Stop culling male layer-type chick: an overview of the alternatives and public perspective

References

• Aleksandrowicz, E., and I. Herr. 2015. “Ethical Euthanasia and Short-Term Anesthesia of the Chick Embryo.” ALTEX 32 (2): 143–147. https://doi.org/10.14573/altex.1410031.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Alin, K., S. Fujitani, A. Kashimori, T. Suzuki, Y. Ogawa, and N. Kondo. 2019. “Non-Invasive Broiler Chick Embryo Sexing Based on Opacity Value of Incubated Eggs.” Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 158: 30–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2019.01.029.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arruda, M. D., V. I. Lyamichev, P. S. Eis, W. Iszczyszyn, R. W. Kwiatkowski, S. M. Law, and M. C. O. A. E. B. Rasmussen. 2002. “Invader Technology for DNA and RNA Analysis: Principles and Applications.” Expert Review of Molecular Diagnostics 2 (5): 487–496. https://doi.org/10.1586/14737159.2.5.487.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Augère-Granier, M.-L. 2019. The EU Poultry Meat and Egg Sector: Main Features, Challenges and Prospects. European Parliamentary Research Service. https://policycommons.net/artifacts/1337506/the-eu-poultry-meat-and-egg-sector/1945404/.
   Google Scholar
• Becker, S., W. Büscher, and I. Tiemann. 2023. “The British Ixworth: Individual Growth and Egg Production of a Purebred Dual-Purpose Chicken.” British Poultry Science 1–11. in print. https://doi.org/10.1080/00071668.2023.2246142.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bell, A. 2018. “The Neurobiology of Acute Pain.” The Veterinary Journal 237: 55–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tvjl.2018.05.004.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bellieni, C. V. 2019. “New Insights into Fetal Pain.” Seminars in Fetal and Neonatal Medicine 24 (4): 101001. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.siny.2019.04.001.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borras, E., Y. Wang, P. Shah, K. Bellido, K. L. Hamera, R. A. Arlen, M. M. McCartney, et al. 2023. “Active Sampling of Volatile Chemicals for Non-Invasive Classification of Chicken Eggs by Sex Early in Incubation.” PLOS ONE 18 (5): e0285726. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0285726.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruijnis, M. R. N., V. Blok, E. N. Stassen, and H. G. J. Gremmen. 2015. “Moral “Lock-in” in Responsible Innovation: The Ethical and Social Aspects of Killing Day-Old Chicks and Its Alternatives.” Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 28 (5): 939–960. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10806-015-9566-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruins, W. S., and W. M. Stutterheim, 2014. “Gender, Viability And/Or Developmental Stage Determination of Avian Embryos in Ovo.”
   Google Scholar
• Bruins, W., and W. Stutterheim. 2017. “ Method and System for the Non-Destructive in Ovo Determination of Fowl Gender.”
   Google Scholar
• Brümmer, N., I. Christoph-Schulz, and A.-K. Rovers. 2018. “Consumers’ Perspective on Dual-Purpose Chickens as Alternative to the Killing of Day-Old Chicks.” International Journal on Food System Dynamics 9 (5): 390–398.
   Google Scholar
• Burkhardt, A., S. Geissler, P. Cimalla, J. Walther, E. Koch. 2010. “Minimal Invasive Localization of the Germinal Disc in Ovo for Subsequent Chicken Sexing Using Optical Coherence Tomography.” In Optical Coherence Tomography and Coherence Domain Optical Methods in Biomedicine XIV, edited by J. A. Izatt, J. G. Fujimoto, and V. V. Tuchin, 75542N. San Francisco, CA: SPIE.
   Google Scholar
• Busse, M., M. L. Kernecker, J. Zscheischler, F. Zoll, and R. Siebert. 2019. “Ethical Concerns in Poultry Production: A German Consumer Survey About Dual Purpose Chickens.” Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 32 (5–6): 905–925. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10806-019-09806-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, T. T., C. C. Huang, T. Y. Lee, K. J. Lin, C. C. Chang, and K. L. Chen. 2010. “Effect of Caponization and Exogenous Androgen Implantation on Muscle Characteristics of Male Chickens.” Poultry Science 89 (3): 558–563. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2009-00429.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choo, Y.-K., S.-T. Oh, K.-W. Lee, C.-W. Kang, H.-W. Kim, C.-J. Kim, E.-J. Kim, H.-S. Kim, and B.-K. An. 2014. “The Growth Performance, Carcass Characteristics, and Meat Quality of Egg-Type Male Growing Chicken and White-Mini Broiler in Comparison with Commercial Broiler (Ross 308).” Korean Journal for Food Science of Animal Resources 34 (5): 622–629. https://doi.org/10.5851/kosfa.2014.34.5.622.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Clark, B., G. B. Stewart, L. A. Panzone, I. Kyriazakis, and L. J. Frewer. 2017. “Citizens, Consumers and Farm Animal Welfare: A Meta-Analysis of Willingness-To-Pay Studies.” Food Policy 68: 112–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2017.01.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clinton, M. 1998. “Sex Determination and Gonadal Development: A Bird’s Eye View.” The Journal of Experimental Zoology 281 (5): 457–465. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-010X(19980801)281:5<457:AID-JEZ10>3.0.CO;2-6.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Clinton, M., L. Haines, B. Belloir, and D. McBride. 2001. “Sexing Chick Embryos: A Rapid and Simple Protocol.” British Poultry Science 42 (1): 134–138. https://doi.org/10.1080/713655025.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clinton, M., S. Nandi, D. Zhao, S. Olson, P. Peterson, T. Burdon, and D. McBride. 2016. “Real-Time Sexing of Chicken Embryos and Compatibility with in Ovo Protocols.” Sexual Development 10 (4): 210–216. https://doi.org/10.1159/000448502.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corion, M., J. Keresztes, B. De Ketelaere, and W. Saeys. 2022. “In Ovo Sexing of Eggs from Brown Breeds with a Gender-Specific Color Using Visible-Near-Infrared Spectroscopy: Effect of Incubation Day and Measurement Configuration.” Poultry Science 101 (5): 101782. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psj.2022.101782.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cortés, O., A. Barroso, and S. Dunner. 1999. “Avian Sexing: An Optimized Protocol Using Polymerase Chain Reaction—Single-strand Conformation Polymorphism.” Journal of Veterinary Diagnostic Investigation 11 (3): 297–299. https://doi.org/10.1177/104063879901100318.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costanzo, A., S. Panseri, A. Giorgi, A. Romano, M. Caprioli, N. Saino, and J. M. Avilés. 2016. “The Odour of Sex: Sex-Related Differences in Volatile Compound Composition Among Barn Swallow Eggs Carrying Embryos of Either Sex.” PLOS ONE 11 (11): e0165055. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0165055.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Haas, E. N., E. Oliemans, and M. A. A. M. van Gerwen. 2021. “The Need for an Alternative to Culling Day-Old Male Layer Chicks: A Survey on Awareness, Alternatives, and the Willingness to Pay for Alternatives in a Selected Population of Dutch Citizens.” Frontiers in Veterinary Science 8:381. https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2021.662197.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doran, T. J., K. R. Morris, T. G. Wise, T. E. O’Neil, C. A. Cooper, K. A. Jenkins, and M. L. V. Tizard. 2018. “Sex Selection in Layer Chickens.” Animal Production Science 58 (3): 476. https://doi.org/10.1071/AN16785.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Douglas, J. M., D. Sanchez-Migallon Guzman, and J. R. Paul-Murphy. 2018. “Pain in Birds: The Anatomical and Physiological Basis.” The Veterinary Clinics of North America. Exotic Animal Practice 21 (1): 17–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cvex.2017.08.008.
   Google Scholar
• Douglas, C., J. M. A. Turner, and J. L. Mueller. 2020. “Advances and Challenges in Genetic Technologies to Produce Single-Sex Litters.” PLOS Genetics 16 (7): e1008898. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1008898.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eide, A. L., and J. C. Glover. 1995. “Development of the Longitudinal Projection Patterns of Lumbar Primary Sensory Afferents in the Chicken Embryo.” The Journal of Comparative Neurology 353 (2): 247–259. https://doi.org/10.1002/cne.903530207.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eide, A. L., and J. C. Glover. 1997. “Developmental Dynamics of Functionally Specific Primary Sensory Afferent Projections in the Chicken Embryo.” Anatomy and Embryology 195 (3): 237–250. https://doi.org/10.1007/s004290050043.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• European Commission. 2021. “European Citizens Initiative on “End the Cage Age”[online].” Accessed March 10, 2023. https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/QANDA_21_3298.
   Google Scholar
• EUROSTAT. 2022. “Poultry Statistics - Statistics Explained [Online].” Accessed March 9, 2023. https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php?title=Poultry_statistics#Poultry_production.
   Google Scholar
• FAO. 2023. “Gateway to Poultry Production and Products [Online].” Accessed March 9, 2023. https://www.fao.org/poultry-production-products/production/en/.
   Google Scholar
• Förster, A., L. Zumbrink, and J. Hurlin. 2022. “L’imagerie Hyper-Spectrale Comme Outil D’ovo-Sexage Pour Les Embryons des Souches D’oeufs Bruns - Une Enquête Terrain à Grande Échelle.” Quatorzièmes Journées de la Recherche Avicole Et Palmipèdes à Foie Gras 444–448.
   Google Scholar
• Fridolfsson, A.-K., and H. Ellegren. 1999. “A Simple and Universal Method for Molecular Sexing of Non-Ratite Birds.” Journal of Avian Biology 30 (1): 116. https://doi.org/10.2307/3677252.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galli, R., G. Preusse, C. Schnabel, T. Bartels, K. Cramer, M.-E. Krautwald-Junghanns, E. Koch, G. Steiner, and Y. K. Mishra. 2018. “Sexing of Chicken Eggs by Fluorescence and Raman Spectroscopy Through the Shell Membrane.” PLOS ONE 13 (2): e0192554. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0192554.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galli, R., G. Preusse, O. Uckermann, T. Bartels, M.-E. Krautwald-Junghanns, E. Koch, and G. Steiner. 2016. “In Ovo Sexing of Domestic Chicken Eggs by Raman Spectroscopy.” Analytical Chemistry 88 (17): 8657–8663. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.analchem.6b01868.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galli, R., G. Preusse, O. Uckermann, T. Bartels, M.-E. Krautwald-Junghanns, E. Koch, and G. Steiner. 2017. “In Ovo Sexing of Chicken Eggs by Fluorescence Spectroscopy.” Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry 409 (5): 1185–1194. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-016-0116-6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gangnat, I. D. M., S. Mueller, M. Kreuzer, R. E. Messikommer, M. Siegrist, and V. H. M. Visschers. 2018. “Swiss consumers’ Willingness to Pay and Attitudes Regarding Dual-Purpose Poultry and Eggs.” Poultry Science 97 (3): 1089–1098. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps/pex397.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gautron, J., S. Réhault-Godbert, T. G. H. Van de Braak, and I. C. Dunn. 2021. “Review: What are the Challenges Facing the Table Egg Industry in the Next Decades and What Can Be Done to Address Them?” Animal 15: 100282. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.animal.2021.100282.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerken, M., D. Jaenecke, M. Kreuzer, and D. G. Martin. 2003. “Growth, Behaviour and Carcass Characteristics of Egg-Type Cockerels Compared to Male Broilers.” World’s Poultry Science Journal 59 (1): 46–49.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giersberg, M., and N. Kemper. 2018. “Rearing Male Layer Chickens: A German Perspective.” Agriculture 8 (11): 176. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture8110176.
   Google Scholar
• Göhler, D., B. Fischer, and S. Meissner. 2017. “In-Ovo Sexing of 14-Day-Old Chicken Embryos by Pattern Analysis in Hyperspectral Images (VIS/NIR Spectra): A Non-Destructive Method for Layer Lines with Gender-Specific Down Feather Color.” Poultry Science 96 (1): 1–4. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps/pew282.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gremmen, B., M. R. N. Bruijnis, V. Blok, and E. N. Stassen. 2018. “A Public Survey on Handling Male Chicks in the Dutch Egg Sector.” Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 31 (1): 93–107. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10806-018-9712-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haunshi, S., A. Pattanayak, S. Bandyopadhaya, S. C. Saxena, and K. M. Bujarbaruah. 2008. “A Simple and Quick DNA Extraction Procedure for Rapid Diagnosis of Sex of Chicken and Chicken Embryos.” The Journal of Poultry Science 45 (1): 75–81. https://doi.org/10.2141/jpsa.45.75.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heise, H., and L. Theuvsen. 2017. “What Do Consumers Think About Farm Animal Welfare in Modern Agriculture? Attitudes and Shopping Behaviour.” International Food and Agribusiness Management Review 20 (3): 379–399. https://doi.org/10.22434/IFAMR2016.0115.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• He, L., P. Martins, J. Huguenin, T.-N.-N. Van, T. Manso, T. Galindo, F. Gregoire, L. Catherinot, F. Molina, and J. Espeut. 2019. “Simple, Sensitive and Robust Chicken Specific Sexing Assays, Compliant with Large Scale Analysis.” PLOS ONE 14 (3): e0213033. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0213033.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoan, N. D., and M. A. Khoan. 2016. “Meat Quality Comparison Between Fast Growing Broiler Ross 308 and Slow Growing Sasso Laying Males Reared in Free Range System.” Journal of Science and Development 148 (1): 101–108.
   Google Scholar
• Icken, W., M. Schmutz, D. Cavero, and R. Preisinger. 2013. “Dual Purpose Chickens: The Breeder’s Answer to the Culling of Day-Old Male Layer.” In IX European Symposium on Poultry Welfare, Uppsala, Sweden, 91.
   Google Scholar
• Kahn, N. W., J. S. John, and T. W. Quinn. 1998. “Chromosome-Specific Intron Size Differences in the Avian CHD Gene Provide an Efficient Method for Sex Identification in Birds.” The Auk: Ornithological Advances 115 (4): 1074–1078. https://doi.org/10.2307/4089527.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaleta, E. F., and T. Redmann. 2008. “Approaches to Determine the Sex Prior to and After Incubation of Chicken Eggs and of Day-Old Chicks.” World’s Poultry Science Journal 64 (3): 391–399. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0043933908000111.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klein, S., and F. Ellendorff. 2000. “Localisation of Xho1 Repetitive Sequences on Autosomes in Addition to the W Chromosome in Chickens and Its Relevance for Sex Diagnosis.” Animal Genetics 31 (2): 104–109. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2052.2000.00568.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koenig, M., G. Hahn, K. Damme, and M. Schmutz. 2010. “Utilization of Laying-Type Cockerels as Coquelets: Growth Performance and Carcass Quality.” Fleischwirtschaft 90 (2): 92–94.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koenig, M., G. Hahn, K. Damme, and M. Schmutz. 2012. “Utilization of Laying-Type Cockerels as ‘Coquelets’: Influence of Genotype and Diet Characteristics on Growth Performance and Carcass Composition.” Archiv Für Geflügelkunde 76 (3): 197–202.
   Google Scholar
• Kollmansperger, S., M. Anders, J. Werner, A. M. Saller, L. Weiss, S. C. Süß, J. Reiser, et al. 2023. “Nociception in Chicken Embryos, Part II: Embryonal Development of Electroencephalic Neuronal Activity in Ovo as a Prerequisite for Nociception.” Animals 13 (18): 2839. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani13182839.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krautwald-Junghanns, M.-E., K. Cramer, B. Fischer, A. Förster, R. Galli, F. Kremer, E. U. Mapesa, et al. 2018. “Current Approaches to Avoid the Culling of Day-Old Male Chicks in the Layer Industry, with Special Reference to Spectroscopic Methods.” Poultry Science 97 (3): 749–757. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps/pex389.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lambertz, C., K. Wuthijaree, and M. Gauly. 2018. “Performance, Behavior, and Health of Male Broilers and Laying Hens of 2 Dual-Purpose Chicken Genotypes.” Poultry Science 97 (10): 3564–3576. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps/pey223.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leary, S., W. Underwood, R. Anthony, S. Cartner, T. Grandin, C. Greenacre, S. Gwaltney-Brant, et al. 2020. “AVMA (American Veterinary Medical Association). AVMA Guidelines of the Euthanasia of Animals.”
   Google Scholar
• Leenstra, F., G. Munnichs, V. Beekman, E. van den Heuvel-Vromans, L. Aramyan, and H. Woelders. 2011. “Killing Day-Old Chicks? Public Opinion Regarding Potential Alternatives.” Animal Welfare 20 (1): 37–45. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0962728600002414.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leenstra, F., P. van Horne, and M. van Krimpen. 2010. “Dual Purpose Chickens, Exploration of Technical, Environmental and Economical Feasibility.” In XIII European Poultry Conference, Tours, France.
   Google Scholar
• Lichovníková, M., J. Jandásek, M. Jůzl, and E. Dračková. 2009. “The Meat Quality of Layer Males from Free Range in Comparison with Fast Growing Chickens.” Czech Journal of Animal Science 54 (11): 490–497. https://doi.org/10.17221/3/2009-CJAS.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mellor, D., and T. Diesch. 2007. “Birth and Hatching: Key Events in the Onset of Awareness in the Lamb and Chick.” New Zealand Veterinary Journal 55 (2): 51–60. https://doi.org/10.1080/00480169.2007.36742.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mueller, S., M. Kreuzer, M. Siegrist, K. Mannale, R. E. Messikommer, and I. D. M. Gangnat. 2018. “Carcass and Meat Quality of Dual-Purpose Chickens (Lohmann Dual, Belgian Malines, Schweizerhuhn) in Comparison to Broiler and Layer Chicken Types.” Poultry Science 97 (9): 3325–3336. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps/pey172.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murawska, D., R. Bochno, D. Michalik, and M. Janiszewska. 2005. “Age-Related Changes in the Carcass Tissue Composition and Distribution of Meat and Fat with Skin in Carcasses of Laying-Type Cockerels.” Archiv Fur Geflugelkunde 69 (3): 135–138.
   Google Scholar
• Murawska, D., M. Gesek, and D. Witkowska. 2019. “Suitability of Layer-Type Male Chicks for Capon Production.” Poultry Science 98 (8): 3345–3351. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps/pez146.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pan, L., W. Zhang, M. Yu, Y. Sun, X. Gu, L. Ma, Z. Li, P. Hu, and K. Tu. 2016. “Gender Determination of Early Chicken Hatching Eggs Embryos by Hyperspectral Imaging.” Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering 32 (1): 181–186.
   Google Scholar
• Peters, J. J., A. R. Vonderahe, and T. H. Powers. 1956. “The Functional Chronology in Developing Chick Nervous System.” Journal of Experimental Zoology 133 (3): 505–518. https://doi.org/10.1002/jez.1401330306.
   Google Scholar
• Petitte, J. N., and A. E. Kegelmeyer. 1995. “Rapid Sex Determination of Chick Embryos Using the Polymerase Chain Reaction 1.” Animal Biotechnology 6 (2): 119–130. https://doi.org/10.1080/10495399509525841.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Popova, T., E. Petkov, M. Ignatova, D. Vlahova-Vangelova, D. Balev, S. Dragoev, and N. Kolev. 2022. “Male Layer-Type Chickens - an Alternative Source for High Quality Poultry Meat: A Review on the Carcass Composition, Sensory Characteristics and Nutritional Profile.” Brazilian Journal of Poultry Science 24 (3): 3. https://doi.org/10.1590/1806-9061-2021-1615.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Preuße, G., V. Porstmann, T. Bartels, C. Schnabel, R. Galli, E. Koch, M. Oelschlägel, O. Uckermann, and G. Steiner. 2023. “Highly Sensitive and Quick in Ovo Sexing of Domestic Chicken Eggs by Two-Wavelength Fluorescence Spectroscopy.” Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry 415 (4): 603–613. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-022-04446-0.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quaresma, M. A. G., I. C. Antunes, M. F. Ribeiro, S. Prazeres, R. J. B. Bessa, and P. M. da Costa. 2017. “Immunocastration as an Alternative to Caponization: Evaluation of Its Effect on Body and Bone Development and on Meat Color and Composition.” Poultry Science 96 (10): 3608–3615. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps/pex191.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reithmayer, C., M. Danne, and O. Mußhoff. 2021a. “Look at That!—The Effect Pictures Have on Consumer Preferences for in Ovo Gender Determination as an Alternative to Culling Male Chicks.” Poultry Science 100 (2): 643–653. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psj.2020.09.092.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reithmayer, C., M. Danne, and O. Mußhoff. 2021b. “Societal Attitudes Towards in Ovo Gender Determination as an Alternative to Chick Culling.” Agribusiness 37 (2): 306–323. https://doi.org/10.1002/agr.21650.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reithmayer, C., and O. Mußhoff. 2019. “Consumer Preferences for Alternatives to Chick Culling in Germany.” Poultry Science 98 (10): 4539–4548. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps/pez272.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Röhl, D. 2020. “Animal Equality - Il Sessaggio In-Ovo [Online].” Accessed March 14, 2023. https://animalequality.it/app/uploads/2020/07/In-OvoSexing-AlternativeToMaleChickenKillingReport_IT-1.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenbruch, M. 1997. “The Sensitivity of Chicken Embryos in Incubated Eggs.” ALTEX 14 (3): 111–113.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ryan, J. 2019. “How CRISPR Could Save 6 Billion Chickens from the Meat Grinder - CNET [Online].” Accessed March 13, 2023. https://www.cnet.com/science/how-crispr-could-save-6-billion-chickens-from-the-meat-grinder/.
   Google Scholar
• Siekmann, L., L. Meier-Dinkel, S. Janisch, B. Altmann, C. Kaltwasser, C. Sürie, and C. Krischek. 2018. “Carcass Quality, Meat Quality and Sensory Properties of the Dual-Purpose Chicken Lohmann Dual.” Foods 7 (10): 156. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods7100156.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soisontes, S., 2015. “An Alternative Use of One Day-Old Male Layer Chicks: The Case of Thailand.” Vechta: Projects Sustainability in Poultry Production: A Comparative Study Between Germany and Thailand. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.16279.98725.
   Google Scholar
• Steiner, G., T. Bartels, A. Stelling, M.-E. Krautwald-Junghanns, H. Fuhrmann, V. Sablinskas, and E. Koch. 2011. “Gender Determination of Fertilized Unincubated Chicken Eggs by Infrared Spectroscopic Imaging.” Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry 400 (9): 2775–2782. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-011-4941-3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Süß, S. C., J. Werner, A. M. Saller, L. Weiss, J. Reiser, J. M. Ondracek, Y. Zablotski, et al. 2023. “Nociception in Chicken Embryos, Part III: Analysis of Movements Before and After Application of a Noxious Stimulus.” Animals 13 (18): 2859. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani13182859.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Symeon, G. K., F. Mantis, I. Bizelis, A. Kominakis, and E. Rogdakis. 2012. “Effects of Caponization on Growth Performance, Carcass Composition and Meat Quality of Males of a Layer Line.” Animal 6 (12): 2023–2030. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1751731112001024.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tiemann, I., S. Hillemacher, and M. Wittmann. 2020. “Are Dual-Purpose Chickens Twice as Good? Measuring Performance and Animal Welfare Throughout the Fattening Period.” Animals 10 (11): 1980. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani10111980.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tiersch, T. R. 2003. “Identification of Sex in Chickens by Flow Cytornetry.” World’s Poultry Science Journal 59 (1): 25–32. https://doi.org/10.1079/WPS20030002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turkyilmaz, M. K., L. Karagenc, and E. Fidan. 2010. “Sexing of Newly-Hatched Chicks Using DNA Isolated from Chorio-Allantoic Membrane Samples by Polymerase Chain Reaction in Denizli Chicken.” British Poultry Science 51 (4): 525–529. https://doi.org/10.1080/00071668.2010.502521.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Bussel, L. M., A. Kuijsten, M. Mars, and P. van ‘t Veer. 2022. “Consumers’ Perceptions on Food-Related Sustainability: A Systematic Review.” Journal of Cleaner Production 341: 130904.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vinci, C., 2022. “Male Chick Culling.” European Parliamentary Research Service.
   Google Scholar
• Webster, B., W. Hayes, T. W. Pike, and N. Saino. 2015. “Avian Egg Odour Encodes Information on Embryo Sex, Fertility and Development.” PLOS ONE 10 (1): e0116345. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0116345.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weissmann, A., A. Förster, J. Gottschalk, S. Reitemeier, M.-E. Krautwald-Junghanns, R. Preisinger, and A. Einspanier. 2014. “In Ovo-Gender Identification in Laying Hen Hybrids: Effects on Hatching and Production Performance.” European Poultry Science (EPS) 78. https://doi.org/10.1399/eps.2014.25.
   Google Scholar
• Weissmann, A., S. Reitemeier, A. Hahn, J. Gottschalk, and A. Einspanier. 2013. “Sexing Domestic Chicken Before Hatch: A New Method for in Ovo Gender Identification.” Theriogenology 80 (3): 199–205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2013.04.014.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weiss, L., A. M. Saller, J. Werner, S. C. Süß, J. Reiser, S. Kollmansperger, M. Anders, T. Fenzl, B. Schusser, and C. Baumgartner. 2023. “Nociception in Chicken Embryos, Part I: Analysis of Cardiovascular Responses to a Mechanical Noxious Stimulus.” Animals 13 (17): 2710. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani13172710.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu, Z. H., Z. F. Ye, and Y. Tang. 2021. “Nondestructive Identification for Gender of Chicken Eggs Based on GA-BPNN with Double Hidden Layers.” Journal of Applied Poultry Research 30 (4): 100203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.japr.2021.100203.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar