Australian forensic scientists: a view from the witness box

References

• Wood , J . 2003 . Forensic science from the judicial perspective . Austr J Forens Sci , 35 : 115 – 132 .
   Google Scholar
• Broeders , A . 2006 . Of earprints, fingerprints, scent dogs, cot deaths and cognitive contamination – a brief look at the state of play in the forensic arena . Forensic Sci Int , 159 : 148
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jasanoff , S . 2005 . Law's knowledge: science for justice in legal settings . Am J Public Hlth , 95 : S49
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walsh , S J , Ribaux , O , Buckleton , J S , Ross , A and Roux , C . 2004 . DNA profiling and criminal justice: a contribution to a changing debate . Austr J Forens Sci , 36 : 34
   Google Scholar
• Poole , D . 1994 . The expert and the advocate . Forens Sci Int , 68 : 75
   Google Scholar
• Edmond , G . 1998 . Azaria's accessories: the social (legal-scientific) construction of the Chamberlains' guilt and innocence . Melb Univ Law Rev , 22 : 396
   Google Scholar
• Neufeld , P J . 2005 . The (near) irrelevance of Daubert to criminal justice and some suggestions for reform . Am J Public Hlth , 95 : S107
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson , P . 2004 . The Sally Clark case: another collision between science and the criminal law . Austr J Forens Sci , 36 : 11
   Google Scholar
• Bourke , J . 1993 . Misapplied science: unreliability in scientific test evidence . Austr Bar Rev , 10 : 123
   Google Scholar
• Justice Crispin , K . 1992 . Coping with complexity . Austr J Forens Sci , 24 : 74
   Google Scholar
• Freckelton , I , Reddy , P and Selby , H . 2001 . Australian magistrates' perspectives on expert evidence: a comparative study , Melbourne : Australian Institute of Judicial Administration .
   Google Scholar
• Walsh , S J . 2005 . Legal perceptions of forensic DNA profiling Part I: a review of the legal literature . Forens Sci Int , 155 : 51
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edmond , G . 2003 . After objectivity: expert evidence and procedural reform . Sydney Law Rev , 25 : 131
   Google Scholar
• Freckelton , I , Reddy , P and Selby , H . 1999 . Australian judicial perspectives on expert evidence: an empirical study , Melbourne : Australian Institute of Judicial Administration .
   Google Scholar
• Wheate , R . 2007 . Jury comprehension of scientific evidence , Canberra, ACT : University of New South Wales ADFA . Available from: http://www.library.unsw.edu.au/∼thesis/adt-ADFA/public/adt-ADFA20070801.133638/index.html
   Google Scholar
• Lucas , D . 1989 . The ethical responsibilities of the forensic scientist: exploring the limits . J Forens Sci , 34 : 719
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson , P . 1994 . Lessons from the Antipodes: successes and failures of forensic science . Forens Sci Int , 67 : 79
   Google Scholar
• Starrs , J . 1991 . The forensic scientist & the open mind . J Forens Sci , 31 : 111
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Likert , R . 1932 . A technique for measurement of attitudes , New York : Archives of Psychology .
   Google Scholar
• O'Muircheartaigh , C , Krosnick , J A and Helic , A . 2000 . Middle alternatives, acquiescence, and the quality of questionnaire data , Chicago : University of Chicago .
   Google Scholar
• Hastie R Inside the juror: the psychology of juror decision making Cambridge University Press New York 1993
   Google Scholar
• Justice Kirby , M . . Expert evidence: causation, proof and presentation . Paper presented at The Inaugural Conference of the International Institute of Forensic Studies . July 3 2002 , Prato, Italy.
   Google Scholar
• Justice Yarnell , M AH . . The Arizona jury past, present and future reform . Paper presented at The University of Canberra School of Law Annual Jury Conference . November 7 2005 , Sydney, Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Abrahams , W . . Difficulties in using expert evidence – R v Karger – A case study . Paper presented at 10th Annual Conference of the International Association of Prosecutors . Paris, France.
   Google Scholar
• Cooper , J and Neuhaus , I M . 2000 . The ‘hired gun’ effect: assessing the effect of pay, frequency of testing, and credentials on the perception of expert testimony . Law Human Behav , 24 : 149
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petterd , C and Royds , D . 1999 . ‘Independent’ forensic practitioners – fact or fiction? . Austr J Forens Sci , 31 : 45
   Google Scholar
• Gutheil , T G . 2000 . The presentation of forensic psychiatric evidence in court . Israel J Psychiatry Rel Sci , 37 : 137
   PubMedGoogle Scholar