Forensic data exchange: ensuring integrity

References

• Australian Government. Commonwealth organised crime strategic framework: overview; 2009 [cited 13 Feb]. Available from: http://www.ag.gov.au/www/agd/agd.nsf/Page/Publications_OrganisedCrime
   Google Scholar
• Brown S. Trading intelligence. Policing. 2009;3(2):181–190.10.1093/police/pap002
   Google Scholar
• Brown S, Willis S. Complexity in forensic science. Forensic Sci Policy Manage. 2010;1(4):192–198.10.1080/19409041003698454
   Google Scholar
• de Hert P, Gutwirth S. Interoperability of police databases within the EU: an accountable political choice? Int Rev Law, Comput Tech. 2006;20(1/2):21–35.10.1080/13600860600818227
   Google Scholar
• den Boer M. Towards an accountability regime for an emerging European policing governance. Policing Soc. 2002;12(4):275–289.10.1080/1043946022000046702
   Google Scholar
• ENSFI. DNA-Database Management Review; 2009 [cited 13 Feb 2013]. Available from: http://www.dnaresource.com/documents/ENFSIdocumentonDNAdatabasemanagement20092.pdf
   Google Scholar
• EU Commission. Strengthening law enforcement cooperation in the EU: the European Information Exchange Model (EIXM); 2012. Brussels 7.12.2012. COM (2012) 735 final.
   Google Scholar
• EU Council Framework Decision. On Accreditation of forensic service providers carrying out laboratory activities; 2009. 2009/905/JHA Official Journal of the EU, 9.12.2009. L 322/14.
   Google Scholar
• Evans M. Beyond the integrity paradox – towards ‘good enough’ governance? Policy Stud. 2012;33(1):97–113.10.1080/01442872.2011.637324
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fox A. Beyond contact: work power and trust relations. London: Faber and Faber; 1974.
   Google Scholar
• Fukyuma F. Trust: the social virtues and the creation of prosperity New York. Free Press; 1995
   Google Scholar
• Giddens A. 1994. Risk, trust, reflexivity. In: Beck U, Giddens A, Lash S, editors. Reflexive modernization; politics, tradition and aesthetics in the modern social order. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gill R. Study of the obstacles to cooperation and information-sharing between forensic science laboratories and other relevant bodies of different Member States and between the latter and counterparts in third countries; 2008 (JLS/D1/2007/025).
   Google Scholar
• Guild E. Evidence provided to the House of Lords European Union Committee, ‘Prüm: an effective weapon against terrorism and crime?’ HL Paper 90. London: The Stationery Office; 2007. pp. 60–98.
   Google Scholar
• Harfield C. The organization of ‘organized crime policing’ and its international context. Criminol Crim Jus. 2008;8(4):483–507.10.1177/1748895808096472
   Google Scholar
• Hindmarsh R, Prainsack B, editors. Genetic suspects: global governance of forensic DNA profiling and databasing. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Hough M, Sato M. Trust in justice: why it is important for criminal policy, and how it can be measured. Final report of the Euro-Justis project. Helsinki: HEUNI; 2011 [cited 13 Feb 2013]. Available from: http://www.icpr.org.uk/media/31613/Final%20Euro-Justis%20report.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Huber v. Germany, European Court of Justice, Case C-524/06, Judgment of 16 December 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Hufnagel S. Policing cooperation across borders: comparative perspectives on law enforcement within the EU and Australia. London: Ashgate; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• ICMPD. Study on the status of information exchange amongst law enforcement authorities in the context of existing EU instruments; 2010 JLS/2009/ISEC/PR/001-F3.
   Google Scholar
• Kelty SF, Julian R, Ross A. Dismantling the justice silos: avoiding the pitfalls and reaping the benefits of information-sharing between forensic science, medicine and law. Forensic Sci Int. 2013;230:8–15.10.1016/j.forsciint.2012.10.032
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The Law Society. Safeguarding expert evidence in the European Union; 2009. Available from: http://international.lawsociety.org.uk/node/6234
   Google Scholar
• Legrand T, Vogel L. Project update: forensic intelligence. CEPS Research Quarterly. 2011;6 [cited 13 Feb 2013]. Available from: http://www.ceps.edu.au/CMS/Uploads/file/CEPS-newsletter%20Sept%202011.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Legrand T, Vogel L. Forensic intelligence. CEPS Briefing Paper Issue 9; 2012 [cited 13 Feb 2013]. Available from: http://www.ceps.edu.au/CMS/Uploads/file/Tim%20Legrand%20and%20Lauren%20Vogel%20Forensic%20Intelligence.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Loof R. Obtaining, adducing and contesting evidence from abroad: a defence perspective on cross-border evidence. Crim Law Rev. 2011;40–57.
   Google Scholar
• Margot P. ‘Commentary’: the need for a research culture in the forensic sciences. UCLA Law Rev. 2011;58:795–801.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCartney C, Williams R, Wilson T. The future of forensic bioinformation; 2010. Available from: http://www.law.leeds.ac.uk/research/projects/bioinformation.php
   Google Scholar
• McCartney C. Transnational exchange of forensic evidence. In: Bruinsma G, Weisburd D, editors. The Springer encyclopaedia of criminology and criminal justice. New York, NY: Springer; 2013;2915–2925.
   Google Scholar
• McCartney C. Opting – in and opting – out: doing the hokey cokey with EU policing and judicial cooperation. J Crim Law. 2013b;77(6):534–561.
   Google Scholar
• Monahan T, Palmer N. The emerging politics of DHS fusion centers. Secur Dialog. 2009;40:617.10.1177/0967010609350314
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mnookin J, Cole SA, Dror IE, Fisher BAJ, Houck MM, Inman K, Kaye DH, Koehler JJ, Langenburg G, Risinger DM, et al. The need for a research culture in the forensic sciences. UCLA Law Rev. 2011;58:724–779.
   Google Scholar
• NDNAD Ethics Group Annual Report. 2011–2012 [cited 13 Feb 2013]. Available from: http://www.homeoffice.gov.uk/publications/agencies-public-bodies/fsr/ndnad-ethics-group-ann-2012.pdf?view=Standard&pubID=1092485
   Google Scholar
• Queensland Police Powers and Responsibilities Act. 2000, section 493.
   Google Scholar
• Reed M. Organization, trust and control: a realist analysis. Org Stud. 2001;22(2):201–228.10.1177/0170840601222002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ribaux O, Girod A, Walsh S, Margot P, Mizrahi S, Clivaz V. Forensic intelligence and crime analysis. Law, Prob Risk. 2003;2:47–60.10.1093/lpr/2.1.47
   Google Scholar
• Ribaux O, Walsh S, Margot P. The contribution of forensic science to crime analysis and investigation: forensic intelligence. Forensic Sci Int. 2006;156:171–181.10.1016/j.forsciint.2004.12.028
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roux C, Crispino F, Ribaux O. From forensics to forensic science. Curr Issues Crim Jus. 2012;24(1):7–24.
   Google Scholar
• Schneider P. Expansion of the European standard set of DNA database loci - the current situation. Profiles DNA. 2009;12:6–7.
   Google Scholar
• Statewatch. Europol: “4x4” intelligence handling codes includes “dodgy data. Statewatch News. 2013 [cited 7 Jan 2013]. Available from: http://www.statewatch.org/news/2013/jan/03europol-dodgy-data.htm#
   Google Scholar
• van der Beek K. Exchange of DNA profiles by the treaty of Prüm. Presented at DNA Data Exchange in Europe conference; 2008 June 5–6. Available from: www.dnaconference.eu/ppt/Van%20der%20Beek.pdf
   Google Scholar
• van der Beek K. Observed and expected numbers of (partially) randomly matching profiles in the Dutch DNA database, and in international DNA searches. Sci Jus. 2010;50(1):47–48.
   Google Scholar