References
- Patriquin ML, Steyn M, Loth SR. Metric analysis of sex differences in South African black and white pelves. Forensic Sci Int. 2005;147(2–3SPEC.ISS.):119–127. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2004.09.074
- Spradley MK, Jantz RL. Sex estimation in forensic anthropology: skull versus postcranial elements. J Forensic Sci. 2011;56(2):289–296. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1556-4029.2010.01635.x
- İscan MY, Steyn M. The human skeleton in forensic medicine. Springfield (IL): Charles C Thomas; 2013.
- Brůžek J, Santos F, Dutailly B, Murail P, Cunha E. Validation and reliability of the sex estimation of the human os coxae using freely available DSP2 software for bioarchaeology and forensic anthropology. Am J Phys Anthropol. 2017;164(2):440–449. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/ajpa.23282
- Coelho JD, Curate F. CADOES: an interactive machine-learning approach for sex estimation with the pelvis. Forensic Sci Int. 302;2019. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2019.109873
- Steyn M, Patriquin ML. Osteometric sex determination from the pelvis-does population specificity matter? Forensic Sci Int. 2009;191(1–3):113.e1–113.e5. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2009.07.009
- Betti L. Sexual dimorphism in the size and shape of the os coxae and the effects of microevolutionary processes. Am J Phys Anthropol. 2014;153(2):167–177. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/ajpa.22410
- Huseynov A, Zollikofer CPE, Coudyzer W, Gascho D, Kellenberger C, Hinzpeter R, Ponce de León MS. Developmental evidence for obstetric adaptation of the human female pelvis. Pro Natl Acad Sci. 2016;201517085. doi:https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1517085113
- Santos F, Guyomarc’h P, Bruzek J. Statistical sex determination from craniometrics: comparison of linear discriminant analysis, logistic regression, and support vector machines. Forensic Sci Int. 2014;245:204.e1–204.e8. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2014.10.010
- Rosas A, Kranioti EF, Bastir M, Sa A. A geometric-morphometric study of the cretan humerus for sex identification. Forensic Sci Int. 2009;189:2–9. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2009.04.013
- Šlaus M, Bedić Ž, Strinović D, Petrovečki V. Sex determination by discriminant function analysis of the tibia for contemporary croats. Forensic Sci Int. 2013;226(1–3):302.e1–302.e4. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2013.01.025
- Stacy M, Ariyo M. An assessment of the accuracy of discriminant function equations for sex determination of the femur and tibia from a South African population. Forensic Sci Int. 2011;206:1–5. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2010.12.009
- Kranioti EF. Radiometry versus osteometry in sex assessment: a study of the Cretan radius. Aust J Forensic Sci. 2019;51(2):135–148. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00450618.2017.1329849
- Barnes AE, Mahakkanukrauh P, Burnett SE, Case DT, Case DT, Burnett SE, Mahakkanukrauh P, Barnes AE, Mahakkanukrauh P, Burnett SE, et al. Sex estimation from the carpal bones in a Thai population. Aust J Forensic Sci. 2019;1–16. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00450618.2019.1620856
- Asala SA. Sex determination from the head of the femur of South African whites and blacks. Forensic Sci Int. 2001;117(1–2):15–22. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0379-0738(00)00444-8
- Mitra A, Khadijeh B, Vida AP, Ali RN, Farzaneh M, Maryam VF, Vahid Y. Sexing based on measurements of the femoral head parameters on pelvic radiographs. J Forensic Leg Med. 2014;23:70–75. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jflm.2014.01.004
- Milner GR, Boldsen JL. Humeral and femoral head diameters in recent white American skeletons. J Forensic Sci. 2012;57:35–40. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1556-4029.2011.01953
- Curate F, Coelho J, Gonçalves D, Coelho C, Ferreira MT, Navega D, Cunha E. A method for sex estimation using the proximal femur. Forensic Sci Int. 2016;266:579.e1–579.e7. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2016.06.011
- Meeusen RA, Christensen AM, Hefner JT. The use of femoral neck axis length to estimate sex and ancestry. J Forensic Sci. 2015;60(5):1300–1304. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/1556-4029.12820
- Du Jardin P, Ponsaillé J, Alunni-Perret V, Quatrehomme G. A comparison between neural network and other metric methods to determine sex from the upper femur in a modern French population. Forensic Sci Int. 2009;192(1–3):127.e1–127.e6. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2009.07.014
- Albanese J, Eklics G, Tuck A. A metric method for sex determination using the proximal femur and fragmentary hipbone. J Forensic Sci. 2008;53(6):1283–1288. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1556-4029.2008.00855.x
- Curate F, Albuquerque A, Ferreira I, Cunha E. Sex estimation with the total area of the proximal femur: A densitometric approach. Forensic Sci Int. 2017;275:110–116. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2017.02.035
- Kranioti EF, Vorniotakis N, Galiatsou C, Işcan MY, Michalodimitrakis M. Sex identification and software development using digital femoral head radiographs. Forensic Sci Int. 2009;189(1–3):113.e1–113.e7. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2009.04.014
- Colman KL, Janssen MCL, Stull KE, van Rijn RR, Oostra RJ, de Boer HH, van der Merwe AE. Dutch population specific sex estimation formulae using the proximal femur. Forensic Sci Int. 2018;286:268.e1–268.e8. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2017.12.029
- Alunni-Perret V, Staccini P, Quatrehomme G. Sex determination from the distal part of the femur in a French contemporary population. Forensic Sci Int. 2008;175(2–3):113–117. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2007.05.018
- Kanz F, Fitzl C, Vlcek A, Frommlet F. Sex estimation using the femur of Austrians born in the 19 th to the middle of the 20 th century. Anthropol Anz. 2015;72(1):117–127. doi:https://doi.org/10.1127/anthranz/2014/0475
- Kim DI, Kwak DS, Han SH. Sex determination using discriminant analysis of the medial and lateral condyles of the femur in Koreans. Forensic Sci Int. 2013;233(1–3):121–125. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2013.08.028
- Curate F, Umbelino C, Perinha A, Nogueira C, Silva AM, Cunha E. Sex determination from the femur in Portuguese populations with classical and machine-learning classifiers. J Forensic Leg Med. 2017;52:75–81. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jflm.2017.08.011
- Dibennardo R, Taylor JV. Classification and misclassification in sexing the Black femur by discriminant function analysis. Am J Phys Anthropol. 1982;58(2):145–151. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/ajpa.1330580206
- Trancho GJ, Robledo B, López-Bueis I, Sánchez JA. Sexual determination of the femur using discriminant functions. Analysis of a Spanish population of known sex and age. J Forensic Sci. 1997;42:181–185. doi:https://doi.org/10.1520/JFS14096J
- Ross AH, Ubelaker DH, Kimmerle EH. Implications of dimorphism, population variation, and secular change in estimating population affinity in the Iberian Peninsula. Forensic Sci Int. 2011;206. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2011.01.003
- Ubelaker DH, Degaglia CM. Forensic anthropology population data population variation in skeletal sexual dimorphism. Forensic Sci Int. 2017;278. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2017.06.012
- Monum T, Prasitwattanseree S, Das S, Siriphimolwat P, Mahakkanukrauh P. Sex estimation by femur in modern Thai population. Clinica Terapeutica. 2017;168(3):e203–e207. doi:https://doi.org/10.7417/T.2017.2007
- Moore MK, DiGangi EA, Niño Ruíz FP, Hidalgo Davila OJ, Sanabria Medina C. Metric sex estimation from the postcranial skeleton for the Colombian population. Forensic Sci Int. 2016;262:286.e1–286.e8. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2016.02.018
- Ross AH, Manneschi MJ. New identification criteria for the Chilean population: estimation of sex and stature. Forensic Sci Int. 2011;204(1–3):206.e1–206.e3. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2010.07.028
- Fowler G, Hughes C. Development and assessment of postcranial sex estimation methods for a Guatemalan population. J Forensic Sci. 2018;63(2):490–496. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/1556-4029.13570
- Ríos Frutos L. Brief communication: sex determination accuracy of the minimum supero-inferior femoral neck diameter in a contemporary rural Guatemalan population. Am J Phys Anthropol. 2003;122(2):123–126. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/ajpa.10227
- Tise ML, Spradley MK, Anderson BE. Postcranial sex estimation of individuals considered hispanic. J Forensic Sci. 2013;58(SUPPL. 1):9–14. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/1556-4029.12006
- Spradley MK, Anderson BE, Tise ML. Postcranial sex estimation criteria for Mexican hispanics. J Forensic Sci. 2015;60(s1):S27–S31. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/1556-4029.12624
- Kanchan T, Gupta A, Krishan K. Estimation of sex from mastoid triangle - A craniometric analysis. J Forensic Leg Med. 2013;20(7):855–860. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jflm.2013.06.016
- Lopez-Capp TT, Rynn C, Wilkinson C, de Paiva LAS, Michel-Crosato E, Biazevic MGH. Discriminant analysis of mandibular measurements for the estimation of sex in a modern Brazilian sample. Int J Legal Med. 2018;132(3):843–851. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-017-1681-8
- da Costa YTF, Lima LNC, Rabello PM. Analysis of canine dimorphism in the estimation of sex. Braz J Oral Sci. 2012;11(3):406–410. doi:https://doi.org/10.20396/bjos.v11i3.8641393
- Kramer N, Lopez-Capp TT, Michel-Crosato E, Biazevic MGH. Sex estimation from the mastoid process using Micro-CT among Brazilians: discriminant analysis and ROC curve analysis. J Forensic Radiol Imaging. 2018;14:1–7. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jofri.2018.05.003
- Ulbricht V, Schmidt CM, Groppo FC, Júnior ED, Queluz DDP, Júnior LF. Sex estimation in Brazilian sample: qualitative or quantitative methodology? Braz J Oral Sci. 2017;16:1–9. doi:https://doi.org/10.20396/bjos.v16i0.8650495
- Pena SDJ, Bastos-Rodrigues L, Pimenta JR, Bydlowski SP. DNA tests probe the genomic ancestry of Brazilians. Braz J Med Biol Res. 2009;42(10):870–876. doi:https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-879X2009005000026
- Pena SDJ, Di Pietro G, Fuchshuber-Moraes M, Genro JP, Hutz MH, Kehdy FDSG, Kohlrausch F, Magno LAV, Montenegro RC, Moraes MO, et al. The genomic ancestry of individuals from different geographical regions of Brazil is more uniform than expected. PLoS One. 2011; 6(2):e17063. doi:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0017063
- Machado MPS, Costa ST, Freire AR, Navega D, Cunha E, Daruge Júnior E, Prado FB, Rossi AC. Application and validation of diagnose sexuelle probabiliste V2 tool in a miscegenated population. Forensic Sci Int. 2018;290:351.e1–351.e5. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2018.06.043
- Bravo G, Potvin L. Estimating the reliability of continuous measures with cronbach’s alpha or the intraclass correlation coefficient: toward the integration of two traditions. J Clin Epidemiol. 1991;44(4–5):381–390. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/0895-4356(91)90076-L
- Cicchetti DV. Guidelines, criteria, and rules of thumb for evaluating normed and standardized assessment instruments in psychology. Psychol Assess. 1994;6:284–290. doi:10.1037%2F1040-3590.6.4.284
- Gama I, Navega D, Cunha E. Sex estimation using the second cervical vertebra: a morphometric analysis in a documented Portuguese skeletal sample. Int J Legal Med. 2015;129:365–372. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-014-1083-0
- Quinlan JR. C4.5: programs for machine learning. San Francisco (CA): Morgan Kaufmann Publishers; 1993.
- Maroco J, Silva D, Rodrigues A, Guerreiro M, Santana I, de Mendonça A. Data mining methods in the prediction of Dementia: A real-data comparison of the accuracy, sensitivity and specificity of linear discriminant analysis, logistic regression, neural networks, support vector machines, classification trees and random forests. BMC Res Notes. 2011;4(1):299. doi:https://doi.org/10.1186/1756-0500-4-299
- Larose D, Larose C. Data mining and predictive analytics. Hoboken (NJ): John Wiley & Sons; 2015.
- R Core Team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna (Austria): R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2019. https://www.R-project.org/
- Chang W, Wickham H. ggvis. Interactive grammar of graphics. 2019. http://ggvis.rstudio.com/.
- Bouckaert RR, Frank E, Hall M, Kirkby R, Reutemann P, Seewald A, Scuse D. Weka manual-3-6-13. Hamilton (Waikato): The University of Waikato; 2013. p. 1–327.
- Bass W, Driscoll P. Summary of skeletal identification in tennessee: 1971–1981. J Forensic Sci. 1983;28:159–168. doi:https://doi.org/10.1520/JFS12248J
- Mays S. The archaeology of human bones. London: Routledge; 1998.
- Franklin D, Flavel A. Population specificity in the estimation of skeletal age and sex: case studies using a Western Australian population. Aust J Forensic Sci. 2019;51(sup1):S188–S192. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00450618.2019.1569722
- Vaz M, Benfica FS. The experience of the forensic anthropology service of the medical examiner’s office in Porto Alegre, Brazil. Forensic Sci Int. 2008;179(2–3):e45–e49. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2008.05.004
- Urbanová P, Ross AH, Jurda M, Nogueira MI. Testing the reliability of software tools in sex and ancestry estimation in a multi-ancestral Brazilian sample. Leg Med. 2014;16(5):264–273. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.legalmed.2014.06.002
- Steyn M, Iscan MY. Sex determination from the femur and tibia in South African whites. Forensic Sci Int. 1997;90(1–2):111–119. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0379-0738(97)00156-4
- Cunha E, Lopez-Capp TT, Inojosa R, Marques SR, Moraes LOC, Liberti E, Machado CEP, de Paiva LAS, Francesquini Júnior L, Daruge Junior E, et al. The Brazilian identified human osteological collections. Forensic Sci Int. 2018;289:449.e1–449.e6. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2018.05.040