J. F. Lafleur, A. Janoo, and V. Teelock. 2014. “The Non-Adult Cohort from Le Morne Cemetery, Mauritius: A Snap Shot of Early Life and Death after Abolition.” International Journal of Osteoarchaeology 24: 737–46. doi:10.1002/oa.2259.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bakker, K. A. and F. Odendall. 2008. “Managing Heritage in a Contested Space: The Case of Le Morne Cultural Landscape in Mauritius.” Sajah 23 (1): 225–44.
   Google Scholar
• Boswell, R. 2006. Le Malaise Creole. New York: Berghahn Books.
   Google Scholar
• Brittain, M. and T. Clack. 2007. Archaeology and the Media. Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cheke, A. and J. P. Hume. 2008. Lost Land of the Dodo: The Ecological History of Mauritius, Réunion and Rodrigues. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Drescher, S. 2002. The Might Experiment: Free Labour versus Slavery in British Emancipation. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Finn, C. 2001. “Mixed Messages: Archaeology and the Media.” Public Archaeology 1: 261–68. doi:10.1179/pua.2001.1.4.261.
   Google Scholar
• Funari, P. 2001. “Public Archaeology from a Latin American Perspective.” Public Archaeology 1: 239–43. doi:10.1179/pua.2001.1.4.239.
   Google Scholar
• Harding, A. 2007. “Communication in Archaeology.” European Journal of Archaeology 10 (2–3): 119–33. doi:10.1177/1461957108095980.
   Google Scholar
• Hodder, I. 2000. “Developing a Reflexive Method in Archaeology.” In Towards Reflexive Method in Archaeology: The Example of Çatalhöyük, edited by I. Hodder, 3–16. Oxford: McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research.
   Google Scholar
• Hodder, I. 2003. “Sustainable Time Travel: Toward a Global Politics of the Past.” In The Politics of Archaeology and Identity in a Global Context, edited by S. Kane, 139–47. Boston, MA: Archaeological Institute of America.
   Google Scholar
• Holtorf, C. 2007a. Archaeology Is a Brand! Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press.
   Google Scholar
• Holtorf, C. 2007b. “Can You Hear Me at the Back? Archaeology, Communication and Society.” European Journal of Archaeology 10 (2–3): 149–65. doi:10.1177/1461957108095982.
   Google Scholar
• Kohl, P. and C. Fawcett. 1995. Nationalism, Politics and the Practice of Archaeology. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kristensen, T. M. 2007. “Archaeological Engagements: New Media and Beyond.” European Journal of Archaeology 10 (1): 73–91. doi:10.1177/1461957108091483.
   Google Scholar
• Levy, J. 2007. “Archaeology, Communication, and Multiple Stakeholders: From the Other Side of the Big Pond.” European Journal of Archaeology 10 (2–3): 167–84. doi:10.1177/1461957108095983.
   Google Scholar
• Lionnet, F. 1993. “Créolité in the Indian Ocean: Two Models of Cultural Diversity.” Yale French Studies 82: 101–12. doi:10.2307/2930213.
   Google Scholar
• Marshall, Y. 2002. “What Is Community Archaeology?” World Archaeology 34 (2): 211–19. doi:10.1080/0043824022000007062.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meskell, L. 2002. “The Intersection of Identity and Politics in Archaeology.” Annual Review of Anthropology 31: 279–301. doi:10.1146/annurev.anthro.31.040402.085457.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meskell, L. 2012. The Nature of Heritage: The New South Africa. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Miles, W. 2000. “The Politics of Language Equilibrium in a Multilingual Society: Mauritius.” Comparative Politics 32 (2): 215–30. doi:10.2307/422398.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mugon, V. 2011. “Visitors at the Aapravasi Ghat World Heritage Property.” Newsletter: Aapravasi Ghat Trust Fund 9: 35.
   Google Scholar
• Patterson, A. 2010. “The Archaeology of Historical Indigenous Australia.” In Handbook of Postcolonial Archaeology, edited by J. Lydon and U. Z. Rizvi, 165–85. Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pike, P. 1873. Sub-tropical Rambles in the Land of Aphanapteryx. New York: Harper & Brothers.
   Google Scholar
• Sánchez, J. A. 2013. “To Be or Not to Be? Public Archaeology as a Tool of Public Opinion and the Dilemma of Intellectuality.” Archaeological Dialogues 20 (1): 5–11. doi:10.1017/S1380203813000044.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scherzler, D. 2007. “Journalists and Archaeologists: Notes on Dealing Constructively with the Mass Media.” European Journal of Archaeology 10 (2–3): 185–206. doi:10.1177/1461957108095984.
   Google Scholar
• Seetah, K. 2010. “Researching the Everyday Lives of Indentured Labourers: Archaeological Work at Trianon Barracks.” Newsletter: Aapravasi Ghat Trust Fund 8: 11.
   Google Scholar
• Seetah, K. 2011. Trianon: Archaeological Investigations of an Indentured Barrack. Unpublished report commissioned by the Aapravasi Ghat Trust Fund, Port Louis, Mauritius. http://www.stanford.edu/group/mauritianachlgy/research/Project%20Report%20-%20Trianon%202010%20-%20LOW%20RES.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Seetah, K. 2015a. “The Archaeology of Mauritius.” Antiquity.
   Google Scholar
• Seetah, K. 2015b. “Objects Past: Objects Present: Materials, Resistance and Memory from the Le Morne Old Cemetery, Mauritius.” Journal of Social Archaeology 15: 2.
   Google Scholar
• Segobye, A. K. 2005. “The Revolution Will Be Televised: African Archaeology Education and the Challenge of Public Archaeology— Some Examples from Southern Africa.” Archaeologies 1 (2): 33–45. doi:10.1007/s11759-005-0019-1.
   Google Scholar
• Selvakumar, V. 2010. “The Use and Relevance of Archaeology in the Post-Modern World: Views from India.” World Archaeology 42 (3): 468–80. doi:10.1080/00438243.2010.498664.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shepherd, N. 2002. “The Politics of Archaeology in Africa.” Annual Review of Anthropology 31: 189–209. doi:10.1146/annurev.anthro.31.040402.085424.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teelock, V. 1998. Bitter Sugar. Moka: Mahatma Gandhi Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Teelock, V. 2009. Mauritian History. Moka: Mahatma Gandhi Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Teelock, V. 2012. “The Potential for Archaeological Study of Mauritian Indenture History and Heritage.” In Angage: Explorations into the History, Society and Culture of Indentured Immigrants and Their Descendants in Mauritius, vol. 2, edited by V. Teelock, 101–21. Port Louis, CA: Aapravasi Ghat Trust Fund.
   Google Scholar
• Vaughan, M. 2005. Creating the Creole Island. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Weiss, L. M. 2005. “The Social Life of Rock Art: Materiality, Consumption and Power in South African Heritage.” In Archaeologies of Materiality, edited by L. Meskell, 46–71. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar