3,356
Views
269
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Retrospective vs. concurrent think-aloud protocols: Testing the usability of an online library catalogue

, &
Pages 339-351 | Published online: 08 Nov 2010

  • ALLWOOD , C. M. and KALEN , T. 1997 . Evaluating and improving the usability of a user manual . Behaviour & Information Technology , 16 : 43 – 57 .
  • BARNUM , C. M. 2002 . Usability Testing and Research , New York : Longman .
  • BATTLESON , B. , BOOTH , A. and WEINTROP , J. 2001 . Usability testing of an academic library web site: a case study . Journal of Academic Librarianship , 237 : 188 – 198 .
  • BOLTON , R. L. 1993 . Pretesting questionnaires: content analyses of respondents' concurrent verbal protocols . Marketing Science , 12 : 280 – 303 .
  • BOREN , M. T. and RAMEY , J. 2000 . Thinking aloud: reconciling theory and practice . IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication , 43 : 261 – 278 .
  • BOWERS , V. A. and SNYDER , H. L. Concurrent versus retrospective verbal protocols for comparing window usability . Human Factors Society 34th Meeting . October 8-12 1990 , Santa Monica. pp. 1270 – 1274 . HFES .
  • BRANCH , J. L. 2000 . Investigating the information-seeking processes of adolescents: The value of using think alouds and think afters . Library & Information Science Research , 22 : 371 – 392 .
  • CAMPBELL , N. , ed. 2001 . Usability Assessment of LibraryRelated Web Sites: Methods and Case Studies. , Chicago : LITA .
  • CAULTON , D. A. 2001 . Relaxing the homogeneity assumption in usability testing . Behaviour & Information Technology , 20 : 1 – 7 .
  • DE JONG , M. and SCHELLENS , P. J. 2000 . Toward a document evaluation methodology: what does research tell us about the validity and reliability of methods? . IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication , 43 : 242 – 260 .
  • DIELI , M. 1986 . Designing Successful Documents: An Investigation of Document Evaluation Methods , Pittsburgh, PA : Carnegie Mellon University . (Dissertation
  • DUMAS , J. S. and REDISH , J. C. 1999 . A Practical Guide to Usability Testing, , Revised edition , Exeter : Intellect .
  • ERICSSON , K. A. and SIMON , H. A. 1993 . Protocol Analysis: Verbal Reports as Data , Cambridge, MA : MIT Press .
  • GRAY , W. D. and SALZMAN , M. C. 1998 . Damaged merchandise? A review of experiments that compare usability evaluation methods . Human-Computer Interaction , 13 : 203 – 261 .
  • HASSENZAHL , M. 2000 . Prioritizing usability problems: datadriven and judgement-driven severity estimates . Behaviour & Information Technology , 19 : 29 – 42 .
  • HENDERSON , R. D. , SMITH , M. C. , PODD , J. and VARELAALVAREZ , H. 1995 . A comparison of the four prominent user-based methods for evaluating the usability of computer software . Ergonomics , 38 : 2030 – 2044 .
  • Hoc , J. M. and LEPLAT , J. 1983 . Evaluation of different modalities of verbalization in a sorting task . International Journal of Man-Machine Studies , 18 : 283 – 306 .
  • JANSEN , C. and STEEHOUDER , M. 1992 . Forms as a source of communication problems . Journal of Technical Writing and Communication , 22 : 179 – 194 .
  • JOHN , B. E. and MARKS , S. J. 1997 . Tracking the effectiveness of usability evaluation methods . Behaviour & Information Technology , 16 : 188 – 202 .
  • KUUSELA , H. and PAUL , P. 2000 . A comparison of concurrent and retrospective verbal protocol analysis . American Journal of Psychology , 113 : 387 – 404 .
  • LAVERY , D. , COCKTON , G. and ATKINSON , M.P. 1997 . Comparison of evaluation methods using structured usability problem reports . Behaviour & Information Technology , 16 : 246 – 266 .
  • LEWIS , J.R. 1994 . Sample sizes for usability studies: additional considerations . Human Factors , 36 : 369 – 378 .
  • LOXTERMAN , J. A. , BECK , I. L. and McKEOWN , M. G. 1994 . The effects of thinking aloud during reading on students' comprehension of more or less coherent text . Reading Research Quarterly , 29 : 353 – 367 .
  • NIELSEN , J. 1993 . Usability Engineering , Boston, MA : Academic Press .
  • NIELSEN , J. 1994 . Estimating the number of subjects needed for a thinking aloud test . International Journal of HumanComputer Studies , 41 : 385 – 397 .
  • NORLIN , E. and WINTERS , C. M. I. 2002 . Usability testing for library websites: a hands-on guide , Chicago : American Library Association .
  • RUBIN , J. 1994 . Handbook of Usability Testing: How to Plan, Design, and Conduct Effective Tests , New York : Wiley .
  • Russo , J. E. , JOHNSON , E. J. and STEPHENS , D. L. 1989 . The validity of verbal protocols . Memory & Cognition , 17 : 759 – 769 .
  • SCHRIVER , K.A. 1997 . Dynamics in Document Design; Creating Text for Readers , New York : Wiley .
  • SIENOT , M. 1997 . Pretesting web sites; a comparison between the plus-minus method and the think-aloud method for the World Wide Web . Journal of Business and Technical Communication , 11 : 469 – 482 .
  • SMILOWITZ , E. D. , DARNELL , M. J. and BENSON , A. E. 1994 . Are we overlooking some usability testing methods? A comparison of lab, beta, and forum tests . Behaviour & Information Technology , 13 : 183 – 190 .
  • TAYLOR , K. L. and DIONNE , J. P. 2000 . Accessing problemsolving strategy knowledge: The complementary use of concurrent verbal protocols and retrospective debriefing . Journal of Educational Psychology , 29 : 413 – 425 .
  • TEAOUE , R. , DE JESUS , K. and NUNES-UENO , M. Concurrent vs. post-task usability test ratings . Conference on Human Factors and Computing Systems . 31 March-5 April 2001 , Seattle, WA. pp. 289 – 290 . ACM SIGCHI .
  • VIRZI , R. A. 1992 . Refining the test phase of usability evaluation: how many subjects is enough? . Human Factors , 34 : 457 – 468 .
  • WRIOHT , P. C. and MONK , A. F. 1991 . A cost-effective evaluation method for use by designers . International Journal of Man-Machine Studies , 36 : 544 – 565 .

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.