Expressing the value of forensic science in policing

References

• Walsh SJ. Evaluating the role and impact of forensic DNA profiling on key areas of the Criminal Justice System. Centre for Forensic Science. Sydney: University Technology of Sydney; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Bradbury S-A, Feist A. The use of forensic science in volume crime investigations: a review of the research literature. Online Report. London: Home Office; 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Robertson J. Forensic science, an enabler or disenabler for criminal investigation? Aust J Forensic Sci. 2012;44(1):83–91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ludwig A, Fraser J. Effective use of forensic science in volume crime investigations: Identifying recurring themes in the literature. Sci Justice. 2014;54(1):81–88.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown C, Ross A, Attewell RG. Benchmarking forensic performance in Australia – volume crime. Forensic Sci Pol Mgmt. 2014;5(3–4):91–98.
   Google Scholar
• Margot P. Forensic science on trial - what is the law of the land? Aust J Forensic Sci. 2011;43(2):89–103.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stoney DA, Stoney PL. Critical review of forensic trace evidence analysis and the need for a new approach. Forensic Sci Int. 2015;251:159–170.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roux C, Robertson J, Talbot-Wright B, Ribaux O, Crispino F. The end of the (forensic science) world as we know it? The example of trace evidence. Phil Trans B. 2015;370:20140260.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ribaux O, Crispino F, Delémont O, Roux C. The progressive opening of forensic science towards criminological concerns. Security J. 2016:In press.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuhn T. The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press; 1962.
   Google Scholar
• Kind SS. The scientific investigation of crime. Harrogate: Forensic Science Services; 1987.
   Google Scholar
• Brodeur J-P. The policing web. New York: Oxford University Press; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Kelty SF, Julian R, Ross A. Dismantling the justice silos: avoiding the pitfalls and reaping the benefits of information-sharing between forensic science, medicine and law. Forensic Sci In. 2012:8–15.
   Google Scholar
• Vincent F. Inquiry into the circumstances that led to the convicition of Mr. Farah Abdulkadir Jama. Melbourne: Victorian Government; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Schuliar Y. La coordination scientifique dans les investigations criminelles. Proposition d’organisation, aspects éthiques ou de la nécessité d’un nouveau métier. Paris et Lausanne: Université Paris 5 - Descartes Faculté de Médecine and Université de Lausanne, Institut de Police Scientifique; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Kind SS. Crime investigation and the criminal trial: a three chapter paradigm of evidence. J Forensic Sci Soc. 1994;34(3):155–164.
   Google Scholar
• Jackson G, Jones S, Booth G, Champod C, Evett IW. The nature of forensic science opinion–a possible framework to guide thinking and practice in investigation and in court proceedings. Science Just. 2006;46(1):33–44.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biedermann A. The role of the subjectivist position in the probabilization of forensic science. J Forensic Sci Med. 2015;1:140–148.
   Google Scholar
• Schuliar Y, Crispino F. Semiotics, heuristics, and inferences used by forensic scientists. In: Houck M, Siegel JA, editors. Encyclopedia of forensic science. Waltham: Academic Press; 2013; p. 310–313.
   Google Scholar
• Hofstadter D, Sander E. Surfaces and essences: analogy as the fuel and fire of thinking. New York, NY: Basic Books; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Schum DA. Species of abductive reasoning in fact investigation in law. Cardozo Law Rev. 2000-2001;22(5-6):1645–1682.
   Google Scholar
• Rossy Q, Ribaux O. A collaborative approach for forensic science and investigation using criminal intelligence analysis and visualisation. Sci Justice. 2014;54(2):146–153.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abimbola K. Abductive reasoning in law: taxonomy and inference to the best explanation. Cardozo Law Rev. 2000-2001;22(5-6):1683–1690.
   Google Scholar
• Hicks T, Taroni F, Curran JM, Buckleton J, Castella V, Ribaux O. Use of DNA profiles for investigation using a simulated Swiss national DNA database: Part II, familial searching. Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2010;4(5):316–322.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maguire CN, McCallum LA, Storey C, Whitaker JP. Familial searching: a specialist forensic DNA profiling service utilising the national DNA database to identify unknown offenders via their relatives - the UK experience. Forensic Sci Int: Genet. 2014;8(1):1–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kayser M. Forensic DNA phenotyping: predicting human appearance from crime scene material for investigative purposes. Forensic Sci Int: Genet. 2015;18:33–48.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ribaux O, Hicks T. Technology and database expansion : what impact on policing? In: Leman-Langlois S, editor. Technocrime, policing and surveillance. Abington: Routledge; 2012; p. 91–109.
   Google Scholar
• Mapes AA, Kloosterman AD, de Poot CJ. DNA in the criminal justice system: the DNA success story in perspective. J Forensic Sci. 2015;60:851–856.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bieber FR. Turning base hits into earned runs: improving the effectiveness of forensic DNA data bank programs. J Law, Med Ethics. 2006;34(2):222–233.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mapes AA, Kloosterman AD, van Marion V, de Poot CJ. Knowledge on DNA success rates to optimize the DNA analysis process: from crime scene to laboratory. J Forensic Sci. 2016; in press.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ludwig A. E 'value'ating forensic science. Forensic Sci Policy Mgmt. 2016;7(3–4):66–77.
   Google Scholar
• Hazard D. La pertinence en science forensique. Une (en)quête épistémologique et empirique. in Institut de Police Scientifique Lausanne: Université de Lausanne; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Bitzer S, Delémont O, Ribaux O. To analyse a trace or not? Evaluating the decision-making process in the criminal investigation. Forensic Sci Int. 2016;262:1–10.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldstein H. Problem Oriented Policing. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press; 1990.
   Google Scholar
• Kelling GL, Pate T, Dieckman D, Brown CE. The Kansas City preventive patrol experiment. A summary report. Washington, DC: Police foundation; 1974.
   Google Scholar
• Chaiken JM, Greenwood PW, Petersilia J. The criminal investigation process: a summary report. Policy Anal. 1977;3(2):187–217.
   Google Scholar
• Tilley N, Townsley M. Forensic science in UK policing: strategies, tactics and effectiveness. In: Fraser J, Williams R, editors. Handbook of forensic science. Cullompton: Willan; 2009; p. 359–379.
   Google Scholar
• Roux C, Julian R, Kelty S, Ribaux O. Forensic science effectiveness. In: Weisburd D, editor. Bruinsma G. Encyclopedia of criminology & criminal justice. Berlin: Springer; 2014; p. 1795–1804.
   Google Scholar
• Black DJ. The social organization of arrest. Stanford Law Rev. 1971;23(6):1087–1111.
   Google Scholar
• Bittner E. The capacity to use force as the core of the police role. In: Elliston F, Feldberg M, editors. Moral issues in police work. Rowman & Allanheld; 1985; p. 15–25.
   Google Scholar
• British Home Office. Summary report of the Scientific Work Improvement (SWIM) package. London: Home Office; 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Crispino F. Nature and place of crime scene management within forensic sciences. Sci Justice. 2008;48(1):24–28.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ludwig A, Fraser J, Williams R. Crime scene examiners and volume crime investigations: an empirical study of perception and practice. Forensic Sci Pol Mgmt. 2012;3(2):53–61.
   Google Scholar
• Kelty S, Julian R, Robertson J. Professionalism in crime scene examination: the seven key attributes of top crime scene examiners. Forensic Sci Pol Mgmt. 2011;2(4):175–186.
   Google Scholar
• Roux C, Crispino F, Ribaux O. From forensics to forensic science. Curr Issues Crim Justice. 2012;24(1):7–24.
   Google Scholar
• Skogan W. The impact of community policing on neighborhood residents: a cross-site analysis. In: Rosenbaum DP, editor. The challenge of community policing: testing the Promises. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 1994; p. 167–181.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson JQ, Kelling G. Broken windows: the police and neighborhood safety. The Atlantic. 1982; (March):29–38.
   Google Scholar
• Colquhoun P. Treatise on the police of the metropolis. ed. r. edition. London; 1797.
   Google Scholar
• Clarke RV, Eck J. Crime analysis for problem solver in 60 small steps. Washington: US Department of Justice, COPS; 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Egger SA. A working definition of serial murder and the reduction of linkage blindness. J Police Sci Admin. 1984;12(3):348–355.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ribaux O, Baylon A, Lock E, Roux C, Delémont O, Zingg C, Margot P. Intelligence-led crime scene processing. Part II: Intelligence and crime scene examination. Forensic Sci Int. 2010;199:63–71.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barclay D. Using forensic science in major crime inquiries. In: Fraser J, Williams R, editors. Handbook of forensic science. Cullompton: Willan; 2009; p. 337–358.
   Google Scholar
• Ressnikoff T, Ribaux O, Baylon A, Jendly M, Rossy Q. The polymorphism of crime scene investigation: an exploratory analysis of the influence of crime and forensic intelligence on decisions made by crime scene examiners. Forensic Sci Int. 2015;257:425–434.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morelato M, Baechler S, Ribaux O, Beavis A, Tahtouh M, Kirkbride P, Roux C, Margot P. Forensic intelligence framework. Part I: Induction of a transversal model by comparing illicit drugs and false identity documents monitoring. Forensic Sci Int. 2014;236:181–190.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rossy Q, Ioset S, Dessimoz D, Ribaux O. Integrating forensic information in a crime intelligence database. Forensic Sci Int. 2013;230:137–146.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braga AA, Pierce GL. Linking crime guns: The impact of ballistics imaging technology on the productivity of the Boston Police Department's ballistics units. J Forensic Sci. 2004;49(4):1–6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ioset S, Esseiva P, Ribaux O, Weyermann C, Anglada F, Lociciro S, Hayoz P, Baer I, Gasté L, Terrettaz-Zufferey A-L, Delaporte C, Margot P. Establishment of an operational system for drug profiling: a Swiss experience. Bul Narcotics. 2005;57(1–2):121–146.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bruenisholz E, Delémont O, Ribaux O. Repetitive deliberate fires: critical review of the situation and proposal of a follow-up process and systematic analysis. Forensic Sci Policy Mgmt. 2015;6(3–4):76–90.
   Google Scholar
• Baechler S, Margot P, Ribaux O. Toward a novel forensic intelligence model: systematic profiling of false identity documents. Forensic Sci Pol Mgmt. 2012;3(2):70–84.
   Google Scholar
• Dégardin K, Roggo Y, Margot P. Understanding and fighting the medicine counterfeit market. J Pharma Biomed Ana. 2014;87:167–175.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pazos D, Giannasi P, Rossy Q, Esseiva P. Combining internet monitoring processes, packaging and isotopic analyses to determine the market structure: the example of gamma butyrolactone. Forensic Sci Int. 2013;230(1–3):29–36.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marclay F, Mangin P, Margot P, Saugy M. Perspectives for Forensic intelligence in anti-doping: thinking outside of the box. Forensic Sci Int. 2013;229(1–3):133–144.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cusson M, Ribaux O. Vers une méthode commune à la police scientifique et à la criminologie. Rev Int Criminol Police Tech Scientif. 2015;3:266–283.
   Google Scholar
• Ratcliffe J. Intelligence-led policing. 2nd ed. Cullompton, UK: Willan; 2016.
   Google Scholar