Digital image forgery detection: a systematic scrutiny

References

• Farid H. Image forgery detection. IEEE Signal Process Mag. 2009;26(2):16–25.10.1109/MSP.2008.931079
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reis G. Digital image integrity. San Jose, CA; 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Photo Tampering throughout history. Fourandsix Technologies, Inc. [Online]. [cited 2017 Aug 18]. Available from: http://pth.izitru.com/
   Google Scholar
• Mhiripiri NA, Chari T. Media law, ethics, and policy in the digital age. United States of America: IGI Global; 2017.10.4018/AMEA
   Google Scholar
• Birajdar GK, Mankar VH. Digital image forgery detection using passive techniques : a survey. Digit Investig. 2013;10(3):226–245.10.1016/j.diin.2013.04.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ali M, Deriche M. A bibliography of pixel-based blind image forgery detection techniques. Signal Process Image Commun. 2015;39:46–74.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abd Warif NB, Abdul Wahab AW, Idna Idris MY, Ramli R, Salleh R, Shamshirband S, Choo KR. Copy-move forgery detection : survey, challenges and future directions. J Netw Comput Appl. 2016;75:259–278.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahmood T, Nawaz T, Ashraf R, Shah M, Khan Z, Irtaza A, Mehmood Z. A survey on block based copy move image forgery detection techniques. International Conference on Emerging Technologies (ICET), 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Dada A, Dharaskar RV, Thakare VM. A survey on keypoint based copy-paste forgery detection techniques. Procedia Comput Sci 78 December 2015: 61–67, 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Asghar K, Hussain M. Copy-move and splicing image forgery detection and localization techniques : a review. Aust J Forensic Sci. 2017;49(3):281–307.10.1080/00450618.2016.1153711
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anoop AM. Image forgery and its detection : a survey. In: International Conference on Innovations in Information, Embedded and Communication Systems (ICIIECS), 2015, pp. 1–9.
   Google Scholar
• Bharti CN. A survey of image forgery detection techniques. In: International Conference onWireless Communications, Signal Processing and Networking (WiSPNET), 2016, pp. 877–881.
   Google Scholar
• Nirmalkar N. A Review of Image Forgery Techniques and their Detection. In: International Conference onInnovations in Information, Embedded and Communication Systems (ICIIECS), 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Khapare AP, Phalke DA. Approaches for camera source identification : a review. Int J Enginnering Comput Sci. 2017;6(1):19977–19979.
   Google Scholar
• Babar MA, Zhang H. Systematic literature reviews in software engineering: preliminary results from interviews with researchers. In Int Symp Empirical Softw Eng Meas, 2009, pp. 346–355.
   Google Scholar
• Kitchenham B, Pretorius R, Budgen D, Brereton OP, Turner M, Niazi M, Linkman S. Systematic literature reviews in software engineering - a tertiary study. Inform Softw Technol. 2010;52(8):792–805.10.1016/j.infsof.2010.03.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abdelmaboud A, Jawawi DNA, Ghani I, Elsafi A, Kitchenham B. Quality of service approaches in cloud computing: a systematic mapping study. J Syst Softw. 2015;101:159–179.10.1016/j.jss.2014.12.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iankoulova I, Daneva M. Cloud computing security requirements: a systematic review. Int Conf Research Challenges Inform Sci. 2012:1–7.
   Google Scholar
• Jula A, Sundararajan E, Othman Z. Cloud computing service composition: a systematic literature review. Expert Syst Appl. 2014;41(8):3809–3824.10.1016/j.eswa.2013.12.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh K, Singh P, Kumar K. A systematic review of IP traceback schemes for denial of service attacks. Comput Secur. 2016;56:111–139.10.1016/j.cose.2015.06.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh K, Singh P, Kumar K. Application layer HTTP-GET flood DDoS attacks: research landscape and challenges. Comput Secur. 2017;65:344–372.10.1016/j.cose.2016.10.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kitchenham BA. Systematic review in software engineering: where we are and where we should be going. Int Workshop Evidential Assess Softw Technol. 2012:1–2.
   Google Scholar
• Brereton MOP, Kitchenham BA, Budgen D, Turner M, Khalil M. Lessons from applying the systematic literature review process within the software engineering domain”. J Syst Softw. 2007;80(4):571–583.10.1016/j.jss.2006.07.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mallett R, Hagen-Zanker J, Slater R, Duvendack M. The benefits and challenges of using systematic reviews in international development research. J Dev Eff. 2012;4(3):445–455.10.1080/19439342.2012.711342
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farid H. Digital doctoring: Can we trust photographs? Decept From Anc Empires to Internet Dating. 2009:95–108
   Google Scholar
• Adobe Photoshop elements. Adobe Syst; 2016. [Online]. [cited 2017 Sep 9]. Available from: http://www.adobe.com/in/products/photoshop-elements.
   Google Scholar
• PIXLR. [Online]. [cited 2017 Sep 9]. Available from: https://pixlr.com/.
   Google Scholar
• GNU image manipulation program (GIMP); 2017. [cited 2017 Sep 9]. Available from: https://www.gimp.org/.
   Google Scholar
• Piva A. An Overview on Image Forensics. ISRN Signal Process. 2013;2013:1–22.10.1155/2013/496701
   Google Scholar
• Fridrich J L J, Soukal D. Detection of copy-move forgery in digital images. Digit Forensic Res Workshop. 2003:55–61.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang Z, Zhou Y. Study of image splicing detection. Adv Intell Comput Theor Appl Asp Theor Methodol Issues. 2008;5226:1103–1110.
   Google Scholar
• Nguyen HC, Katzenbeisser S. Robust resampling detection in digital images. in International Conference on Communications and Multimedia Security; 2012, pp. 3–15.10.1007/978-3-642-32805-3
   Google Scholar
• Lyu S, Farid H. How realistic is photorealistic? IEEE Trans Signal Process. 2005;53(2):845–850.10.1109/TSP.2004.839896
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gloe T, Kirchner M, Winkler A, Böhme R. Can we trust digital image forensics? in 15th Int. Conf. Multimedia; 2007, pp. 78–86.
   Google Scholar
• Stamm MC, Liu KJR. Anti-forensics of digital image compression. IEEE Trans Inf Forensics Secur. 2011;6(3):1050–1065.10.1109/TIFS.2011.2119314
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi KS, Lam EY, WongKKY. Source camera identification using footprints from lens aberration. Proceedings Volume 6069, Digital Photography II; 60690J. 2006. https://doi.org/10.1117/12.649775.
   Google Scholar
• Geradts ZJ, Bijhold J, Kieft M, Kurosawa K, Kuroki K, Saitoh N. Methods for identification of images acquired with digital cameras in Proc. of SPIE, Enabling Technologies for Law Enforcement and Security; 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Lukas J, Fridrich J, Goljan M. Digital camera identification from sensor pattern noise. IEEE Trans Inf Forensics Secur. 2006;2(1):205–214.10.1109/TIFS.2006.873602
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bayram S, Sencar HT, Memon N, Avcibas I. Source camera identification based on CFA interpolation. in IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP); 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Kharrazi M, Sencar HT, and Memon N. Blind source camera identification. in IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP); 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Farid H, Bravo MJ. Perceptual discrimination of computer generated and photographic faces. Digit Investig. 2012;8(3):226–236.10.1016/j.diin.2011.06.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang Y, Moulin P. On discrimination between photorealistic and photographic images. in IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Dehnie S, Sencar HT, Memon N. Digital image forensics for identifying computer generated and digital camera images. in IEEE International Conference on Image Processing; 2006, pp. 2313–2316.
   Google Scholar
• Khanna N, Chiu GT-C, Allebach JP, Delp EJ. Forensic techniques for classifying scanner, computer generated and digital camera images. in IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing; 2008, pp. 1653–1656.
   Google Scholar
• Haouzia A, Noumeir R. Methods for image authentication: a survey. Multimed Tools Appl. 2008;39(1):1–46.10.1007/s11042-007-0154-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh P, Chadha RS. A survey of digital watermarking techniques, applications and attacks. Int J Eng Innov Technol. 2013;2(9):165–175.
   Google Scholar
• Wang X, Xue J, Zheng Z, Liu Z, Li N. Image forensic signature for content authenticity analysis. J Vis Comun Image Represent. Jul. 2012;23(5):782–797.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cox I, Miller ML, Bloom JA. Digital watermarking. San Francisco, CA, USA: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc.; 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Friedman GL. The trustworthy digital camera: restoring credibility to the photographic image. IEEE Trans Consum Electron. 1993;39(4):905–910.10.1109/30.267415
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rey C, Dugelay J-L. A survey of watermarking algorithms for image authentication. EURASIP J Adv Signal Proc. 2002;2002(6):613–621.
   Google Scholar
• Langelaar GC, Setyawan I, Lagendijk RL. Watermarking digital image and video data. a state-of-the-art overview. IEEE Signal Proc Mag. 2000;17(5):20–46.10.1109/79.879337
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tafti AP, Malakooti MV, Ashourian M, Janosepah S. Digital image forgery detection through data embedding in spatial domain and cellular automata. 7th International Conference on Digital Content, Multimedia Technology and its Applications (IDCTA); 2011:11–15.
   Google Scholar
• Elwin JGR, Aditya TS, Shankar SM. Survey on passive methods of image tampering detection. Proceedings of the International Conference on Communication and Computational Intelligence; 2010 Dec 27–29; Perundurai, Erode: Kongu Engineering College; 2003. p. 431–436.
   Google Scholar
• Qazi T, Hayat K, Khan SU, Madani SA, Khan IA, Kolodziej J, Li H, Lin W, Yow KC, et al. Survey on blind image forgery detection. IET Image Proc. 2013;7(7):660–670.10.1049/iet-ipr.2012.0388
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christlein CRV, Jordan J, Riess C, Angelopoulou E. An evaluation of popular copy-move forgery detection approaches. IEEE Trans Inf Forensics Secur. 2012;7(6):1841–1854.10.1109/TIFS.2012.2218597
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zheng J, Liu Y, Ren J, Zhu T, Yan Y, Yang H. Fusion of block and keypoints based approaches for effective copy-move image forgery detection. Multidimens Syst Signal Process. 2016;27(4):989–1005.10.1007/s11045-016-0416-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sreelakshmy IJ, Anver J. An improved method for copy-move forgery detection in digital forensic. in Online International Conference on Green Engineering and Technologies (IC-GET); 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Farid H. Detecting digital forgeries using bispectral analysis. in AI Lab, Massachusetts Institute of Technology; 1999, p. Tech. Rep. AIM-1657.
   Google Scholar
• Ng TT, Chang SF. A model for image splicing. in International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP); 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Lin Z, Wang R, Tang X, Shum H-Y. Detecting doctored images using camera response normality and consistency. Recognition, IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern (CVPR); 2005, pp. 1087–1092.
   Google Scholar
• Fontani M, Bianchi T, De Rosa A, Piva A, Barni M. A framework for decision fusion in image forensics based on Dempster Shafer theory of evidence. IEEE Trans. Inf. Forensics Secur. 2013;8(4):593–607.10.1109/TIFS.2013.2248727
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kharrazi M, Sencar HT, Memon ND. Improving steganalysis by fusion techniques: a case study with image steganography. Trans Data Hiding Multimed Secur. 2006;4300:123–137.10.1007/11926214
   Google Scholar
• Kirchner M, Gloe T. “On resampling detection in re-compressed images”, in First IEEE International Workshop on Information Forensics and Security, 2009. WIFS. 2009;2009:21–25.
   Google Scholar
• JVCIR, Su Y, Jin X, Zhang C, Chen Y. Hierarchical image resampling detection based on blind deconvolution q. J Vis Commun Image Represent. 2017;48:480–490.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirchner M, Fridrich J. On detection of median filtering in digital images. Proceedings of the SPIE, Electronic Imaging, Media Forensics and Security XII, San Jose, CA, USA; January 2010. 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Kang X, Stamm MC, Peng A, Liu KJR. Robust median filtering forensics using an autoregressive model. IEEE Trans. Inf. Forensics Secur. 2013;8(9):1456–1468.10.1109/TIFS.2013.2273394
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen C, Ni J, Huang R, Huang J. Blind median filtering detection using statistics in difference domain. In 14th international conference on Information Hiding; 2012, pp. 1–15.
   Google Scholar
• Yuan H. Blind forensics of median filtering in digital images. IEEE Trans Inf Forensics Secur. 2011;6(4):1335–1345.10.1109/TIFS.2011.2161761
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garg A, Hailu A, Sridharan R. Image forgery identification using jpeg intrinsic fingerprints. 2008:1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Zach F, Riess C, Angelopoulou E. “Automated image forgery detection through classification of JPEG Ghosts”, DAGM/OAGM 2012. Pattern Recognit. 2012;7476:185–194.
   Google Scholar
• Bianchi T, Piva A. Detection of non-aligned double JPEG compression based on integer periodicity maps. IEEE Trans Inf Forensics Secur. 2012;7(2):842–848.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson MK, Farid H. Exposing digital forgeries by detecting inconsistencies in lighting. ACM Multimedia and Security Workshop ’05 New York, NY, USA. 2005:1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson MK, Farid H. Exposing digital forgeries in complex lighting environments. IEEE Trans Inf Forensics Secur. 2007;2(3):450–461.10.1109/TIFS.2007.903848
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kee E, Farid H. Exposing digital forgeries from 3-D lighting environments, in IEEE Int. Forensics Security: Conf. on Inf; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Silva E, Carvalho T, Ferreira A, Rocha A. Going deeper into copy-move forgery detection: exploring image telltales via multi-scale analysis and voting processes. J Vis Commun Image Represent. 2015;29:16–32.10.1016/j.jvcir.2015.01.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cozzolino D, Poggi G, Verdoliva L. Efficient dense-field copy – move forgery detection. IEEE Trans Inf Forensics Secur. 2015;10(11):2284–2297.10.1109/TIFS.2015.2455334
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu L, Han Q, Niu X. Feature point-based copy-move forgery detection : covering the non-textured areas. Multimed Tools Appl. 2016;75(2):1159–1176.10.1007/s11042-014-2362-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zandi M, Mahmoudi-aznaveh A, Talebpour A. Iterative copy-move forgery detection based on a new interest point detector. IEEE Trans Inf Forensics Secur. 2016;11(11):2499–2512.10.1109/TIFS.2016.2585118
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uliyan DM, Jalab HA, Wahab AWA, Sadeghi S. Image region duplication forgery detection based on angular radial partitioning and Harris key-points. Symmetry (Basel). 2016;8(7):62–81.
   Google Scholar
• Ulutas G, Muzaffer G. A new copy move forgery detection method resistant to object removal with uniform background forgery. Math Probl Eng. 2016;2016:1–19.10.1155/2016/3215162
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang X, Li S, Liu Y. A new keypoint-based copy-move forgery detection for small smooth regions. Multimed Tools Appl. 2016;2017(22):23353–23382.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang W, Yang Z, Niu S, Wang J. Detection of copy-move forgery in flat region based on feature enhancement. In: Shi Y, Kim H, Perez-Gonzalez F, Liu F, editors. Digital Forensics and Watermarking. IWDW 2016. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 10082. Springer, Cham; 2017. 2017:159–171.
   Google Scholar
• Yang F, Li J, Lu W, Weng J. Copy-move forgery detection based on hybrid features. Eng Appl Artif Intell. 2017;59, no. December 2016:73–83. 10.1016/j.engappai.2016.12.022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abdul Warif NB, Abdul Wahab AW, Idna Idris MY, Fazidah Othman RS. SIFT-Symmetry : A robust detection method for copy-move forgery with reflection attack. J Vis Commun Image Represent. 2017;46:219–232.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bi X, Pun CM, Yuan XC. Multi-level dense descriptor and hierarchical feature matching for copy-move forgery detection. Inf Sci (NY). 2016;345:226–242.10.1016/j.ins.2016.01.061
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee J-C, Chang C-P, Chen W-K. Detection of copy-move image forgery using histogram of orientated gradients. Inf Sci (NY). 2015;321:250–262.10.1016/j.ins.2015.03.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee J-C. Copy-move image forgery detection based on Gabor magnitude. J Vis Commun Image Represent. 2015;31:320–334.10.1016/j.jvcir.2015.07.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liang Z, Yang G, Ding X, Li L. An efficient forgery detection algorithm for object removal by exemplar-based image inpainting. J Vis Commun Image Represent. 2015;30:75–85.10.1016/j.jvcir.2015.03.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang D, Huang C, Hu W, Chou C. Robustness of copy-move forgery detection under high JPEG compression artifacts. Multimed Tools Appl. 2017;76(1):1509–1530.10.1007/s11042-015-3152-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tralic D, Grgic S, Sun X, Rosin PL. Combining cellular automata and local binary patterns for copy-move forgery detection. Multimed Tools Appl. 2016;75(24):16881–16903.10.1007/s11042-015-2961-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou H, Shen Y, Zhu X, Liu B, Fu Z, Fan N. Digital image modification detection using color information and its histograms. Forensic Sci Int. 2016;266:379–388.10.1016/j.forsciint.2016.06.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wo Y, Yang K, Han G, Chen H, Wu W. Copy-move forgery detection based on multi- radius PCET. IET Image Process. 2016;11(2):99–108.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jenadeleh M, Moghaddam ME. Blind detection of region duplication forgery using fractal coding and feature matching. J Forensic Sci. 2016;61(3):623–636.10.1111/1556-4029.13108
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jinke X, Guangdong Z. Image forgery detection algorithm based on non sampling wavelet transform and Zernike moments. Int J Secur Its Appl. 2016;10(2):27–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang X, Liu Y, Xu H, Wang P, Yang H. Robust copy-move forgery detection using quaternion exponent moments. Pattern Anal Appl. 2016;2016:1–17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10044-016-0588-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ustubioglu B et al. Improved copy-move forgery detection based on the CLDs and colour moments. Imaging Sci J. 2016;64(4).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li J, Li X, Yang B, Sun X. Segmentation-based image copy-move forgery detection scheme. IEEE Trans Inf Forensics Secur. 2015;10(3):507–518.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pun CM, Yuan XC, Bi XL. Image forgery detection using adaptive oversegmentation and feature point matching. IEEE Trans Inf Forensics Secur. 2015;10(8):1705–1716.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ardizzone E, Bruno A, Mazzola G. Copy-move forgery detection by matching triangles of keypoints. IEEE Trans Inf Forensics Secur. 2015;10(10):2084–2094.10.1109/TIFS.2015.2445742
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhong J, Gan Y, Xie S. Radon odd radial harmonic Fourier moments in detecting cloned forgery image. Chaos Solitons Fractals. 2016;89:115–129.10.1016/j.chaos.2015.10.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tatkare KA, History A. Fusion of sift and hue moments features for cloning tamper detection, in International Conference on Applied and Theoretical Computing and Communication Technology (iCATccT);2015, pp. 409–414.10.1109/ICATCCT.2015.7456918
   Google Scholar
• Thirunavukkarasu V, Kumar JS, Chae GS, Kishorkumar J. Non-intrusive forensic detection method using DSWT with reduced feature set for copy-move image. Wirel Pers Commun. 2017:1–19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-016-3941-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferreira A, Felipussi SC, Alfaro C, Fonseca P, Vargas-Muñoz JE, dos Santos JA, Rocha A. Behavior knowledge space-based fusion for copy-move forgery detection. IEEE Trans Image Process. 2016;25(10):4729–4742.10.1109/TIP.2016.2593583
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao X, Wang S, Li S, Li J. Passive image splicing detection by a 2-D Noncausal Markov Model. IEEE Trans Circuits Syst Video Technol. 2015;25(2):185–199.10.1109/TCSVT.2014.2347513
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bahrami K, Kot AC, Li L, Li H. Blurred image splicing localization by exposing blur type inconsistency. IEEE Trans Inf Forensics Secur. 2015;10(5):999–1009.10.1109/TIFS.2015.2394231
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhan L, Zhu Y, Mo Z. An image splicing detection method based on PCA minimum eigenvalues. J Inf Hiding Multimed Signal Process. 2016;7(3):610–619.
   Google Scholar
• Carvalho T, Faria FA, Pedrin H, Torres RS, Rocha A. Illuminant-based transformed spaces for image forensics. IEEE Trans Inf FORENSICS Secur. 2016;11(4):720–733.10.1109/TIFS.2015.2506548
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cozzolino D, Verdoliva L. Single-image splicing localization through autoencoder-based anomaly detection, in IEEE International Workshop on Information Forensics and Security (WIFS);2016.
   Google Scholar
• J. V. C. I. R, Pun C, Liu B, Yuan X. Multi-scale noise estimation for image splicing forgery detection. J Vis Commun Image Represent. 2016; 38:195–206. 10.1016/j.jvcir.2016.03.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Han JG, Park TH, Moon YH, Eom IK. Efficient Markov feature extraction method for image splicing detection using maximization and threshold expansion,” J Electron Imaging. 2016;25(2):023031. https://doi.org/10.1117/1.JEI.25.2.023031.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang Y, Li S, Wang S, Zhao X. Identifying image splicing based on local statistical features in DCT and DWT domain. In: Mu J, Liang Q, Wang W, Zhang B, Pi Y, editors. The proceedings of the third international conference on communications, signal processing, and systems. Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering, vol 322. Cham: Springer, pp. 723–731.
   Google Scholar
• Kaur M, Gupta S. A passive blind approach for image splicing detection based on DWT and LBP histograms. Int Symp Secur Comput Commun. 2016:318–327.10.1007/978-981-10-2738-3
   Google Scholar
• Li C. Image splicing detection based on Markov features in QDCT domain. Neurocomputing. 2017;228:29–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• He X, Guan Q, Tong Y, Zhao X. a novel robust image forensics algorithm based on L1-norm estimation. International Workshop on Digital Watermarking. 2017;2:145–158.
   Google Scholar
• Li H, Luo W, Qiu X, Huang J. Image forgery localization via integrating tampering possibility maps. IEEE Trans Inf Forensics Secur. 2017;12(5):1240–1252.10.1109/TIFS.2017.2656823
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Korus P, Huang J. Multi-scale fusion for improved localization of malicious tampering in digital images. IEEE Trans Image Process. 2016;25(3):1312–1326.10.1109/TIP.2016.2518870
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen J, Kang X, Liu Y, Wang ZJ. Median filtering forensics based on convolutional neural networks. IEEE Signal Process. Lett. 2015;22(11):1849–1853.10.1109/LSP.2015.2438008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bayar B, Stamm MC. A deep learning approach to universal image manipulation detection using a new convolutional layer. In Proceedings of the 4th ACM Workshop on Information Hiding and Multimedia Security - IH&MMSec ’16; 2016, pp. 5–10.
   Google Scholar
• Wang Q, Zhang R. Double JPEG compression forensics based on a convolutional neural network. EURASIP J Inf Secur. 2016;2016:23. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13635-016-0047-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang Y, Goh J, Lei L, Thing V. Image region forgery detection : a deep learning approach. Singapore Cyber-Security Conf. 2016;14:1–11.
   Google Scholar
• Liu A, Zhao Z, Zhang C, Su Y. Smooth filtering identification based on convolutional neural networks. Multimed Tools Appl. 2016:1–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu J, Zhan Y, Yang J Xiangui KB. A multi-purpose image counter-anti-forensic method using convolutional neural networks. In International Workshop on Digital Watermarking. 2017:3–15.
   Google Scholar
• Choi, H, et al. Detecting composite image manipulation based on deep neural networks. Int. Conf. Syst. Signals Image Process; 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Rao Y, Ni J. A deep learning approach to detection of splicing and copy-move forgeries in images. IEEE Int Work Information Forensics Secur. 2016. https://doi.org/10.1109/WIFS.2016.7823911.
   Google Scholar
• Cozzolino D, Poggi G, Verdoliva L. “Recasting Residual-based Local Descriptors as Convolutional Neural Networks: an Application to Image Forgery Detection”, in 5th ACM Workshop on Information Hiding and Multimedia. Security. 2017;159–164.
   Google Scholar
• Tuba V, Jovanovic R, Tuba M. Digital Image Forgery Detection Based on Shadow HSV Inconsistency. In 5th International Symposium on Digital Forensic and Security (ISDFS); 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Li B, Ng T, Li X, Tan S. Revealing the trace of high-quality JPEG compression through quantization noise analysis. IEEE Trans Inf Forensics Secur. 2015;10(3):558–573.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li L, Xue J, Wang X. A robust approach to detect digital forgeries by exploring correlation patterns. Pattern Anal Appl. 2015;18(2):351–365.10.1007/s10044-013-0319-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cristin R, Raj VC. Consistency features and fuzzy-based segmentation for shadow and reflection detection in digital image forgery. Sci China Inf Sci. 2017;2017:60, 082101. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11432-016-0478-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hwang M, Kim S, Har D. A method of identifying digital images with geometric distortion. Aust J Forensic Sci. 2017;49(1):93–105.10.1080/00450618.2015.1128970
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farooq S, Yousaf MH, Hussain F. A generic passive image forgery detection scheme using local binary pattern with rich models. Comput Electr Eng. 2017;62:459–472.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wattanachote K, Shih TK, Member S, Chang W, Chang H. Tamper detection of JPEG image due to seam modifications. IEEE Trans Inf Forensics Secur. 2015;10(12):2477–2491.10.1109/TIFS.2015.2464776
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu Q. An approach to detecting JPEG down-recompression and seam carving forgery under recompression anti-forensics. Pattern Recognit. 2017;65:35–46.10.1016/j.patcog.2016.12.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alhussein M. Image tampering detection based on local texture descriptor and extreme learning machine. In 18th International Conference on Computer Modelling and Simulation; 2016, pp. 196–199.
   Google Scholar
• Yin T, Yang G, Li L, Zhang D. Detecting seam carving based image resizing. Comput Secur. 2015;55:130–141.10.1016/j.cose.2015.09.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeng F, Wang W, Tang M, Cao Z. Exposing Blurred Image Forgeries through Blind Image Restoration. In 10th International Conference on P2P, Parallel, Grid, Cloud and Internet Computing (3PGCIC);2015, pp. 466–469.
   Google Scholar
• Shen X, Shi Z, Chen H. Splicing image forgery detection using textural features based on the gray level co-occurrence matrices. IET Image Process. 2017;11(1):44–53.10.1049/iet-ipr.2016.0238
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar