Culture is our business: Issues and challenges for forensic and correctional psychologists

References

• McLuhan M. Culture is our business. New York (NY): McGraw-Hill; 1970; p. 8.
   Google Scholar
• Mitis F, Sethi D. Male-on-male violence: a leading cause of death around the world. In: Donelly PD, Ward CL, editors. Oxford textbook of violence prevention: epidemiology, evidence, and policy. Oxford (UK): Oxford University Press; 2015; p. 57–63.
   Google Scholar
• Stermac LE, Segal ZV, Gillis R. Social and cultural factors in sexual assault. In: Marshall WL, Laws DR, Barbaree HE, editors. Handbook of sexual assault: issues, theories, and treatment of the offender. New York (NY): Plenum; 1989; p. 143–159.
   Google Scholar
• Otto RK, Ogloff JRP. Defining forensic psychology. In: Weiner IB, Otto RK, editors. Handbook of forensic psychology. 4th ed. Hoboken (NJ): Wiley; 2014; p. 35–55.
   Google Scholar
• Australian Psychological Society. Forensic psychology [internet]. Melbourne (Australia): Australian Psychological Society; c.2016 [cited 2016 Aug 20]. Available from: https://www.psychology.org.au/public/forensic/
   Google Scholar
• Andrews DA, Bonta J. The psychology of criminal conduct. 5th ed. New Providence (NJ): LexisNexis; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Mills JF, Kroner DG, Morgan RD. Clinician’s guide to violence risk assessment. London (UK): Guilford; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Douglas KS, Hart SD, Groscup JL, Litwack TR. Assessing violence risk. In: Weiner IB, Otto RK, editors. Handbook of forensic psychology. 4th ed. Hoboken (NJ): Wiley; 2014; p. 385–441.
   Google Scholar
• Conroy MA, Murrie DC. Forensic assessment of violence risk. New York (NY); Wiley. 2007. 10.1002/9781118269671
   Google Scholar
• Tamatea A. The problem with ‘the problem with gangs’: reflections on practice and offender desistance. Practice: New Zealand Corrections J. 2015;3(1): 33–36.
   Google Scholar
• Boer DP, Hart SD, Kropp PR, Webster CD. Manual for the sexual violence risk–20: professional guidelines for assessing risk of sexual violence. Vancouver (Canada): Mental Health, Law, and Policy Institute; 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Kropp PR, Hart SD, Webster CD, Eaves D. Spousal assault risk assessment guide (SARA). Toronto (Canada): Multi-Health Systems; 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Wong SCP, Gordon A. Violence risk scale manual. Saskatchewan (Canada): University of Saskatchewan; 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Douglas KS, Webster CD, Hart SD, Eaves D, Ogloff JRP. HCR-20: violence risk management companion guide. Burnaby (Canada): Mental Health, Law, and Policy Institute, Simon Fraser University; 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Douglas KS, Hart SD, Webster CD, Belfrage H. HCR-20v3: assessing risk for violence – User guide. Burnaby (Canada): Mental Health, Law, and Policy Institute, Simon Fraser University; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Serin RC. The dynamic risk assessment for offender re-entry (DRAOR). Unpublished user manual. Ottawa (Canada): Carelton University; 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Tamatea A, Wilson N. Dynamic risk assessment for offender re-entry (DRAOR): a pilot study. Unpublished government report. Wellington (NZ): Department of Corrections; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• de Vogel V, de Ruiter C, Bouman Y, de Vries Robbé M. SAPROF: guidelines for the assessment of protective factors for violence risk. Utrecht (The Netherlands): Forum Educatief; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Webber C. Background, foreground, foresight: the third dimension of cultural criminology? Crime Media Cult. 2007;3(2):139–157. 10.1177/1741659007078539
   Google Scholar
• Ferrell J. Cultural criminology. Annu Rev Sociol. 1999;25:395–418. 10.1146/annurev.soc.25.1.395
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferrell J. Cultural criminology and the politics of meaning. Crit Criminol. 2013;21:257–271. 10.1007/s10612-013-9186-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atkinson DR, Morten G, Sue DW. Counseling American minorities. Boston (MA): McGraw Hill; 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson H, Gutierrez L. A meta-analysis examining the predictive ability of the level of service inventory (LSI) with aboriginal offenders. Crim Justice Behav. 2014;41(2):196–219. 10.1177/0093854813500958
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• López SR, Guarnaccia PJ. Cultural psychopathology: uncovering the social world of mental illness. Annu Rev Psychol. 2000;51(1):571–598. 10.1146/annurev.psych.51.1.571
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans IM. Behavior therapy: regulation by self, by others, and by the physical world. In: O’Donnell CR, Yamauchi LA, editors. Culture & context in human behavior change: theory, research, and applications. New York (NY): Peter Lang; 2005; p. 13–39.
   Google Scholar
• Kleinman A. Rethinking psychiatry: from cultural category to personal experience. New York (NY): Free Press; 1988.
   Google Scholar
• Ewert V. Canada 2015 FC 1093 (2015).
   Google Scholar
• Hanson RK, Morton-Bourgon K. The accuracy of recidivism risk assessments for sexual offenders: a meta-analysis of 118 prediction studies. Psychol Assess. 2009;21(1):1–21. 10.1037/a0014421
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Långström N. Accuracy of actuarial procedures for assessment of sexual offender recidivism risk may vary across ethnicity. Sexual Abuse: J Res Treatment. 2004;16(2):107–120.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allan A, Dawson D. Developing a unique risk of violence tool for Australian Indigenous offenders. CRC 6/00-01. Canberra (Australia): Criminology Research Council; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Smallbone S, Rallings M. Short-term predictive validity of the Static-99 and Static-99-R for indigenous and non-indigenous Australian sexual offenders. Sexual Abuse. 2013;25(3):302–316. 10.1177/1079063212472937
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Babchishin KM, Blais J, Helmus L. Do static risk factors predict differently for aboriginal sex offenders? a multi-site comparison using the original and revised static-99 and static-2002 scales. Can J Criminol Crim Justice. 2012;54:1–43. 10.3138/cjccj.2010.E.40
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Day A. Reducing the risk of re-offending in Australian indigenous offenders: what works for whom? J Offender Rehabil. 2003;37(2):1–15. 10.1300/J076v37n02_01
   Google Scholar
• Hsu C, Caputi P, Byrne MK. Level of service inventory–revised: assessing the risk and need characteristics of Australian Indigenous offenders. Psychiatry Psychol Law. 2010;17(3):355–367. 10.1080/13218710903089261
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Case S. Young people 'at risk' of what? challenging risk-focused early intervention as crime prevention. Youth Justice. 2006;6(3):171–179. 10.1177/1473225406069491
   Google Scholar
• Société canadienne de psychologie. Canadian code of ethics for psychologists. Ottawa (ON): Author; 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Australian Psychological Society. Code of ethics. Melbourne (Australia): Author; 2007.
   Google Scholar
• New Zealand Psychological Society. Te Tikanga Matatika: code of ethics for psychologists working in Aotearoa/New Zealand. Wellington (NZ): Author; 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Ethics Committee of the British Psychological Society. Code of ethics and conduct. Leicester (UK): Author; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• American Psychological Association. Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct. Washington, D.C.: Author; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Australian Bureau of Statistics: Aboriginal and Torres Strait islander prisoner characteristics [Internet]. Belconnen (Australia): Australian Bureau of Statistics; 10 Dec 2015 [cited 2016 Aug 20]. Available from: http://www.abs.gov.au/
   Google Scholar
• Australian Bureau of Statistics: Estimates of aboriginal and Torres Strait islander Australians, June 2011 [Internet]. Belconnen (Australia): Australian Bureau of Statistics; 27 Jan 2016 [cited 2016 Aug 20]. Available from: http://www.abs.gov.au/
   Google Scholar
• Department of Corrections: Prison facts and statistics – March 2016 [Internet]. Wellington (NZ): Department of Corrections; 31 Mar 2016 [cited 2016 Aug 20]. Available from: http://www.corrections.govt.nz/
   Google Scholar
• Statistics NZ: Maori population estimates: mean year ended 31 December 2015 [Internet]. Wellington (NZ): Statistics NZ; 16 May 2016 [cited 2016 Aug 20]. Available from: http://www.stats.govt.nz/
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Health. He Pa Harakeke: Maori health workforce profile: selected regulated health occupations 2007. Wellington (NZ): Ministry of Health; 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Australian Indigenous Psychologists Association. About AIPA [internet]. Australia: Australian Indigenous psychologists association; c.2016 [cited 2016 August 20] Available from: http://www.indigenouspsychology.com.au/page/2970/about-aipa
   Google Scholar
• Sue DW, Sue D. Counseling the culturally different: theory and practice. 2nd ed. New York (NY): Wiley; 1990.
   Google Scholar
• Janus E. Failure to protect: America’s sexual predator laws and the risk of the preventive state. Ithaca (NY): Cornell University Press; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Trimble JE, Fisher CB. Introduction: our shared journey: lessons from the past to protect the future. In Trimble JE, Fisher CB, editors. The handbook of ethical research with ethnocultural populations & communities. Thousand Oaks (CA): Sage; 2006. pp. xv–xxix. 10.4135/9781412986168
   Google Scholar
• Rack P. Culture, race, and mental disorder. London (UK): Tavistock; 1982.
   Google Scholar
• Sobo EJ. Culture and meaning in health services research: a practical field guide. Walnut Creek (CA): Left Coast Press; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Sue DW, Sue D. Counseling the culturally diverse: theory and practice. 6th ed. New York (NY): Wiley; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Ellerby L. Community-based treatment of aboriginal sexual offenders: facing realities and exploring possibilities. Forum on Corrections Res. 1994;6:23–25.
   Google Scholar
• Couture JE. Multicultural competence: theory and practice for correctional psychologists. In: Leis TA, Motiuk LL, Ogloff JRP, editors. Forensic psychology: policy and practice in corrections. Canada: Correctional Service of Canada; 1995. pp. 57–65.
   Google Scholar
• Tamatea AJ, Ryan J, Mason P. Bicultural therapy model (BTM) review. Wellington (NZ): Department of Corrections; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Williams C. The too-hard basket: Maori and criminal justice since 1980. Wellington (NZ): Institute of Policy Studies; 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Lynch MJ, Stretesky PB, Long MA. Defining crime. New York (NY): Palgrave Macmillan; 2015. 10.1057/9781137479358
   Google Scholar
• Foster KR, Huber PW. Judging science: scientific knowledge and the federal courts. Cambridge (MA): MIT Press; 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Sue S. Science, ethnicity, and bias: where have we gone wrong? Am Psychol. 1999;54(12):1070–1077. 10.1037/0003-066X.54.12.1070
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Madison DS. Critical ethnography: method, ethics, and performance. Thousand Oaks (CA): Sage; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Garrett HJ. The routing and re-routing of difficult knowledge: social studies teachers encounter “when the levees broke”. Theory Res Soc Educ. 2011;39(3):320–347. 10.1080/00933104.2011.10473458
   Google Scholar
• Halloran MJ. Indigenous reconciliation in Australia: do values, identity and collective guilt matter? J Community Appl Soc Psychol. 2007;17:1–18. 10.1002/(ISSN)1099-1298
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matthews RA. The construction of ‘So What?’ criminology: a realist analysis. Crime Law Soc Change. 2010;54:125–140. 10.1007/s10611-010-9249-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quinsey Vernon L., Harris Grant T., Rice Marnie E., Cormier Catherine A. Violent offenders: appraising and managing risk. Washington DC: American Psychological Association; 1998; p. 171. 10.1037/10304-000
   Google Scholar
• Smallbone S, Rallings M. Short-term predictive validity of the static-99 and static-99-R for indigenous and non-indigenous Australian sexual offenders. Sexual Abuse. 2013;25(3):302–316. 10.1177/1079063212472937
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skelton A, Riley D, Wales D, Vess J. Assessing risk for sexual offenders in New Zealand: development and validation of a computer-scored risk measure. J Sex Aggress. 2006;12(3):277–286. 10.1080/13552600601100326
   Google Scholar
• Groth-Marnat G. Handbook of psychological assessment. 5th ed. New York (NY): Wiley; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Hanson RK, Morton-Bourgon K. The accuracy of recidivism risk assessments for sexual offenders: a meta-analysis of 118 prediction studies. Psychol Assess. 2009;21(1):1–21. 10.1037/a0014421
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogers R. The uncritical acceptance of risk assessment in forensic practice. Law Hum Behav. 2000;24(5):595–605. 10.1023/A:1005575113507
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonta J. Offender risk assessment: guidelines for selection and use. Crim Justice Behav. 2002;29(4):355–379. 10.1177/0093854802029004002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ward T, Marshall B. Narrative identity and offender rehabilitation. Int J Off Ther Comp Crim. 2007;51(3):279–297. 10.1177/0306624X06291461
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennett RR. Constructing cross-cultural theories in criminology. application of the generative approach. Criminology. 1980;18(2):252–268. 10.1111/crim.1980.18.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar