Relationship between nasal and skeletal landmarks on lateral cephalograms of adults

References

• Jayaprakash PT, Srinivasan GJ, Amravaneswaran MG. Cranio-facial morphanalysis: a new method for enhancing reliability while identifying skulls by photo superimposition. Foren Sci Inter. 2001;117(1–2):121–143.10.1016/S0379-0738(00)00455-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Claes P, Vandermeulen D, De Greef S, Willems G, Suetens P. Craniofacial reconstruction using a combined statistical model of face shape and soft tissue depths: methodology and validation. Forensic Sci Inter. 2006;159(Suppl 1):S147–158.10.1016/j.forsciint.2006.02.035
   Google Scholar
• Eliasova H, Krsek P. Superimposition and projective transformation of 3D object. Forensic Sci Inter. 2007;167(2–3):146–153.10.1016/j.forsciint.2006.06.062
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Starbuck JM, Ward RE. The affect of tissue depth variation on craniofacial reconstructions. Forensic Sci Inter. 2007;172(2–3):130–136.10.1016/j.forsciint.2007.01.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Utsuno H, Kageyama T, Deguchi T, et al. Facial soft tissue thickness in Japanese female children. Forensic Sci Inter. 2005;152(2–3):101–107.10.1016/j.forsciint.2004.07.010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoshino M, Matsuda H, Kubota S, et al. Computer-assisted skull identification system using video superimposition. Forensic Sci Inter. 1997;90(3):231–244.10.1016/S0379-0738(97)00168-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Utsuno H, Kageyama T, Deguchi T, et al. Facial soft tissue thickness in skeletal type I Japanese children. Forensic Sci Inter. 2007;172(2–3):137–143.10.1016/j.forsciint.2007.01.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Genecov JS, Sinclair PM, Dechow PC. Development of the nose and soft tissue profile. Angle Orthod. 1990;60(3):191–198.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nanda RS, Meng H, Kapila S, Goorhuis J. Growth changes in the soft tissue facial profile. Angle Orthod. 1990;60(3):177–190.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siegel MI, Mooney MP, Kimes KR, Todhunter J. Developmental correlates of midfacial components in a normal and cleft lip and palate human fetal sample. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 1991;28(4):408–412.10.1597/1545-1569(1991)028<0408:DCOMCI>2.3.CO;2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferrario VF, Sforza C. Size and shape of soft-tissue facial profile: effects of age, gender, and skeletal class. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 1997;34(6):498–504.10.1597/1545-1569(1997)034<0498:SASOST>2.3.CO;2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alcalde RE, Jinno T, Orsini MG, et al. Soft tissue cephalometric norms in Japanese adults. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2000;118(1):84–89.10.1067/mod.2000.104411
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hwang HS, Kim WS, McNamara JA Jr. Ethnic differences in the soft tissue profile of Korean and European-American adults with normal occlusions and well-balanced faces. Angle Orthod. 2002;72(1):72–80.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Inada E, Saitoh I, Hayasaki H, et al. Cross-sectional growth changes in skeletal and soft tissue cephalometric landmarks of children. Cranio. 2008;26(3):170–181.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Inada E, Saitoh I, Hayasaki H, et al. Relationship of nasal and skeletal landmarks in lateral cephalograms of preschool children. Forensic Sci Int. 2009;191(1-3):111 e1–4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bravo LA. Soft tissue facial profile changes after orthodontic treatment with four premolars extracted. Angle Orthod. 1994;64(1):31–42.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nojima K, Nagai H, Nishii Y, Sakamoto T, Yamaguchi H. Morphological evaluations in skeletal Class III malocclusion requiring maxillofacial surgery using orthognathic surgical analysis. Bull Tokyo Dent Coll. 2002;43(3):163–171.10.2209/tdcpublication.43.163
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Simpson E, Henneberg M. Variation in soft-tissue thicknesses on the human face and their relation to craniometric dimensions. Am J Phys Anthropol. 2002;118(2):121–133.10.1002/(ISSN)1096-8644
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kushimoto K. Study on the growth of the nose. Gifu Shika Gakkai Zasshi. 1990;17(1):100–123.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Stephan CN, Henneberg M, Sampson W. Predicting nose projection and pronasale position in facial approximation: a test of published methods and proposal of new guidelines. Am J Phys Anthropol. 2003;122(3):240–250.10.1002/(ISSN)1096-8644
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Keeling SD, Riolo ML, Martin RE, Ten Have TR. A multivariate approach to analyzing the relation between occlusion and craniofacial morphology. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1989;95(4):297–305.10.1016/0889-5406(89)90162-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halazonetis DJ. Morphometric correlation between facial soft-tissue profile shape and skeletal pattern in children and adolescents. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2007;132(4):450–457.10.1016/j.ajodo.2005.10.033
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kusnoto J, Kusnoto H. The effect of anterior tooth retraction on lip position of orthodontically treated adult Indonesians. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2001;120(3):304–307.10.1067/mod.2001.116089
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cozza P, De Toffol L, Colagrossi S. Dentoskeletal effects and facial profile changes during activator therapy. Eur J Orthod. 2004;26(3):293–302.10.1093/ejo/26.3.293
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elmore JG, Carney PA, Abraham LA, et al. The association between obesity and screening mammography accuracy. Arch Intern Med. 2004;164(10):1140–1147.10.1001/archinte.164.10.1140
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bishara SE, Jakobsen JR, Hession TJ, Treder JE. Soft tissue profile changes from 5 to 45 years of age. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1998;114(6):698–706.10.1016/S0889-5406(98)70203-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferrario VF, Sforza C, Poggio CE, Colombo A, Cova M. Effect of growth and development on cephalometric shapes in orthodontic patients: a Fourier analysis. Eur J Orthod. 1997;19(6):669–680.10.1093/ejo/19.6.669
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar