Fingermark detection and identification: current research efforts

References

• Lennard C. Fingermark detection and identification: current research efforts. Aust J Forensic Sci. 2014;46(3):293–303.10.1080/00450618.2013.839743
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moret S, Spindler X, Lennard C, Roux C. Microscopic examination of fingermark residues: opportunities for fundamental studies. Forensic Sci Int. 2015;255:28–37.10.1016/j.forsciint.2015.05.027
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kent T. Water content of latent fingerprints – dispelling the myth. Forensic Sci Int. 2016;266:134–138.10.1016/j.forsciint.2016.05.016
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bailey MJ, Randall EC, Costa C, Salter TL, Race AM, De Puit M, Koeberg M, Baumert M, Bunch J. Analysis of urine, oral fluid and fingerprints by liquid extraction surface analysis coupled to high resolution MS and MS/MS – opportunities for forensic and biomedical science. Anal Methods. 2016;8(16):3373–3382.10.1039/C6AY00782A
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bradshaw R, Denison N, Francese S. Implementation of MALDI MS profiling and imaging methods for the analysis of real crime scene fingermarks. Analyst. 2017;142(9):1581–1590.10.1039/C7AN00218A
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Francese S, Bradshaw R, Denison N. An update on MALDI mass spectrometry based technology for the analysis of fingermarks – stepping into operational deployment. Analyst. 2017;142(14):2518–2546.10.1039/C7AN00569E
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bécue A. Emerging fields in fingermark (meta)detection – a critical review. Anal Methods. 2016;8(45):7983–8003.10.1039/C6AY02496C
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Errington B, Lawson G, Lewis SW, Smith GD. Micronised Egyptian blue pigment: a novel near-infrared luminescent fingerprint dusting powder. Dyes Pigm. 2016;132:310–315.10.1016/j.dyepig.2016.05.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lam R, Wilkinson D, Tse T, Pynn B. Recommended protocols for fingerprint detection on Canadian polymer banknotes – part I: chemical development. J Forensic Ident. 2014;64(4):375–401.
   Google Scholar
• King RSP, Skros DA. Sunlight-activated near-infrared phosphorescence as a viable means of latent fingermark visualisation. Forensic Sci Int. 2017;276:e35–e39.10.1016/j.forsciint.2017.04.012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farrugia KJ, Fraser J, Friel L, Adams D, Attard-Montalto N, Deacon P. A comparison between atmospheric/humidity and vacuum cyanoacrylate fuming of latent fingermarks. Forensic Sci Int. 2015;257:54–70.10.1016/j.forsciint.2015.07.035
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steiner R, Bécue A. Effect of water immersion on multi- and mono-metallic VMD. Forensic Sci Int. 2018;283:118–127.10.1016/j.forsciint.2017.12.020
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perry H, Sears VG. The use of natural yellow 3 (curcumin) for the chemical enhancement of latent friction ridge detail on naturally weathered materials. J Forensic Identif. 2015;65(1):45–66.
   Google Scholar
• Frick AA, Busetti F, Cross A, Lewis SW. Aqueous nile blue: a simple, versatile and safe reagent for the detection of latent fingermarks. Chem Commun. 2014;50(25):3341–3343.10.1039/C3CC49577A
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de la Hunty M, Moret S, Chadwick S, Lennard C, Spindler X, Roux C. Understanding physical developer (PD): part I – is PD targeting lipids? Forensic Sci Int. 2015;257:481–487.10.1016/j.forsciint.2015.06.034
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de la Hunty M, Moret S, Chadwick S, Lennard C, Spindler X, Roux C. Understanding physical developer (PD): part II – is PD targeting eccrine constituents? Forensic Sci Int. 2015;257:488–495.10.1016/j.forsciint.2015.08.029
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levin-Elad M, Liptz Y, Bar-Or KL, Almog J. 1,2-Indanedione – a winning ticket for developing fingermarks: a validation study. Forensic Sci Int. 2017;271:8–12.10.1016/j.forsciint.2016.12.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olszowska I, Deacon P, Lindsay M, Leśniewskia A, Niedziółka-Jönssona J, Farrugia K. An alternative carrier solvent for fingermark enhancement reagents. Forensic Sci Int. 2018;284:53–64.10.1016/j.forsciint.2017.12.012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arbeli T, Liptz Y, Bengiat R, Levin-Elad M. Development of fingermarks on latex gloves: the solution to a challenging surface. Forensic Sci Int. 2017;280:147–152.10.1016/j.forsciint.2017.09.015
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwarz L, Klenke I, Becker I. Daktyloskopische Spurensicherung auf Eurobanknoten der Europaserie: Das “Kolloidale Gold” – Verfahren neu entdeckt. Kriminalistik. 2017;71(2):105–110.
   Google Scholar
• Newland TG, Moret S, Bécue A, Lewis SW. Further investigations into the single metal deposition (SMD II) technique for the detection of latent fingermarks. Forensic Sci Int. 2016;268:62–72.10.1016/j.forsciint.2016.09.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao Y-B, Ma Y-J, Song D, Liu Y, Luo Y, Lin S, Liu C-Y. New luminescent nanoparticles based on carbon dots/SiO2 for the detection of latent fingermarks. Anal Methods. 2017;9(33):4770–4775.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Girelli CMA, Lobo BJM, Cunha AG, Freitas JCC, Emmerich FG. Comparison of practical techniques to develop latent fingermarks on fired and unfired cartridge cases. Forensic Sci Int. 2015;250:17–26.10.1016/j.forsciint.2015.02.012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lam R, Hofstetter O, Lennard C, Roux C, Spindler X. Evaluation of multi-target immunogenic reagents for the detection of latent and body fluid-contaminated fingermarks. Forensic Sci Int. 2016;264:168–175.10.1016/j.forsciint.2016.04.014
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liang K, Carbonell C, Styles MJ, Ricco R, Cui J, Richardson JJ, Maspoch D, Caruso F, Falcaro P. Biomimetic replication of microscopic metal-organic framework patterns using printed protein patterns. Adv Mater. 2015;27(45):7293–7298.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelly PF, King RSP, Shah B, Mortimer RJ. The use of sulfur nitrides as fingerprint developers. Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng. 2009;7486:748602.
   Google Scholar
• Patel E, Cicatiello P, Deininger L, Clench MR, Marino G, Giardina P, Langenburg G, West A, Marshall P, Sears V, et al. A proteomic approach for the rapid, multi-informative and reliable identification of blood. Analyst. 2016;141(1):191–198.10.1039/C5AN02016F
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dalrymple BE, Smith J. Focus stacking in Photoshop – depth of field optimization in macrophotography. J Forensic Ident. 2014;64(1):71–83.
   Google Scholar
• Fritz P, Frick AA, Van Bronswijk W, Beaudoin A, Bleay S, Lennard C, Lewis SW. Investigations into the influence of donor traits on the performance of fingermark development reagents. Part 1: 1,2-indanedione-zinc chloride. J Forensic Identif. 2017;67(3):410–425.
   Google Scholar
• Frick AA, Fritz P, Van Bronswijk W, Beaudoin A, Bleay S, Lennard C, Lewis SW. Investigations into the influence of donor traits on performance of fingermark development reagents. Part 2: Oil Red O and PD. J Forensic Identif. 2017;67(3):427–446.
   Google Scholar
• International Fingerprint Research Group (IFRG). Guidelines for the assessment of fingermark detection techniques. J Forensic Identif. 2014;64(2):174–200.
   Google Scholar
• Abraham J, Champod C, Lennard C, Roux C. Modern statistical models for forensic fingerprint examinations: a critical review. Forensic Sci Int. 2013;232:131–150.10.1016/j.forsciint.2013.07.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abraham J, Champod C, Lennard C, Roux C. Spatial analysis of corresponding fingerprint features from match and close non-match populations. Forensic Sci Int. 2013;230:87–98.10.1016/j.forsciint.2012.10.034
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee R, Comber B, Abraham J, Wagner M, Lennard C, Spindler X, Roux C. Supporting fingerprint identification assessments using a skin stretch model – a preliminary study. Forensic Sci Int. 2017;272:41–49.10.1016/j.forsciint.2016.12.036
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langenburg G, Hall C, Rosemarie Q. Utilizing AFIS searching tools to reduce errors in fingerprint casework. Forensic Sci Int. 2015;257:123–133.10.1016/j.forsciint.2015.07.054
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar