Reliability of weathering in the estimation of the post-mortem interval of human remains buried in coffins

References

• Swift B. Dating human skeletal remains: investigating the viability of measuring the equilibrium between 210Po and 210Pb as a means of estimating the post-mortem interval. Forensic Sci Int. 1998;98:119–126. 10.1016/S0379-0738(98)00141-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Love J, Marks M. Hard evidence: case studies in forensic anthropology. Upper Saddle River (NJ): Prentice Hall; 2003. Chapter 13, Taphonomy and time: estimating the postmortem interval; p. 160-175.
   Google Scholar
• Cattaneo C. Forensic anthropology: developments of a classical discipline in the new millennium. Forensic Sci Int. 2007;165:185–193. 10.1016/j.forsciint.2006.05.018
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cattaneo C, Gibelli D Wiley encyclopedia of forensic sciences. Chichester (UK): Wiley; 2009. Volume 4, Postmortem interval: Anthropology; p. 2089–2093.
   Google Scholar
• Forbes SL, Nugent K. Handbook of forensic anthropology and archaeology. Walnut Creek (CA): Left Coast Press; 2009. Chapter 14, Dating of anthropological skeletal remains of forensic interest; p. 164-173.
   Google Scholar
• Rogers J. Dating death: Forensic Taphonomy and the Postmortem interval [ PhD Thesis]. [Wolverhampton (UK)]: University of Wolverhampton; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Ferreira MT. Para lá da morte: Estudo tafonómico da decomposição cadavérica e da degradação óssea e implicações na estimativa do intervalo pós-morte [Beyond death: a taphonomic study of cadaveric decomposition and bone degradation and their implications in the estimation of the post-mortem time interval] [ PhD Thesis]. [Coimbra (PT)]: Universidade de Coimbra; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Ferreira MT, Cunha E. Será credível estimar o PMI em restos cadavéricos em avançado estado de decomposição? [Is it possible to provide a credible PMI estimation of remains in an advanced state of cadaveric decomposition?]. Cadernos do GEEvH. 2012;2:7–20.
   Google Scholar
• Ubelaker DH. Encyclopedia of Forensic Sciences. In: Siegel JA, Saukko PJ, editors. Encyclopedia of forensic sciences. 2nd ed. Waltham (MA): Academic Press; 2013. p. 24–27. 10.1016/B978-0-12-382165-2.00006-4
   Google Scholar
• Mann RW, Bass WM, Meadow L. Time since death and decomposition of the human body: variables and observations in case and experimental field studies. J Forensic Sci. 1990;35:103–111.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark MA, Worrell MB, Pless JE. Forensic Taphonomy: the Postmortem faith of human remains. Boca Raton (FL): CRC Press; 1997. Chapter 9, Postmortem changes in soft tissue; p. 151–160.
   Google Scholar
• Galloway A. Forensic Taphonomy: the Postmortem fate of human remains. Boca Raton (FL): CRC Press; 1997. Chapter 8, The process of decomposition: a model from the Arizona-Sonoma Desert; p. 139–149.
   Google Scholar
• Rodriguez WC. Forensic Taphonomy: the Postmortem fate of human remains. Boca Raton (FL): CRC Press; 1997. Chapter 29, Decomposition of buried and submerged bodies; p. 459-467.
   Google Scholar
• Forbes SL. Soil analysis in forensic Taphonomy. chemical and biological effects of human buried remains. Boca Raton (FL): CRC Press; 2008. Chapter 8, Soil analysis in forensic Taphonomy; p. 203-223. 10.1201/9781420069921
   Google Scholar
• Vass AA. The elusive universal post-mortem interval formula. Forensic Sci Int. 2011;204:34–40. 10.1016/j.forsciint.2010.04.052
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bass WM. Forensic Taphonomy: the Postmortem fate of human remains. Boca Raton (FL): CRC Press; 1997. Chapter 12, Outdoor decomposition rates in Tennessee; p. 181–186.
   Google Scholar
• Galloway A, Birkby WH, Jones AM, Henry TE, Parks BO. Decay rates of human remains in an arid environment. J Forensic Sci. 1989;34:607–616.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rhine S, Dawson JE. Forensic osteology – advances in the identification of human remains. Springfield (Illinois): Charles C. Thomas Publisher, Ltd.; 1998. Chapter 7, Estimation of time since death in the Southwestern United States; p. 145-159.
   Google Scholar
• Pinheiro J. Forensic anthropology and medicine: complementary sciences from recovery to cause of death. Totowa (NJ): Humana Press; 2006. Chapter 5, Forensic anthropology and medicine; p. 85–116.10.1007/978-1-59745-099-7
   Google Scholar
• Janjua MA, Rogers TL. Bone weathering patterns of metatarsal v. femur and the postmortem interval in Southern Ontario. Forensic Sci Int. 2008;178:16–23. 10.1016/j.forsciint.2008.01.011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cunningham SL, Kirkland SA, Ross AH. The juvenile skeleton in forensic abuse investigations. New Jersey (NJ): Humana Press; 2011. Chapter 12, The juvenile skeleton in forensic abuse investigations, p. 179-196. 10.1007/978-1-61779-255-7
   Google Scholar
• Ross AH, Cunningham SL. Time-since-death and bone weathering in a tropical environment. Forensic Sci Int. 2011;204:126–133. 10.1016/j.forsciint.2010.05.018
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buekenhout I, Cravo L, Vieira DN, Cunha E, Ferreira MT. Applying standardized decomposition stages when estimating the PMI of buried remains: reality or fiction? Aust J Forensic Sci. [Internet]. 2016 [Cited 2016 Mar 24]. Available from: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00450618.2016.1212268?journalCode=tajf20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vass AA, Bass WM, Wolt JD, Foss JE, Ammos JT. Time since death determinations of human cadavers using soil solutions. J Forensic Sci. 1992;37:1236–1253.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• University of Indianapolis archeology & forensics laboratory [Internet]. Indianapolis (IN): University of Indianapolis; c1996–2016 [cited 2016 Mar 24]. Available from: http://archlab.uindy.edu
   Google Scholar
• Ubelaker DH. Forensic Taphonomy: the Postmortem fate of human remains. Boca Raton (FL): CRC Press; 1997. Chapter 5, Taphonomic applications in forensic anthropology; p. 77-90.
   Google Scholar
• Buikstra J, Ubelaker D. Standards for data collection from human skeletal remains: proceedings of a seminar at the field museum of natural history organized by Jonathan Haas. Arkansas Archeological Survey Research Series No. 44. Fayetteville (AR): Arkansas Archeological Survey; 1994.
   Google Scholar
• White TD, Folkens PA. The human bone manual. San Diego (CA): Academic Press; 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Karr LP, Outram AK. Tracking changes in bone fracture morphology over time: environment, Taphonomy, and the archaeological record. J Archaeol Sci. 2012;39:555–559. 10.1016/j.jas.2011.10.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Behrensmeyer AK. Taphonomic and ecologic information from bone weathering. Paleobiology. 1978;4:150–162. 10.1017/S0094837300005820
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tappen M. Bone Weathering in the Tropical Rain Forest. J Archaeol Sci. 1994;21:667–673. 10.1006/jasc.1994.1066
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andrews P. Experiments in Taphonomy. J Archaeol Sci. 1995;22:147–153. 10.1006/jasc.1995.0016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson AS, Janaway RC, Holland AD, Dodson HI, Baran E, Pollard AM, Tobin DJ. Modelling the buried human body environment in upland climes using three contrasting field sites. Forensic Sci Int. 2007;169:6–18. 10.1016/j.forsciint.2006.07.023
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mant AK. Death, decay, and reconstruction: approaches to archaeology and forensic science. Manchester (UK): Manchester University Press; 1987. Chapter 7, Knowledge acquired from post-War exhumations; p. 65-78.
   Google Scholar
• Pokines JT, Baker JE. Manual of forensic Taphonomy. Boca Raton (FL): CRC Press; 2010. Chapter 5, Effects of burial environment on osseous remains; p. 315-340.
   Google Scholar
• McLaughlin G, Lednev IK. Potential application of Raman spectroscopy for determining burial duration of skeletal remains. Anal Bioanal Chem. 2011;401:2511–2518. 10.1007/s00216-011-5338-z
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lyman RL. Manual of forensic Taphonomy. Boca Raton (FL): CRC Press; 2010. Chapter 4, Bone density and bone attrition; p. 51-72.
   Google Scholar
• Galloway A, Willey P, Snyder L. Forensic Taphonomy: the Postmortem fate of human remains. Boca Raton (FL): CRC Press; 1997. Human bone mineral densities and survival of bone elements: a contemporary sample; p. 308-330.
   Google Scholar
• Ferreira MT, Vicente R, Navega D, Gonçalves D, Curate F, Cunha E. A new forensic collection housed at the university of Coimbra Portugal: the 21st century identified skeletal collection. Forensic Sci Inter. 2014; 245: 202.e1–202.e5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kottek M, Grieser J, Beck C, Rudolf B, Rubel F. World map of the Köppen-Geiger climate classification updated. Meteorologische Zeitschrift. 2006;15(3):259–263. 10.1127/0941-2948/2006/0130
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tumer AR, Karacaoglu E, Namli A, Keten A, Farasat S, Akcan R, Sert O, Odabaşi AB. Effects of different types of soil on decomposition: An experimental study. Legal Med. 2013;15:149–156. 10.1016/j.legalmed.2012.11.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar