Advanced search
Publication Cover
Australian Journal of Forensic Sciences Volume 48, 2016 - Issue 6
Submit an article Journal homepage
346
Views
5
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Papers

Empirical investigation of biometric, non-visible, intra-signature features in known and simulated signatures

Tahnee N. DewhurstDepartment of Human Biosciences, La Trobe University, Victoria, Australia;Forensic Services Department, Victoria Police, Victoria, AustraliaCorrespondence[email protected]
,
Kaye N. BallantyneForensic Services Department, Victoria Police, Victoria, Australia;School of Psychology and Public Health, La Trobe University, Victoria, Australia
&
Bryan FoundDepartment of Human Biosciences, La Trobe University, Victoria, Australia;Forensic Services Department, Victoria Police, Victoria, Australia;Faculty of Law, University of New South Wales, New South Wales, Australia
Pages 659-675 | Received 23 Aug 2015, Accepted 15 Nov 2015, Published online: 22 Jan 2016

References

  • Osborn AS. Questioned document problems. New York, NY: Boyd Printing Company; 1946. p. 338.
  • Harrison WR. Forgery detection: a practical guide. London: Sweet and Maxwell; 1964. p. 115.
  • Harrison WR. Suspect documents and their scientific examination. London: Sweet and Maxwell; 1966. p. 324.
  • Hilton O. Scientific examination of questioned documents. Revised Ed. New York: CRC Press; 1982. p. 185.
  • Ellen D. The scientific examination of documents: methods and techniques. New York: Ellis Horwood; 1989. p. 41–42.
  • Huber RA, Headrick AM. Handwriting identification. Boca Raton (FL): CRC Press; 1999. p. 289.10.1201/9781420048773
  • van Gemmert AWA, van Galen GP. Dynamical features of mimicking another person’s writing and signature. Amsterdam (The Netherlands): IOP Press; 1996. Handwriting and drawing research: basic and applied issues, Simner ML, Leedham CG, Thomassen AJWN, editors; 459–471.
  • Sita J, Rogers D. Changes in forgers’ handwriting pressure related to the original writers’ dynamics. J Forensic Doc Exam. 1999;12:101–112.
  • Franke K. Dynamic, on-line signature analysis: Trends and challenges for forensic investigation services. Salzburg (Austria); 2007. Proceedings of the seventh international congress of the Gesellschaft fur Forensischen Schriftuntersuchung (GFS); Salzburg.
  • Mohammed L, Found B, Caligiuri M, Rogers D. Dynamic characteristics of signatures: effects of writer style on genuine and simulated signatures. J Forensic Sci. 2015;60(1):89–94.10.1111/jfo.2015.60.issue-1
  • Alewijnse LC, van den Heuvel CE, Stoel R. Analysis of signature complexity. J Forensic Doc Exam. 2011;21:37–49.
  • Dewhurst T, Found B, Rogers D. The relationship between quantitatively modelled signature complexity levels and forensic document examiners’ qualitative opinions on casework. J. Forensic Doc Exam. 2007;18:21–40.
  • van Galen G. Structural complexity of motor patterns: a study of reaction times of handwritten letters. Psychol Res. 1984;46(1-2):49–57.10.1007/BF00308592
  • Franke K. Analysis of authentic signatures and forgeries. Computational forensics. Proceedings of the Third International Workshop on Computational Forensics (IWCF 2009); 2009 Aug 13–14; The Hague (The Netherlands): Springer Verlag, 2009.
  • Hagan WE. Treatise on disputed handwriting. Albany (NY): Banks & Brothers; 1894.
  • Mathyer J. The expert examination of signatures. J Crim Law and Criminology. 1961;52 ( May-June) Article 12: 122–133.10.2307/1141512
  • Lewis J. Forensic document examination, fundamentals and current trends. Oxford: Academic Press; 2014.
  • Leung S, Cheng Y, Fung H, Poon N. Forgery I - simulation. J. Forensic Sci. 1993;38:413–424.
  • Mohammed L, Found B, Caligiuri M, Rogers D. The dynamic character of disguise behavior for text-based, mixed, and stylized signatures. J Forensic Sci. 2011;56(S1):S136–S141.10.1111/jfo.2010.56.issue-s1
  • Bird C, Found B, Ballantyne K, Rogers D. Forensic handwriting examiners’ opinions on the process of production of disguised and simulated signatures. Forensic Sci Int. 2010;195(1–3):103–107.10.1016/j.forsciint.2009.12.001
  • Bird C, Found B, Rogers D. Forensic document examiners’ skill in distinguishing between natural and disguised handwriting behaviors. J Forensic Sci. 2010;55(5):1291–1295.10.1111/j.1556-4029.2010.01456.x
  • Dewhurst T, Found B, Rogers D. Are expert penmen better than lay people at producing simulations of a model signature? Forensic Sci Int. 2008;180(1):50–53.10.1016/j.forsciint.2008.06.009

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Order Reprints Request Corporate Permissions

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

Request Academic Permissions

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.