References
- Kiely T. Forensic evidence: science and the criminal law. Boca Raton (FL): CRC Press; 2005.
- Bodziak W. Forensic footwear evidence. Boca Raton (FL): CRC Press; 2016.
- Crabbe S, Vassena P, Hendrix W. 3D-forensics-mobile high-resolution 3D-scanner and 3D data analysis for forensic evidence. 9th Future Security, Security Research Conference; 2014, Berlin: Fraunhofer Verlag.
- Akimov I. Evaluation of alternate materials and methods for the collection of identifying characteristics of footwear impressions. MA: Boston University; 2018.
- Andaló F, Calakli F, Taubin G, Goldenstein S. Accurate 3D footwear impression recovery from photographs. In Fourth International Conference on Imaging for Crime Detection and Prevention, 2011; 2011; London, UK: ICDP.
- Faulkner S. Photogrammetry of 3D footwear impressions forensic applications. WA: Murdoch University; 2017.
- Dirik AK. Forensic use of photo response non-uniformity of imaging sensors and a counter method. Opt Express. 2014;22(1):470–482. doi:https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.22.000470.
- Blackwell S, Taylor R, Gordon I, Ogleby C, Tanijiri T, Yoshino M, Donald M, Clement J. 3-D imaging and quantitative comparison of human dentitions and simulated bite marks. Int J Legal Med. 2007;121(1):9–17. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-005-0058-6.
- Becerik-Gerber B, Jazizadeh F, Kavulya G, Calis G. Assessment of target types and layouts in 3D laser scanning for registration accuracy. Autom Constr. 2011;20(5):649–658. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2010.12.008.
- Geng J. Structured-light 3D surface imaging: a tutorial. Adv Opt Photonics. 2011;3(2). doi:https://doi.org/10.1364/AOP.3.000128.
- Buck U, Albertini N, Naether S, Thali M. 3D documentation of footwear impressions and tyre tracks in snow with high resolution optical surface scanning. Forensic Sci Int. 2007;171(2–3):157–164. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2006.11.001.
- Gamage R, Joshi A, Zheng J, Tuceryan M, A high resolution 3D tire and footprint impression acquisition for forensics applications. In Institute of Electronics and Electronic Engineers Workshop on Applications of Computer Vision (WACV); 2013; Toulouse, France: IEEE.
- Thompson T, Norris P. A new method for the recovery and evidential comparison of footwear impressions using 3D structured light scanning. Sci Justice. 2018;58(3):237–243. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scijus.2018.02.001.
- CloudCompare Wiki. Match bounding-box centres. 2019 [cited 2019 Aug 7]. Available from: https://www.cloudcompare.org/doc/wiki/index.php?title=Match_bounding_box_centers.
- Ahmad Fuad N, Yusoff A, Ismail Z, Majid Z. Comparing the performance of point cloud registration methods for landslide monitoring using mobile laser scanning data. Int Arch Photogramm Remote Sens Spatial Inf Sci. 2018;42:11–21.
- CloudCompare Wiki. ICP. 2019 [cited 2019 Aug 7]. Available from: https://www.cloudcompare.org/doc/wiki/index.php?title=ICP.
- Ezra E, Sharir M, Efrat A. On the performance of the ICP algorithm. Comput Geom. 2008;41(1–2):77–93. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comgeo.2007.10.007.
- CloudCompare Forum. Registration RMS. 2017 [ cited 2019 Oct 7]. Available from https://www.danielgm.net/cc/forum/viewtopic.php?t=1296
- Namitha N, Vaitheeswaran S, Jayasree V, Bharat M. Point cloud mapping measurements using kinect RGB-D sensor and kinect fusion for visual odometry. Procedia Comput Sci. 2016;89:209–212. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2016.06.044.
- Magtalas M, Aves J, Blanco A. Georeferencing UAS derivatives through point cloud registration with archived LIDAR datasets, ISPRS Annals of Photogrammetry. Remote Sens Spatial Inf Sci. 2016;4:195–199.
- CloudCompare Wiki. Cloud-to-mesh distance. 2015 [cited 2015 Oct 3]. Available from: https://www.cloudcompare.org/doc/wiki/index.php?title=Cloud-to-Mesh_Distance.
- Nespeca R, De Luca L. Analysis, thematic maps and data mining from point cloud to ontology for software development. Int Arch Photogramm Remote Sens Spatial Inf Sci. 2016;5:347–354.
- Aspert N, Santa-Cruz D, Ebrahimi T. Mesh: measuring errors between surfaces using the hausdorff distance. In Institute of Electronics and Electronic Engineers Conference on Multimedia and Expo Workshops; 2002; Piscataway, New Jersey.
- Eberly D. Distance between point and triangle in 3D. 1999 [cited 1999 Oct 5]. Available from: http://www.magic-software.com/Documentation/pt3tri3.pdf.
- CloudCompare Wiki. Interactive segmentation tool. 2018 [cited 2018 Oct 3]. Available from: https://www.cloudcompare.org/doc/wiki/index.php?title=Interactive_Segmentation_Tool.
- Artec Group. Using the hardware — artec studio 14 documentation. 2020 [cited 2020 Jan 30]. Available from: http://docs.artec-group.com/as/14/en/hardware.html.
- Needham J, Sharp J. Watch your step! A frustrated total internal reflection approach to forensic footwear imaging. Sci Rep. 2016;6:1–7. doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/srep21290.
- Kennedy R, Chen S, Pressman I, Yamashita A, Pressman A. A large-scale statistical analysis of barefoot impressions. J Forensic Sci. 2005;50(5):1–10. doi:https://doi.org/10.1520/JFS2004277.
- Williams A. Footwear assessment and management’. Podiatry Manage. 2007;26(8):165-178.
- Shakoor N, Sengupta M, Foucher K, Wimmer M, Fogg L, Block J. Effects of common footwear on joint loading in osteoarthritis of the knee. Arthritis Care Res. 2010;62(7):917–923. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/acr.20165.
- President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology. Report to the President, forensic science in criminal courts: ensuring scientific validity of feature-comparison methods. Washington (DC): Executive Office of the President of the United States; 2016.
- National Research Council. Strengthening forensic science in the United States: a path forward. Washington (DC): National Academies Press; 2009.