Skull and long bones – Forensic DNA techniques for historic shipwreck human remains

References

• Guareschi E, Tobe S, Nicholls P, Magni P. Taphonomy and diagenesis of human bone in underwater archaeology: a review of the current status and the proposal of Post-Mortem Submersion Interval (PMSI) as a potential forensic application. J Marit Archaeol. 2021;16:57–75. doi:10.1007/s11457-020-09286-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hagelberg E, Clegg JB. Isolation and characterization of DNA from archaeological bone. Proc Biol Sci. 1991;244(1309):45–50.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yahya P, Gaudieri S, Franklin D. DNA analysis of human skeletal remains associated with the Batavia mutiny of 1629. Perth, Australia: Western Australian Museum; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Simonds A. Who are you? An archaeological examination of the human remains associated with Vasa. Grrenville, North Carolina: East Carolina University; 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Defence AG. Mystery of HMAS Sydney II sailor solved. Defence news. 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Hilliard J. Dead man may tell a tale: cape cod museum tests DNA from pirate ship. The Boston Globe. 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Marchant J. Human skeleton found on famed Antikythera shipwreck. Nat. 2016;537(7621):462–463. doi:10.1038/537462a
   Google Scholar
• Mays S, Ogden A, Montgomery J, Vincent S, Battersby W, Taylor G. New light on the personal identification of a skeleton of a member of Sir John Franklin’s last expedition to the Arctic, 1845. J Archaeol Sci. 2011;38:1571–1582. doi:10.1016/j.jas.2011.02.022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stenton D, Keenleyside A, Trepkov D, Park R. Faces from the Franklin expedition? Craniofacial reconstructions of two members of the 1845 northwest passage expedition. Polar Record. 2015;52(1) 1–6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stenton D, Fratpietro S, Keenleyside A, Park R. DNA identification of a sailor from the 1845 Franklin northwest passage expedition 57. Polar Record; 2021. p. 1–5.
   Google Scholar
• UNESCO, editor Convention on the Protection of the Underwater Cultural Heritage. Convention on the protection of the underwater cultural heritage. Paris: UNESCO; 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Delgado J. Encyclopedia of underwater and maritime archaeology. London: British Museum Press; 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Museum Act 1959. Sect. 11, (1959).
   Google Scholar
• Museum Act 1969, (1969).
   Google Scholar
• Maritime Archaeology Act 1973, (1973).
   Google Scholar
• Underwater Cultural Heritage Act, (2018).
   Google Scholar
• Hughes-Stamm S. DNA typing methods for highly degraded samples. Gold Coast (Australia): Bond University; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Hagelberg E, Sykes B, Hedges R. Ancient bone DNA amplified. Nat. 1989;342(6249):485. doi:10.1038/342485a0
   Google Scholar
• Zouganelis GD, Ogden R, Nahar N, Runfola V, Bonab M, Ardalan A, Radford D, Barnett R, Larson G, Hildred A, et al. An old dog and new tricks: genetic analysis of a Tudor dog recovered from the Mary Rose wreck. Forensic Sci Int. 2014;245:51–57. doi:10.1016/j.forsciint.2014.10.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hutchinson WF, Culling M, Orton DC, Hänfling B, Lawson Handley L, Hamilton-Dyer S, O’Connell TC, Richards MP, Barrett JH, Hutchinson WF, et al. The globalization of naval provisioning: ancient DNA and stable isotope analyses of stored cod from the wreck of the Mary Rose, AD 1545. R Soc Open Sci. 2015;2(9):150199. doi:10.1098/rsos.150199
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ralph E. Cape Gelidonya: a Bronze Age Shipwreck, New Series. In: Bass G, editor. Carbon-14 dates for wood. Philadelphia, PA: Transactions of the American Philosophy Society: American Philosophy Society; 1967. p. 168.
   Google Scholar
• Chadwick A, Berko A, Schofield E, Smith A, Mosselmans J, Jones AM, Cibin G. The application of X-ray absorption spectroscopy in archaeological conservation: example of an artefact from Henry VIII warship, the Mary Rose. J Non Cryst Solids. 2016;451:49–55. doi:10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2016.05.020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Formenti F, Hesnard A, Tchernia A. Note sur le contenu d’une amphore Lamboglia 2 de l’épave de la Madrague de Giens. Archaeonautica. 1978;2:95–100. doi:10.3406/nauti.1978.868
   Google Scholar
• Franklin D, Scadding C, Stanbury M, Watling J. ICP-MS trace element analysis for the potential reassignment of separated skeletal remains of a’Batavia mutiny’ victim. J Australas Inst Mari. Archaeol. 2010;34:1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Scorrer J, Faillace K, Hildred A, Nederbragt A, Andersen M, Millet M, Lamb AL, Madgwick R. Diversity aboard a Tudor warship: investigating the origins of the Mary Rose crew using multi-isotope analysis. R Soc Open Sci. 2021;8(5). doi:10.1098/rsos.202106
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kerns J, Buckley B, Parker A, Bircha H, Matousek P, Hildred A, Goodship AE. The use of laser spectroscopy to investigate bone disease in King Henry VIII’s sailors. J Archaeol Sci. 2015;53:516–520. doi:10.1016/j.jas.2014.11.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stirland A, Waldron T. Evidence for activity related markers in the vertebrae of the crew of the Mary Rose. J Archaeol Sci. 1997;24(4):329–335. doi:10.1006/jasc.1996.0117
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paterson A, Franklin D. The 1629 mass grave for Batavia victims, Beacon Island, Houtman Abrolhos Islands, Western Australia. Australas Hist Archaeol. 2004;22:71–78.
   Google Scholar
• Franklin D, Freedman L. A bioarchaeological investigation of a multiple burial associated with the Batavia mutiny of 1629. Perth, Australia: Western Australian Museum; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Franklin D. Human skeletal remains from a multiple burial associated with the mutiny of the VOC Retourschip Batavia, 1629. Int J Osteoarchaeol. 2012;22(6):740–748. doi:10.1002/oa.1235
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donlon D Anthropological report of the examination of unknown skeletal remains from Christmas Island 2006. 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Associated Press. Bones found in shipwreck don’t belong to infamous pirate. New York Post; 2018 25 May 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Maier M, Gomez B, Parera S, Elkin D, De Rosa H, Ciarlo N, Svoboda H. Characterization of cultural remains associated to a human skeleton found at the site HMS Swift (1770). J Mol Struct. 2010;978(1–3):191–194. doi:10.1016/j.molstruc.2010.03.049
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stenton D. Finding the dead: bodies, bones and burials from the 1845 Franklin northwest passage expedition. Polar Record. 2018;54(3):197–212. doi:10.1017/S0032247418000359
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ambers A, MM B, JL K, Jones B, Durst J, Bruseth JE, Gill-King, H, Budowle, B. Forensic genetic investigation of human skeletal remains recovered from the La Belle shipwreck. Forensic Sci Int. 2020;306:110050. doi:10.1016/j.forsciint.2019.110050
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watherston J, McNevin D, Gahan ME, Bruce D, Ward J. Current and emerging tools for the recovery of genetic information from post mortem samples: new directions for disaster victim identification. Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2018;37:270–282. doi:10.1016/j.fsigen.2018.08.016
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burger J, Hummel S, Hermann B, Henke W. DNA preservation: a microsatellite-DNA study on ancient skeletal remains. Electrophoresis. 1999;20(8):1722–1728. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1522-2683(19990101)20:8<1722::AID-ELPS1722>3.0.CO;2-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Latham KE, Miller JJ. DNA recovery and analysis from skeletal material in modern forensic contexts. Forensic Sci Res. 2019;4(1):51–59. doi:10.1080/20961790.2018.1515594
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Latham K, Madonna M. DNA survivability in skeletal remains. In: Pokines J, Symes S, editors. Manual of forensic taphonomy. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 2013. p. 403–426.
   Google Scholar
• Ambers, A. Forensic genetic approaches for identification of human skeletal remains: Challenges, best practices, and emerging technologies. 1st ed. Ambers A, editor. Cambridge (MA): Academic Press; 2023.
   Google Scholar
• Rodriguez W. Forensic taphonomy: the postmortem fate of human remains. In: Haglund W, Sorg M, editors. Decomposition of buried and submerged bodies. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 1997. p. 459–468.
   Google Scholar
• Caruso JL. Decomposition changes in bodies recovered from water. Acad Forensic Pathol. 2016;6(1):19–27. doi:10.23907/2016.003
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Anderson GS, Hobischak NR. Decomposition of carrion in the marine environment in British Columbia, Canada. Int J Legal Med. 2004;118(4):206–209. doi:10.1007/s00414-004-0447-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson GS, Bell LS, Archambault P. Deep coastal marine taphonomy: investigation into carcass decomposition in the Saanich Inlet, British Columbia using a baited camera. PLoS One. 2014;9(10):e110710. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0110710
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellingham STD, Perich P, Tidball-Binz M. The fate of human remains in a maritime context and feasibility for forensic humanitarian action to assist in their recovery and identification. Forensic Sci Int. 2017;279:229–234. doi:10.1016/j.forsciint.2017.07.039
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prangnell J, McGowan G. Soil temperature calculation for burial site analysis. Forensic Sci Int. 2009;191(1–3):104–109. doi:10.1016/j.forsciint.2009.07.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simmons T, Heaton V. Postmortem interval:Submerged bodies. In: Jamieson A, editor. Wiley encyclopedia of forensic science. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley Online Library: Wiley; 2013. p. 1–10.
   Google Scholar
• O’Brien TG, Kuehner AC. Waxing grave about adipocere: soft tissue change in an aquatic context. J Forensic Sci. 2007;52(2):294–301. doi:10.1111/j.1556-4029.2006.00362.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Widya M, Moffatt C, Simmons T. The formation of early stage adipocere in submerged remains: a preliminary experimental study. J Forensic Sci. 2012;57(2):328–333. doi:10.1111/j.1556-4029.2011.01980.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forbes SL, Wilson ME, Stuart BH. Examination of adipocere formation in a cold water environment. Int J Legal Med. 2011;125(5):643–650. doi:10.1007/s00414-010-0460-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fielder S, Buegger F, Klaubert B, Zipp K, Dohrmann R, Wittemeyer M, Zarei M, Graw M. Adipocere withstands 1,600 years of fluctuating groundwater levels in soil. J Archaeol Sci. 2009;36(7):1328–1333. doi:10.1016/j.jas.2009.01.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pfeiffer S, Milne S, Stevenson RM. The natural decomposition of adipocere. J Forensic Sci. 1998;43(2):368–370. doi:10.1520/JFS16147J
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fründ HC, Schoenen D. Quantification of adipocere degradation with and without access to oxygen and to the living soil. Forensic Sci Int. 2009;188(1–3):18–22. doi:10.1016/j.forsciint.2009.03.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nagy Z. A hands-on overview of tissue preservation methods for molecular genetic analyses. Org Divers Evol. 2010;10(1):91–105. doi:10.1007/s13127-010-0012-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gill-King H. Chemical and ultrastructural aspects of decomposition. Forensic taphonomy: the postmortem fate of human remains. Boca Raton: CRC Press. 1997. p. 109–126.
   Google Scholar
• Alaeddini R, Walsh SJ, Abbas A. Forensic implications of genetic analyses from degraded DNA - A review. Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2010;4(3):148–157. doi:10.1016/j.fsigen.2009.09.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham E, Adamowicz MS, editors. Effects of different types of water on the degradation rate of human DNA in bone and tissue. 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Geigl E. On the circumstances surrounding the preservation and analysis of very old DNA. Archaeometry. 2002;44(3):337–342. doi:10.1111/1475-4754.t01-1-00066
   Google Scholar
• Haglund W, Sorg M. Forensic taphonomy: the postmortem fate of human remains. Amsterdam: CRC Press; 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Haglund WD. Disappearance of soft tissue and the disarticulation of human remains from aqueous environments. J Forensic Sci. 1993;38(4):806–815. doi:10.1520/JFS13476J
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schuliar Y, Perich P French gendarmerie disaster victim identification team crash of the air France flight airbus AF 447 Rio de Janeiro - Paris (1st of June 2009) recovery process in the Atlantic Ocean. Taphonomical and medico-legal considerations. 22nd Congress of the International Academy of the Legal Medicine; Istanbul 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Sorg M, Dearborn J, Sweeney K, Ryan H, Rodriguez W, editors. Marine taphonomy of a case submerged for 32 years. Proc Am Acad Forensic Sci Seattle, Washington; 1995.
   Google Scholar
• Haglund W, Sorg M. Advances in forensic taphonomy (Method, theory and archaeological perspectives). In: Haglund W, Sorg M, editors. Human remains in water environments. Boca Raton (FL): CRC Press; 2002. p. 201–218.
   Google Scholar
• Pokines J, Higgs N. Macroscopic taphonomic alterations to human bone recovered from marine environments. J Forensic Identif. 2015;65:953–984.
   Google Scholar
• Bell LS, Skinner MF, Jones SJ. The speed of post mortem change to the human skeleton and its taphonomic significance. Forensic Sci Int. 1996;82(2):129–140. doi:10.1016/0379-0738(96)01984-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bell L, Elkerton A. Unique marine taphonomy in human skeletal material recovered from the medieval warship Mary Rose. Int J Osteoarchaeol. 2008;18:523–535. doi:10.1002/oa.952
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keenan S. From bone to fossil: a review of the diagenesis of bioapatite. Am Miner. 2016;101:1943–1951. doi:10.2138/am-2016-5737
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trueman C, Orr P. Chemical taphonomy of biomineralized tissues. Paleontol. 2013;56:475–486. doi:10.1111/pala.12041
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koenig A, Rogers R, Trueman C. Visualizing fossilization using laser ablation-inductively couple plasma-mass spectrometry maps of trace elements in Late Cretaceous bones. Geol. 2009;37(6):511–514. doi:10.1130/G25551A.1
   Google Scholar
• Green J. Maritime archaeology: a technical handbook. San Diego (CA): Elsevier; 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Steptoe D, Wood W. The human remains from HMS Pandora. Int Archaeol 11. 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson GS, Bell LS, Kiel S. Impact of marine submergence and season on faunal colonization and decomposition of pig carcasses in the Salish Sea. PLoS One. 2016;11(3):e0149107. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0149107
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ribéreau-Gayon A, Rando C, Schuliar Y, Chapenoire S, Crema ER, Claes J, Seret B, Maleret V, Morgan RM. Extensive unusual lesions on a large number of immersed human victims found to be from cookiecutter sharks (Isistius spp.): an examination of the Yemenia plane crash. Int J Legal Med. 2017;131(2):423–432. doi:10.1007/s00414-016-1449-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perich P, editor.Aspects taphonomiques et lesions crash vol IY 626 Sanaa-Moroni Airbus A 310 Yemenia. Dijon: XX Congres AFIO; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Byard RW, James RA, Heath KJ. Recovery of human remains after shark attack. Am J Forensic Med Pathol. 2006;27(3):256–259. doi:10.1097/01.paf.0000221081.80866.5c
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Byard RW, Both K, Simpson E. The identification of submerged skeletonized remains. Am J Forensic Med Pathol. 2008;29(1):69–71. doi:10.1097/PAF.0b013e31816520aa
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Işcan MY, McCabe BQ. Analysis of human remains recovered from a shark. Forensic Sci Int. 1995;72(1):15–23. doi:10.1016/0379-0738(94)01643-J
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nambiar P, Bridges TE, Brown KA. Allometric relationships of the dentition of the great White Shark, Carcharodon carcharias, in forensic investigations of shark attacks. J Forensic Odontostomatol. 1991;9(1):1–16.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nambiar P, Brown KA, Bridges TE. Forensic implications of the variation in morphology of marginal serrations on the teeth of the great white shark. J Forensic Odontostomatol. 1996;14(1):2–8.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Woolgar JD, Cliff G, Nair R, Hafez H, Robbs JV. Shark attack: review of 86 consecutive cases. J Trauma. 2001;50(5):887–891. doi:10.1097/00005373-200105000-00019
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ihama Y, Ninomiya K, Noguchi M, Fuke C, Miyazaki T. Characteristic features of injuries due to shark attacks: a review of 12 cases. Leg Med (Tokyo). 2009;11(5):219–225. doi:10.1016/j.legalmed.2009.06.002
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lowry D, de Castro A, Mara K, Whitenack LB, Delius B, Burgess GH, Motta P. Determining shark size from forensic analysis of bite damage. Mar Biol. 2009;156:2483–2492. doi:10.1007/s00227-009-1273-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White J, Burgess G, Nakatsukasa M, Hudson M, Pouncett J, Kusaka S. 3000-year-old shark attack victim from Tsukumo shell-mound, Okayama, Japan. J Archaeol Sci: Reports 38. 2021; p. 1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Introna F, Di Vella G, Campobasso CP. Migrant deaths and the Kater Radez I wreck: from recovery of the relict to marine taphonomic findings and identification of the victims. Int J Legal Med. 2013;127(4):871–879. doi:10.1007/s00414-012-0807-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Byard RW, James RA, Gilbert JD. Diagnostic problems associated with cadaveric trauma from animal activity. Am J Forensic Med Pathol. 2002;23(3):238–244. doi:10.1097/00000433-200209000-00006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duband S, Forest F, Clemenson A, Debout M, Péoc’h M. Postmortem injuries inflicted by crawfish: morphological and histological aspects. Forensic Sci Int. 2011;206(1–3):e49–51. doi:10.1016/j.forsciint.2010.08.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hobischak NR, Anderson GS. Time of submergence using aquatic invertebrate succession and decompositional changes. J Forensic Sci. 2002;47(1):142–151. doi:10.1520/JFS15215J
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tiemensma M, Bruce NL, Willan RC. Post-mortem human cadaver scavenging by marine crustaceans (Isopoda: cirolanidae) in tropical waters. Forensic Sci Med Pathol. 2017;13(4):515–517. doi:10.1007/s12024-017-9926-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson G, Hobischak N. Determination of time of death for humans discovered in saltwater using aquatic organism succession and decomposition rates. Ottawa (ON): Canadian Police Research Centre; 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Makino Y, Tachihara K, Ageda S, Arao T, Fuke C, Miyazaki T. Peculiar circular and C-shaped injuries on a body from the sea. Am J Forensic Med Pathol. 2004;25(2):169–171. doi:10.1097/01.paf.0000127390.07879.62
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montelius K, Lindblom B. DNA analysis in disaster victim identification. Forensic Sci Med Pathol. 2012;8(2):140–147. doi:10.1007/s12024-011-9276-z
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prinz M, Carracedo A, Mayr WR, Morling N, Parsons TJ, Sajantila A, Scheithauer R, Schmitter H, Schneider PM. DNA commission of the International Society for Forensic Genetics (ISFG): recommendations regarding the role of forensic genetics for disaster victim identification (DVI). Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2007;1(1):3–12. doi:10.1016/j.fsigen.2006.10.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manjunath BC, Chandrashekar BR, Mahesh M, Vatchala Rani RM. DNA profiling and forensic dentistry–a review of the recent concepts and trends. J Forensic Leg Med. 2011;18(5):191–197. doi:10.1016/j.jflm.2011.02.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andelinović S, Sutlović D, Erceg Ivkosić I, Skaro V, Ivkosić A, Paić F. Twelve-year experience in identification of skeletal remains from mass graves. Croat Med J. 2005;46(4):530–539.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milos A, Selmanović A, Smajlović L, Huel RL, Katzmarzyk C, Rizvić A, Parsons TJ. Success rates of nuclear short tandem repeat typing from different skeletal elements. Croat Med J. 2007;48(4):486–493.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ziętkiewicz E, Witt M, Daca P, Zebracka-Gala J, Goniewicz M, Jarząb B, Witt M. Current genetic methodologies in the identification of disaster victims and in forensic analysis. J Appl Genet. 2012;53(1):41–60. doi:10.1007/s13353-011-0068-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calacal GC, Apaga DLT, Salvador JM, Jimenez JAD, Lagat LJ, Villacorta RPF, Lim MCF, Fortun RDR, Datar FA, De Ungria MCA, et al. Comparing different post-mortem human samples as DNA sources for downstream genotyping and identification. Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2015;19:212–220. doi:10.1016/j.fsigen.2015.07.017
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ICMP. Standard operating procedure for sampling bone and tooth specimens from human remains for DNA testing at the ICMP. ICMP; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Edson S, Christensen A, Barritt S, Meehan A, Leney M, Finelli LN. Sampling of the cranium for mitochondrial DNA analysis of human skeletal remains. Forensic Sci Int Genet Suppl Ser. 2009;2:269–270. doi:10.1016/j.fsigss.2009.09.029
   Google Scholar
• Kulstein G, Hadrys T, Wiegand P. As solid as a rock-comparison of CE- and MPS-based analyses of the petrosal bone as a source of DNA for forensic identification of challenging cranial bones. Int J Legal Med. 2018;132(1):13–24. doi:10.1007/s00414-017-1653-z
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mundorff A, Davoren JM. Examination of DNA yield rates for different skeletal elements at increasing post mortem intervals. Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2014;8(1):55–63. doi:10.1016/j.fsigen.2013.08.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fredericks J, Brown K, Williams A, Bennett P. DNA analysis of skeletal tissue recovered from the English Channel. J Forensic Leg Med. 2013;20(6):757–759. doi:10.1016/j.jflm.2013.04.013
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Leo D, Turrina S, Marigo M. Effects of individual dental factors on genomic DNA analysis. Am J Forensic Med Pathol. 2000;21(4):411–415. doi:10.1097/00000433-200012000-00023
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rubio L, Martinez LJ, Martinez E, Martin de Las Heras S. Study of short- and long-term storage of teeth and its influence on DNA. J Forensic Sci. 2009;54(6):1411–1413. doi:10.1111/j.1556-4029.2009.01159.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Higgins D, Austin JJ. Teeth as a source of DNA for forensic identification of human remains: a review. Sci Justice. 2013;53(4):433–441. doi:10.1016/j.scijus.2013.06.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwartz TR, Schwartz EA, Mieszerski L, McNally L, Kobilinsky L. Characterization of deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) obtained from teeth subjected to various environmental conditions. J Forensic Sci. 1991;36(4):979–990. doi:10.1520/JFS13113J
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alvarez García A, Muñoz I, Pestoni C, Lareu MV, Rodríguez-Calvo MS, Carracedo A. Effect of environmental factors on PCR-DNA analysis from dental pulp. Int J Legal Med. 1996;109(3):125–129. doi:10.1007/BF01369671
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisher DL, Holland MM, Mitchell L, Sledzik PS, Wilcox AW, Wadhams M. Extraction, evaluation, and amplification of DNA from decalcified and undecalcified United States Civil War bone. J Forensic Sci. 1993;38(1):60–68.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sørensen E, Hansen SH, Eriksen B, Morling N. Application of thiopropyl sepharose 6B for removal of PCR inhibitors from DNA extracts of a thigh bone recovered from the sea. Int J Legal Med. 2003;117(4):245–247. doi:10.1007/s00414-003-0375-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Combs LG, Warren JE, Huynh V, Castaneda J, Golden TD, Roby RK. The effects of metal ion PCR inhibitors on results obtained with the quantifiler® human DNA quantification kit. Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2015;19:180–189. doi:10.1016/j.fsigen.2015.06.013
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pionzio AM, McCord BR. The effect of internal control sequence and length on the response to PCR inhibition in real-time PCR quantitation. Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2014;9:55–60. doi:10.1016/j.fsigen.2013.10.010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alaeddini R, Burgoyne L, editors. Endogenous inhibition of DNA amplification from human skeletal remains. The 18th International Symposium of the Forensic Sciences; 2006; Fremantle (Perth), (Australia).
   Google Scholar
• Sutlovic D, Gamulin S, Definis-Gojanovic M, Gugic D, Andjelinovic S. Interaction of humic acids with human DNA: proposed mechanisms and kinetics. Electrophoresis. 2008;29(7):1467–1472. doi:10.1002/elps.200700699
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Primorac D. The role of DNA technology in identification of skeletal remains discovered in mass graves. Forensic Sci Int. 2004;146(Suppl):S63–4.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tebbe CC, Vahjen W. Interference of humic acids and DNA extracted directly from soil in detection and transformation of recombinant DNA from bacteria and a yeast. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1993;59(8):2657–2665. doi:10.1128/aem.59.8.2657-2665.1993
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsai YL, Olson BH. Rapid method for separation of bacterial DNA from humic substances in sediments for polymerase chain reaction. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1992;58(7):2292–2295. doi:10.1128/aem.58.7.2292-2295.1992
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kreader CA. Relief of amplification inhibition in PCR with bovine serum albumin or T4 gene 32 protein. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1996;62(3):1102–1106. doi:10.1128/aem.62.3.1102-1106.1996
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alaeddini R. Forensic implications of PCR inhibition - A review. Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2012;6(3):297–305. doi:10.1016/j.fsigen.2011.08.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson RE, Duncan G, McCord BR. An investigation of PCR inhibition using Plexor®-based quantitative PCR and short tandem repeat amplification. J Forensic Sci. 2014;59(6):1517–1529. doi:10.1111/1556-4029.12556
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giannakis C, Forbes IJ, Zalewski PD. Ca2+/Mg(2+)-dependent nuclease: tissue distribution, relationship to inter-nucleosomal DNA fragmentation and inhibition by Zn2+. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1991;181(2):915–920. doi:10.1016/0006-291X(91)91278-K
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindahl T. Instability and decay of the primary structure of DNA. Nat. 1993;362(6422):709–715. doi:10.1038/362709a0
   Google Scholar
• Stiller M, Green RE, Ronan M, Simons JF, Du L, He W, Egholm M, Rothberg JM, Keates SG, Ovodov ND, et al. Patterns of nucleotide misincorporations during enzymatic amplification and direct large-scale sequencing of ancient DNA. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006;103(37):13578–13584. doi:10.1073/pnas.0605327103
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dong L, Mi R, Glass RA, Barry JN, Cao W. Repair of deaminated base damage by Schizosaccharomyces pombe thymine DNA glycosylase. DNA Repair (Amst). 2008;7(12):1962–1972. doi:10.1016/j.dnarep.2008.08.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allen-Hall A, McNevin D. Non-cryogenic forensic tissue preservation in the field: a review. Aust J Forensic Sci. 2013;45(4):450–460. doi:10.1080/00450618.2013.789077
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilbert M, Hansen A, Willerslev E, Turner-Walker G, Collins M. Insights into the processes behind the contamination of degraded human teeth and bone samples with exogenous sources of DNA. Int J Ostoarchaeol. 2006;16:156–164. doi:10.1002/oa.832
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilbert M, Rudbeck L, Willerslev E, Hansen A, Smith C. Biochemical and physical correlates of DNA contamination in archaeological human bones and teeth excavated at Matera, Italy. J Archaeol Sci. 2005;32:783–795.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richards M, Sykes B, Hedges R. Authenticating DNA extracted from ancient skeletal remains. J Archaeol Sci. 1995;22:291–299. doi:10.1006/jasc.1995.0031
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Handt O, Krings M, Ward RH, Pääbo S. The retrieval of ancient human DNA sequences. Am J Hum Genet. 1996;59(2):368–376.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hofreiter M, Serre D, Poinar HN, Kuch M, Pääbo S. Ancient DNA. Nat Rev Genet. 2001;2(5):353–359. doi:10.1038/35072071
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wandeler P, Smith S, Morin PA, Pettifor RA, Funk SM. Patterns of nuclear DNA degeneration over time–a case study in historic teeth samples. Mol Ecol. 2003;12(4):1087–1093. doi:10.1046/j.1365-294X.2003.01807.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• von Wurmb-schwark N, Heinrich A, Freudenberg M, Gebühr M, Schwark T. The impact of DNA contamination of bone samples in forensic case analysis and anthropological research. Leg Med (Tokyo). 2008;10(3):125–130. doi:10.1016/j.legalmed.2007.10.001
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Currey J. Bones: structure and mechanics. Princeton: Princeton University Press; 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Sampietro ML, Gilbert MT, Lao O, Caramelli D, Lari M, Bertranpetit J. Tracking down human contamination in ancient human teeth. Mol Biol Evol. 2006;23(9):1801–1807. doi:10.1093/molbev/msl047
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Westen AA, Gerretsen RR, Maat GJ. Femur, rib, and tooth sample collection for DNA analysis in disaster victim identification (DVI): a method to minimize contamination risk. Forensic Sci Med Pathol. 2008;4(1):15–21. doi:10.1007/s12024-007-0027-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kemp BM, Smith DG. Use of bleach to eliminate contaminating DNA from the surface of bones and teeth. Forensic Sci Int. 2005;154(1):53–61. doi:10.1016/j.forsciint.2004.11.017
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edson SM, Christensen AF. Field contamination of skeletonized human remains with exogenous DNA. J Forensic Sci. 2013;58(1):206–209. doi:10.1111/j.1556-4029.2012.02270.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ballou S, Stolorow M. The biological evidence preservation handbook: best practices for evidence handlers. Washington D.C.: U.S: Department of Commerce, National Institute of Standards and Technology; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Hummel S. Ancient DNA typing (Methods, strategies and applications). Berlin Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag; 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Grdina S, Fris E, Podovsovnik E, Zupanc T, Pajnic I. Storage of second world war bone samples: bone fragments versus bone powder. Forensic Sci Intl: Genet Suppl Ser. 2019;7:175–176.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Austin RM, Sholts SB, Williams L, Kistler L, Hofman CA. Opinion: to curate the molecular past, museums need a carefully considered set of best practices. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019;116(5):1471–1474. doi:10.1073/pnas.1822038116
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• INTERPOL. Disaster victim identification (amended) guide. Lyon: INTERPOL; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Ward J. Best practice recommendations for the establishment of a national DNA identification program for missing persons: a global perspective. Forensic Sci Int Genet Suppl Ser. 2017;6:e43–e45. doi:10.1016/j.fsigss.2017.09.009
   Google Scholar
• Kalmár T, Bachrati CZ, Marcsik A, Raskó I. A simple and efficient method for PCR amplifiable DNA extraction from ancient bones. Nucleic Acids Res. 2000;28(12):E67. doi:10.1093/nar/28.12.e67
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer E, Wiese M, Bruchhaus H, Claussen M, Klein A. Extraction and amplification of authentic DNA from ancient human remains. Forensic Sci Int. 2000;113(1–3):87–90. doi:10.1016/S0379-0738(00)00220-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alonso A, Andelinović S, Martín P, Sutlović D, Erceg I, Huffine E, de Simón LF, Albarrán C, Definis-Gojanović M, Fernández-Rodriguez A, et al. DNA typing from skeletal remains: evaluation of multiplex and megaplex STR systems on DNA isolated from bone and teeth samples. Croat Med J. 2001;42(3):260–266.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edson SM, Ross JP, Coble MD, Parsons TJ, Barritt SM. Naming the dead - confronting the realities of rapid identification of degraded skeletal remains. Forensic Sci Rev. 2004;16(1):63–90.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Salamon M, Tuross N, Arensburg B, Weiner S. Relatively well preserved DNA is present in the crystal aggregates of fossil bones. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005;102(39):13783–13788. doi:10.1073/pnas.0503718102
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lalueza-Fox C. Analysis of ancient mitochondrial DNA from extinct Aborigines from Tierra del Fuego-Patagonia. Ancient Biomol. 1996;1:43–54.
   Google Scholar
• Lalueza C, Pérez-Pérez A, Prats E, Cornudella L, Turbón D. Lack of founding Amerindian mitochondrial DNA lineages in extinct aborigines from Tierra del Fuego-Patagonia. Hum Mol Genet. 1997;6(1):41–46. doi:10.1093/hmg/6.1.41
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montiel R, Malgosa A, Francalacci P. Authenticating ancient human mitochondrial DNA. Hum Biol. 2001;73(5):689–713. doi:10.1353/hub.2001.0069
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• González-Oliver A, Márquez-Morfín L, Jiménez JC, Torre-Blanco A. Founding Amerindian mitochondrial DNA lineages in ancient Maya from Xcaret, Quintana Roo. Am J Phys Anthropol. 2001;116(3):230–235. doi:10.1002/ajpa.1118
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barta JL, Monroe C, Kemp BM. Further evaluation of the efficacy of contamination removal from bone surfaces. Forensic Sci Int. 2013;231(1–3):340–348. doi:10.1016/j.forsciint.2013.06.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodwin WH. The use of forensic DNA analysis in humanitarian forensic action: the development of a set of international standards. Forensic Sci Int. 2017;278:221–227. doi:10.1016/j.forsciint.2017.07.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang D, Watt K. Contamination controls when preparing archaeological remains for ancient DNA analysis. J Archaeol Sci. 2005;32:331–336. doi:10.1016/j.jas.2004.09.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooper A, Poinar H. Ancient DNA: do it right or not at all. Sci. 2000;18:1139–1141. doi:10.1126/science.289.5482.1139b
   Google Scholar
• Poinar H , editor Criteria of authenticity for DNA from ancient and forensic samples. Int Congr Ser. 1239; 2003; p. 575–579.
   Google Scholar
• Taberlet P, Griffin S, Goossens B, Questiau S, Manceau V, Escaravage N. Reliable genotyping of samples with very low DNA quantities using PCR. Nucleic Acids Res. 1996;24(16):3189–3194. doi:10.1093/nar/24.16.3189
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pinhasi R, Fernandes D, Sirak K, Novak M, Connell S, Alpaslan-Roodenberg S, Gerritsen F, Moiseyev V, Gromov A, Raczky P, et al. Optimal ancient DNA yields from the inner ear part of the human petrous bone. PLoS One. 2015;10(6):e0129102. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0129102
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jørkov ML, Heinemeier J, Lynnerup N. The petrous bone–a new sampling site for identifying early dietary patterns in stable isotopic studies. Am J Phys Anthropol. 2009;138(2):199–209. doi:10.1002/ajpa.20919
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ponce de León MS, Koesbardiati T, Weissmann JD, Milella M, Reyna-Blanco CS, Suwa G, Kondo O, Malaspinas A-S, White TD, Zollikofer CPE, et al. Human bony labyrinth is an indicator of population history and dispersal from Africa. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018;115(16):4128–4133. doi:10.1073/pnas.1717873115
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansen HB, Damgaard PB, Margaryan A, Stenderup J, Lynnerup N, Willerslev E, Allentoft ME. Comparing ancient DNA preservation in petrous bone and tooth cementum. PLoS One. 2017;12(1):e0170940. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0170940
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferreira S, Garrido R, Paula K, Nogueira R, Oliveira E, Moraes A. Cartilage and phalanges from hallux: alternative sources of samples for DNA typing in disaster victim identification (DVI). A comparative study. Forensic Sci Int Genet Supp Ser. 2013;4:e366–e7. doi:10.1016/j.fsigss.2013.10.186
   Google Scholar
• Watherston J, Watson J, Bruce D, Ward J, McNevin D. Efficient DNA profiling protocols for disaster victim identification. Forensic Sci. 2021;1(3):148–170. doi:10.3390/forensicsci1030014
   Google Scholar
• Inkret J, Podovšovnik E, Zupanc T, Haring G, Pajnič IZ. Intra-bone nuclear DNA variability in Second World War metatarsal and metacarpal bones. Int J Legal Med. 2021;135(4):1245–1256. doi:10.1007/s00414-021-02528-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zupanc T, Podovšovnik E, Obal M, Zupanič Pajnič I. High DNA yield from metatarsal and metacarpal bones from Slovenian Second World War skeletal remains. Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2021;51:102426. doi:10.1016/j.fsigen.2020.102426
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hasap L, Chotigeat W, Pradutkanchana J, Vongvatcharanon U, Kitpipit T, Thanakiatkrai P. A novel, 4-h DNA extraction method for STR typing of casework bone samples. Int J Legal Med. 2020;134(2):461–471. doi:10.1007/s00414-019-02232-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Emmons AL, Davoren J, DeBruyn JM, Mundorff AZ. Inter and intra-individual variation in skeletal DNA preservation in buried remains. Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2020;44:102193. doi:10.1016/j.fsigen.2019.102193
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sirak KA, Fernandes DM, Cheronet O, Novak M, Gamarra B, Balassa T, Bernert Z, Cséki A, Dani J, Gallina JZ, et al. A minimally-invasive method for sampling human petrous bones from the cranial base for ancient DNA analysis. Biotechniques. 2017;62(6):283–289. doi:10.2144/000114558
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watherston J, Watson J, Bruce D, Ueland M, McNevin D, Ward J. An in-field evaluation of rapid DNA instruments for disaster victim identification. Int J Legal Med. 2021;136:493–499. under review. doi:10.1007/s00414-021-02748-z
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loreille OM, Diegoli TM, Irwin JA, Coble MD, Parsons TJ. High efficiency DNA extraction from bone by total demineralization. Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2007;1(2):191–195. doi:10.1016/j.fsigen.2007.02.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finaughty C, Heathfield LJ, Kemp V, Márquez-Grant N. Forensic DNA extraction methods for human hard tissue: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis of technologies and sample type. Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2022;63:102818. doi:10.1016/j.fsigen.2022.102818
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang DY, Eng B, Waye JS, Dudar JC, Saunders SR. Technical note: improved DNA extraction from ancient bones using silica-based spin columns. Am J Phys Anthropol. 1998;105(4):539–543. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1096-8644(199804)105:4<539::AID-AJPA10>3.0.CO;2-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee HY, Park MJ, Kim NY, Sim JE, Yang WI, Shin KJ. Simple and highly effective DNA extraction methods from old skeletal remains using silica columns. Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2010;4(5):275–280. doi:10.1016/j.fsigen.2009.10.014
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seo SB, Zhang A, Kim HY, Yi JA, Lee HY, Shin DH, Lee SD. Technical note: efficiency of total demineralization and ion-exchange column for DNA extraction from bone. Am J Phys Anthropol. 2010;141(1):158–162. doi:10.1002/ajpa.21193
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amory S, Huel R, Bilić A, Loreille O, Parsons TJ. Automatable full demineralization DNA extraction procedure from degraded skeletal remains. Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2012;6(3):398–406. doi:10.1016/j.fsigen.2011.08.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dabney J, Knapp M, Glocke I, Gansauge MT, Weihmann A, Nickel B, Valdiosera C, García N, Pääbo S, Arsuaga J-L, et al. Complete mitochondrial genome sequence of a Middle Pleistocene cave bear reconstructed from ultrashort DNA fragments. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013;110(39):15758–15763. doi:10.1073/pnas.1314445110
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xavier C, Eduardoff M, Bertoglio B, Amory C, Berger C, Casas-Vargas A, Pallua J, Parson W. Evaluation of DNA extraction methods developed for forensic and ancient DNA applications using bone samples of different age. Genes (Basel). 2021;12:2. doi:10.3390/genes12020146
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zavala EI, Thomas JT, Sturk-Andreaggi K, Daniels-Higginbotham J, Meyers KK, Barrit-Ross S, Aximu-Petri A, Richter J, Nickel B, Berg GE, et al. Ancient DNA methods improve forensic DNA profiling of Korean War and World War II unknowns. Genes (Basel). 2022;13:1. doi:10.3390/genes13010129
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ward J, Watherston J. Quantitative and qualitative assessment of DNA recovered from human skeletal remains. In: Ambers A, editor. Forensic genetic approaches for the identification of human skeletal remains: challenges, best practices, and emerging technologies. New York: Elsevier Academic Press; 2022; p. 137–163.
   Google Scholar
• Watherston J, Ward J. Autosomal short tandem repeat profiling of human skeletal remains. In: Ambers A, editor. Forensic genetic approaches for the identification of human skeletal remains: challenges, best practices, and emerging technologies. New York: Elsevier Academic Press; 2022; p. 167–197.
   Google Scholar
• Prakash S, Patole M, Ghumatkar S, Shouche Y. Mitochondrial 12S rRNA sequence analysis in wildlife forensics. Curr Sci India. 2000;78(10):1239–1241.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Melton T, Holland C. Routine forensic use of the mitochondrial 12S ribosomal RNA gene for species identification. J Forensic Sci. 2007;52(6):1305–1307. doi:10.1111/j.1556-4029.2007.00553.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walsh S, Lindenbergh A, Zuniga SB, Sijen T, de Knijff P, Kayser M, Ballantyne KN. Developmental validation of the IrisPlex system: determination of blue and brown iris colour for forensic intelligence. Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2011;5(5):464–471. doi:10.1016/j.fsigen.2010.09.008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walsh S, Liu F, Ballantyne KN, van Oven M, Lao O, Kayser M. IrisPlex: a sensitive DNA tool for accurate prediction of blue and brown eye colour in the absence of ancestry information. Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2011;5(3):170–180. doi:10.1016/j.fsigen.2010.02.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walsh S, Liu F, Wollstein A, Kovatsi L, Ralf A, Kosiniak-Kamysz A, Branicki W, Kayser M. The HIrisPlex system for simultaneous prediction of hair and eye colour from DNA. Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2013;7(1):98–115. doi:10.1016/j.fsigen.2012.07.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walsh S, Chaitanya L, Clarisse L, Wirken L, Draus-Barini J, Kovatsi L, Maeda H, Ishikawa T, Sijen T, de Knijff P, et al. Developmental validation of the HIrisPlex system: DNA-based eye and hair colour prediction for forensic and anthropological usage. Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2014;9:150–161. doi:10.1016/j.fsigen.2013.12.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chaitanya L, Breslin K, Zuñiga S, Wirken L, Pośpiech E, Kukla-Bartoszek M, Sijen T, Knijff PD, Liu F, Branicki W, et al. The HIrisPlex-S system for eye, hair and skin colour prediction from DNA: introduction and forensic developmental validation. Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2018;35:123–135. doi:10.1016/j.fsigen.2018.04.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chaitanya L, Pajnič IZ, Walsh S, Balažic J, Zupanc T, Kayser M. Bringing colour back after 70 years: predicting eye and hair colour from skeletal remains of World War II victims using the HIrisPlex system. Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2017;26:48–57. doi:10.1016/j.fsigen.2016.10.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phillips C, Salas A, Sánchez JJ, Fondevila M, Gómez-Tato A, Alvarez-Dios J, Calaza M, de Cal MC, Ballard D, Lareu MV, et al. Inferring ancestral origin using a single multiplex assay of ancestry-informative marker SNPs. Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2007;1(3–4):273–280. doi:10.1016/j.fsigen.2007.06.008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halder I, Shriver M, Thomas M, Fernandez JR, Frudakis T. A panel of ancestry informative markers for estimating individual biogeographical ancestry and admixture from four continents: utility and applications. Hum Mutat. 2008;29(5):648–658. doi:10.1002/humu.20695
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pereira R, Phillips C, Pinto N, Santos C, Dos Santos SE, Amorim A. Straightforward inference of ancestry and admixture proportions through ancestry-informative insertion deletion multiplexing. PLoS One. 2012;7(1):e29684.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fondevila M, Phillips C, Santos C, Freire Aradas A, Vallone PM, Butler JM, Lareu MV, Carracedo Á. Revision of the SNPforID 34-plex forensic ancestry test: assay enhancements, standard reference sample genotypes and extended population studies. Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2013;7(1):63–74. doi:10.1016/j.fsigen.2012.06.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phillips C, Freire Aradas A, Kriegel AK, Fondevila M, Bulbul O, Santos C, Rech FS, Carceles MDP, Carracedo Á, Schneider PM, et al. Eurasiaplex: a forensic SNP assay for differentiating European and South Asian ancestries. Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2013;7(3):359–366. doi:10.1016/j.fsigen.2013.02.010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santos C, Phillips C, Fondevila M, Daniel R, van Oorschot RAH, Burchard EG, Schanfield MS, Souto L, Uacyisrael J, Via M, et al. Pacifiplex: an ancestry-informative SNP panel centred on Australia and the Pacific region. Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2016;20:71–80. doi:10.1016/j.fsigen.2015.10.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phillips C, McNevin D, Kidd KK, Lagacé R, Wootton S, de la Puente M, Freire-Aradas A, Mosquera-Miguel A, Eduardoff M, Gross T, et al. MAPlex - A massively parallel sequencing ancestry analysis multiplex for Asia-Pacific populations. Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2019;42:213–226. doi:10.1016/j.fsigen.2019.06.022
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xavier C, de la Puente M, Phillips C, Eduardoff M, Heidegger A, Mosquera-Miguel A, Freire-Aradas A, Lagace R, Wootton S, Power D, et al. Forensic evaluation of the Asia Pacific ancestry-informative MAPlex assay. Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2020;48:102344. doi:10.1016/j.fsigen.2020.102344
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Illumina. ForenSeq™ DNA signature prep reference guide. San Diego, California: Illumina, Inc; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Applied Biosystems™. Precision ID panels with the Ion PGM™ system APPLICATION GUIDE. In: Life Technologies Corporation E, editor. Carlsbad (CA): TFS SCIENTIFIC; 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Hollard C, Keyser C, Delabarde T, Gonzalez A, Vilela Lamego C, Zvénigorosky V, Ludes B. Case report: on the use of the HID-Ion AmpliSeq™ ancestry panel in a real forensic case. Int J Legal Med. 2017;131(2):351–358. doi:10.1007/s00414-016-1425-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al-Asfi M, McNevin D, Mehta B, Power D, Gahan ME, Daniel R. Assessment of the precision ID ancestry panel. Int J Legal Med. 2018;132:1581–1594. doi:10.1007/s00414-018-1785-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kidd KK, Speed WC, Pakstis AJ, Furtado MR, Fang R, Madbouly A, Maiers M, Middha M, Friedlaender FR, Kidd JR, et al. Progress toward an efficient panel of SNPs for ancestry inference. Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2014;10:23–32. doi:10.1016/j.fsigen.2014.01.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Espregueira Themudo G, Smidt Mogensen H, Børsting C, Morling N. Frequencies of HID-ion ampliseq ancestry panel markers among greenlanders. Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2016;24:60–64. doi:10.1016/j.fsigen.2016.06.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• García O, Ajuriagerra JA, Alday A, Alonso S, Pérez JA, Soto A, Uriarte I, Yurrebaso I. Frequencies of the precision ID ancestry panel markers in Basques using the Ion Torrent PGM. Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2017;31:e1–e4. doi:10.1016/j.fsigen.2017.09.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pereira V, Mogensen HS, Børsting C, Morling N. Evaluation of the precision ID ancestry panel for crime case work: a SNP typing assay developed for typing of 165 ancestral informative markers. Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2017;28:138–145. doi:10.1016/j.fsigen.2017.02.013
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butler JM, Coble MD, Vallone PM. STRs vs. SNPs: thoughts on the future of forensic DNA testing forensic. Sci Med Pathol. 2007;3(3):200–205.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Vallone PM, Butler JM. Y-SNP typing of U.S. African American and Caucasian samples using allele-specific hybridization and primer extension. J Forensic Sci. 2004;49(4):723–732.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wetton JH, Tsang KW, Khan H. Inferring the population of origin of DNA evidence within the UK by allele-specific hybridization of Y-SNPs. Forensic Sci Int. 2005;152(1):45–53. doi:10.1016/j.forsciint.2005.03.009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gill P, Brenner C, Brinkmann B, Budowle B, Carracedo A, Jobling MA, de Knijff P, Kayser M, Krawczak M, Mayr WR, et al. DNA commission of the international society of forensic genetics: recommendations on forensic analysis using Y-chromosome STRs. Forensic Sci Int. 2001;124(1):5–10. doi:10.1016/S0379-0738(01)00498-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balanovsky O. Toward a consensus on SNP and STR mutation rates on the human Y-chromosome. Hum Genet. 2017;136(5):575–590. doi:10.1007/s00439-017-1805-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butler JM. Advanced topics in forensic DNA typing: methodology. San Diego: Academic Press; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Nachman MW, Crowell SL. Estimate of the mutation rate per nucleotide in humans. Genet. 2000;156(1):297–304. doi:10.1093/genetics/156.1.297
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qian X, Hou J, Wang Z, Ye Y, Lang M, Gao T, Liu J, Hou Y. Next generation sequencing plus (NGS+) with Y-chromosomal markers for forensic pedigree searches. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1):11324. doi:10.1038/s41598-017-11955-x
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• van Oven M, Van Geystelen A, Kayser M, Decorte R, Larmuseau MH. Seeing the wood for the trees: a minimal reference phylogeny for the human Y chromosome. Hum Mutat. 2014;35(2):187–191. doi:10.1002/humu.22468
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calafell F, Larmuseau MHD. The Y chromosome as the most popular marker in genetic genealogy benefits interdisciplinary research. Hum Genet. 2017;136(5):559–573. doi:10.1007/s00439-016-1740-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Truelsen D, Freire-Aradas A, Nazari M, Aliferi A, Ballard D, Phillips C, Morling N, Pereira V, Børsting C. Evaluation of a custom QIAseq targeted DNA panel with 164 ancestry informative markers sequenced with the Illumina MiSeq. Sci Rep. 2021;11(1):21040. doi:10.1038/s41598-021-99933-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verogen. ForenSeq Kintelligence Kit - Reference Guide. 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Kling D, Phillips C, Kennett D, Tillmar A. Investigative genetic genealogy: current methods, knowledge and practice. Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2021;52:102474. doi:10.1016/j.fsigen.2021.102474
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Vries JH, Kling D, Vidaki A, Arp P, Kalamara V, Verbiest MMPJ, Piniewska-Róg D, Parsons TJ, Uitterlinden AG, Kayser M, et al. Impact of SNP microarray analysis of compromised DNA on kinship classification success in the context of investigative genetic genealogy. Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2021;56:102625. doi:10.1016/j.fsigen.2021.102625
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keating B, Bansal AT, Walsh S, Millman J, Newman J, Kidd K, Budowle B, Eisenberg A, Donfack J, Gasparini P, et al. First all-in-one diagnostic tool for DNA intelligence: genome-wide inference of biogeographic ancestry, appearance, relatedness, and sex with the Identitas v1 Forensic Chip. Int J Legal Med. 2013;127(3):559–572. doi:10.1007/s00414-012-0788-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fondevila M, Phillips C, Naveran N, Fernandez L, Cerezo M, Salas A, Carracedo Á, Lareu MV. Case report: identification of skeletal remains using short-amplicon marker analysis of severely degraded DNA extracted from a decomposed and charred femur. Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2008;2(3):212–218. doi:10.1016/j.fsigen.2008.02.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dietrich D, Uhl B, Sailer V, Holmes EE, Jung M, Meller S, Kristiansen G. Improved PCR performance using template DNA from formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded tissues by overcoming PCR inhibition. PLoS One. 2013;8(10):e77771. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0077771
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gill P. Application of low copy number DNA profiling. Croat Med J. 2001;42(3):229–232.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parsons TJ, Huel RML, Bajunović Z, Rizvić A. Large scale DNA identification: the ICMP experience. Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2019;38:236–244. doi:10.1016/j.fsigen.2018.11.008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bessekri M, Aggoune A, Lazreg S, Bucht R, Fuller V. Comparative study on the effects of reduced PCR reaction volumes and increased cycle number, on the sensitivity and the stochastic threshold of the AmpFlSTR Identifiler® Plus kit. Forensic Sci Int Genet Suppl Ser. 2013;4(1):e306–e7. doi:10.1016/j.fsigss.2013.10.156
   Google Scholar
• Gaines ML, Wojtkiewicz PW, Valentine JA, Brown CL. Reduced volume PCR amplification reactions using the AmpFlSTR profiler plus kit. J Forensic Sci. 2002;47(6):1224–1237. doi:10.1520/JFS15554J
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoffman NH, Fenger T. Validation of half-reaction amplification using Promega PowerPlex 16. J Forensic Sci. 2010;55(4):1044–1049. doi:10.1111/j.1556-4029.2010.01388.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brito P, Gouveia N, Bogas V, Bento A, Balsa F, Lopes V, Sampaio L, Cunha P, Bento MS, Serra A, et al. Evaluation and comparative analysis on reduction of Globalfiler™ reaction volume in low template samples. Forensic Sci Int Genet Suppl Ser. 2017;6:e362–e4. doi:10.1016/j.fsigss.2017.09.109
   Google Scholar
• Zar M, Shahid A, Shahzad M, Shin K-J, Lee H, Israr M, Husnain T. Comparative study of STR loci for typing old skeletal remains with modified protocols of AmpFlSTR identifiler and AmpFlSTR MiniFiler STR kits. Aust J Forensic Sci. 2015;47(2):200–223. doi:10.1080/00450618.2014.925976
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Irwin JA, Just RS, Loreille OM, Parsons TJ. Characterization of a modified amplification approach for improved STR recovery from severely degraded skeletal elements. Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2012;6(5):578–587. doi:10.1016/j.fsigen.2012.01.010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• JA I, Leney MD, Loreille O, Barritt SM, Christensen AF, Holland TD. Application of low copy number STR typing to the identification of aged, degraded skeletal remains. J Forensic Sci. 2007;52(6):1322–1327. doi:10.1111/j.1556-4029.2007.00561.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zar M, Shahid A, Shahzad M, Shin K-J, Lee H, Israr M. Forensic DNA typing of old skeletal remains using AmpFlSTR® identifiler® PCR amplification kit. J Forensic Res. 2013;5(1):1–6.
   Google Scholar
• McNevin D, Edson J, Robertson J, Austin JJ. Reduced reaction volumes and increased Taq DNA polymerase concentration improve STR profiling outcomes from a real-world low template DNA source: telogen hairs. Forensic Sci Med Pathol. 2015;11(3):326–338. doi:10.1007/s12024-015-9679-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hofreiter M, Sneberger J, Pospisek M, Vanek D. Progress in forensic bone DNA analysis: lessons learned from ancient DNA. Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2021;54:102538. doi:10.1016/j.fsigen.2021.102538
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar