1,144
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Commentary

Misinterpretation of expert evidence in Wood v R

Pages 368-382 | Received 12 Dec 2013, Accepted 17 Dec 2013, Published online: 31 Jan 2014

References

  • Faigman D. Judges as “Amateur Scientists” Boston Uni Law Review. 2006;86:1207–1225.
  • Porter C, Parker R. The demeanour of expert witnesses, Aust J Forensic Sci. 2001;33:45–50.
  • Wood v R [2012. NSWCCA 21] ( McClellan CJ, Latham J, Rothman J).
  • Etter B. The contribution of forensic science to miscarriage of justice cases Aust J Forensic Sci. 2013. doi:10.1080/00450618.2013.767376.
  • Cross R. Evidence for murder: how physics convicted a killer. Sydney: University of New South Wales Press; 2009.
  • Cross R. Fatal falls from a height: two case studies, J Forensic Science. 2006;51:93–99.
  • Cross R. Forensic physics 101: Falls from a height. Am J Phys. 2008;76(9):833–836.
  • Tovell A, McKenna K, Bradley C, Pointer S. Hospital separations due to injury and poisoning, Australia 2009-10, Australian Institute of Health and Welfare, 2012.
  • Davies GL. Court appointed experts. Law and Justice Jnl. 2005; 5(1):89–101.
  • Moenssens A. Admissibility of scientific evidence – an alternative to the Frye rule William Mary Law Review. 1983;25(4):545–575.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.